Ingle, James C; Karig, Daniel E (2005): Smear slide analysis of Hole 31-291 [dataset]. PANGAEA, https://doi.org/10.1594/PANGAEA.230597
Always quote citation above when using data! You can download the citation in several formats below.
Related to:
DSDP (1989): Data from the Deep Sea Drilling Project. Sediment, hard rock and reference files. National Geophysical Data Center, National Environmental Satellite, Data and Information Service, National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration, U.S. Department of Commerce, 1, CD-ROM
Ingle, James C; Karig, Daniel E; Bouma, D E; Ellis, C Howard; Haile, N S; Koizumi, I; Moore, J Casey; Ujiie, H; Watanabe, T; White, S M; Yasuii, M; Ling, Hsin Yi (1975): Initial Reports of the Deep Sea Drilling Project. U. S. Government Printing Office, XXXI, 927 pp, https://doi.org/10.2973/dsdp.proc.31.1975
Further details:
Project(s):
Deep Sea Drilling Project (DSDP)
Coverage:
Latitude: 12.807200 * Longitude: 127.830800
Date/Time Start: 1973-06-23T00:00:00 * Date/Time End: 1973-06-23T00:00:00
Minimum DEPTH, sediment/rock: 1.33 m * Maximum DEPTH, sediment/rock: 119.50 m
Event(s):
31-291 * Latitude: 12.807200 * Longitude: 127.830800 * Date/Time: 1973-06-23T00:00:00 * Elevation: -5217.0 m * Penetration: 128 m * Recovery: 10.4 m * Location: North Pacific/Philippine Sea/TRENCH * Campaign: Leg31 * Basis: Glomar Challenger * Method/Device: Drilling/drill rig (DRILL) * Comment: 6 cores; 42.5 m cored; 0 m drilled; 24.4 % recovery
Parameter(s):
# | Name | Short Name | Unit | Principal Investigator | Method/Device | Comment |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
1 | DEPTH, sediment/rock | Depth sed | m | Geocode | ||
2 | Sample code/label | Sample label | DSDP/ODP/IODP sample designation | |||
3 | Sand | Sand | % | Smear slide analysis | ||
4 | Silt | Silt | % | Smear slide analysis | ||
5 | Size fraction < 0.002 mm, clay | <2 µm | % | Smear slide analysis | ||
6 | Stratigraphy | Stratigraphy | Smear slide analysis | |||
7 | Lithology/composition/facies | Lithology | Smear slide analysis | |||
8 | Comment | Comment | Smear slide analysis | |||
9 | Carbonates | Carb | % | Smear slide analysis | ||
10 | Nannofossils | Nannos | % | Smear slide analysis | ||
11 | Radiolarians | Rad | % | Smear slide analysis | ||
12 | Diatoms | Diatoms | % | Smear slide analysis | ||
13 | Spiculae | Spiculae | % | Smear slide analysis | ||
14 | Feldspar | Fsp | % | Smear slide analysis | ||
15 | Zeolite | Zeo | % | Smear slide analysis | ||
16 | Clay minerals | Clay min | % | Smear slide analysis | ||
17 | Opaque minerals | Opaque | % | Smear slide analysis | ||
18 | Iron | Fe | % | Smear slide analysis | ||
19 | Heavy minerals | HM | % | Smear slide analysis | ||
20 | Amphibole | Amp | % | Smear slide analysis | ||
21 | Pyroxene | Pyrox | % | Smear slide analysis | ||
22 | Volcanic glass | Volc glass | % | Smear slide analysis | ||
23 | Palagonite | Palagonite | % | Smear slide analysis | ||
24 | Micronodules | Micronod | % | Smear slide analysis |
License:
Creative Commons Attribution 3.0 Unported (CC-BY-3.0)
Size:
436 data points
Data
1 Depth sed [m] | 2 Sample label | 3 Sand [%] | 4 Silt [%] | 5 <2 µm [%] | 6 Stratigraphy | 7 Lithology | 8 Comment | 9 Carb [%] | 10 Nannos [%] | 11 Rad [%] | 12 Diatoms [%] | 13 Spiculae [%] | 14 Fsp [%] | 15 Zeo [%] | 16 Clay min [%] | 17 Opaque [%] | 18 Fe [%] | 19 HM [%] | 20 Amp [%] | 21 Pyrox [%] | 22 Volc glass [%] | 23 Palagonite [%] | 24 Micronod [%] |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
1.33 | 31-291-1-11,133 | 0 | 10 | 90 | Upper pliocene | SILT RICH ZEOLITE CLAY | Dominat lithology; relative abundance | 0 | 2 | 2 | 0 | 2 | 8 | 25 | 46 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 |
1.60 | 31-291-1-CC,0 | 0 | 10 | 0 | Upper pliocene | SILT FRACTION H2O2 WASH GREATER THAN 63 MICRONS | Dominat lithology; numerical abundance | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 2 | 10 | 37 | 30 | 0 | 0 | 25 | 9 | 1 | 2 | 10 | 1 |
1.60 | 31-291-1-CC,0 | 0 | 100 | 90 | Upper pliocene | SILT RICH ZEOLITE CLAY | Dominat lithology; relative abundance | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 15 | 0 | 50 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 10 | 0 |
60.55 | 31-291-2-1,55 | 1 | 19 | 80 | Upper oligocene | SILT RICH ZEOLITE CLAY | Dominat lithology; relative abundance | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 2 | 5 | 30 | 48 | 0 | 0 | 10 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 15 | 1 |
61.29 | 31-291-2-11,129 | 0 | 10 | 90 | Upper oligocene | SILTY ZEOLITE CLAY | Dominat lithology; numerical abundance | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 3 | 25 | 45 | 0 | 20 | 7 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
61.42 | 31-291-2-11,142 | 0 | 10 | 90 | Upper oligocene | SILTY ZEOLITE CLAY | Dominat lithology; relative abundance | 0 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 34 | 45 | 0 | 0 | 3 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 15 | 1 |
62.20 | 31-291-2-2,70 | 0 | 0 | 100 | Upper oligocene | NANNO OOZE | Dominat lithology; numerical abundance | 0 | 88 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 10 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
63.10 | 31-291-2-CC,0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | Upper oligocene | CLAYEY NANNO OOZE | Dominat lithology; relative abundance | 0 | 65 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 35 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 0 | 0 |
80.03 | 31-291-3-11,103 | 0 | 0 | 100 | Upper eocene | CLAYEY NANNO OOZE | Dominat lithology; numerical abundance | 0 | 80 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 20 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
80.25 | 31-291-3-11,125 | 0 | 0 | 100 | Upper eocene | RAD CLAY RICH NANNO OOZE | Dominat lithology; relative abundance | 20 | 38 | 20 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 20 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 0 | 0 |
80.37 | 31-291-3-11,137 | 0 | 5 | 95 | Upper eocene | CLAYEY RAD OOZE | Dominat lithology; numerical abundance | 0 | 0 | 45 | 0 | 10 | 0 | 0 | 40 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
80.60 | 31-291-3-CC,0 | 0 | 15 | 85 | Upper eocene | NANNO RICH RADIOLARIAN CLAY | Dominat lithology; relative abundance | 0 | 13 | 35 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 3 | 46 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
98.65 | 31-291-4-1,65 | 0 | 0 | 100 | Upper eocene | CLAY RAD RICH NANNO OOZE | Dominat lithology; numerical abundance | 0 | 58 | 20 | 0 | 21 | 0 | 0 | 20 | 0 | 5 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
100.30 | 31-291-4-2,80 | 0 | 0 | 100 | Upper eocene | NANNO RAD RICH CLAY | Dominat lithology; relative abundance | 0 | 10 | 15 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 2 | 75 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
101.65 | 31-291-4-3,65 | 0 | 0 | 100 | Upper eocene | RAD BEARING CLAY | Dominat lithology; relative abundance | 0 | 5 | 9 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 5 | 70 | 0 | 3 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 0 | 2 |
103.41 | 31-291-4-4,91 | 0 | 5 | 95 | Upper eocene | FE OXIDE ZEOLITE RICH CLAY | Dominat lithology; relative abundance | 0 | 2 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 15 | 50 | 0 | 25 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
104.10 | 31-291-4-CC,0 | 0 | 10 | 90 | Upper eocene | ZEOLITE RICH CLAY | Dominat lithology; relative abundance | 0 | 2 | 5 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 15 | 80 | 0 | 5 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
118.15 | 31-291-5-11,115 | 0 | 5 | 95 | Eocene | CLAY | Dominat lithology; numerical abundance | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 5 | 87 | 0 | 5 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 |
119.50 | 31-291-5-21,100 | 0 | 40 | 60 | Eocene | Dominat lithology; relative abundance | 0 | 15 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 4 | 3 | 5 | 0 | 25 | 12 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 0 | 0 |