Citation:

PANGAEA.230569

Always quote citation above when using data! You can download the citation in several formats below.

RIS Citation BibTeX Citation Text Citation Facebook TwitterShow Map Google Earth

Related to:

DSDP (1989): Data from the Deep Sea Drilling Project. Sediment, hard rock and reference files. National Geophysical Data Center, National Environmental Satellite, Data and Information Service, National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration, U.S. Department of Commerce, 1, CD-ROM

Maxwell, Arthur E; Milow, E Dean; Andrews, James E; Hsü, Kenneth J; Von Herzon, Richard P; Boyce, Robert E; Percival, Stephen F Jr; Saito, Tsunemasa (1970): Initial Reports of the Deep Sea Drilling Project. Initial Reports of the Deep Sea Drilling Project, U.S. Government Printing Office, III, 806 pp, https://doi.org/10.2973/dsdp.proc.3.1970

Further details:

Processed smear slide data base - background and methods

Project(s):

Deep Sea Drilling Project (DSDP)

Coverage:

Latitude: 6.040000 * Longitude: -18.228500

Date/Time Start: 1968-12-03T00:00:00 * Date/Time End: 1968-12-03T00:00:00

Minimum DEPTH, sediment/rock: 0.00 m * Maximum DEPTH, sediment/rock: 144.25 m

Event(s):

3-13 * Latitude: 6.040000 * Longitude: -18.228500 * Date/Time: 1968-12-03T00:00:00 * Elevation: -4585.0 m * Penetration: 145 m * Recovery: 26.5 m * Location: North Atlantic/CONT RISE * Campaign: * Basis: Glomar Challenger * Method/Device: Drilling/drill rig (DRILL) * Comment: 3 cores; 27 m cored; 0 m drilled; 98.1 % recovery

Parameter(s):

#	Name	Short Name	Unit	Method/Device	Comment
1	DEPTH, sediment/rock	Depth sed	m		Geocode
2	Sample code/label	Sample label		DSDP/ODP/IODP sample designation
3	Sand	Sand	%	Smear slide analysis
4	Silt	Silt	%	Smear slide analysis
5	Size fraction < 0.002 mm, clay	<2 µm	%	Smear slide analysis
6	Stratigraphy	Stratigraphy		Smear slide analysis
7	Lithology/composition/facies	Lithology		Smear slide analysis
8	Comment	Comment		Smear slide analysis
9	Carbonates	Carb	%	Smear slide analysis
10	Nannofossils	Nannos	%	Smear slide analysis
11	Foraminifera	Foram	%	Smear slide analysis
12	Radiolarians	Rad	%	Smear slide analysis
13	Quartz	Qz	%	Smear slide analysis
14	Feldspar	Fsp	%	Smear slide analysis
15	Zeolite	Zeo	%	Smear slide analysis
16	Biotite	Bt	%	Smear slide analysis
17	Clay minerals	Clay min	%	Smear slide analysis
18	Opaque minerals	Opaque	%	Smear slide analysis
19	Volcanic glass	Volc glass	%	Smear slide analysis
20	Manganese	Mn	%	Smear slide analysis

License:

Creative Commons Attribution 3.0 Unported (CC-BY-3.0)

Size:

501 data points

Data

Download dataset as tab-delimited text — use the following character encoding:

1 Depth sed [m]	2 Sample label	3 Sand [%]	4 Silt [%]	5 <2 µm [%]	6 Stratigraphy	7 Lithology	8 Comment	9 Carb [%]	10 Nannos [%]	11 Foram [%]	12 Rad [%]	14 Fsp [%]	15 Zeo [%]	16 Bt [%]	17 Clay min [%]	18 Opaque [%]	19 Volc glass [%]	20 Mn [%]
0.00	3-13-1-1,0	10	45	45	Upper pliocene		numerical abundance	45	45	10	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0
0.63	3-13-1-1,63	0	0	0	Upper pliocene	TURBIDITE SAND	Minor lithology; numerical abundance	0	0	0	40	0	0	0	60	0	0	0
1.50	3-13-1-2,0	70	20	10	Upper pliocene		numerical abundance	30	0	70	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0
1.50	3-13-1-2,0	70	20	10	Upper pliocene		numerical abundance	30	0	70	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0
3.80	3-13-1-3,80	5	45	45	Upper pliocene		relative abundance	0	45	5	0	0	2	0	0	0	0	0
4.50	3-13-1-4,0	10	45	45	Upper pliocene		numerical abundance	0	90	10	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0
6.10	3-13-1-5,10	10	45	45	Upper pliocene	FORAM NANNO SILT	Dominat lithology; relative abundance	0	80	20	0	0	0	0	2	0	0	0
6.25	3-13-1-5,25	0	40	60	Upper pliocene	ZEOLITIC SILTY CLAY	Minor lithology; relative abundance	0	0	2	0	0	40	2	60	1	0	0
6.33	3-13-1-5,33	0	40	60	Upper pliocene	ZEOLITIC SILTY CLAY	Minor lithology; numerical abundance	40	0	0	0	0	0	0	60	0	0	0
6.83	3-13-1-5,83	70	40	40	Upper pliocene	FORAM NANNO SILT	Dominat lithology; numerical abundance	0	70	20	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0
7.50	3-13-1-6,0	15	45	40	Upper pliocene	NANNO CHALK OOZE	Dominat lithology; numerical abundance	0	83	18	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0
21.00	3-13-2-1,0	10	45	45	Lower pliocene	NANNO FORAM OOZE	Dominat lithology; numerical abundance	0	90	10	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0
21.51	3-13-2-1,51	5	25	70	Lower pliocene	ZEOLITIC SILTY CLAY	Dominat lithology; numerical abundance	0	0	0	0	0	30	0	70	0	0	0
22.67	3-13-2-2,17	0	25	75	Lower pliocene		numerical abundance	0	100	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0
23.30	3-13-2-2,80	2	48	50	Lower pliocene		numerical abundance	0	98	1	0	0	1	0	0	0	0	0
24.70	3-13-2-3,70	10	50	40	Lower pliocene	NANNO FORAM SILT	Dominat lithology; numerical abundance	0	90	8	0	0	2	0	0	0	0	0
25.40	3-13-2-31,140	5	70	25	Lower pliocene		numerical abundance	0	0	0	0	0	75	0	25	0	0	0
26.30	3-13-2-4,80	0	20	80	Lower pliocene	ZEOLITIC CLAY	Minor lithology; relative abundance	0	0	0	0	0	100	0	0	0	0	2
27.75	3-13-2-5,75	0	50	50	Lower pliocene		relative abundance	0	0	0	0	2	50	0	50	0	0	0
29.20	3-13-2-6,70	0	50	50	Lower pliocene	ZEOLITIC CLAY	Dominat lithology; numerical abundance	0	0	0	0	0	90	0	10	0	0	0
30.10	3-13-2-CC,0	10	0	0			numerical abundance	0	0	0	0	75	0	0	0	0	0	0
136.90	3-13-3-1,90	0	90	10	Middle eocene	RAD OOZE	Minor lithology; numerical abundance	0	0	0	100	0	0	0	0	0	0	0
138.25	3-13-3-2,75	0	15	85	Middle eocene	RAD SILT	Dominat lithology; relative abundance	0	0	0	100	0	2	0	0	0	0	0
139.80	3-13-3-3,80	0	30	70	Middle eocene	RAD SILT	Dominat lithology; relative abundance	0	0	0	100	0	2	0	0	0	1	0
141.62	3-13-3-41,112	0	80	20	Middle eocene		numerical abundance	0	0	0	100	0	0	0	0	0	0	0
143.00	3-13-3-51,100	0	25	75	Middle eocene	RAD SILT	Dominat lithology; numerical abundance	0	0	0	100	0	0	0	0	0	0	0
144.25	3-13-3-6,75	0	75	85	Middle eocene	RAD SILT	Dominat lithology; relative abundance	0	0	0	100	0	2	0	0	0	0	0