/* DATA DESCRIPTION: Citation: Bader, Richard G; Gerard, Robert D (2005): Smear slide analysis of Hole 4-25. PANGAEA, https://doi.org/10.1594/PANGAEA.230684 Related to: DSDP (1989): Data from the Deep Sea Drilling Project. Sediment, hard rock and reference files. National Geophysical Data Center, National Environmental Satellite, Data and Information Service, National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration, U.S. Department of Commerce, 1, CD-ROM Sayles, Frederick L; Riedel, William R; Ruef, Michael H; Rothwell, W Thomas; Hay, William W; Bolli, Hans M; Benson, William E; Gerard, Robert D; Bader, Richard G (1970): Initial Reports of the Deep Sea Drilling Project. Initial Reports of the Deep Sea Drilling Project, U.S. Government Printing Office, IV, 751 pp, https://doi.org/10.2973/dsdp.proc.4.1970 Further details: Processed smear slide data base - background and methods (URI: hdl:10013/epic.32353.d001) Project(s): Deep Sea Drilling Project (DSDP) (URI: http://www.deepseadrilling.org/) Coverage: LATITUDE: -0.516700 * LONGITUDE: -39.240000 DATE/TIME START: 1969-02-10T00:00:00 * DATE/TIME END: 1969-02-10T00:00:00 MINIMUM DEPTH, sediment/rock: 0.00 m * MAXIMUM DEPTH, sediment/rock: 3.10 m Event(s): 4-25 * LATITUDE: -0.516700 * LONGITUDE: -39.240000 * DATE/TIME: 1969-02-10T00:00:00 * ELEVATION: -1916.0 m * Penetration: 66 m * Recovery: 25.7 m * LOCATION: South Atlantic/RIDGE * CAMPAIGN: Leg4 (URI: https://doi.org/10.2973/dsdp.proc.4.1970) * BASIS: Glomar Challenger (URI: http://www-odp.tamu.edu/glomar.html) * METHOD/DEVICE: Drilling/drill rig (DRILL) * COMMENT: 4 cores; 36 m cored; 30 m drilled; 71.4 % recovery Parameter(s): DEPTH, sediment/rock [m] (Depth sed) * GEOCODE Sample code/label (Sample label) * METHOD/DEVICE: DSDP/ODP/IODP sample designation (URI: hdl:10013/epic.27914.d001) Sand [%] (Sand) * METHOD/DEVICE: Smear slide analysis Silt [%] (Silt) * METHOD/DEVICE: Smear slide analysis Size fraction < 0.002 mm, clay [%] (<2 µm) * METHOD/DEVICE: Smear slide analysis Stratigraphy (Stratigraphy) * METHOD/DEVICE: Smear slide analysis Lithology/composition/facies (Lithology) * METHOD/DEVICE: Smear slide analysis Comment (Comment) * METHOD/DEVICE: Smear slide analysis Carbonates [%] (Carb) * METHOD/DEVICE: Smear slide analysis Nannofossils [%] (Nannos) * METHOD/DEVICE: Smear slide analysis Foraminifera [%] (Foram) * METHOD/DEVICE: Smear slide analysis Quartz [%] (Qz) * METHOD/DEVICE: Smear slide analysis Mica [%] (Mica) * METHOD/DEVICE: Smear slide analysis Biotite [%] (Bt) * METHOD/DEVICE: Smear slide analysis Clay minerals [%] (Clay min) * METHOD/DEVICE: Smear slide analysis Detritus [%] (Detritus) * METHOD/DEVICE: Smear slide analysis * COMMENT: detrital material License: Creative Commons Attribution 3.0 Unported (CC-BY-3.0) (URI: https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/3.0/) Size: 90 data points */ Depth sed [m] Sample label Sand [%] Silt [%] <2 µm [%] Stratigraphy Lithology Comment Carb [%] Nannos [%] Foram [%] Qz [%] Mica [%] Bt [%] Clay min [%] Detritus [%] 0.00 4-25-1-0,0 65 5 30 Pleistocene FORAM OOZE Dominat lithology; numerical abundance 30 0 70 0 0 0 0 0 0.30 4-25-1-1,20 70 5 25 Pleistocene FORAM NANNO CHALK OOZE Dominat lithology; numerical abundance 5 20 75 0 0 0 0 0 0.80 4-25-1-1,70 60 10 30 Pleistocene FORAM NANNO CHALK OOZE Dominat lithology; numerical abundance 10 20 70 0 0 0 0 0 1.60 4-25-1-2,0 85 0 15 Pleistocene FORAM OOZE Dominat lithology; numerical abundance 5 5 85 0 0 0 5 0 2.35 4-25-1-2,75 58 17 25 Pleistocene FORAM NANNO CHALK OOZE Dominat lithology; relative abundance 5 10 68 1 1 1 0 2 3.10 4-25-1-3,0 83 5 12 Pleistocene FORAM OOZE Dominat lithology; numerical abundance 5 2 83 0 0 0 5 0