Citation:

PANGAEA.230689

Always quote citation above when using data! You can download the citation in several formats below.

RIS Citation BibTeX Citation Text Citation Facebook TwitterShow Map Google Earth

Related to:

DSDP (1989): Data from the Deep Sea Drilling Project. Sediment, hard rock and reference files. National Geophysical Data Center, National Environmental Satellite, Data and Information Service, National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration, U.S. Department of Commerce, 1, CD-ROM

Sayles, Frederick L; Riedel, William R; Ruef, Michael H; Rothwell, W Thomas; Hay, William W; Bolli, Hans M; Benson, William E; Gerard, Robert D; Bader, Richard G (1970): Initial Reports of the Deep Sea Drilling Project. Initial Reports of the Deep Sea Drilling Project, U.S. Government Printing Office, IV, 751 pp, https://doi.org/10.2973/dsdp.proc.4.1970

Further details:

Processed smear slide data base - background and methods

Project(s):

Deep Sea Drilling Project (DSDP)

Coverage:

Latitude: 14.785200 * Longitude: -69.322700

Date/Time Start: 1969-03-08T00:00:00 * Date/Time End: 1969-03-08T00:00:00

Minimum DEPTH, sediment/rock: 0.30 m * Maximum DEPTH, sediment/rock: 223.80 m

Event(s):

4-29 * Latitude: 14.785200 * Longitude: -69.322700 * Date/Time: 1969-03-08T00:00:00 * Elevation: -4247.0 m * Penetration: 229.5 m * Recovery: 84.1 m * Location: Caribbean Sea/BASIN * Campaign: * Basis: Glomar Challenger * Method/Device: Drilling/drill rig (DRILL) * Comment: 18 cores; 152.5 m cored; 3 m drilled; 55.1 % recovery

Parameter(s):

#	Name	Short Name	Unit	Method/Device	Comment
1	DEPTH, sediment/rock	Depth sed	m		Geocode
2	Sample code/label	Sample label		DSDP/ODP/IODP sample designation
3	Sand	Sand	%	Smear slide analysis
4	Silt	Silt	%	Smear slide analysis
5	Size fraction < 0.002 mm, clay	<2 µm	%	Smear slide analysis
6	Stratigraphy	Stratigraphy		Smear slide analysis
7	Lithology/composition/facies	Lithology		Smear slide analysis
8	Comment	Comment		Smear slide analysis
9	Carbonates	Carb	%	Smear slide analysis
10	Nannofossils	Nannos	%	Smear slide analysis
11	Foraminifera	Foram	%	Smear slide analysis
12	Lamellibranchiata	Lamellibranchiata	%	Smear slide analysis
13	Radiolarians	Rad	%	Smear slide analysis
14	Diatoms	Diatoms	%	Smear slide analysis
15	Spiculae	Spiculae	%	Smear slide analysis
16	Clay minerals	Clay min	%	Smear slide analysis
17	Volcanic glass	Volc glass	%	Smear slide analysis
18	Fecal pellets	Fecal pel	%	Smear slide analysis
19	Minerals	Minerals	%	Smear slide analysis	isotropic minerals

License:

Creative Commons Attribution 3.0 Unported (CC-BY-3.0)

Size:

1350 data points

Data

Download dataset as tab-delimited text — use the following character encoding:

1 Depth sed [m]	2 Sample label	3 Sand [%]	4 Silt [%]	5 <2 µm [%]	6 Stratigraphy	7 Lithology	8 Comment	9 Carb [%]	10 Nannos [%]	11 Foram [%]	13 Rad [%]	14 Diatoms [%]	15 Spiculae [%]	16 Clay min [%]	17 Volc glass [%]	18 Fecal pel [%]	19 Minerals [%]
0.30	4-29-1-1,30	20	20	60	Pleistocene	FORAM NANNOS CLAY OOZE	Dominat lithology; numerical abundance	0	30	20	0	0	0	50	0	0	0
1.16	4-29-1-11,116	20	30	50	Pleistocene	FORAM NANNOS CLAY OOZE	Dominat lithology; relative abundance	0	30	30	2	0	0	40	0	0	0
1.86	4-29-1-2,36	5	25	70	Pleistocene	FORAM NANNOS CLAY OOZE	Dominat lithology; relative abundance	0	30	5	2	0	0	65	0	0	0
2.92	4-29-1-21,142	1	40	60	Pleistocene	NANNOS AND CLAY OOZE	Dominat lithology; relative abundance	0	34	2	2	0	0	70	0	0	0
3.50	4-29-1-3,50	20	30	50	Pleistocene	FORAM NANNOS CLAY	Dominat lithology; numerical abundance	0	30	10	0	0	0	60	0	0	0
4.16	4-29-1-31,116	1	50	50	Pleistocene	BLACK BLOB	Minor lithology; relative abundance	0	10	2	0	0	0	45	0	0	45
4.34	4-29-1-31,134	5	45	50	Pleistocene	NANNOS AND CLAY OOZE	Dominat lithology; relative abundance	0	30	2	0	0	0	70	0	0	0
4.60	4-29-1-CC,0	60	15	25	Pleistocene	PLANKTONIC FORAM OOZE	Dominat lithology; relative abundance	5	0	70	0	2	0	25	0	0	0
9.45	4-29-2-1,45	1	40	60	Pleistocene	NANNOS FORAM OOZE	Dominat lithology; numerical abundance	0	10	10	0	0	0	80	0	0	0
10.10	4-29-2-11,110	1	40	60	Pleistocene	NANNOS FORAM OOZE	Dominat lithology; numerical abundance	0	25	5	0	0	0	70	0	0	0
10.90	4-29-2-2,40	5	45	50	Pleistocene	NANNOS FORAM OOZE	Dominat lithology; numerical abundance	0	30	5	0	0	0	65	0	0	0
11.70	4-29-2-21,120	1	30	70	Pleistocene	NANNOS FORAM OOZE	Dominat lithology; relative abundance	0	20	2	0	0	0	80	0	0	0
12.40	4-29-2-3,40	5	30	65	Upper pliocene	FORAM NANNOS OOZE	Dominat lithology; numerical abundance	0	5	5	0	0	0	90	0	0	0
13.04	4-29-2-31,104	10	10	80	Upper pliocene	FORAM NANNOS OOZE	Dominat lithology; numerical abundance	0	30	10	0	0	0	60	0	0	0
13.41	4-29-2-31,141	5	20	75	Upper pliocene	FORAM NANNOS OOZE	Dominat lithology; numerical abundance	0	20	10	0	0	0	70	0	0	0
13.60	4-29-2-CC,0	30	55	15	Upper pliocene	PLANKTONIC FORAM CHALK OOZE	Dominat lithology; numerical abundance	25	0	70	0	0	0	5	0	0	0
19.60	4-29-3-CC,0	25	35	40	Upper pliocene	FORAMS NANNOS CHALK OOZE	Dominat lithology; numerical abundance	20	20	50	0	5	0	5	0	0	0
28.63	4-29-4-2,13	5	45	50	Lower pliocene	FORAM NANNOS OOZE	Dominat lithology; numerical abundance	0	20	5	0	0	0	0	0	0	75
28.74	4-29-4-2,24	1	20	80	Lower pliocene	FORAM NANNOS OOZE	Dominat lithology; numerical abundance	0	20	5	0	0	0	0	0	0	75
31.02	4-29-4-31,102	1	40	60	Lower pliocene	NANNOS OOZE	Dominat lithology; relative abundance	0	30	2	0	0	0	0	0	0	70
31.16	4-29-4-31,116	1	20	80	Lower pliocene	NANNOS OOZE	Dominat lithology; relative abundance	0	30	2	0	0	0	0	0	0	70
32.00	4-29-4-4,50	1	40	60	Lower pliocene	NANNOS OOZE	Dominat lithology; relative abundance	0	30	2	0	0	0	70	0	0	0
32.62	4-29-4-41,112	10	50	40	Upper miocene	NANNOS FORAM OOZE	Dominat lithology; numerical abundance	0	30	10	0	0	0	0	0	0	60
33.10	4-29-4-CC,0	1	30	70	Upper miocene	CLAY	Dominat lithology; relative abundance	0	0	2	0	0	0	0	0	0	100
38.08	4-29-5-11,108	1	50	50	Upper miocene	CLAY	Dominat lithology; numerical abundance	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	100
46.91	4-29-6-1,91	1	40	60	Upper miocene	CLAY	Dominat lithology; relative abundance	0	30	2	0	0	0	0	0	0	70
47.27	4-29-6-11,127	1	40	60	Upper miocene	CLAY	Dominat lithology; numerical abundance	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	100
136.65	4-29-9-2,15	40	50	10	Middle eocene	RADS NANNOS OOZE	Dominat lithology; relative abundance	5	5	0	50	2	10	0	0	10	0
137.30	4-29-9-2,80	45	55	0	Middle eocene	RADS OOZE	Dominat lithology; numerical abundance	0	0	0	65	0	10	0	0	0	0
138.15	4-29-9-3,15	55	40	5	Middle eocene	RADS OOZE	Dominat lithology; numerical abundance	0	0	0	75	0	15	0	0	0	0
139.10	4-29-9-31,110	55	35	10	Middle eocene	RADS OOZE	Dominat lithology; numerical abundance	0	0	0	70	0	20	0	0	0	0
140.25	4-29-9-4,75	40	60	0	Middle eocene	RADS OOZE	Dominat lithology; numerical abundance	0	0	0	60	0	10	0	0	0	0
144.55	4-29-10-1,55	75	25	0	Middle eocene	RADS OOZE	Dominat lithology; numerical abundance	0	0	0	95	0	0	0	0	0	5
145.10	4-29-10-11,110	45	55	0	Middle eocene	RADS OOZE	Dominat lithology; numerical abundance	0	0	0	90	0	5	0	0	0	5
146.00	4-29-10-2,50	35	60	5	Middle eocene	RADS OOZE	Dominat lithology; numerical abundance	0	0	0	95	0	0	5	0	0	0
147.70	4-29-10-3,70	40	60	1	Middle eocene	RADS OOZE	Dominat lithology; relative abundance	0	0	0	100	0	0	2	0	0	0
149.20	4-29-10-4,70	30	60	10	Middle eocene	RADS OOZE	Dominat lithology; numerical abundance	0	0	0	90	0	0	10	0	0	0
150.40	4-29-10-5,40	45	45	10	Middle eocene	RADS OOZE	Dominat lithology; numerical abundance	0	0	0	90	0	0	10	0	0	0
150.90	4-29-10-5,90	30	50	20	Middle eocene	RADS OOZE	Dominat lithology; numerical abundance	0	0	0	80	0	0	20	0	0	0
157.90	4-29-11-1,90	50	50	0	Middle eocene	RADS OOZE	Dominat lithology; numerical abundance	0	0	0	90	0	0	0	0	0	0
162.70	4-29-12-1,70	25	60	15	Middle eocene	RADS OOZE	Dominat lithology; numerical abundance	0	0	0	85	0	0	15	0	0	0
164.30	4-29-12-2,80	35	60	5	Middle eocene	RADS OOZE	Dominat lithology; numerical abundance	0	0	0	90	0	5	5	0	0	0
165.75	4-29-12-3,75	55	40	5	Middle eocene	RADS OOZE	Dominat lithology; numerical abundance	0	0	0	50	0	15	5	0	0	0
167.00	4-29-12-4,50	45	55	0	Middle eocene	RADS OOZE	Dominat lithology; numerical abundance	0	0	0	65	0	5	0	0	0	0
168.40	4-29-12-5,40	45	55	0	Middle eocene	RADS OOZE	Dominat lithology; numerical abundance	0	0	0	60	0	15	0	0	0	0
170.45	4-29-12-6,95	45	50	5	Middle eocene	RADS OOZE	Dominat lithology; numerical abundance	0	0	0	40	0	15	0	0	0	0
171.10	4-29-12-CC,0	60	40	0	Middle eocene	RADS OOZE	Dominat lithology; numerical abundance	0	0	0	80	0	0	0	0	0	0
172.00	4-29-13-1,0	30	70	0	Middle eocene	RADS OOZE	Dominat lithology; numerical abundance	0	0	0	60	0	0	0	0	0	0
184.00	4-29-14-1,0	80	20	1	Middle eocene	RADS OOZE	Dominat lithology; numerical abundance	0	0	0	95	0	0	5	0	0	0
186.22	4-29-14-2,44	25	60	15	Middle eocene	RADS OOZE	Dominat lithology; numerical abundance	0	0	0	95	0	0	2	0	0	0
187.60	4-29-14-3,60	10	70	20	Middle eocene	RADS OOZE	Dominat lithology; numerical abundance	1	0	0	96	0	0	3	0	0	0
188.50	4-29-14-4,0	60	40	0	Middle eocene	RADS OOZE	Dominat lithology; numerical abundance	0	0	0	100	0	0	0	0	0	0
190.55	4-29-14-5,55	90	10	0	Middle eocene	GRAY MATERIAL	Minor lithology; relative abundance	0	0	0	2	2	2	0	100	0	0
191.00	4-29-14-51,100	70	20	10	Middle eocene	RADS OOZE	Dominat lithology; relative abundance	0	0	0	90	2	0	10	0	0	0
192.27	4-29-14-6,77	80	10	10	Middle eocene	RADS OOZE	Dominat lithology; relative abundance	0	0	0	90	2	0	10	0	0	0
193.10	4-29-14-CC,0	30	70	0	Middle eocene	RADS OOZE	Dominat lithology; numerical abundance	0	0	0	60	0	0	0	0	0	0
193.79	4-29-15-1,79	70	20	10	Middle eocene	RADS OOZE	Dominat lithology; relative abundance	0	2	0	80	10	0	10	0	0	0
195.15	4-29-15-2,65	70	25	5	Middle eocene	RADS OOZE	Dominat lithology; relative abundance	0	0	0	95	2	0	5	0	0	0
196.00	4-29-15-3,0	20	45	25	Middle eocene	RADS OOZE	Dominat lithology; relative abundance	2	0	0	100	0	0	0	0	0	0
198.10	4-29-15-4,60	30	70	0	Middle eocene	RADS OOZE	Dominat lithology; relative abundance	2	0	0	100	0	0	0	0	0	0
200.50	4-29-15-6,0	40	60	0	Middle eocene	CALCEROUS RAD OOZE	Dominat lithology; numerical abundance	10	0	0	90	0	0	0	0	0	0
203.00	4-29-16-11,100	70	20	10	Middle eocene	RAD DIATOM OOZE	Dominat lithology; numerical abundance	0	5	0	75	10	0	10	0	0	0
204.20	4-29-16-2,70	70	20	10	Middle eocene	RADS OOZE	Dominat lithology; relative abundance	0	2	0	85	5	0	10	0	0	0
205.70	4-29-16-3,70	55	35	10	Middle eocene	RADS DIATOM OOZE	Dominat lithology; relative abundance	0	5	2	65	20	0	10	0	0	0
207.20	4-29-16-4,70	60	30	10	Middle eocene	RADS DIATOM OOZE	Dominat lithology; relative abundance	0	10	2	70	10	0	10	0	0	0
208.70	4-29-16-5,70	75	15	10	Middle eocene	RADS OOZE	Dominat lithology; numerical abundance	0	5	0	80	5	0	10	0	0	0
210.20	4-29-16-6,70	60	30	10	Middle eocene	RADS DIATOM OOZE	Dominat lithology; relative abundance	0	10	2	60	20	0	10	0	0	0
211.70	4-29-17-1,70	80	10	10	Middle eocene	RADS OOZE	Dominat lithology; numerical abundance	0	0	0	85	10	0	10	0	0	0
213.10	4-29-17-2,60	80	10	0	Middle eocene	RADS OOZE	Dominat lithology; numerical abundance	0	0	0	85	0	15	0	0	0	0
214.60	4-29-17-3,60	50	50	0	Middle eocene	RADS OOZE	Dominat lithology; numerical abundance	0	0	0	85	0	15	0	0	0	0
216.25	4-29-17-4,75	75	25	0	Middle eocene	RADS OOZE	Dominat lithology; numerical abundance	0	0	0	80	0	20	0	0	0	0
217.70	4-29-17-5,70	50	50	0	Middle eocene	SP.SPIC RADS OOZE	Dominat lithology; numerical abundance	0	0	0	80	0	20	0	0	0	0
219.50	4-29-17-61,100	40	60	0	Middle eocene	RADS OOZE	Dominat lithology; numerical abundance	0	0	0	90	0	10	0	0	0	0
222.30	4-29-18-2,80	40	60	0	Middle eocene	RADS OOZE	Dominat lithology; numerical abundance	0	0	0	90	0	10	0	0	0	0
223.80	4-29-18-3,80	50	50	0	Middle eocene	RADS OOZE	Dominat lithology; numerical abundance	0	0	0	80	0	20	0	0	0	0