Citation:

PANGAEA.230670

Always quote citation above when using data! You can download the citation in several formats below.

RIS Citation BibTeX Citation Text Citation Facebook TwitterShow Map Google Earth

Related to:

DSDP (1989): Data from the Deep Sea Drilling Project. Sediment, hard rock and reference files. National Geophysical Data Center, National Environmental Satellite, Data and Information Service, National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration, U.S. Department of Commerce, 1, CD-ROM

White, Stan; Warnke, Detlef A; Nilsen, T H; Müller, Carla; Morris, D A; Kharin, Gennady S; Faas, Richard W; Caston, V S D; Bjorklund, Kjell R; Talwani, Manik; Udintsev, Gleb B (1976): Initial Reports of the Deep Sea Drilling Project. Initial Reports of the Deep Sea Drilling Project, U.S. Government Printing Office, XXXVIII, 1256 pp, https://doi.org/10.2973/dsdp.proc.38.1976

Further details:

Processed smear slide data base - background and methods

Project(s):

Deep Sea Drilling Project (DSDP)

Coverage:

Latitude: 63.649500 * Longitude: -12.471000

Date/Time Start: 1974-09-19T00:00:00 * Date/Time End: 1974-09-19T00:00:00

Minimum DEPTH, sediment/rock: 96.30 m * Maximum DEPTH, sediment/rock: 116.10 m

Event(s):

38-352A * Latitude: 63.649500 * Longitude: -12.471000 * Date/Time: 1974-09-19T00:00:00 * Elevation: -990.0 m * Penetration: 122.5 m * Recovery: 5.1 m * Location: North Atlantic/RIDGE * Campaign: * Basis: Glomar Challenger * Method/Device: Drilling/drill rig (DRILL) * Comment: 3 cores; 28.5 m cored; 0 m drilled; 17.9 % recovery

Parameter(s):

#	Name	Short Name	Unit	Method/Device	Comment
1	DEPTH, sediment/rock	Depth sed	m		Geocode
2	Sample code/label	Sample label		DSDP/ODP/IODP sample designation
3	Sand	Sand	%	Smear slide analysis
4	Silt	Silt	%	Smear slide analysis
5	Size fraction < 0.002 mm, clay	<2 µm	%	Smear slide analysis
6	Stratigraphy	Stratigraphy		Smear slide analysis
7	Lithology/composition/facies	Lithology		Smear slide analysis
8	Comment	Comment		Smear slide analysis
9	Carbonates	Carb	%	Smear slide analysis
10	Dolomite	Dol	%	Smear slide analysis
11	Nannofossils	Nannos	%	Smear slide analysis
12	Foraminifera	Foram	%	Smear slide analysis
13	Diatoms	Diatoms	%	Smear slide analysis
14	Spiculae	Spiculae	%	Smear slide analysis
15	Quartz	Qz	%	Smear slide analysis
16	Feldspar	Fsp	%	Smear slide analysis
17	Mica	Mica	%	Smear slide analysis
18	Clay minerals	Clay min	%	Smear slide analysis
19	Glauconite	Glt	%	Smear slide analysis
20	Opaque minerals	Opaque	%	Smear slide analysis
21	Iron	Fe	%	Smear slide analysis
22	Heavy minerals	HM	%	Smear slide analysis
23	Volcanic glass	Volc glass	%	Smear slide analysis
24	Palagonite	Palagonite	%	Smear slide analysis
25	Micronodules	Micronod	%	Smear slide analysis

License:

Creative Commons Attribution 3.0 Unported (CC-BY-3.0)

Size:

408 data points

Data

Download dataset as tab-delimited text — use the following character encoding:

1 Depth sed [m]	2 Sample label	3 Sand [%]	4 Silt [%]	5 <2 µm [%]	6 Stratigraphy	7 Lithology	8 Comment	9 Carb [%]	10 Dol [%]	11 Nannos [%]	12 Foram [%]	13 Diatoms [%]	14 Spiculae [%]	15 Qz [%]	16 Fsp [%]	17 Mica [%]	18 Clay min [%]	19 Glt [%]	20 Opaque [%]	21 Fe [%]	22 HM [%]	23 Volc glass [%]	24 Palagonite [%]	25 Micronod [%]
96.30	38-352A-1-2,80	3	7	90	Middle oligocene	NANNO OOZE	Dominat lithology; numerical abundance	0	0	54	10	1	15	1	1	3	10	1	1	0	0	3	0	0
96.50	38-352A-1-21,100	5	5	90	Middle oligocene	NANNO OOZE	Dominat lithology; relative abundance	5	0	41	10	0	20	1	2	3	10	1	2	0	2	5	0	0
96.80	38-352A-1-21,130	0	0	0	Middle oligocene	NANNO OOZE	Dominat lithology; numerical abundance	0	0	49	5	0	20	1	0	0	15	10	0	0	0	0	0	0
96.88	38-352A-1-21,138	0	0	0	Middle oligocene	NANNO OOZE	Minor lithology; numerical abundance	0	0	48	5	0	15	1	0	0	15	0	10	0	0	5	0	0
97.10	38-352A-1-CC,0	5	5	90	Middle oligocene	NANNO OOZE	Dominat lithology; numerical abundance	0	0	72	3	1	5	0	1	1	15	0	1	0	0	1	0	0
105.10	38-352A-2-CC,0	5	5	90	Middle oligocene	NANNO OOZE	Dominat lithology; relative abundance	5	0	55	10	1	10	1	3	1	10	1	2	0	0	2	0	0
113.55	38-352A-3-1,55	0	0	100	Middle oligocene	MUDDY NANNO OOZE	Dominat lithology; numerical abundance	3	0	38	5	1	25	0	0	0	20	1	2	0	0	5	0	0
113.77	38-352A-3-1,77	5	5	90	Middle oligocene	MUDDY NANNO OOZE	Dominat lithology; relative abundance	3	0	41	5	1	15	1	1	1	25	1	4	0	0	2	0	1
113.95	38-352A-3-1,95	5	15	80	Middle oligocene	MUDDY NANNO OOZE	Dominat lithology; relative abundance	15	1	24	0	0	15	1	1	0	10	5	3	0	2	10	15	0
114.15	38-352A-3-11,115	15	30	55	Middle oligocene	MUDDY NANNO OOZE	Dominat lithology; numerical abundance	3	0	40	5	1	15	1	0	1	20	2	5	0	0	7	0	0
114.22	38-352A-3-11,122	0	0	0	Middle oligocene	MUDDY NANNO OOZE	Dominat lithology; numerical abundance	10	0	25	3	1	10	1	1	4	35	2	3	0	0	5	0	0
114.55	38-352A-3-2,5	5	15	0	Middle oligocene	NANNO OOZE	Dominat lithology; numerical abundance	5	1	50	3	1	15	1	0	1	20	0	3	0	0	0	0	0
114.95	38-352A-3-2,45	5	20	75	Middle oligocene	MUDDY NANNO OOZE	Dominat lithology; numerical abundance	10	0	37	5	1	10	0	1	1	30	1	2	0	0	1	0	1
115.25	38-352A-3-2,75	5	10	85	Middle oligocene	MUDDY NANNO OOZE	Dominat lithology; relative abundance	10	0	45	5	0	5	1	0	1	30	1	1	2	0	0	0	1
115.65	38-352A-3-21,115	5	5	90	Middle oligocene	NANNO OOZE	Dominat lithology; numerical abundance	7	0	65	5	0	2	1	0	0	15	3	1	0	0	0	0	1
115.95	38-352A-3-21,145	5	5	90	Middle oligocene	NANNO OOZE	Dominat lithology; numerical abundance	5	0	54	10	1	5	1	0	1	20	1	1	0	0	1	0	0
116.10	38-352A-3-CC,0	5	0	0	Middle oligocene	NANNO OOZE	Dominat lithology; relative abundance	3	0	62	10	1	1	1	0	1	20	0	1	0	0	2	0	0