Citation:

PANGAEA.230562

Always quote citation above when using data! You can download the citation in several formats below.

RIS Citation BibTeX Citation Text Citation Facebook TwitterShow Map Google Earth

Related to:

DSDP (1989): Data from the Deep Sea Drilling Project. Sediment, hard rock and reference files. National Geophysical Data Center, National Environmental Satellite, Data and Information Service, National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration, U.S. Department of Commerce, 1, CD-ROM

Perch-Nielsen, Katharina; Ovenshine, A Thomas; Margolis, Stanley V; Jenkins, D Graham; Hampton, Monty A; Hajos, Marta; Gostin, Victor A; Edwards, Anthony R; Andrews, Peter B; Kennett, James P; Houtz, Robert E (1975): Initial Reports of the Deep Sea Drilling Project. Initial Reports of the Deep Sea Drilling Project, U.S. Government Printing Office, XXIX, 999 pp, https://doi.org/10.2973/dsdp.proc.29.1975

Further details:

Processed smear slide data base - background and methods

Project(s):

Deep Sea Drilling Project (DSDP)

Coverage:

Latitude: -47.997300 * Longitude: 147.764200

Date/Time Start: 1973-03-31T00:00:00 * Date/Time End: 1973-03-31T00:00:00

Minimum DEPTH, sediment/rock: 0.10 m * Maximum DEPTH, sediment/rock: 159.10 m

Event(s):

29-281 * Latitude: -47.997300 * Longitude: 147.764200 * Date/Time: 1973-03-31T00:00:00 * Elevation: -1591.0 m * Penetration: 169 m * Recovery: 101.9 m * Location: Antarctic Ocean/Tasman Sea/CONT RISE * Campaign: * Basis: Glomar Challenger * Method/Device: Drilling/drill rig (DRILL) * Comment: 14 cores; 133 m cored; 36 m drilled; 76.6 % recovery

Parameter(s):

#	Name	Short Name	Unit	Method/Device	Comment
1	DEPTH, sediment/rock	Depth sed	m		Geocode
2	Sample code/label	Sample label		DSDP/ODP/IODP sample designation
3	Sand	Sand	%	Smear slide analysis
4	Silt	Silt	%	Smear slide analysis
5	Size fraction < 0.002 mm, clay	<2 µm	%	Smear slide analysis
6	Stratigraphy	Stratigraphy		Smear slide analysis
7	Lithology/composition/facies	Lithology		Smear slide analysis
8	Comment	Comment		Smear slide analysis
9	Carbonates	Carb	%	Smear slide analysis
10	Dolomite	Dol	%	Smear slide analysis
11	Nannofossils	Nannos	%	Smear slide analysis
12	Foraminifera	Foram	%	Smear slide analysis
13	Ostracoda	Ostrac	%	Smear slide analysis
14	Siliceous microfossils	Silic foss	%	Smear slide analysis
15	Radiolarians	Rad	%	Smear slide analysis
16	Diatoms	Diatoms	%	Smear slide analysis
17	Silicoflagellates	Silicoflag	%	Smear slide analysis
18	Spiculae	Spiculae	%	Smear slide analysis
19	Minerals, other	Min other	%	Smear slide analysis
20	Quartz	Qz	%	Smear slide analysis
21	Feldspar	Fsp	%	Smear slide analysis
22	Mica	Mica	%	Smear slide analysis
23	Biotite	Bt	%	Smear slide analysis
24	Clay minerals	Clay min	%	Smear slide analysis
25	Glauconite	Glt	%	Smear slide analysis
26	Opaque minerals	Opaque	%	Smear slide analysis
27	Pyrite, FeS2	Py	%	Smear slide analysis
28	Heavy minerals	HM	%	Smear slide analysis
29	Zircon	Zrn	%	Smear slide analysis
30	Tourmaline	Tur	%	Smear slide analysis
31	Hornblende	Hbl	%	Smear slide analysis
32	Volcanic glass	Volc glass	%	Smear slide analysis
33	Terrigenous	Terr	%	Smear slide analysis	terrigeneous detritus
34	Micronodules	Micronod	%	Smear slide analysis

License:

Creative Commons Attribution 3.0 Unported (CC-BY-3.0)

Size:

1122 data points

Data

Download dataset as tab-delimited text — use the following character encoding:

1 Depth sed [m]	2 Sample label	3 Sand [%]	4 Silt [%]	5 <2 µm [%]	6 Stratigraphy	7 Lithology	8 Comment	9 Carb [%]	10 Dol [%]	11 Nannos [%]	12 Foram [%]	13 Ostrac [%]	14 Silic foss [%]	15 Rad [%]	16 Diatoms [%]	17 Silicoflag [%]	18 Spiculae [%]	19 Min other [%]	20 Qz [%]	21 Fsp [%]	22 Mica [%]	23 Bt [%]	24 Clay min [%]	25 Glt [%]	26 Opaque [%]	27 Py [%]	28 HM [%]	29 Zrn [%]	30 Tur [%]	31 Hbl [%]	32 Volc glass [%]	33 Terr [%]	34 Micronod [%]
0.10	29-281-1-CC,0	0	0	0	Upper pleistocene	NANNO RICH FORAM OOZE	Dominat lithology; relative abundance	0	0	23	75	0	0	0	1	0	1	0	1	0	1	0	0	1	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0
16.60	29-281-2-CC,0	0	0	0	Upper pliocene	NANNO BEARING FORAM OOZE	Dominat lithology; numerical abundance	0	0	10	90	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0
20.10	29-281-3-3,10	0	0	0	Upper pliocene	FORAM RICH NANNO OOZE	Dominat lithology; relative abundance	0	0	73	25	0	0	0	5	0	1	0	0	1	0	0	0	1	0	0	1	0	0	1	1	2	0
20.30	29-281-3-3,30	0	0	0	Upper pliocene	FORAM NANNO OOZE	Dominat lithology; relative abundance	0	0	50	45	0	0	1	1	1	2	0	0	0	0	0	0	1	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0
26.10	29-281-3-CC,0	0	0	0	Upper pliocene	MICARB BEARING FORAM NANNO OOZE	Dominat lithology; numerical abundance	5	0	35	60	0	0	0	30	0	30	0	1	0	0	0	0	10	5	0	0	0	0	1	0	0	0
26.10	29-281-3-CC,0	1	30	0	Upper pliocene	MICARB BEARING FORAM NANNO OOZE	Dominat lithology; relative abundance	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	30	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0
26.60	29-281-4-CC,0	0	0	0	Lower pliocene	DETRITAL BEARING NANNO FORAM OOZE	Dominat lithology; relative abundance	0	0	35	60	1	0	1	0	1	0	0	0	0	1	0	0	2	0	0	1	0	0	0	1	3	0
40.60	29-281-5-CC,0	0	0	0	Upper miocene	NANNO FORAM OOZE	Dominat lithology; relative abundance	1	0	35	65	0	0	0	1	0	0	0	1	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	1	0	0	0	0	0	0
54.60	29-281-6-CC,0	0	0	0	Upper miocene	SILICIOUS BEARING NANNO FORAM OOZE	Dominat lithology; relative abundance	0	0	35	55	0	0	1	1	5	1	0	1	0	1	0	0	0	0	0	1	0	0	0	0	2	0
64.10	29-281-7-CC,0	0	0	0	Upper miocene	FORAM NANNO OOZE	Dominat lithology; relative abundance	0	0	59	40	0	1	0	0	0	0	0	1	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0
64.60	29-281-8-CC,0	0	0	0	Upper miocene	SPICULE BEARING FORAM NANNO OOZE	Dominat lithology; numerical abundance	0	0	70	25	0	0	0	0	0	5	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0
83.10	29-281-9-CC,0	0	0	0	Middle miocene	FORAM NANNO OOZE	Dominat lithology; relative abundance	0	0	55	40	1	0	0	0	1	1	0	1	0	1	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	1	0
92.60	29-281-10-CC,0	0	0	0	Middle miocene	NANNO FORAM OOZE	Dominat lithology; relative abundance	0	0	35	60	1	0	0	0	1	2	0	1	1	1	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	1	0
102.10	29-281-11-CC,0	50	0	0	Lower miocene	FORAM NANNO OOZE	Dominat lithology; relative abundance	0	0	64	35	0	0	0	0	1	1	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0
111.60	29-281-12-CC,0	0	0	0	Lower miocene	FORAM NANNO OOZE	Dominat lithology; relative abundance	0	0	65	35	0	0	0	0	1	1	0	1	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0
114.70	29-281-13-21,120	0	0	0	Lower miocene	GLAUCONITE BEARING NANNO FORAM OOZE	Dominat lithology; numerical abundance	0	0	30	65	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	2	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	1	0
116.40	29-281-13-31,140	70	10	0	Lower miocene	DETRITAL SAND AND GLAUCONITE BEARING FORAM RICH NANNO OOZE	Dominat lithology; relative abundance	0	0	66	20	0	0	0	0	0	1	0	7	0	0	0	0	7	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	7	0
117.25	29-281-13-4,75	90	0	0	Lower miocene	FORAM OOZE	Dominat lithology; relative abundance	0	0	0	15	0	0	0	0	0	0	1	40	41	2	1	0	0	0	0	7	1	0	1	0	100	0
117.75	29-281-13-41,125	70	30	0	Lower oligocene	NANNO AND FORAM BEARING GLAUCONITE DETRITAL SAND	Dominat lithology; relative abundance	2	0	4	5	0	0	0	0	0	2	0	42	5	2	0	0	15	0	0	1	0	0	0	0	24	0
119.33	29-281-13-51,133	80	20	1	Lower oligocene	DOLOMITE AND FORAM BEARING GLAUCONITE AND NANNO RICH DETRITAL SAND	Dominat lithology; relative abundance	1	4	15	5	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	45	10	1	0	0	15	0	0	5	0	0	0	0	60	0
119.60	29-281-13-CC,0	70	25	5	Lower oligocene	FELDSPAR RICH GLAUCONITE QUARTZ SAND	Dominat lithology; numerical abundance	0	0	1	1	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	52	18	0	0	0	26	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0
121.58	29-281-14-1,8	50	50	0	Upper eocene	GLAUCONITE FORAM RAD AND SPICULE BEARING DIATOM AND DETRITAL SILTY SAND	Dominat lithology; relative abundance	0	0	1	3	0	0	3	16	0	6	0	46	13	3	0	0	3	0	1	3	0	0	0	0	50	0
123.75	29-281-14-2,75	30	30	45	Upper eocene	RAD SPICULE AND GALUCONITE BEARING DETRITAL SANDY SILTY CLAY	Dominat lithology; relative abundance	0	0	1	0	0	0	5	20	0	5	0	45	6	6	0	6	10	0	0	3	0	0	0	0	60	0
128.25	29-281-14-5,75	30	30	40	Upper eocene	GLAUCONITE RAD AND FORAM BEARING SPICULE RICH DIATOM DETRITAL SAND SILT	Dominat lithology; relative abundance	0	0	2	1	0	0	5	30	0	14	0	17	9	2	0	17	5	0	0	1	0	0	0	0	45	0
130.60	29-281-14-CC,0	20	50	30	Upper eocene	GLAUCONITE RAD SPICULE BEARING DETRITAL SILT RICH FORAM DIATOM OOZE	Dominat lithology; relative abundance	0	0	1	30	0	0	5	30	0	10	0	13	5	1	0	0	5	0	0	1	0	0	0	0	20	0
133.23	29-281-15-2,73	15	45	40	Upper eocene	FORAM-NANNO-SPICULE BEARING DETRITAL CLAYEY SILT TO DIATOM OOZE	Dominat lithology; relative abundance	2	0	5	5	0	0	1	30	0	11	0	23	0	3	0	22	2	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	45	0
133.44	29-281-15-2,94	80	20	0	Upper eocene	FORAM NANNO SPONGE AND DETRITAL SAND RICH DIATOM OOZE	Dominat lithology; relative abundance	0	0	15	10	0	0	1	54	1	10	0	8	1	1	0	0	1	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	10	0
135.60	29-281-15-CC,0	60	30	10	Upper eocene	GLAUCONITE BEARING FORAM NANNO SPONGE SPICULE AND DETRITAL SILTY SAND RI	Dominat lithology; relative abundance	0	0	20	10	0	0	1	35	2	15	0	1	1	2	1	1	3	0	0	1	0	0	0	0	15	0
149.32	29-281-16-61,107	90	8	2	Upper eocene	DETRITAL SAND RICH NANNO DIATOM OOZE	Minor lithology; relative abundance	0	2	35	2	0	0	0	40	1	5	0	1	0	1	0	1	1	0	0	1	0	0	0	0	15	0
149.70	29-281-16-61,145	15	35	50	Upper eocene	NANNO BEARING SPICULE AND FORAM-RICH DETRITAL SILTY CLAY-DIATOM OOZE	Dominat lithology; relative abundance	0	0	5	15	0	0	0	25	0	10	55	18	1	5	0	22	1	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	45	0
149.85	29-281-16-CC,0	67	33	0	Upper eocene	RAD AND NANNO BEARING FORAM DETRITAL SAND AND SPICULE RICH DIATOM OOZE	Dominat lithology; relative abundance	1	0	10	15	0	0	10	30	2	20	0	14	0	1	0	0	1	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	15	0
150.10	29-281-17-1,10	80	20	0	Upper eocene	GLAUCONITE BEARING DETRITAL SAND-FORAM RICH NANNO CHALK	Dominat lithology; relative abundance	0	1	52	15	0	0	0	0	0	1	0	25	1	1	0	0	5	0	0	0	0	1	1	0	20	2
157.79	29-281-17-6,29	30	30	40	Upper eocene	SANDY SILTY CLAY	Dominat lithology; relative abundance	0	1	1	0	0	0	1	0	0	0	0	65	25	0	0	0	10	0	10	0	0	0	0	0	0	0
159.10	29-281-17-CC,0	0	0	0	Upper eocene	MUSCOVITE QUARTZ SCHIST	Dominat lithology; numerical abundance	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0