Citation:

PANGAEA.230597

Always quote citation above when using data! You can download the citation in several formats below.

RIS Citation BibTeX Citation Text Citation Facebook TwitterShow Map Google Earth

Related to:

DSDP (1989): Data from the Deep Sea Drilling Project. Sediment, hard rock and reference files. National Geophysical Data Center, National Environmental Satellite, Data and Information Service, National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration, U.S. Department of Commerce, 1, CD-ROM

Ingle, James C; Karig, Daniel E; Bouma, D E; Ellis, C Howard; Haile, N S; Koizumi, I; Moore, J Casey; Ujiie, H; Watanabe, T; White, S M; Yasuii, M; Ling, Hsin Yi (1975): Initial Reports of the Deep Sea Drilling Project. U. S. Government Printing Office, XXXI, 927 pp, https://doi.org/10.2973/dsdp.proc.31.1975

Further details:

Processed smear slide data base - background and methods

Project(s):

Deep Sea Drilling Project (DSDP)

Coverage:

Latitude: 12.807200 * Longitude: 127.830800

Date/Time Start: 1973-06-23T00:00:00 * Date/Time End: 1973-06-23T00:00:00

Minimum DEPTH, sediment/rock: 1.33 m * Maximum DEPTH, sediment/rock: 119.50 m

Event(s):

31-291 * Latitude: 12.807200 * Longitude: 127.830800 * Date/Time: 1973-06-23T00:00:00 * Elevation: -5217.0 m * Penetration: 128 m * Recovery: 10.4 m * Location: North Pacific/Philippine Sea/TRENCH * Campaign: * Basis: Glomar Challenger * Method/Device: Drilling/drill rig (DRILL) * Comment: 6 cores; 42.5 m cored; 0 m drilled; 24.4 % recovery

Parameter(s):

#	Name	Short Name	Unit	Method/Device	Comment
1	DEPTH, sediment/rock	Depth sed	m		Geocode
2	Sample code/label	Sample label		DSDP/ODP/IODP sample designation
3	Sand	Sand	%	Smear slide analysis
4	Silt	Silt	%	Smear slide analysis
5	Size fraction < 0.002 mm, clay	<2 µm	%	Smear slide analysis
6	Stratigraphy	Stratigraphy		Smear slide analysis
7	Lithology/composition/facies	Lithology		Smear slide analysis
8	Comment	Comment		Smear slide analysis
9	Carbonates	Carb	%	Smear slide analysis
10	Nannofossils	Nannos	%	Smear slide analysis
11	Radiolarians	Rad	%	Smear slide analysis
12	Diatoms	Diatoms	%	Smear slide analysis
13	Spiculae	Spiculae	%	Smear slide analysis
14	Feldspar	Fsp	%	Smear slide analysis
15	Zeolite	Zeo	%	Smear slide analysis
16	Clay minerals	Clay min	%	Smear slide analysis
17	Opaque minerals	Opaque	%	Smear slide analysis
18	Iron	Fe	%	Smear slide analysis
19	Heavy minerals	HM	%	Smear slide analysis
20	Amphibole	Amp	%	Smear slide analysis
21	Pyroxene	Pyrox	%	Smear slide analysis
22	Volcanic glass	Volc glass	%	Smear slide analysis
23	Palagonite	Palagonite	%	Smear slide analysis
24	Micronodules	Micronod	%	Smear slide analysis

License:

Creative Commons Attribution 3.0 Unported (CC-BY-3.0)

Size:

436 data points

Data

Download dataset as tab-delimited text — use the following character encoding:

1 Depth sed [m]	2 Sample label	3 Sand [%]	4 Silt [%]	5 <2 µm [%]	6 Stratigraphy	7 Lithology	8 Comment	9 Carb [%]	10 Nannos [%]	11 Rad [%]	12 Diatoms [%]	13 Spiculae [%]	14 Fsp [%]	15 Zeo [%]	16 Clay min [%]	17 Opaque [%]	18 Fe [%]	19 HM [%]	20 Amp [%]	21 Pyrox [%]	22 Volc glass [%]	23 Palagonite [%]	24 Micronod [%]
1.33	31-291-1-11,133	0	10	90	Upper pliocene	SILT RICH ZEOLITE CLAY	Dominat lithology; relative abundance	0	2	2	0	2	8	25	46	0	0	2	0	0	0	0	1
1.60	31-291-1-CC,0	0	10	0	Upper pliocene	SILT FRACTION H2O2 WASH GREATER THAN 63 MICRONS	Dominat lithology; numerical abundance	0	0	1	1	2	10	37	30	0	0	25	9	1	2	10	1
1.60	31-291-1-CC,0	0	100	90	Upper pliocene	SILT RICH ZEOLITE CLAY	Dominat lithology; relative abundance	0	0	0	0	0	15	0	50	0	0	0	0	0	0	10	0
60.55	31-291-2-1,55	1	19	80	Upper oligocene	SILT RICH ZEOLITE CLAY	Dominat lithology; relative abundance	0	0	1	0	2	5	30	48	0	0	10	0	0	2	15	1
61.29	31-291-2-11,129	0	10	90	Upper oligocene	SILTY ZEOLITE CLAY	Dominat lithology; numerical abundance	0	0	0	0	0	3	25	45	0	20	7	0	0	0	0	0
61.42	31-291-2-11,142	0	10	90	Upper oligocene	SILTY ZEOLITE CLAY	Dominat lithology; relative abundance	0	2	0	0	0	2	34	45	0	0	3	0	0	0	15	1
62.20	31-291-2-2,70	0	0	100	Upper oligocene	NANNO OOZE	Dominat lithology; numerical abundance	0	88	0	0	0	0	1	10	0	1	0	0	0	0	0	0
63.10	31-291-2-CC,0	0	0	0	Upper oligocene	CLAYEY NANNO OOZE	Dominat lithology; relative abundance	0	65	0	0	0	0	2	35	0	0	2	0	0	2	0	0
80.03	31-291-3-11,103	0	0	100	Upper eocene	CLAYEY NANNO OOZE	Dominat lithology; numerical abundance	0	80	0	0	0	0	0	20	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0
80.25	31-291-3-11,125	0	0	100	Upper eocene	RAD CLAY RICH NANNO OOZE	Dominat lithology; relative abundance	20	38	20	0	1	0	0	20	1	0	0	0	0	2	0	0
80.37	31-291-3-11,137	0	5	95	Upper eocene	CLAYEY RAD OOZE	Dominat lithology; numerical abundance	0	0	45	0	10	0	0	40	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0
80.60	31-291-3-CC,0	0	15	85	Upper eocene	NANNO RICH RADIOLARIAN CLAY	Dominat lithology; relative abundance	0	13	35	0	0	0	3	46	0	0	2	0	0	0	0	0
98.65	31-291-4-1,65	0	0	100	Upper eocene	CLAY RAD RICH NANNO OOZE	Dominat lithology; numerical abundance	0	58	20	0	21	0	0	20	0	5	0	0	0	0	0	0
100.30	31-291-4-2,80	0	0	100	Upper eocene	NANNO RAD RICH CLAY	Dominat lithology; relative abundance	0	10	15	0	1	0	2	75	1	0	0	0	0	0	0	0
101.65	31-291-4-3,65	0	0	100	Upper eocene	RAD BEARING CLAY	Dominat lithology; relative abundance	0	5	9	0	0	0	5	70	0	3	0	0	0	2	0	2
103.41	31-291-4-4,91	0	5	95	Upper eocene	FE OXIDE ZEOLITE RICH CLAY	Dominat lithology; relative abundance	0	2	2	0	0	1	15	50	0	25	0	0	0	0	0	0
104.10	31-291-4-CC,0	0	10	90	Upper eocene	ZEOLITE RICH CLAY	Dominat lithology; relative abundance	0	2	5	0	0	0	15	80	0	5	0	0	0	0	0	0
118.15	31-291-5-11,115	0	5	95	Eocene	CLAY	Dominat lithology; numerical abundance	0	0	0	0	0	1	5	87	0	5	1	0	0	0	0	1
119.50	31-291-5-21,100	0	40	60	Eocene		Dominat lithology; relative abundance	0	15	0	0	0	4	3	5	0	25	12	0	0	2	0	0