Citation:

PANGAEA.230679

Always quote citation above when using data! You can download the citation in several formats below.

RIS Citation BibTeX Citation Text Citation Facebook TwitterShow Map Google Earth

Related to:

DSDP (1989): Data from the Deep Sea Drilling Project. Sediment, hard rock and reference files. National Geophysical Data Center, National Environmental Satellite, Data and Information Service, National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration, U.S. Department of Commerce, 1, CD-ROM

Perch-Nielsen, Katharina; Supko, Peter R; Boersma, Anne; Bonatti, Enrico; Carlson, Richard L; McCoy, Floyd W; Neprochnov, Yuri P; Zimmerman, H B (1977): Initial Reports of the Deep Sea Drilling Project. U. S. Government Printing Office, XXXIX, 1139 pp, https://doi.org/10.2973/dsdp.proc.39.1977

Further details:

Processed smear slide data base - background and methods

Project(s):

Deep Sea Drilling Project (DSDP)

Coverage:

Latitude: -34.985000 * Longitude: -4.497200

Date/Time Start: 1974-12-10T00:00:00 * Date/Time End: 1974-12-10T00:00:00

Minimum DEPTH, sediment/rock: 28.70 m * Maximum DEPTH, sediment/rock: 86.87 m

Event(s):

39-359 * Latitude: -34.985000 * Longitude: -4.497200 * Date/Time: 1974-12-10T00:00:00 * Elevation: -1655.0 m * Penetration: 104 m * Recovery: 27.3 m * Location: South Atlantic/SEAMOUNT * Campaign: * Basis: Glomar Challenger * Method/Device: Drilling/drill rig (DRILL) * Comment: 5 cores; 47 m cored; 0 m drilled; 58.1 % recovery

Parameter(s):

#	Name	Short Name	Unit	Method/Device	Comment
1	DEPTH, sediment/rock	Depth sed	m		Geocode
2	Sample code/label	Sample label		DSDP/ODP/IODP sample designation
3	Sand	Sand	%	Smear slide analysis
4	Silt	Silt	%	Smear slide analysis
5	Size fraction < 0.002 mm, clay	<2 µm	%	Smear slide analysis
6	Stratigraphy	Stratigraphy		Smear slide analysis
7	Lithology/composition/facies	Lithology		Smear slide analysis
8	Comment	Comment		Smear slide analysis
9	Carbonates	Carb	%	Smear slide analysis
10	Dolomite	Dol	%	Smear slide analysis
11	Nannofossils	Nannos	%	Smear slide analysis
12	Foraminifera	Foram	%	Smear slide analysis
13	Radiolarians	Rad	%	Smear slide analysis
14	Diatoms	Diatoms	%	Smear slide analysis
15	Spiculae	Spiculae	%	Smear slide analysis
16	Quartz	Qz	%	Smear slide analysis
17	Feldspar	Fsp	%	Smear slide analysis
18	Zeolite	Zeo	%	Smear slide analysis
19	Mica	Mica	%	Smear slide analysis
20	Biotite	Bt	%	Smear slide analysis
21	Clay minerals	Clay min	%	Smear slide analysis
22	Glauconite	Glt	%	Smear slide analysis
23	Opaque minerals	Opaque	%	Smear slide analysis
24	Iron	Fe	%	Smear slide analysis
25	Limonite	Lm	%	Smear slide analysis
26	Volcanic glass	Volc glass	%	Smear slide analysis

License:

Creative Commons Attribution 3.0 Unported (CC-BY-3.0)

Size:

325 data points

Data

Download dataset as tab-delimited text — use the following character encoding:

1 Depth sed [m]	2 Sample label	3 Sand [%]	4 Silt [%]	5 <2 µm [%]	6 Stratigraphy	7 Lithology	8 Comment	9 Carb [%]	10 Dol [%]	11 Nannos [%]	12 Foram [%]	13 Rad [%]	14 Diatoms [%]	15 Spiculae [%]	16 Qz [%]	17 Fsp [%]	18 Zeo [%]	19 Mica [%]	20 Bt [%]	21 Clay min [%]	22 Glt [%]	23 Opaque [%]	24 Fe [%]	25 Lm [%]	26 Volc glass [%]
28.70	39-359-2-1,20	10	20	70	Miocene	FORAM NANNO OOZE	Dominat lithology; relative abundance	5	0	75	15	0	0	0	2	0	0	0	0	5	0	0	0	0	0
31.00	39-359-2-21,100	35	30	35	Miocene	FORAM NANNO OOZE	Dominat lithology; relative abundance	10	0	56	35	0	2	2	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0
33.75	39-359-2-4,75	30	30	40	Miocene	FORAM NANNO OOZE	Dominat lithology; relative abundance	10	0	55	30	2	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	5	2	0	0	2	0
36.62	39-359-2-6,62	25	25	50	Upper eocene	FORAM NANNO OOZE	Dominat lithology; relative abundance	10	0	45	25	0	2	0	5	2	0	0	0	5	5	0	0	5	0
56.90	39-359-3-1,40	35	55	10	Upper eocene	NANNO FORAM OOZE	Dominat lithology; relative abundance	5	0	30	35	2	2	2	5	5	2	0	0	10	10	0	0	0	2
57.78	39-359-3-11,128	5	45	50	Upper eocene	CALCAREOUS VOLCANIC MUD	Dominat lithology; relative abundance	5	0	25	10	2	2	10	5	2	0	0	0	10	5	5	0	2	25
60.50	39-359-3-31,100	5	45	50	Upper eocene	CALCAREOUS VOLCANIC MUD	Dominat lithology; relative abundance	5	0	25	10	2	2	10	5	2	0	2	0	10	5	5	0	0	25
61.73	39-359-3-4,73	20	70	10	Upper eocene	VOLCANIC ASH	Dominat lithology; relative abundance	5	0	10	0	0	2	2	10	5	0	2	0	0	0	5	0	0	55
86.15	39-359-4-11,115	10	35	55	Upper eocene	CALCAREOUS VOLCANIC MUD	Dominat lithology; relative abundance	2	5	20	15	0	2	2	5	0	5	0	2	15	2	5	0	2	30
86.40	39-359-4-11,140	0	35	65	Upper eocene	VOLCANIC MUD	Dominat lithology; relative abundance	5	5	10	5	0	5	2	5	2	10	0	0	25	2	0	2	0	30
86.53	39-359-4-2,3	5	70	25	Upper eocene	ASHY MUD	Dominat lithology; numerical abundance	45	5	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	5	0	0	15	0	0	0	0	30
86.60	39-359-4-2,10	0	30	70	Upper eocene	ASHY CHALK?	Dominat lithology; relative abundance	40	5	0	0	0	0	0	2	0	0	0	0	30	0	5	0	2	20
86.87	39-359-4-2,37	0	20	80	Upper eocene	ALTERED VOLCANIC ASH	Dominat lithology; numerical abundance	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	10	0	0	40	0	0	0	0	50