Citation:

PANGAEA.230611

Always quote citation above when using data! You can download the citation in several formats below.

RIS Citation BibTeX Citation Text Citation Facebook TwitterShow Map Google Earth

Related to:

DSDP (1989): Data from the Deep Sea Drilling Project. Sediment, hard rock and reference files. National Geophysical Data Center, National Environmental Satellite, Data and Information Service, National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration, U.S. Department of Commerce, 1, CD-ROM

Larson, Roger L; Moberly, Ralph; Bukry, David; Foreman, H P; Gardner, James V; Keene, John B; Lancelot, Yves; Luterbacher, Hanspeter; Marshall, M C; Matter, A (1975): Initial Reports of the Deep Sea Drilling Project. U. S. Government Printing Office, XXXII, 980 pp, https://doi.org/10.2973/dsdp.proc.32.1975

Further details:

Processed smear slide data base - background and methods

Project(s):

Deep Sea Drilling Project (DSDP)

Coverage:

Latitude: 40.808300 * Longitude: 154.451200

Date/Time Start: 1973-08-18T00:00:00 * Date/Time End: 1973-08-18T00:00:00

Minimum DEPTH, sediment/rock: 1.60 m * Maximum DEPTH, sediment/rock: 211.10 m

Event(s):

32-303 * Latitude: 40.808300 * Longitude: 154.451200 * Date/Time: 1973-08-18T00:00:00 * Elevation: -5609.0 m * Penetration: 229 m * Recovery: 25.9 m * Location: North Pacific/BASIN * Campaign: * Basis: Glomar Challenger * Method/Device: Drilling/drill rig (DRILL) * Comment: 5 cores; 45 m cored; 9 m drilled; 57.6 % recovery

Parameter(s):

#	Name	Short Name	Unit	Method/Device	Comment
1	DEPTH, sediment/rock	Depth sed	m		Geocode
2	Sample code/label	Sample label		DSDP/ODP/IODP sample designation
3	Sand	Sand	%	Smear slide analysis
4	Silt	Silt	%	Smear slide analysis
5	Size fraction < 0.002 mm, clay	<2 µm	%	Smear slide analysis
6	Stratigraphy	Stratigraphy		Smear slide analysis
7	Lithology/composition/facies	Lithology		Smear slide analysis
8	Comment	Comment		Smear slide analysis
9	Nannofossils	Nannos	%	Smear slide analysis
10	Radiolarians	Rad	%	Smear slide analysis
11	Diatoms	Diatoms	%	Smear slide analysis
12	Silicoflagellates	Silicoflag	%	Smear slide analysis
13	Spiculae	Spiculae	%	Smear slide analysis
14	Quartz	Qz	%	Smear slide analysis
15	Feldspar	Fsp	%	Smear slide analysis
16	Zeolite	Zeo	%	Smear slide analysis
17	Clay minerals	Clay min	%	Smear slide analysis
18	Iron	Fe	%	Smear slide analysis
19	Heavy minerals	HM	%	Smear slide analysis
20	Pyroxene	Pyrox	%	Smear slide analysis
21	Volcanic glass	Volc glass	%	Smear slide analysis
22	Palagonite	Palagonite	%	Smear slide analysis
23	Micronodules	Micronod	%	Smear slide analysis

License:

Creative Commons Attribution 3.0 Unported (CC-BY-3.0)

Size:

437 data points

Data

Download dataset as tab-delimited text — use the following character encoding:

1 Depth sed [m]	2 Sample label	3 Sand [%]	4 Silt [%]	5 <2 µm [%]	6 Stratigraphy	7 Lithology	8 Comment	9 Nannos [%]	10 Rad [%]	11 Diatoms [%]	12 Silicoflag [%]	13 Spiculae [%]	14 Qz [%]	15 Fsp [%]	16 Zeo [%]	17 Clay min [%]	18 Fe [%]	19 HM [%]	20 Pyrox [%]	21 Volc glass [%]	22 Palagonite [%]	23 Micronod [%]
1.60	32-303-1-CC,0	35	60	60	Upper pleistocene	DIATOM VOLCANIC ASH	Dominat lithology; numerical abundance	0	12	28	3	0	3	3	0	0	3	0	0	41	3	3
62.58	32-303-2-1,58	35	60	60	Lower pliocene	RADIOLARIAN DIATOM OOZE	Minor lithology; numerical abundance	0	35	35	15	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	15	0	0
62.66	32-303-2-1,66	35	60	60	Lower pliocene	DIATOM RADIOLARIAN OOZE	Minor lithology; numerical abundance	0	35	35	15	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	15	0	0
62.88	32-303-2-1,88	35	60	60	Lower pliocene	DIATOM RADIOLARIAN OOZE	Dominat lithology; numerical abundance	0	33	33	14	0	0	0	0	0	3	0	0	17	0	0
62.98	32-303-2-1,98	10	60	60	Lower pliocene	RADIOLARIAN DIATOM OOZE	Minor lithology; numerical abundance	0	31	31	13	0	0	0	0	13	0	0	0	13	0	0
64.60	32-303-2-21,110	35	60	60	Lower pliocene	DIATOM RADIOLARIAN OOZE	Dominat lithology; numerical abundance	0	35	35	15	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	15	0	0
64.97	32-303-2-21,147	35	60	60	Lower pliocene	DIATOM RADIOLARIAN OOZE	Dominat lithology; numerical abundance	0	35	35	15	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	15	0	0
67.17	32-303-2-4,67	60	60	10	Lower pliocene	VOLCANIC ASH	Minor lithology; relative abundance	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	6	0	81	0	0
71.10	32-303-2-CC,0	35	60	60		DIATOM RADIOLARIAN OOZE	Dominat lithology; numerical abundance	3	32	32	13	3	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	13	3	0
118.38	32-303-3-11,138	35	60	60	Upper miocene	CLAYEY DIATOM RADIOLARIAN OOZE	Dominat lithology; numerical abundance	0	29	29	12	0	0	0	0	12	3	0	0	15	0	0
119.97	32-303-3-21,147	35	60	60	Upper miocene	CLAYEY DIATOM RADIOLARIAN OOZE	Dominat lithology; numerical abundance	0	30	30	12	0	0	0	0	12	0	0	0	15	0	0
123.75	32-303-3-5,75	35	85	10	Upper miocene	VOLCANIC ASH	Minor lithology; relative abundance	0	6	6	0	0	0	23	0	0	0	0	6	75	6	0
123.90	32-303-3-5,90	10	60	35	Upper miocene	CLAYEY DIATOM RAD OOZE	Dominat lithology; numerical abundance	0	31	31	13	0	0	0	0	13	0	0	0	13	0	0
126.10	32-303-3-CC,0	10	85	35	Upper miocene	ASH RICH DIATOM RAD OOZE	Dominat lithology; numerical abundance	0	25	25	10	0	3	0	0	10	0	0	0	28	0	0
176.15	32-303-4-2,65	0	60	60	Upper miocene	RAD RICH RED CLAY WITH FERROMANGANESEMICRO NODULES	Minor lithology; numerical abundance	0	38	4	4	0	0	0	0	38	0	0	0	0	0	16
176.30	32-303-4-2,80	10	60	60	Upper miocene	RAD RICH RED CLAY	Dominat lithology; numerical abundance	0	33	14	14	0	0	0	0	33	0	0	0	3	0	3
177.66	32-303-4-3,66	0	60	60	Upper miocene	RAD BEARING RED CLAY	Minor lithology; relative abundance	0	55	23	0	0	0	0	0	55	0	0	0	0	0	6
183.10	32-303-4-CC,0	0	35	85		RAD BEARING RED CLAY	Dominat lithology; numerical abundance	0	15	4	0	0	0	0	4	50	15	0	0	6	4	0
183.10	32-303-4-CC,0	0	35	85		RAD BEARING RED CLAY	Dominat lithology; relative abundance	0	23	0	0	0	0	0	0	75	0	0	0	8	0	0
211.10	32-303-5-CC,0	0	35	60	Cretaceous	SLIGHTLY ZEOLITIC BROWN CLAY	Dominat lithology; numerical abundance	0	0	0	0	0	4	0	15	48	19	0	0	0	0	15