Lancelot, Yves; Seibold, Eugen (2005): Smear slide analysis of Hole 41-366A [dataset]. PANGAEA, https://doi.org/10.1594/PANGAEA.230699
Always quote citation above when using data! You can download the citation in several formats below.
Related to:
DSDP (1989): Data from the Deep Sea Drilling Project. Sediment, hard rock and reference files. National Geophysical Data Center, National Environmental Satellite, Data and Information Service, National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration, U.S. Department of Commerce, 1, CD-ROM
Lancelot, Yves; Seibold, Eugen; Cepek, Pavel; Dean, Walter E; Eremeev, V V; Gardner, J; Jansa, Lubomir F; Johnson, D; Krasheninnikov, Valery A; Pflaumann, Uwe; Rankin, J G; Trabant, P; Bukry, David (1978): Initial Reports of the Deep Sea Drilling Project. U.S. Government Printing Office, XLI, 1259 pp, https://doi.org/10.2973/dsdp.proc.41.1978
Further details:
Project(s):
Deep Sea Drilling Project (DSDP)
Coverage:
Latitude: 5.678000 * Longitude: -19.851300
Date/Time Start: 1975-02-22T00:00:00 * Date/Time End: 1975-02-22T00:00:00
Minimum DEPTH, sediment/rock: 0.70 m * Maximum DEPTH, sediment/rock: 363.60 m
Event(s):
41-366A * Latitude: 5.678000 * Longitude: -19.851300 * Date/Time: 1975-02-22T00:00:00 * Elevation: -2853.0 m * Penetration: 367 m * Recovery: 277.1 m * Location: North Atlantic/CONT RISE * Campaign: Leg41 * Basis: Glomar Challenger * Method/Device: Drilling/drill rig (DRILL) * Comment: 38 cores; 357.5 m cored; 9.5 m drilled; 77.5 % recovery
Parameter(s):
# | Name | Short Name | Unit | Principal Investigator | Method/Device | Comment |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
1 | DEPTH, sediment/rock | Depth sed | m | Geocode | ||
2 | Sample code/label | Sample label | DSDP/ODP/IODP sample designation | |||
3 | Sand | Sand | % | Smear slide analysis | ||
4 | Silt | Silt | % | Smear slide analysis | ||
5 | Size fraction < 0.002 mm, clay | <2 µm | % | Smear slide analysis | ||
6 | Stratigraphy | Stratigraphy | Smear slide analysis | |||
7 | Lithology/composition/facies | Lithology | Smear slide analysis | |||
8 | Comment | Comment | Smear slide analysis | |||
9 | Carbonates | Carb | % | Smear slide analysis | ||
10 | Nannofossils | Nannos | % | Smear slide analysis | ||
11 | Foraminifera | Foram | % | Smear slide analysis | ||
12 | Opal, biogenic silica | bSiO2 | % | Smear slide analysis | ||
13 | Radiolarians | Rad | % | Smear slide analysis | ||
14 | Diatoms | Diatoms | % | Smear slide analysis | ||
15 | Silicoflagellates | Silicoflag | % | Smear slide analysis | ||
16 | Spiculae | Spiculae | % | Smear slide analysis | ||
17 | Clay minerals | Clay min | % | Smear slide analysis | ||
18 | Iron | Fe | % | Smear slide analysis |
License:
Creative Commons Attribution 3.0 Unported (CC-BY-3.0)
Size:
884 data points
Data
1 Depth sed [m] | 2 Sample label | 3 Sand [%] | 4 Silt [%] | 5 <2 µm [%] | 6 Stratigraphy | 7 Lithology | 8 Comment | 9 Carb [%] | 10 Nannos [%] | 11 Foram [%] | 12 bSiO2 [%] | 13 Rad [%] | 14 Diatoms [%] | 15 Silicoflag [%] | 16 Spiculae [%] | 17 Clay min [%] | 18 Fe [%] |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
0.70 | 41-366A-1-1,70 | 0 | 0 | 0 | Pleistocene | FORAM-BEARING NANNO OOZE | Dominat lithology; numerical abundance | 0 | 36 | 16 | 0 | 4 | 4 | 0 | 0 | 36 | 4 |
1.03 | 41-366A-1-11,103 | 0 | 0 | 0 | Pleistocene | NANNO MARL | Minor lithology; relative abundance | 0 | 55 | 6 | 0 | 6 | 6 | 0 | 0 | 55 | 6 |
5.10 | 41-366A-1-4,60 | 0 | 0 | 0 | Pleistocene | NANNO MARL | Dominat lithology; relative abundance | 0 | 55 | 6 | 0 | 6 | 6 | 0 | 0 | 55 | 6 |
11.50 | 41-366A-2-4,50 | 0 | 0 | 0 | Pleistocene | FORAM-BEARING NANNO MARL | Dominat lithology; numerical abundance | 0 | 34 | 15 | 0 | 4 | 1 | 4 | 0 | 34 | 4 |
19.00 | 41-366A-3-3,50 | 0 | 0 | 0 | Pleistocene | FORAM-BEARING NANNO MARL | Dominat lithology; numerical abundance | 0 | 35 | 15 | 0 | 4 | 4 | 0 | 0 | 35 | 4 |
19.30 | 41-366A-3-3,80 | 0 | 0 | 0 | Pleistocene | FORAM NANNO MARL | Minor lithology; numerical abundance | 0 | 30 | 30 | 0 | 3 | 3 | 0 | 0 | 30 | 3 |
24.01 | 41-366A-3-61,101 | 0 | 0 | 0 | Pleistocene | FORAM NANNO MARL | Minor lithology; numerical abundance | 0 | 27 | 27 | 0 | 3 | 11 | 0 | 0 | 27 | 3 |
34.20 | 41-366A-4-CC,0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | Pliocene | NANNO MARL | Dominat lithology; relative abundance | 0 | 55 | 6 | 0 | 6 | 6 | 0 | 0 | 55 | 6 |
43.80 | 41-366A-5-CC,0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | Pliocene | NANNO MARL | Dominat lithology; relative abundance | 0 | 55 | 6 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 55 | 6 |
53.10 | 41-366A-6-CC,0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | Pliocene | NANNO MARL | Dominat lithology; relative abundance | 0 | 55 | 6 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 55 | 0 |
62.90 | 41-366A-7-CC,0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | Pliocene | FORAM-BEARING NANNO MARL | Dominat lithology; numerical abundance | 0 | 35 | 15 | 0 | 4 | 4 | 0 | 0 | 35 | 4 |
72.10 | 41-366A-8-CC,0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | Pliocene | NANNO MARL | Dominat lithology; relative abundance | 0 | 55 | 6 | 0 | 6 | 6 | 0 | 0 | 55 | 6 |
81.60 | 41-366A-9-CC,0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | Pliocene | NANNO MARL | Dominat lithology; relative abundance | 0 | 55 | 6 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 55 | 6 |
83.60 | 41-366A-10-CC,0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | Neogene | NANNO MARL | Dominat lithology; relative abundance | 0 | 55 | 6 | 0 | 0 | 6 | 0 | 0 | 55 | 6 |
100.60 | 41-366A-11-CC,0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | Neogene | NANNO OOZE | Dominat lithology; relative abundance | 0 | 55 | 6 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 55 | 0 |
109.50 | 41-366A-12-61,100 | 0 | 0 | 0 | Neogene | NANNO OOZE | Dominat lithology; relative abundance | 0 | 55 | 6 | 0 | 6 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 55 | 6 |
109.72 | 41-366A-12-61,122 | 0 | 0 | 0 | Neogene | NANNO OOZE | Dominat lithology; relative abundance | 0 | 55 | 6 | 0 | 6 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 55 | 6 |
110.10 | 41-366A-12-CC,0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | Neogene | NANNO OOZE | Dominat lithology; relative abundance | 0 | 55 | 6 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 55 | 6 |
119.60 | 41-366A-13-CC,0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | Miocene | FORAM-BEARING NANNO OOZE | Dominat lithology; relative abundance | 0 | 55 | 23 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 55 | 6 |
129.50 | 41-366A-14-CC,0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | Middle miocene | FORAM-BEARING NANNO OOZE | Dominat lithology; numerical abundance | 0 | 36 | 16 | 0 | 4 | 4 | 0 | 0 | 36 | 4 |
132.20 | 41-366A-15-2,80 | 0 | 0 | 0 | Middle miocene | CLAY | Minor lithology; relative abundance | 0 | 6 | 0 | 0 | 6 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 75 | 23 |
138.50 | 41-366A-15-61,110 | 0 | 0 | 0 | Middle miocene | NANNO MARL | Minor lithology; numerical abundance | 0 | 36 | 4 | 0 | 4 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 36 | 16 |
139.00 | 41-366A-15-CC,0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | Middle miocene | FORAM-BEARING NANNO OOZE | Dominat lithology; numerical abundance | 0 | 36 | 16 | 0 | 4 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 36 | 4 |
143.40 | 41-366A-16-31,140 | 0 | 0 | 0 | Middle miocene | NANNO MARL | Minor lithology; relative abundance | 0 | 55 | 6 | 0 | 6 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 55 | 6 |
146.21 | 41-366A-16-51,121 | 0 | 0 | 0 | Middle miocene | NANNO MARL | Minor lithology; relative abundance | 0 | 55 | 0 | 0 | 6 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 55 | 6 |
146.27 | 41-366A-16-51,127 | 0 | 0 | 0 | Middle miocene | NANNO CLAY | Minor lithology; numerical abundance | 0 | 36 | 4 | 0 | 4 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 49 | 4 |
146.33 | 41-366A-16-51,133 | 0 | 0 | 0 | Middle miocene | FORAM-BEARING NANNO OOZE | Minor lithology; relative abundance | 0 | 55 | 23 | 0 | 6 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 55 | 0 |
146.60 | 41-366A-16-CC,0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | Middle miocene | FORAM-BEARING NANNO OOZE | Dominat lithology; numerical abundance | 0 | 33 | 14 | 4 | 4 | 4 | 0 | 0 | 33 | 4 |
158.10 | 41-366A-17-CC,0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | Lower miocene | FORAM-BEARING NANNO OOZE | Dominat lithology; numerical abundance | 0 | 38 | 16 | 0 | 4 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 38 | 4 |
167.10 | 41-366A-18-CC,0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | Lower miocene | NANNO OOZE | Dominat lithology; relative abundance | 0 | 55 | 6 | 0 | 6 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 55 | 6 |
181.60 | 41-366A-20-CC,0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | Lower miocene | FORAM-BEARING NANNO OOZE | Dominat lithology; numerical abundance | 0 | 36 | 16 | 0 | 4 | 0 | 0 | 4 | 36 | 0 |
196.10 | 41-366A-21-CC,0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | Lower miocene | FORAM NANNO CHALK | Dominat lithology; numerical abundance | 0 | 36 | 16 | 0 | 4 | 4 | 0 | 4 | 36 | 0 |
199.10 | 41-366A-22-CC,0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | Lower miocene | RAD- AND FORAM-BEARING NANNO CHALK | Dominat lithology; numerical abundance | 0 | 35 | 14 | 0 | 14 | 4 | 0 | 0 | 34 | 0 |
205.92 | 41-366A-23-1,12 | 0 | 0 | 0 | Lower miocene | PELAGIC CLAY | Minor lithology; relative abundance | 0 | 6 | 0 | 0 | 6 | 6 | 0 | 0 | 55 | 0 |
207.89 | 41-366A-23-2,59 | 0 | 0 | 0 | Lower miocene | DIATOM-BEARING CLAY | Minor lithology; relative abundance | 0 | 6 | 0 | 0 | 6 | 23 | 0 | 6 | 0 | 6 |
218.10 | 41-366A-24-CC,0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | Lower miocene | RAD- AND FORAM-BEARING CLAYEY NANNO CHALK | Dominat lithology; numerical abundance | 0 | 34 | 14 | 0 | 4 | 4 | 0 | 0 | 34 | 0 |
226.10 | 41-366A-25-CC,0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | Lower miocene | FORAM- AND DIATOM-BEARING CLAYEY NANNO CHALK | Dominat lithology; numerical abundance | 0 | 33 | 14 | 0 | 3 | 14 | 3 | 0 | 33 | 0 |
239.15 | 41-366A-26-4,65 | 0 | 0 | 0 | Lower miocene | CLAYEY NANNO CHALK | Minor lithology; numerical abundance | 0 | 38 | 4 | 0 | 4 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 38 | 0 |
241.60 | 41-366A-26-CC,0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | Lower miocene | RAD-BEARING CLAYEY NANNO CHALK | Dominat lithology; numerical abundance | 14 | 34 | 4 | 0 | 14 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 34 | 0 |
252.50 | 41-366A-27-61,150 | 0 | 0 | 0 | Lower miocene | CLAYEY NANNO CHALK | Dominat lithology; relative abundance | 0 | 55 | 6 | 0 | 6 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 55 | 6 |
262.60 | 41-366A-28-CC,0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | Oligocene | CLAYEY NANNO CHALK | Dominat lithology; relative abundance | 0 | 55 | 6 | 0 | 6 | 0 | 0 | 6 | 55 | 6 |
271.60 | 41-366A-29-CC,0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | Oligocene | CLAYEY NANNO CHALK | Dominat lithology; relative abundance | 6 | 55 | 6 | 0 | 6 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 55 | 0 |
281.30 | 41-366A-30-CC,0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | Oligocene | FORAM-BEARING CLAYEY NANNO CHALK | Dominat lithology; numerical abundance | 0 | 38 | 16 | 0 | 4 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 38 | 4 |
289.10 | 41-366A-31-CC,0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | Oligocene | CLAYEY NANNO CHALK | Dominat lithology; relative abundance | 0 | 55 | 6 | 0 | 6 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 55 | 0 |
291.10 | 41-366A-32-CC,0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | Oligocene | CLAYEY NANNO CHALK | Dominat lithology; numerical abundance | 0 | 56 | 3 | 0 | 3 | 3 | 0 | 0 | 28 | 3 |
309.60 | 41-366A-33-CC,0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | Oligocene | CLAY-BEARING NANNO CHALK | Dominat lithology; relative abundance | 0 | 55 | 6 | 0 | 6 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 23 | 0 |
319.10 | 41-366A-34-CC,0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | Oligocene | CLAYEY NANNO CHALK | Dominat lithology; relative abundance | 0 | 55 | 6 | 0 | 6 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 55 | 6 |
328.60 | 41-366A-35-CC,0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | Oligocene | CLAY-BEARING NANNO CHALK | Dominat lithology; relative abundance | 0 | 55 | 6 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 23 | 6 |
336.60 | 41-366A-36-CC,0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | Oligocene | CLAY-BEARING NANNO CHALK | Dominat lithology; relative abundance | 0 | 55 | 6 | 0 | 6 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 23 | 0 |
347.60 | 41-366A-37-CC,0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | Oligocene | FORAM- AND CLAY-BEARING NANNO CHALK | Dominat lithology; relative abundance | 0 | 55 | 23 | 0 | 6 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 23 | 6 |
354.10 | 41-366A-38-CC,0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | Oligocene | FORAM-BEARING NANNO CHALK | Dominat lithology; numerical abundance | 0 | 38 | 16 | 0 | 4 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 38 | 4 |
363.60 | 41-366A-39-CC,0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | Oligocene | CLAYEY NANNO CHALK | Dominat lithology; relative abundance | 0 | 55 | 6 | 0 | 6 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 55 | 6 |