Citation:

PANGAEA.230702

Always quote citation above when using data! You can download the citation in several formats below.

RIS Citation BibTeX Citation Text Citation Facebook TwitterShow Map Google Earth

Related to:

DSDP (1989): Data from the Deep Sea Drilling Project. Sediment, hard rock and reference files. National Geophysical Data Center, National Environmental Satellite, Data and Information Service, National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration, U.S. Department of Commerce, 1, CD-ROM

Lancelot, Yves; Seibold, Eugen; Cepek, Pavel; Dean, Walter E; Eremeev, V V; Gardner, J; Jansa, Lubomir F; Johnson, D; Krasheninnikov, Valery A; Pflaumann, Uwe; Rankin, J G; Trabant, P; Bukry, David (1978): Initial Reports of the Deep Sea Drilling Project. U.S. Government Printing Office, XLI, 1259 pp, https://doi.org/10.2973/dsdp.proc.41.1978

Further details:

Processed smear slide data base - background and methods

Project(s):

Deep Sea Drilling Project (DSDP)

Coverage:

Latitude: 26.592500 * Longitude: -14.998700

Date/Time Start: 1975-03-23T00:00:00 * Date/Time End: 1975-03-23T00:00:00

Minimum DEPTH, sediment/rock: 1.33 m * Maximum DEPTH, sediment/rock: 38.40 m

Event(s):

41-369 * Latitude: 26.592500 * Longitude: -14.998700 * Date/Time: 1975-03-23T00:00:00 * Elevation: -1752.0 m * Penetration: 41 m * Recovery: 36.1 m * Location: North Atlantic/CONT SLOPE * Campaign: * Basis: Glomar Challenger * Method/Device: Drilling/drill rig (DRILL) * Comment: 5 cores; 41 m cored; 0 m drilled; 88 % recovery

Parameter(s):

#	Name	Short Name	Unit	Method/Device	Comment
1	DEPTH, sediment/rock	Depth sed	m		Geocode
2	Sample code/label	Sample label		DSDP/ODP/IODP sample designation
3	Sand	Sand	%	Smear slide analysis
4	Silt	Silt	%	Smear slide analysis
5	Size fraction < 0.002 mm, clay	<2 µm	%	Smear slide analysis
6	Stratigraphy	Stratigraphy		Smear slide analysis
7	Lithology/composition/facies	Lithology		Smear slide analysis
8	Comment	Comment		Smear slide analysis
9	Carbonates	Carb	%	Smear slide analysis
10	Aragonite	Arg	%	Smear slide analysis
11	Nannofossils	Nannos	%	Smear slide analysis
12	Foraminifera	Foram	%	Smear slide analysis
13	Radiolarians	Rad	%	Smear slide analysis
14	Diatoms	Diatoms	%	Smear slide analysis
15	Silicoflagellates	Silicoflag	%	Smear slide analysis
16	Spiculae	Spiculae	%	Smear slide analysis
17	Quartz	Qz	%	Smear slide analysis
18	Feldspar	Fsp	%	Smear slide analysis
19	Clay minerals	Clay min	%	Smear slide analysis
20	Glauconite	Glt	%	Smear slide analysis
21	Iron	Fe	%	Smear slide analysis
22	Heavy minerals	HM	%	Smear slide analysis
23	Manganese	Mn	%	Smear slide analysis
24	Micronodules	Micronod	%	Smear slide analysis

License:

Creative Commons Attribution 3.0 Unported (CC-BY-3.0)

Size:

161 data points

Data

Download dataset as tab-delimited text — use the following character encoding:

1 Depth sed [m]	2 Sample label	6 Stratigraphy	7 Lithology	8 Comment	9 Carb [%]	10 Arg [%]	11 Nannos [%]	12 Foram [%]	13 Rad [%]	14 Diatoms [%]	15 Silicoflag [%]	16 Spiculae [%]	17 Qz [%]	18 Fsp [%]	19 Clay min [%]	20 Glt [%]	21 Fe [%]	22 HM [%]	23 Mn [%]	24 Micronod [%]
1.33	41-369-1-11,133	Cenozoic	FORAM BEARING NANNO MARL	Minor lithology; numerical abundance	6	3	28	12	3	3	3	0	3	0	28	3	3	0	3	0
1.44	41-369-1-11,144	Cenozoic	FORAM BEARING NANNO OOZE	Minor lithology; numerical abundance	16	0	31	13	3	0	3	3	3	1	13	3	3	0	3	0
2.50	41-369-1-21,100	Cenozoic	CLAYEY NANNO OOZE	Dominat lithology; relative abundance	6	0	75	6	0	0	0	0	6	0	23	6	0	0	6	0
15.00	41-369-3-11,100	Upper miocene	CLAYEY FORAM BEARING NANNO OOZE	Dominat lithology; numerical abundance	4	0	46	14	0	0	0	0	4	4	14	4	4	4	4	0
25.20	41-369-4-2,70	Upper miocene	CLAY FORAM BEARING NANNO OOZE	Dominat lithology; numerical abundance	4	0	37	15	4	0	0	0	4	4	15	4	4	4	4	0
34.80	41-369-5-2,80	Middle miocene	CLAYEY NANNO OOZE	Dominat lithology; relative abundance	6	0	75	6	0	0	0	0	6	6	23	6	6	0	0	6
38.40	41-369-5-41,140	Middle miocene	CLAYEY NANNO OOZE	Dominat lithology; numerical abundance	4	4	53	4	0	0	0	0	4	0	16	4	4	1	4	0