Benson, William E; Sheridan, Robert E (2005): Smear slide analysis of Hole 44-391B [dataset]. PANGAEA, https://doi.org/10.1594/PANGAEA.230730
Always quote citation above when using data! You can download the citation in several formats below.
Related to:
Benson, William E; Enos, Paul; Freeman, Tom; Gradstein, Felix M; Murdmaa, Ivar O; Pastouret, L; Schmidt, Ronald R; Sheridan, Robert E; Stuermer, D H; Weaver, Fred M; Worstell, Paula J (1978): Initial Reports of the Deep Sea Drilling Project. U. S. Government Printing Office, XLIV, 1005 pp, https://doi.org/10.2973/dsdp.proc.44.1978
Further details:
Project(s):
Deep Sea Drilling Project (DSDP)
Coverage:
Latitude: 28.226800 * Longitude: -75.616700
Date/Time Start: 1975-09-02T00:00:00 * Date/Time End: 1975-09-02T00:00:00
Minimum DEPTH, sediment/rock: 1.15 m * Maximum DEPTH, sediment/rock: 8.65 m
Event(s):
44-391B * Latitude: 28.226800 * Longitude: -75.616700 * Date/Time: 1975-09-02T00:00:00 * Elevation: -4974.0 m * Penetration: 9.5 m * Recovery: 9.1 m * Location: North Atlantic/BASIN * Campaign: Leg44 * Basis: Glomar Challenger * Method/Device: Drilling/drill rig (DRILL) * Comment: 1 cores; 9.5 m cored; 0 m drilled; 96.3 % recovery
Parameter(s):
# | Name | Short Name | Unit | Principal Investigator | Method/Device | Comment |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
1 | DEPTH, sediment/rock | Depth sed | m | Geocode | ||
2 | Sample code/label | Sample label | DSDP/ODP/IODP sample designation | |||
3 | Sand | Sand | % | Smear slide analysis | ||
4 | Silt | Silt | % | Smear slide analysis | ||
5 | Size fraction < 0.002 mm, clay | <2 µm | % | Smear slide analysis | ||
6 | Stratigraphy | Stratigraphy | Smear slide analysis | |||
7 | Lithology/composition/facies | Lithology | Smear slide analysis | |||
8 | Comment | Comment | Smear slide analysis | |||
9 | Carbonates | Carb | % | Smear slide analysis | ||
10 | Dolomite | Dol | % | Smear slide analysis | ||
11 | Nannofossils | Nannos | % | Smear slide analysis | ||
12 | Foraminifera | Foram | % | Smear slide analysis | ||
13 | Radiolarians | Rad | % | Smear slide analysis | ||
14 | Spiculae | Spiculae | % | Smear slide analysis | ||
15 | Quartz | Qz | % | Smear slide analysis | ||
16 | Feldspar | Fsp | % | Smear slide analysis | ||
17 | Zeolite | Zeo | % | Smear slide analysis | ||
18 | Mica | Mica | % | Smear slide analysis | ||
19 | Clay minerals | Clay min | % | Smear slide analysis | ||
20 | Glauconite | Glt | % | Smear slide analysis | ||
21 | Pyrite, FeS2 | Py | % | Smear slide analysis | ||
22 | Iron | Fe | % | Smear slide analysis | ||
23 | Heavy minerals | HM | % | Smear slide analysis | ||
24 | Rutile | Rt | % | Smear slide analysis | ||
25 | Zircon | Zrn | % | Smear slide analysis | ||
26 | Garnet | Grt | % | Smear slide analysis | ||
27 | Apatite | Ap | % | Smear slide analysis | ||
28 | Hornblende | Hbl | % | Smear slide analysis | ||
29 | Pyroxene | Pyrox | % | Smear slide analysis | ||
30 | Minerals | Minerals | % | Smear slide analysis | isotropic minerals | |
31 | Terrigenous | Terr | % | Smear slide analysis | terrigeneous detritus |
License:
Creative Commons Attribution 3.0 Unported (CC-BY-3.0)
Size:
240 data points
Data
1 Depth sed [m] | 2 Sample label | 3 Sand [%] | 4 Silt [%] | 5 <2 µm [%] | 6 Stratigraphy | 7 Lithology | 8 Comment | 9 Carb [%] | 10 Dol [%] | 11 Nannos [%] | 12 Foram [%] | 13 Rad [%] | 14 Spiculae [%] | 15 Qz [%] | 16 Fsp [%] | 17 Zeo [%] | 18 Mica [%] | 19 Clay min [%] | 20 Glt [%] | 21 Py [%] | 22 Fe [%] | 23 HM [%] | 24 Rt [%] | 25 Zrn [%] | 26 Grt [%] | 27 Ap [%] | 28 Hbl [%] | 29 Pyrox [%] | 30 Minerals [%] | 31 Terr [%] |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
1.15 | 44-391B-1-11,100 | 0 | 15 | 85 | Quaternary | CLAY | Dominat lithology; relative abundance | 6 | 0 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 5 | 0 | 0 | 3 | 84 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
2.15 | 44-391B-1-2,50 | 7 | 85 | 8 | Quaternary | FORAM SILT | Minor lithology; relative abundance | 62 | 0 | 0 | 25 | 0 | 2 | 5 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 8 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
2.70 | 44-391B-1-21,105 | 0 | 13 | 87 | Quaternary | CLAY | Dominat lithology; relative abundance | 2 | 2 | 22 | 1 | 0 | 2 | 4 | 0 | 2 | 3 | 18 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 2 | 2 | 0 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
4.15 | 44-391B-1-31,100 | 1 | 10 | 90 | Quaternary | CLAY | Dominat lithology; relative abundance | 1 | 0 | 2 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 90 | 0 | 2 | 2 | 2 | 2 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 2 | 0 |
5.50 | 44-391B-1-4,85 | 3 | 30 | 67 | Quaternary | FORAMINIFERAL NANNO OOZE | Minor lithology; relative abundance | 36 | 0 | 50 | 10 | 0 | 2 | 2 | 2 | 0 | 4 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 4 |
5.85 | 44-391B-1-41,120 | 1 | 30 | 70 | Quaternary | SILTY CLAY | Dominat lithology; relative abundance | 5 | 2 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 10 | 3 | 2 | 3 | 69 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 8 | 0 |
7.45 | 44-391B-1-51,130 | 1 | 25 | 75 | Quaternary | SILTY ? CLAY | Dominat lithology; relative abundance | 2 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 12 | 1 | 0 | 10 | 67 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
8.65 | 44-391B-1-61,100 | 1 | 30 | 70 | Quaternary | SILTY CLAY | Dominat lithology; relative abundance | 3 | 0 | 2 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 15 | 3 | 0 | 4 | 67 | 2 | 2 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 5 | 0 |