Maxwell, Arthur E; von Herzen, Richard P (2005): Smear slide analysis of Hole 3-19 [dataset]. PANGAEA, https://doi.org/10.1594/PANGAEA.230578
Always quote citation above when using data! You can download the citation in several formats below.
Related to:
DSDP (1989): Data from the Deep Sea Drilling Project. Sediment, hard rock and reference files. National Geophysical Data Center, National Environmental Satellite, Data and Information Service, National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration, U.S. Department of Commerce, 1, CD-ROM
Maxwell, Arthur E; Milow, E Dean; Andrews, James E; Hsü, Kenneth J; Von Herzon, Richard P; Boyce, Robert E; Percival, Stephen F Jr; Saito, Tsunemasa (1970): Initial Reports of the Deep Sea Drilling Project. Initial Reports of the Deep Sea Drilling Project, U.S. Government Printing Office, III, 806 pp, https://doi.org/10.2973/dsdp.proc.3.1970
Further details:
Project(s):
Deep Sea Drilling Project (DSDP)
Coverage:
Latitude: -28.534700 * Longitude: -23.677200
Date/Time Start: 1969-01-07T00:00:00 * Date/Time End: 1969-01-07T00:00:00
Minimum DEPTH, sediment/rock: 0.25 m * Maximum DEPTH, sediment/rock: 139.10 m
Event(s):
3-19 * Latitude: -28.534700 * Longitude: -23.677200 * Date/Time: 1969-01-07T00:00:00 * Elevation: -4677.0 m * Penetration: 145.2 m * Recovery: 96.5 m * Location: South Atlantic/RIDGE * Campaign: Leg3 * Basis: Glomar Challenger * Method/Device: Drilling/drill rig (DRILL) * Comment: 12 cores; 103.8 m cored; 0 m drilled; 93 % recovery
Parameter(s):
# | Name | Short Name | Unit | Principal Investigator | Method/Device | Comment |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
1 | DEPTH, sediment/rock | Depth sed | m | Geocode | ||
2 | Sample code/label | Sample label | DSDP/ODP/IODP sample designation | |||
3 | Sand | Sand | % | Smear slide analysis | ||
4 | Silt | Silt | % | Smear slide analysis | ||
5 | Size fraction < 0.002 mm, clay | <2 µm | % | Smear slide analysis | ||
6 | Stratigraphy | Stratigraphy | Smear slide analysis | |||
7 | Lithology/composition/facies | Lithology | Smear slide analysis | |||
8 | Comment | Comment | Smear slide analysis | |||
9 | Nannofossils | Nannos | % | Smear slide analysis | ||
10 | Foraminifera | Foram | % | Smear slide analysis | ||
11 | Radiolarians | Rad | % | Smear slide analysis | ||
12 | Minerals, other | Min other | % | Smear slide analysis | ||
13 | Zeolite | Zeo | % | Smear slide analysis | ||
14 | Clay minerals | Clay min | % | Smear slide analysis | ||
15 | Iron | Fe | % | Smear slide analysis | ||
16 | Manganese | Mn | % | Smear slide analysis |
License:
Creative Commons Attribution 3.0 Unported (CC-BY-3.0)
Size:
1124 data points
Data
1 Depth sed [m] | 2 Sample label | 3 Sand [%] | 4 Silt [%] | 5 <2 µm [%] | 6 Stratigraphy | 7 Lithology | 8 Comment | 9 Nannos [%] | 10 Foram [%] | 11 Rad [%] | 12 Min other [%] | 13 Zeo [%] | 14 Clay min [%] | 15 Fe [%] | 16 Mn [%] |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
0.25 | 3-19-1-1,25 | 0 | 55 | 45 | Pleistocene | ZEOLITIC NANNOFOSSIL RED CLAY | Dominat lithology; numerical abundance | 15 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 40 | 30 | 13 | 0 |
1.00 | 3-19-1-11,100 | 0 | 55 | 45 | Pleistocene | ZEOLITIC SILTY CLAY | Dominat lithology; relative abundance | 0 | 0 | 2 | 2 | 30 | 45 | 23 | 0 |
1.90 | 3-19-1-2,40 | 0 | 60 | 40 | Neogene | ZEOLITIC RED CLAY | Dominat lithology; numerical abundance | 0 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 38 | 40 | 20 | 0 |
2.25 | 3-19-1-2,75 | 0 | 40 | 60 | Neogene | ZEOLITIC RED CLAY | Dominat lithology; relative abundance | 0 | 0 | 2 | 2 | 40 | 40 | 18 | 0 |
3.00 | 3-19-1-3,0 | 0 | 25 | 75 | Neogene | RED CLAY | Dominat lithology; numerical abundance | 0 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 30 | 50 | 18 | 0 |
4.50 | 3-19-1-4,0 | 0 | 65 | 35 | Neogene | ZEOLITIC RED CLAY | Dominat lithology; numerical abundance | 0 | 0 | 0 | 5 | 15 | 50 | 30 | 0 |
6.75 | 3-19-1-5,75 | 0 | 20 | 70 | Neogene | ZEOLITE RED CLAY | Dominat lithology; numerical abundance | 0 | 0 | 0 | 5 | 15 | 50 | 30 | 0 |
9.10 | 3-19-1-CC,0 | 0 | 13 | 87 | Neogene | ZEOLITIC RED CLAY | Dominat lithology; relative abundance | 1 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 50 | 25 | 0 | 0 |
9.85 | 3-19-2-1,75 | 0 | 20 | 80 | Neogene | ZEOLITIC RED CLAY | Dominat lithology; numerical abundance | 0 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 10 | 73 | 15 | 0 |
11.35 | 3-19-2-2,75 | 0 | 15 | 85 | Neogene | ZEOLITIC RED CLAY | Dominat lithology; relative abundance | 0 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 5 | 75 | 0 | 1 |
13.60 | 3-19-2-31,150 | 0 | 0 | 100 | Neogene | RED CLAY | Dominat lithology; numerical abundance | 0 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 10 | 68 | 10 | 0 |
13.60 | 3-19-2-31,150 | 0 | 0 | 100 | Neogene | RED CLAY ZEOLITIC | Dominat lithology; numerical abundance | 0 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 8 | 80 | 20 | 0 |
16.60 | 3-19-2-51,150 | 0 | 0 | 100 | Neogene | RED CLAY | Dominat lithology; numerical abundance | 0 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 40 | 50 | 10 | 0 |
16.60 | 3-19-2-51,150 | 0 | 0 | 100 | Neogene | ZOELITIC RED CLAY | Dominat lithology; numerical abundance | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 5 | 83 | 20 | 0 |
18.20 | 3-19-2-CC,0 | 0 | 15 | 85 | ZEOLITIC RED CLAY | Dominat lithology; numerical abundance | 0 | 0 | 0 | 5 | 45 | 40 | 0 | 0 | |
36.60 | 3-19-3-1,0 | 0 | 10 | 90 | Upper oligocene | NANNO CHALK OOZE | Dominat lithology; relative abundance | 90 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 4 | 2 | 5 | 0 |
38.10 | 3-19-3-2,0 | 0 | 6 | 94 | Upper oligocene | NANNO CHALK OOZE | Dominat lithology; relative abundance | 85 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 1 | 9 | 5 | 0 |
40.65 | 3-19-3-31,105 | 0 | 5 | 95 | Upper oligocene | NANNO CHALK OOZE | Dominat lithology; numerical abundance | 91 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 2 | 2 | 1 | 0 |
40.95 | 3-19-3-31,135 | 0 | 21 | 79 | Upper oligocene | NANNO CHALK OOZE MARLY | Dominat lithology; numerical abundance | 77 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 5 | 2 | 15 | 0 |
42.40 | 3-19-3-41,130 | 0 | 5 | 95 | Upper oligocene | NANNO CHALK OOZE | Dominat lithology; relative abundance | 93 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 2 | 2 | 3 | 0 |
43.35 | 3-19-3-5,75 | 0 | 10 | 90 | Upper oligocene | NANNO CHALK OOZE | Dominat lithology; relative abundance | 90 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 5 | 2 | 5 | 0 |
44.10 | 3-19-3-6,0 | 0 | 5 | 95 | Upper oligocene | NANNO CHALK OOZE SOMEWHAT MARLY | Dominat lithology; relative abundance | 90 | 2 | 0 | 2 | 0 | 5 | 5 | 0 |
45.10 | 3-19-3-61,100 | 0 | 2 | 95 | Upper oligocene | NANNO CHALK OOZE | Dominat lithology; relative abundance | 95 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 0 | 3 | 2 | 0 |
45.50 | 3-19-3-61,140 | 0 | 0 | 0 | Upper oligocene | NANNO CHALK OOZE | Dominat lithology; numerical abundance | 100 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
56.70 | 3-19-4-1,0 | 0 | 1 | 99 | Upper oligocene | NANNO CHALK OOZE | Dominat lithology; relative abundance | 98 | 2 | 0 | 2 | 0 | 2 | 1 | 0 |
58.20 | 3-19-4-2,0 | 0 | 1 | 99 | Upper oligocene | NANNO CHALK OOZE | Dominat lithology; relative abundance | 100 | 2 | 0 | 2 | 0 | 2 | 2 | 0 |
59.70 | 3-19-4-3,0 | 0 | 0 | 100 | Upper oligocene | NANNO CHALK OOZE | Dominat lithology; numerical abundance | 100 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
61.20 | 3-19-4-4,0 | 0 | 0 | 100 | Upper oligocene | NANNO CHALK OOZE | Dominat lithology; numerical abundance | 100 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 |
62.70 | 3-19-4-5,0 | 0 | 0 | 100 | Upper oligocene | NANNO CHALK OOZE | Dominat lithology; relative abundance | 100 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 0 | 0 |
64.20 | 3-19-4-6,0 | 0 | 0 | 100 | Lower oligocene | NANNO CHALK OOZE | Dominat lithology; relative abundance | 100 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 0 | 2 | 0 | 0 |
75.60 | 3-19-5-1,0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | Lower oligocene | PURE NANNO CHALK OOZE | Dominat lithology; relative abundance | 100 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 0 |
77.85 | 3-19-5-2,75 | 0 | 0 | 100 | Lower oligocene | NANNO CHALK OOZE | Dominat lithology; numerical abundance | 98 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 0 |
79.35 | 3-19-5-3,75 | 0 | 0 | 100 | Upper eocene | NANNO CHALK OOZE | Dominat lithology; numerical abundance | 92 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 5 | 1 | 0 |
79.90 | 3-19-5-31,130 | 0 | 0 | 100 | Upper eocene | NANNO CHALK OOZE | Dominat lithology; relative abundance | 100 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
80.85 | 3-19-5-4,75 | 0 | 0 | 100 | Upper eocene | NANNO CHALK OOZE | Dominat lithology; numerical abundance | 100 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
82.35 | 3-19-5-5,75 | 0 | 0 | 100 | Upper eocene | NANNO CHALK OOZE | Dominat lithology; numerical abundance | 100 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 |
83.85 | 3-19-5-6,75 | 0 | 0 | 100 | Upper eocene | NANNO CHALK OOZE | Dominat lithology; numerical abundance | 100 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
86.00 | 3-19-6-1,0 | 0 | 0 | 100 | Upper eocene | NANNO CHALK OOZE | Dominat lithology; relative abundance | 100 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 0 | 0 |
87.50 | 3-19-6-2,0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | Upper eocene | PURE NANNO CHALK OOZE | Dominat lithology; relative abundance | 2 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 0 | 0 |
89.00 | 3-19-6-3,0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | Upper eocene | NANNO CHALK OOZE | Dominat lithology; relative abundance | 98 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 0 |
90.50 | 3-19-6-4,0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | Upper eocene | NANNO CHALK OOZE | Dominat lithology; relative abundance | 97 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 2 | 0 |
92.00 | 3-19-6-5,0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | Upper eocene | NANNO CHALK OOZE | Dominat lithology; relative abundance | 100 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 0 |
93.50 | 3-19-6-6,0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | Upper eocene | NANNO CHALK OOZE | Dominat lithology; numerical abundance | 98 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 0 |
95.85 | 3-19-7-1,75 | 1 | 1 | 2 | Upper eocene | NANNO CHALK OOZE | Dominat lithology; relative abundance | 97 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0 |
97.35 | 3-19-7-2,75 | 0 | 0 | 100 | Middle eocene | NANNO CHALK OOZE | Dominat lithology; relative abundance | 100 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 0 |
98.85 | 3-19-7-3,75 | 0 | 0 | 1 | Middle eocene | NANNO CHALK OOZE | Dominat lithology; numerical abundance | 98 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0 |
99.64 | 3-19-7-4,4 | 0 | 8 | 0 | Middle eocene | NANNO CHALK OOZE SLIGHTLY MARLY | Dominat lithology; numerical abundance | 90 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 8 | 0 |
100.35 | 3-19-7-4,75 | 0 | 1 | 1 | Middle eocene | NANNO CHALK OOZE | Dominat lithology; relative abundance | 100 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 1 | 0 |
101.70 | 3-19-7-5,60 | 0 | 0 | 0 | Middle eocene | NANNO CHALK OOZE | Dominat lithology; numerical abundance | 95 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 3 | 0 |
103.10 | 3-19-7-6,50 | 0 | 1 | 99 | Middle eocene | NANNO CHALK OOZE | Dominat lithology; relative abundance | 95 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 5 | 0 |
103.22 | 3-19-7-6,62 | 0 | 5 | 5 | Middle eocene | NANNO CHALK OOZE WITH FORAMS | Dominat lithology; numerical abundance | 92 | 3 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 5 | 0 |
104.30 | 3-19-8-1,0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | Middle eocene | NANNO CHALK OOZE | Dominat lithology; numerical abundance | 98 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 0 |
106.44 | 3-19-8-2,64 | 0 | 0 | 100 | Middle eocene | MARLY NANNO CHALK OOZE | Dominat lithology; numerical abundance | 85 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 5 | 10 | 0 |
107.30 | 3-19-8-3,0 | 0 | 0 | 2 | Middle eocene | NANNO CHALK OOZE | Dominat lithology; relative abundance | 98 | 0 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 2 | 0 |
108.80 | 3-19-8-4,0 | 0 | 0 | 100 | Middle eocene | NANNO CHALK OOZE | Dominat lithology; numerical abundance | 98 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 0 |
110.30 | 3-19-8-5,0 | 0 | 7 | 93 | Middle eocene | NANNO CHALK OOZE MARLY | Dominat lithology; numerical abundance | 90 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 3 | 7 | 0 |
111.80 | 3-19-8-6,0 | 0 | 1 | 99 | Middle eocene | NANNO CHALK OOZE | Dominat lithology; numerical abundance | 92 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 3 | 4 | 0 |
113.40 | 3-19-9-1,0 | 1 | 0 | 99 | Middle eocene | NANNO CHALK OOZE | Dominat lithology; relative abundance | 100 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 2 | 0 |
114.90 | 3-19-9-2,0 | 0 | 1 | 5 | Middle eocene | NANNO CHALK OOZE | Dominat lithology; relative abundance | 95 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 3 | 0 |
116.40 | 3-19-9-3,0 | 1 | 0 | 5 | Middle eocene | NANNO CHALK OOZE | Dominat lithology; numerical abundance | 95 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 2 | 3 | 0 |
117.90 | 3-19-9-4,0 | 0 | 8 | 2 | Middle eocene | NANNO CHALK OOZE | Dominat lithology; relative abundance | 98 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 0 | 0 |
119.40 | 3-19-9-5,0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | Middle eocene | NANNO CHALK OOZE | Dominat lithology; relative abundance | 92 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 8 | 0 |
122.40 | 3-19-9-61,150 | 0 | 50 | 50 | Middle eocene | FORAM-NANNO OOZE | Dominat lithology; numerical abundance | 48 | 50 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 0 |
122.50 | 3-19-9-CC,0 | 2 | 5 | 93 | Middle eocene | NANNO CHALK OOZE | Dominat lithology; numerical abundance | 88 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 5 | 5 | 0 |
123.80 | 3-19-10-1,0 | 0 | 0 | 100 | Middle eocene | NANNO CHALK OOZE | Dominat lithology; numerical abundance | 90 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 4 | 6 | 0 |
125.30 | 3-19-10-2,0 | 5 | 0 | 95 | Middle eocene | FORAM NANNO CHALK OOZE | Dominat lithology; relative abundance | 92 | 5 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 3 | 0 |
126.80 | 3-19-10-3,0 | 0 | 1 | 99 | Middle eocene | NANNO CHALK OOZE | Dominat lithology; relative abundance | 93 | 1 | 0 | 2 | 0 | 1 | 5 | 0 |
129.80 | 3-19-10-5,0 | 0 | 0 | 100 | Middle eocene | NANNO CHALK OOZE | Dominat lithology; numerical abundance | 92 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 8 | 0 |
131.30 | 3-19-10-6,0 | 0 | 2 | 98 | Middle eocene | NANNO CHALK OOZE | Dominat lithology; numerical abundance | 93 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 5 | 0 |
132.90 | 3-19-10-CC,0 | 0 | 4 | 96 | Middle eocene | NANNO CHALK OOZE | Dominat lithology; numerical abundance | 92 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 6 | 3 | 0 |
133.00 | 3-19-11-1,0 | 0 | 1 | 99 | Middle eocene | NANNO CHALK OOZE | Dominat lithology; numerical abundance | 97 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 0 | 0 |
134.50 | 3-19-11-2,0 | 0 | 10 | 90 | Middle eocene | NANNO CHALK OOZE | Dominat lithology; numerical abundance | 90 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 10 | 0 |
136.00 | 3-19-11-3,0 | 1 | 1 | 98 | Middle eocene | NANNO CHALK OOZE | Dominat lithology; numerical abundance | 85 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 5 | 8 | 0 |
137.50 | 3-19-11-4,0 | 0 | 2 | 98 | Middle eocene | NANNO CHALK OOZE | Dominat lithology; relative abundance | 93 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 5 | 0 |
139.10 | 3-19-11-CC,0 | 0 | 5 | 95 | Middle eocene | NANNO CHALK OOZE | Dominat lithology; numerical abundance | 94 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 3 | 3 | 0 |