Citation:

PANGAEA.230733

Always quote citation above when using data! You can download the citation in several formats below.

RIS Citation BibTeX Citation Text Citation Facebook TwitterShow Map Google Earth

Related to:

Benson, William E; Enos, Paul; Freeman, Tom; Gradstein, Felix M; Murdmaa, Ivar O; Pastouret, L; Schmidt, Ronald R; Sheridan, Robert E; Stuermer, D H; Weaver, Fred M; Worstell, Paula J (1978): Initial Reports of the Deep Sea Drilling Project. U. S. Government Printing Office, XLIV, 1005 pp, https://doi.org/10.2973/dsdp.proc.44.1978

DSDP (1989): Data from the Deep Sea Drilling Project. Sediment, hard rock and reference files. National Geophysical Data Center, National Environmental Satellite, Data and Information Service, National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration, U.S. Department of Commerce, 1, CD-ROM

Further details:

Processed smear slide data base - background and methods

Project(s):

Deep Sea Drilling Project (DSDP)

Coverage:

Latitude: 29.910500 * Longitude: -76.178000

Date/Time Start: 1975-09-23T00:00:00 * Date/Time End: 1975-09-23T00:00:00

Minimum DEPTH, sediment/rock: 51.47 m * Maximum DEPTH, sediment/rock: 83.42 m

Event(s):

44-392A * Latitude: 29.910500 * Longitude: -76.178000 * Date/Time: 1975-09-23T00:00:00 * Elevation: -2601.0 m * Penetration: 349 m * Recovery: 25.9 m * Location: North Atlantic * Campaign: * Basis: Glomar Challenger * Method/Device: Drilling/drill rig (DRILL) * Comment: 31 cores; 269.3 m cored; 13.5 m drilled; 9.6 % recovery

Parameter(s):

#	Name	Short Name	Unit	Method/Device	Comment
1	DEPTH, sediment/rock	Depth sed	m		Geocode
2	Sample code/label	Sample label		DSDP/ODP/IODP sample designation
3	Sand	Sand	%	Smear slide analysis
4	Silt	Silt	%	Smear slide analysis
5	Size fraction < 0.002 mm, clay	<2 µm	%	Smear slide analysis
6	Stratigraphy	Stratigraphy		Smear slide analysis
7	Lithology/composition/facies	Lithology		Smear slide analysis
8	Comment	Comment		Smear slide analysis
9	Carbonates	Carb	%	Smear slide analysis
10	Dolomite	Dol	%	Smear slide analysis
11	Nannofossils	Nannos	%	Smear slide analysis
12	Foraminifera	Foram	%	Smear slide analysis
13	Spiculae	Spiculae	%	Smear slide analysis
14	Minerals, other	Min other	%	Smear slide analysis
15	Siderite	Sd	%	Smear slide analysis
16	Quartz	Qz	%	Smear slide analysis
17	Feldspar	Fsp	%	Smear slide analysis
18	Zeolite	Zeo	%	Smear slide analysis
19	Mica	Mica	%	Smear slide analysis
20	Biotite	Bt	%	Smear slide analysis
21	Clay minerals	Clay min	%	Smear slide analysis
22	Opaque minerals	Opaque	%	Smear slide analysis
23	Pyrite, FeS2	Py	%	Smear slide analysis
24	Iron	Fe	%	Smear slide analysis
25	Heavy minerals	HM	%	Smear slide analysis
26	Rutile	Rt	%	Smear slide analysis
27	Zircon	Zrn	%	Smear slide analysis
28	Tourmaline	Tur	%	Smear slide analysis
29	Apatite	Ap	%	Smear slide analysis
30	Epidote	Ep	%	Smear slide analysis
31	Pyroxene	Pyrox	%	Smear slide analysis
32	Volcanic glass	Volc glass	%	Smear slide analysis
33	Organic matter	OM	%	Smear slide analysis	organic debris
34	Terrigenous	Terr	%	Smear slide analysis	terrigeneous detritus

License:

Creative Commons Attribution 3.0 Unported (CC-BY-3.0)

Size:

462 data points

Data

Download dataset as tab-delimited text — use the following character encoding:

1 Depth sed [m]	2 Sample label	3 Sand [%]	4 Silt [%]	5 <2 µm [%]	6 Stratigraphy	7 Lithology	8 Comment	9 Carb [%]	10 Dol [%]	11 Nannos [%]	12 Foram [%]	13 Spiculae [%]	14 Min other [%]	15 Sd [%]	16 Qz [%]	17 Fsp [%]	18 Zeo [%]	19 Mica [%]	20 Bt [%]	21 Clay min [%]	22 Opaque [%]	23 Py [%]	24 Fe [%]	25 HM [%]	26 Rt [%]	27 Zrn [%]	28 Tur [%]	29 Ap [%]	30 Ep [%]	31 Pyrox [%]	32 Volc glass [%]	33 OM [%]	34 Terr [%]
51.47	44-392A-1-1,97	1	30	69	Upper campanian	NANNO OOZE	Dominat lithology; relative abundance	23	0	40	1	0	0	0	1	0	0	2	0	35	0	0	0	2	0	0	0	0	0	0	2	0	0
51.55	44-392A-1-11,105	25	50	25	Upper campanian	FORAM NANNO OOZE	Dominat lithology; relative abundance	27	0	37	15	2	0	0	5	0	2	5	0	10	0	2	0	3	1	1	0	0	1	0	0	0	23
51.88	44-392A-1-11,138	2	50	48	Upper campanian	FORAM NANNO OOZE	Dominat lithology; relative abundance	20	0	45	10	0	0	2	5	0	2	5	0	10	0	2	0	2	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	22
52.30	44-392A-1-2,30	2	48	50	Upper campanian	NANNO OOZE	Dominat lithology; relative abundance	20	0	68	2	0	0	0	2	2	2	1	0	8	2	1	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	9
53.11	44-392A-1-21,111	3	57	40	Upper campanian	FORAM NANNO OOZE	Dominat lithology; relative abundance	5	0	70	10	0	0	0	2	0	0	2	0	15	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0
66.85	44-392A-2-1,85	2	40	58	Albian	SILTY MARLY LIMESTONE (MARL)	Dominat lithology; relative abundance	10	0	30	2	0	0	0	10	0	0	2	0	39	0	5	0	1	1	0	0	0	1	0	0	1	52
67.10	44-392A-2-11,110	1	39	60	Albian	CALCAREOUS SILTY CLAY	Dominat lithology; relative abundance	5	0	7	2	0	10	0	7	3	2	10	0	52	2	2	0	1	0	0	0	0	0	0	2	3	0
67.28	44-392A-2-11,128	2	38	60	Albian	MARLY NANNO OOZE	Dominat lithology; relative abundance	10	0	40	2	0	0	2	7	2	2	5	1	35	0	0	0	1	1	0	1	1	1	1	0	0	0
68.69	44-392A-2-21,119	5	45	50	Albian	MARLY NANNO OOZE	Dominat lithology; relative abundance	6	2	40	8	0	3	0	5	2	0	5	0	30	0	2	1	2	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0
81.35	44-392A-3-2,85	1	59	40	Upper aptian	NANNO OOZE	Dominat lithology; relative abundance	5	0	89	2	0	0	0	1	0	0	2	0	5	0	0	0	2	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0
81.85	44-392A-3-21,135	1	60	40	Upper aptian	NANNO OOZE	Minor lithology; relative abundance	18	1	60	2	0	0	0	1	2	2	2	0	20	2	0	0	2	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0
82.21	44-392A-3-3,21	0	70	30	Upper aptian	NANNO OOZE	Dominat lithology; relative abundance	1	0	78	2	0	0	2	2	0	0	2	0	20	0	0	1	2	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0
83.36	44-392A-3-31,136	1	59	40	Upper aptian	NANNO OOZE	Dominat lithology; relative abundance	10	0	72	2	0	0	0	4	0	1	1	0	10	0	2	2	2	0	0	0	0	1	0	0	0	16
83.42	44-392A-3-31,142	0	30	70	Upper aptian	NANNO OOZE	Minor lithology; relative abundance	20	0	70	0	0	0	0	0	0	2	2	0	10	2	0	0	2	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0