Citation:

PANGAEA.230648

Always quote citation above when using data! You can download the citation in several formats below.

RIS Citation BibTeX Citation Text Citation Facebook TwitterShow Map Google Earth

Related to:

DSDP (1989): Data from the Deep Sea Drilling Project. Sediment, hard rock and reference files. National Geophysical Data Center, National Environmental Satellite, Data and Information Service, National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration, U.S. Department of Commerce, 1, CD-ROM

Wright, T; Robinson, Paul T; Miles, G A; Hyndman, Roy D; Howe, Robert C; Flower, M; Fischer, Joseph F; Dmitriev, Leonid V; Bougault, Henri; Hall, James M; Aumento, Fabrizio; Melson, William G (1977): Initial Reports of the Deep Sea Drilling Project. Initial Reports of the Deep Sea Drilling Project, U.S. Government Printing Office, XXXVII, 1008 pp, https://doi.org/10.2973/dsdp.proc.37.1977

Further details:

Processed smear slide data base - background and methods

Project(s):

Deep Sea Drilling Project (DSDP)

Coverage:

Latitude: 36.878700 * Longitude: -33.641000

Date/Time Start: 1974-06-17T00:00:00 * Date/Time End: 1974-06-17T00:00:00

Minimum DEPTH, sediment/rock: 1.20 m * Maximum DEPTH, sediment/rock: 4.60 m

Event(s):

37-332 * Latitude: 36.878700 * Longitude: -33.641000 * Date/Time: 1974-06-17T00:00:00 * Elevation: -1818.0 m * Penetration: 7 m * Recovery: 3.6 m * Location: North Atlantic/VALLEY * Campaign: * Basis: Glomar Challenger * Method/Device: Drilling/drill rig (DRILL) * Comment: 1 cores; 7 m cored; 0 m drilled; 51.4 % recovery

Parameter(s):

#	Name	Short Name	Unit	Method/Device	Comment
1	DEPTH, sediment/rock	Depth sed	m		Geocode
2	Sample code/label	Sample label		DSDP/ODP/IODP sample designation
3	Sand	Sand	%	Smear slide analysis
4	Silt	Silt	%	Smear slide analysis
5	Size fraction < 0.002 mm, clay	<2 µm	%	Smear slide analysis
6	Stratigraphy	Stratigraphy		Smear slide analysis
7	Lithology/composition/facies	Lithology		Smear slide analysis
8	Comment	Comment		Smear slide analysis
9	Carbonates	Carb	%	Smear slide analysis
10	Nannofossils	Nannos	%	Smear slide analysis
11	Foraminifera	Foram	%	Smear slide analysis
12	Spiculae	Spiculae	%	Smear slide analysis
13	Feldspar	Fsp	%	Smear slide analysis
14	Zeolite	Zeo	%	Smear slide analysis
15	Mica	Mica	%	Smear slide analysis
16	Heavy minerals	HM	%	Smear slide analysis
17	Volcanic glass	Volc glass	%	Smear slide analysis
18	Palagonite	Palagonite	%	Smear slide analysis

License:

Creative Commons Attribution 3.0 Unported (CC-BY-3.0)

Size:

153 data points

Data

Download dataset as tab-delimited text — use the following character encoding:

1 Depth sed [m]	2 Sample label	6 Stratigraphy	7 Lithology	8 Comment	9 Carb [%]	10 Nannos [%]	11 Foram [%]	12 Spiculae [%]	13 Fsp [%]	14 Zeo [%]	15 Mica [%]	16 HM [%]	17 Volc glass [%]	18 Palagonite [%]
1.20	37-332-1-11,120	Pleistocene	FORAM BEARING NANNO OOZE	Dominat lithology; relative abundance	1	95	4	2	0	0	0	0	2	2
1.36	37-332-1-11,136	Pleistocene	FORAM NANNO OOZE	Minor lithology; relative abundance	1	61	30	1	2	0	0	2	2	0
1.59	37-332-1-2,9	Pleistocene	FORAM RICH NANNO OOZE	Minor lithology; relative abundance	0	85	13	2	0	0	0	0	2	0
2.14	37-332-1-2,64	Pleistocene	FORAM BEARING NANNO OOZE	Dominat lithology; relative abundance	0	95	5	2	2	0	0	0	2	0
2.56	37-332-1-21,106	Pleistocene	FORAM BEARING NANNO OOZE	Dominat lithology; relative abundance	0	94	5	0	0	0	0	2	2	0
3.43	37-332-1-3,43	Pleistocene	FORAM BEARING NANNO OOZE	Dominat lithology; relative abundance	0	95	5	2	0	2	0	0	0	2
4.10	37-332-1-31,110	Pleistocene	FORAM BEARING NANNO OOZE	Dominat lithology; relative abundance	0	98	2	0	0	0	2	0	2	0
4.32	37-332-1-31,132	Pleistocene	FORAM BEARING NANNO OOZE	Dominat lithology; relative abundance	0	94	6	2	2	0	0	0	2	0
4.60	37-332-1-CC,0	Pleistocene	FORAM BEARING NANNO OOZE	Dominat lithology; relative abundance	0	96	4	0	2	0	0	0	2	0