Citation:

PANGAEA.230615

Always quote citation above when using data! You can download the citation in several formats below.

RIS Citation BibTeX Citation Text Citation Facebook TwitterShow Map Google Earth

Related to:

DSDP (1989): Data from the Deep Sea Drilling Project. Sediment, hard rock and reference files. National Geophysical Data Center, National Environmental Satellite, Data and Information Service, National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration, U.S. Department of Commerce, 1, CD-ROM

Larson, Roger L; Moberly, Ralph; Bukry, David; Foreman, H P; Gardner, James V; Keene, John B; Lancelot, Yves; Luterbacher, Hanspeter; Marshall, M C; Matter, A (1975): Initial Reports of the Deep Sea Drilling Project. U. S. Government Printing Office, XXXII, 980 pp, https://doi.org/10.2973/dsdp.proc.32.1975

Further details:

Processed smear slide data base - background and methods

Project(s):

Deep Sea Drilling Project (DSDP)

Coverage:

Latitude: 31.867000 * Longitude: 157.478500

Date/Time Start: 1973-09-03T00:00:00 * Date/Time End: 1973-09-03T00:00:00

Minimum DEPTH, sediment/rock: 2.50 m * Maximum DEPTH, sediment/rock: 468.62 m

Event(s):

32-306 * Latitude: 31.867000 * Longitude: 157.478500 * Date/Time: 1973-09-03T00:00:00 * Elevation: -3399.0 m * Penetration: 475 m * Recovery: 27.8 m * Location: North Pacific/CONT RISE * Campaign: * Basis: Glomar Challenger * Method/Device: Drilling/drill rig (DRILL) * Comment: 42 cores; 381 m cored; 0 m drilled; 7.3 % recovery

Parameter(s):

#	Name	Short Name	Unit	Method/Device	Comment
1	DEPTH, sediment/rock	Depth sed	m		Geocode
2	Sample code/label	Sample label		DSDP/ODP/IODP sample designation
3	Sand	Sand	%	Smear slide analysis
4	Silt	Silt	%	Smear slide analysis
5	Size fraction < 0.002 mm, clay	<2 µm	%	Smear slide analysis
6	Stratigraphy	Stratigraphy		Smear slide analysis
7	Lithology/composition/facies	Lithology		Smear slide analysis
8	Comment	Comment		Smear slide analysis
9	Carbonates	Carb	%	Smear slide analysis
10	Dolomite	Dol	%	Smear slide analysis
11	Nannofossils	Nannos	%	Smear slide analysis
12	Foraminifera	Foram	%	Smear slide analysis
13	Calcareous spicules	Calc spic	%	Smear slide analysis
14	Siliceous microfossils	Silic foss	%	Smear slide analysis	other siliceous material
15	Radiolarians	Rad	%	Smear slide analysis
16	Diatoms	Diatoms	%	Smear slide analysis
17	Spiculae	Spiculae	%	Smear slide analysis
18	Zeolite	Zeo	%	Smear slide analysis
19	Mica	Mica	%	Smear slide analysis
20	Clay minerals	Clay min	%	Smear slide analysis
21	Pyrite, FeS2	Py	%	Smear slide analysis
22	Iron	Fe	%	Smear slide analysis
23	Volcanic glass	Volc glass	%	Smear slide analysis
24	Organic matter	OM	%	Smear slide analysis	organic debris

License:

Creative Commons Attribution 3.0 Unported (CC-BY-3.0)

Size:

782 data points

Data

Download dataset as tab-delimited text — use the following character encoding:

1 Depth sed [m]	2 Sample label	6 Stratigraphy	7 Lithology	8 Comment	9 Carb [%]	10 Dol [%]	11 Nannos [%]	12 Foram [%]	13 Calc spic [%]	14 Silic foss [%]	15 Rad [%]	16 Diatoms [%]	17 Spiculae [%]	18 Zeo [%]	19 Mica [%]	20 Clay min [%]	21 Py [%]	22 Fe [%]	23 Volc glass [%]	24 OM [%]
2.50	32-306-1-21,100	No age given	NANNO FORAM OOZE	Dominat lithology; relative abundance	0	0	23	55	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	6	0
2.81	32-306-1-21,131	No age given	SILICEOUS FORAM OOZE	Dominat lithology; relative abundance	0	0	55	23	0	0	6	6	6	0	0	0	0	0	23	0
8.51	32-306-1-61,101	No age given	FORAM NANNO OOZE	Dominat lithology; relative abundance	6	0	55	23	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0
9.10	32-306-1-CC,0	No age given	ZEOLITIC FORAM NANNO OOZE	Dominat lithology; numerical abundance	0	0	31	31	0	0	13	0	0	13	0	13	0	0	0	0
9.60	32-306-2-CC,0	Cretaceous	FORAM NANNO CHALK	Dominat lithology; relative abundance	0	0	75	23	0	0	6	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0
19.10	32-306-3-CC,0	Cretaceous	FORAM NANNO OOZE	Dominat lithology; relative abundance	6	0	55	55	6	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0
39.10	32-306-4-CC,0	Albian	FORAM NANNO OOZE	Dominat lithology; relative abundance	0	0	55	23	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	2	0	0	0	0
56.60	32-306-5-CC,0	Upper albian	RAD RICH NANNO CHALK	Dominat lithology; relative abundance	23	0	55	0	0	0	23	0	2	0	0	0	0	0	2	0
76.66	32-306-6-11,116	Lower cretaceous	RAD NANNO LIMESTONE	Dominat lithology; relative abundance	23	0	39	23	0	0	39	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0
94.10	32-306-7-CC,0	Lower cretaceous	FORAM RAD NANNO LIMESTONE	Dominat lithology; relative abundance	23	0	23	23	0	0	23	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0
207.60	32-306-13-CC,0	Lower cretaceous	CARBONACEOUS BLACK SHALE	Minor lithology; relative abundance	0	0	23	0	0	0	23	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	23	55
244.10	32-306-17-CC,0	Neocomian	NANNO OOZE	Dominat lithology; relative abundance	6	6	75	0	0	0	6	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0
253.10	32-306-18-CC,0	Neocomian	NANNO CHALK	Minor lithology; relative abundance	23	0	75	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0
262.60	32-306-19-CC,0	Lower cretaceous	CLAYEY NANNO OOZE	Dominat lithology; relative abundance	0	0	75	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	6	6	23	0	0
272.50	32-306-20-11,100	Lower cretaceous	NANNO OOZE	Dominat lithology; relative abundance	55	0	75	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0
272.55	32-306-20-11,105	Lower cretaceous	CLAYEY NANNO OOZE	Dominat lithology; relative abundance	39	6	75	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	6	0	0
274.60	32-306-20-CC,0	Lower cretaceous	CLAYEY NANNO OOZE	Dominat lithology; relative abundance	55	6	55	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	2	0	0
281.62	32-306-21-1,62	Lower cretaceous	NANNO CHALK	Dominat lithology; relative abundance	6	0	75	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	6	6	0	0
282.44	32-306-21-11,144	Lower cretaceous	NANNO CHALK	Dominat lithology; relative abundance	6	6	75	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	6	23	0	0
282.60	32-306-21-CC,0	Lower cretaceous	RAD NANNO CHALK	Dominat lithology; relative abundance	0	6	75	6	0	0	23	0	0	0	0	6	2	2	0	0
282.60	32-306-21-CC,0	Lower cretaceous	RAD NANNO CHALK	Dominat lithology; relative abundance	0	6	75	6	0	0	23	0	0	0	0	6	2	2	0	0
300.10	32-306-23-CC,0	Neocomian	CLAYEY NANNO CHALK	Dominat lithology; relative abundance	15	6	75	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	15	6	0	6	0
310.03	32-306-24-11,103	Lower cretaceous	NANNO CHALK	Dominat lithology; relative abundance	23	0	75	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	6	0	6	0
310.60	32-306-24-CC,0	Lower cretaceous	NANNO CHALK	Dominat lithology; relative abundance	23	6	75	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	6	0	0	0
318.60	32-306-25-CC,0	Lower cretaceous	NANNO CHALK	Dominat lithology; relative abundance	6	0	75	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	6	6	0	0	0
327.60	32-306-26-CC,0	Lower cretaceous	NANNO CHALK	Dominat lithology; relative abundance	23	6	75	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0
355.60	32-306-29-CC,0	Lower cretaceous	CLAYEY NANNO CHALK	Dominat lithology; relative abundance	0	6	75	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	6	6	0	0	0
411.60	32-306-36-CC,0	Neocomian	NANNO CHALK	Dominat lithology; relative abundance	23	0	75	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	6	0	0	0
421.10	32-306-37-CC,0	Neocomian	NANNO CHALK	Dominat lithology; relative abundance	6	0	75	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	6	0	0	0
430.60	32-306-38-CC,0	Neocomian	NANNO CHALK	Dominat lithology; relative abundance	23	0	75	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	6	0	6	0
451.10	32-306-40-CC,0	Neocomian	CLAYEY NANNO CHALK	Dominat lithology; relative abundance	0	6	75	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	6	6	0	0	0
459.71	32-306-41-1,71	Berriasian	DOLOMITIC CELADONITIC NANNO CHALK	Dominat lithology; numerical abundance	0	33	33	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	33	0	0	0	0	0
460.60	32-306-41-CC,0	Berriasian	SILICEOUS NANNO RAD CHALK	Dominat lithology; numerical abundance	4	0	29	0	0	16	39	0	0	0	4	4	0	0	4	0
468.62	32-306-42-11,112	Lower berriasian	SILICEOUS RAD NANNO CHALK	Dominat lithology; numerical abundance	15	0	36	0	0	0	36	0	0	0	4	0	4	0	4	0