Benson, William E; Sheridan, Robert E (2005): Smear slide analysis of Hole 44-391 [dataset]. PANGAEA, https://doi.org/10.1594/PANGAEA.230728
Always quote citation above when using data! You can download the citation in several formats below.
Related to:
Benson, William E; Enos, Paul; Freeman, Tom; Gradstein, Felix M; Murdmaa, Ivar O; Pastouret, L; Schmidt, Ronald R; Sheridan, Robert E; Stuermer, D H; Weaver, Fred M; Worstell, Paula J (1978): Initial Reports of the Deep Sea Drilling Project. U. S. Government Printing Office, XLIV, 1005 pp, https://doi.org/10.2973/dsdp.proc.44.1978
Further details:
Project(s):
Deep Sea Drilling Project (DSDP)
Coverage:
Latitude: 28.228800 * Longitude: -75.612700
Date/Time Start: 1975-09-02T00:00:00 * Date/Time End: 1975-09-02T00:00:00
Minimum DEPTH, sediment/rock: 1.00 m * Maximum DEPTH, sediment/rock: 3.10 m
Event(s):
44-391 * Latitude: 28.228800 * Longitude: -75.612700 * Date/Time: 1975-09-02T00:00:00 * Elevation: -4974.0 m * Penetration: 4.5 m * Recovery: 2.3 m * Location: North Atlantic/BASIN * Campaign: Leg44 * Basis: Glomar Challenger * Method/Device: Drilling/drill rig (DRILL) * Comment: 1 cores; 4.5 m cored; 0 m drilled; 51.1 % recovery
Parameter(s):
# | Name | Short Name | Unit | Principal Investigator | Method/Device | Comment |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
1 | DEPTH, sediment/rock | Depth sed | m | Geocode | ||
2 | Sample code/label | Sample label | DSDP/ODP/IODP sample designation | |||
3 | Sand | Sand | % | Smear slide analysis | ||
4 | Silt | Silt | % | Smear slide analysis | ||
5 | Size fraction < 0.002 mm, clay | <2 µm | % | Smear slide analysis | ||
6 | Stratigraphy | Stratigraphy | Smear slide analysis | |||
7 | Lithology/composition/facies | Lithology | Smear slide analysis | |||
8 | Comment | Comment | Smear slide analysis | |||
9 | Carbonates | Carb | % | Smear slide analysis | ||
10 | Dolomite | Dol | % | Smear slide analysis | ||
11 | Nannofossils | Nannos | % | Smear slide analysis | ||
12 | Foraminifera | Foram | % | Smear slide analysis | ||
13 | Radiolarians | Rad | % | Smear slide analysis | ||
14 | Spiculae | Spiculae | % | Smear slide analysis | ||
15 | Quartz | Qz | % | Smear slide analysis | ||
16 | Feldspar | Fsp | % | Smear slide analysis | ||
17 | Zeolite | Zeo | % | Smear slide analysis | ||
18 | Mica | Mica | % | Smear slide analysis | ||
19 | Clay minerals | Clay min | % | Smear slide analysis | ||
20 | Heavy minerals | HM | % | Smear slide analysis |
License:
Creative Commons Attribution 3.0 Unported (CC-BY-3.0)
Size:
38 data points
Data
1 Depth sed [m] | 2 Sample label | 3 Sand [%] | 4 Silt [%] | 5 <2 µm [%] | 6 Stratigraphy | 7 Lithology | 8 Comment | 9 Carb [%] | 10 Dol [%] | 11 Nannos [%] | 12 Foram [%] | 13 Rad [%] | 14 Spiculae [%] | 15 Qz [%] | 16 Fsp [%] | 17 Zeo [%] | 18 Mica [%] | 19 Clay min [%] | 20 HM [%] |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
1.00 | 44-391-1-11,100 | 3 | 20 | 80 | Quaternary | CALCAREOUS CLAY | Dominat lithology; relative abundance | 10 | 2 | 40 | 1 | 2 | 2 | 10 | 2 | 0 | 2 | 37 | 2 |
3.10 | 44-391-1-CC,0 | 0 | 5 | 95 | Quaternary | MARLY NANNO OOZE | Dominat lithology; relative abundance | 2 | 0 | 77 | 2 | 2 | 2 | 3 | 0 | 2 | 2 | 20 | 0 |