/* DATA DESCRIPTION: Citation: Maxwell, Arthur E; von Herzen, Richard P (2005): Smear slide analysis of Hole 3-14. PANGAEA, https://doi.org/10.1594/PANGAEA.230571 Related to: DSDP (1989): Data from the Deep Sea Drilling Project. Sediment, hard rock and reference files. National Geophysical Data Center, National Environmental Satellite, Data and Information Service, National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration, U.S. Department of Commerce, 1, CD-ROM Maxwell, Arthur E; Milow, E Dean; Andrews, James E; Hsü, Kenneth J; Von Herzon, Richard P; Boyce, Robert E; Percival, Stephen F Jr; Saito, Tsunemasa (1970): Initial Reports of the Deep Sea Drilling Project. Initial Reports of the Deep Sea Drilling Project, U.S. Government Printing Office, III, 806 pp, https://doi.org/10.2973/dsdp.proc.3.1970 Further details: Processed smear slide data base - background and methods (URI: hdl:10013/epic.32353.d001) Project(s): Deep Sea Drilling Project (DSDP) (URI: http://www.deepseadrilling.org/) Coverage: LATITUDE: -28.331500 * LONGITUDE: -20.941000 DATE/TIME START: 1968-12-20T00:00:00 * DATE/TIME END: 1968-12-20T00:00:00 MINIMUM DEPTH, sediment/rock: 0.90 m * MAXIMUM DEPTH, sediment/rock: 108.60 m Event(s): 3-14 * LATITUDE: -28.331500 * LONGITUDE: -20.941000 * DATE/TIME: 1968-12-20T00:00:00 * ELEVATION: -4343.0 m * Penetration: 108 m * Recovery: 76.1 m * LOCATION: South Atlantic/HILL * CAMPAIGN: Leg3 (URI: https://doi.org/10.2973/dsdp.proc.3.1970) * BASIS: Glomar Challenger (URI: http://www-odp.tamu.edu/glomar.html) * METHOD/DEVICE: Drilling/drill rig (DRILL) * COMMENT: 10 cores; 83 m cored; 0 m drilled; 91.7 % recovery Parameter(s): DEPTH, sediment/rock [m] (Depth sed) * GEOCODE Sample code/label (Sample label) * METHOD/DEVICE: DSDP/ODP/IODP sample designation (URI: hdl:10013/epic.27914.d001) Sand [%] (Sand) * METHOD/DEVICE: Smear slide analysis Silt [%] (Silt) * METHOD/DEVICE: Smear slide analysis Size fraction < 0.002 mm, clay [%] (<2 µm) * METHOD/DEVICE: Smear slide analysis Stratigraphy (Stratigraphy) * METHOD/DEVICE: Smear slide analysis Lithology/composition/facies (Lithology) * METHOD/DEVICE: Smear slide analysis Comment (Comment) * METHOD/DEVICE: Smear slide analysis Carbonates [%] (Carb) * METHOD/DEVICE: Smear slide analysis Nannofossils [%] (Nannos) * METHOD/DEVICE: Smear slide analysis Foraminifera [%] (Foram) * METHOD/DEVICE: Smear slide analysis Radiolarians [%] (Rad) * METHOD/DEVICE: Smear slide analysis Feldspar [%] (Fsp) * METHOD/DEVICE: Smear slide analysis Zeolite [%] (Zeo) * METHOD/DEVICE: Smear slide analysis Clay minerals [%] (Clay min) * METHOD/DEVICE: Smear slide analysis Opaque minerals [%] (Opaque) * METHOD/DEVICE: Smear slide analysis Iron [%] (Fe) * METHOD/DEVICE: Smear slide analysis Pyroxene [%] (Pyrox) * METHOD/DEVICE: Smear slide analysis License: Creative Commons Attribution 3.0 Unported (CC-BY-3.0) (URI: https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/3.0/) Size: 942 data points */ Depth sed [m] Sample label Sand [%] Silt [%] <2 µm [%] Stratigraphy Lithology Comment Carb [%] Nannos [%] Foram [%] Rad [%] Fsp [%] Zeo [%] Clay min [%] Opaque [%] Fe [%] Pyrox [%] 0.90 3-14-1-1,90 0 15 85 Lower miocene NANNO OOZE Dominat lithology; relative abundance 0 100 0 0 0 2 0 0 0 0 2.00 3-14-1-2,50 0 0 100 Lower miocene ZEOLITIC NANNO OOZE Dominat lithology; numerical abundance 0 85 0 0 0 10 0 5 0 0 3.50 3-14-1-3,50 0 0 100 Lower miocene ZEOLITIC NANNO CHALK OOZE Dominat lithology; numerical abundance 0 90 0 0 0 10 0 0 0 0 3.60 3-14-1-3,60 0 0 100 Lower miocene numerical abundance 0 73 0 0 0 25 0 0 0 0 4.26 3-14-1-31,126 0 5 95 Lower miocene FORAM NANNO SILTY CLAY Dominat lithology; numerical abundance 0 95 5 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 6.75 3-14-1-5,75 0 1 100 Lower miocene relative abundance 0 100 2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 6.95 3-14-1-5,95 0 0 100 Lower miocene ZEOLITIC NANNO CHALK OOZE Dominat lithology; numerical abundance 0 75 0 0 0 25 0 0 0 0 7.78 3-14-1-6,28 0 0 100 Lower miocene NANNO OOZE Dominat lithology; numerical abundance 0 95 0 0 0 5 0 0 0 0 8.45 3-14-1-6,95 0 0 100 Lower miocene NANNO OOZE Dominat lithology; numerical abundance 0 95 0 0 0 5 0 0 0 0 8.80 3-14-1-61,130 0 0 100 Lower miocene ZEOLITIC NANNO OOZE Dominat lithology; numerical abundance 0 80 0 0 0 15 5 0 0 0 9.10 3-14-1-CC,0 0 5 95 NANNO OOZE Dominat lithology; numerical abundance 0 94 1 0 0 4 0 0 1 0 12.90 3-14-2-1,90 0 0 100 Upper oligocene NANNO CHALK OOZE Dominat lithology; relative abundance 0 100 2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 14.25 3-14-2-2,75 1 9 90 Upper oligocene NANNO OOZE Dominat lithology; numerical abundance 0 100 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 15.00 3-14-2-3,0 3 12 85 Upper oligocene NANNO FORAM CHALK OOZE Dominat lithology; numerical abundance 0 97 3 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 17.25 3-14-2-4,75 3 3 94 Upper oligocene NANNO CHALK OOZE Dominat lithology; numerical abundance 0 97 3 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 18.75 3-14-2-5,75 2 8 90 Upper oligocene NANNO CHALK OOZE Dominat lithology; numerical abundance 0 98 2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 33.75 3-14-3-1,75 2 2 96 Upper oligocene NANNO CHALK OOZE Dominat lithology; numerical abundance 0 98 2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 35.25 3-14-3-2,75 2 5 93 Upper oligocene NANNO CHALK OOZE Dominat lithology; numerical abundance 0 98 2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 36.75 3-14-3-3,75 5 15 80 Upper oligocene FORAM NANNO CHALK OOZE Dominat lithology; numerical abundance 0 95 5 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 38.25 3-14-3-4,75 2 15 83 Upper oligocene NANNO CHALK OOZE Dominat lithology; numerical abundance 0 2 98 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 39.75 3-14-3-5,75 2 5 93 Upper oligocene NANNO CHALK OOZE Dominat lithology; numerical abundance 0 98 2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 41.25 3-14-3-6,75 5 5 90 Upper oligocene NANNO CHALK OOZE Dominat lithology; numerical abundance 0 95 5 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 52.40 3-14-4-1,40 0 1 99 Upper oligocene NANNO OOZE Dominat lithology; numerical abundance 1 100 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 55.00 3-14-4-3,0 0 95 5 Upper oligocene CRYSTALLINE CHALK Dominat lithology; numerical abundance 95 5 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 61.75 3-14-5-1,75 1 7 92 Upper oligocene NANNO CHALK OOZE Dominat lithology; numerical abundance 0 100 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 63.25 3-14-5-2,75 1 5 94 Upper oligocene NANNO CHALK OOZE Dominat lithology; relative abundance 0 100 1 0 0 0 0 0 2 0 64.75 3-14-5-3,75 0 2 98 Upper oligocene FORAM NANNO CHALK OOZE Dominat lithology; relative abundance 0 98 2 0 0 0 0 2 0 0 66.25 3-14-5-4,75 0 2 98 Upper oligocene NANNO CHALK OOZE Dominat lithology; numerical abundance 0 100 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 67.75 3-14-5-5,75 0 5 95 Upper oligocene NANNO CHALK OOZE Dominat lithology; relative abundance 0 100 2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 69.25 3-14-5-6,75 2 8 90 Upper oligocene FORAM NANNO CHALK OOZE Dominat lithology; numerical abundance 0 98 2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 71.75 3-14-6-1,75 0 1 99 Upper oligocene NANNO CHALK OOZE Dominat lithology; relative abundance 2 100 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 73.25 3-14-6-2,75 8 2 90 Upper oligocene NANNO FORAM OOZE Dominat lithology; relative abundance 0 92 8 0 0 0 0 0 2 0 73.50 3-14-6-21,100 3 2 95 Upper oligocene FORAM NANNO OOZE Dominat lithology; relative abundance 2 97 3 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 74.75 3-14-6-3,75 5 3 92 Upper oligocene FORAM NANNO CHALK OOZE Dominat lithology; relative abundance 0 92 5 2 0 0 2 0 3 0 76.25 3-14-6-4,75 7 0 93 Upper oligocene NANNO CHALK OOZE Dominat lithology; numerical abundance 0 90 3 0 0 0 7 0 0 0 77.75 3-14-6-5,75 5 0 95 Upper oligocene FORAM NANNO CHALK OOZE Dominat lithology; numerical abundance 0 90 3 0 0 0 5 2 0 0 79.25 3-14-6-6,75 3 5 92 Upper oligocene FORAM NANNO CHALK OOZE Dominat lithology; relative abundance 0 92 3 0 0 0 2 0 5 0 80.00 3-14-7-1,0 2 5 93 Upper oligocene NANNO CHALK OOZE Dominat lithology; numerical abundance 0 91 2 0 0 0 2 0 5 0 81.55 3-14-7-2,5 1 0 99 Upper oligocene NANNO CHALK OOZE Dominat lithology; relative abundance 0 100 1 2 0 0 0 0 0 0 83.75 3-14-7-3,75 2 6 92 Upper oligocene NANNO CHALK OOZE Dominat lithology; numerical abundance 0 88 2 0 0 0 4 0 6 0 85.25 3-14-7-4,75 6 0 94 Upper oligocene NANNO CHALK OOZE Dominat lithology; numerical abundance 0 92 1 0 0 0 2 0 5 0 86.75 3-14-7-5,75 2 8 90 Upper oligocene FORAM NANNO CHALK OOZE Dominat lithology; numerical abundance 0 88 2 0 0 0 2 0 8 0 88.25 3-14-7-6,75 1 8 91 Lower oligocene NANNO CHALK OOZE Dominat lithology; numerical abundance 0 86 1 0 0 0 5 0 8 0 90.50 3-14-8-2,0 5 8 87 Lower oligocene FORAM NANNO CHALK OOZE Dominat lithology; numerical abundance 0 87 5 0 0 0 0 8 0 0 92.75 3-14-8-3,75 3 15 82 Lower oligocene numerical abundance 0 80 3 0 0 0 2 0 15 0 94.25 3-14-8-4,75 1 5 95 Lower oligocene NANNO CHALK OOZE Dominat lithology; relative abundance 0 95 2 0 0 0 2 0 5 0 95.75 3-14-8-5,75 18 5 97 Lower oligocene FORAM NANNO CHALK OOZE Dominat lithology; numerical abundance 0 77 3 0 0 0 5 0 15 0 96.50 3-14-8-6,0 0 0 0 Lower oligocene NANNO CHALK OOZE Dominat lithology; numerical abundance 0 90 0 0 0 0 5 0 5 0 100.25 3-14-9-2,75 1 17 82 Lower oligocene numerical abundance 0 79 1 0 0 0 5 15 0 0 101.00 3-14-9-3,0 0 0 0 Lower oligocene MARLY NANNO CHALK OOZE Dominat lithology; numerical abundance 0 85 0 0 0 0 7 0 8 0 102.50 3-14-9-4,0 0 14 86 Lower oligocene NANNO CHALK OOZE Dominat lithology; numerical abundance 0 86 2 0 0 0 0 0 12 0 104.00 3-14-9-5,0 5 15 80 Lower oligocene NANNO CHALK OOZE Dominat lithology; numerical abundance 0 80 2 0 0 0 3 0 15 0 106.25 3-14-9-6,75 2 15 83 Upper eocene NANNO CHALK OOZE Dominat lithology; relative abundance 0 80 2 0 0 2 3 0 15 0 107.10 3-14-9-CC,0 0 0 100 numerical abundance 0 100 0 0 0 0 10 10 0 0 107.10 3-14-9-CC,0 0 0 100 relative abundance 0 80 0 0 0 0 0 2 0 0 108.60 3-14-10-CC,0 0 0 0 BASALT Minor lithology; relative abundance 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 1