Kennett, James P; Houtz, Robert E (2005): Smear slide analysis of Hole 29-280 [dataset]. PANGAEA, https://doi.org/10.1594/PANGAEA.230560
Always quote citation above when using data! You can download the citation in several formats below.
Related to:
DSDP (1989): Data from the Deep Sea Drilling Project. Sediment, hard rock and reference files. National Geophysical Data Center, National Environmental Satellite, Data and Information Service, National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration, U.S. Department of Commerce, 1, CD-ROM
Perch-Nielsen, Katharina; Ovenshine, A Thomas; Margolis, Stanley V; Jenkins, D Graham; Hampton, Monty A; Hajos, Marta; Gostin, Victor A; Edwards, Anthony R; Andrews, Peter B; Kennett, James P; Houtz, Robert E (1975): Initial Reports of the Deep Sea Drilling Project. Initial Reports of the Deep Sea Drilling Project, U.S. Government Printing Office, XXIX, 999 pp, https://doi.org/10.2973/dsdp.proc.29.1975
Further details:
Project(s):
Deep Sea Drilling Project (DSDP)
Coverage:
Latitude: -48.957300 * Longitude: 147.234700
Date/Time Start: 1973-03-26T00:00:00 * Date/Time End: 1973-03-26T00:00:00
Minimum DEPTH, sediment/rock: 0.70 m * Maximum DEPTH, sediment/rock: 5.55 m
Event(s):
29-280 * Latitude: -48.957300 * Longitude: 147.234700 * Date/Time: 1973-03-26T00:00:00 * Elevation: -4176.0 m * Penetration: 6 m * Recovery: 5.5 m * Location: Antarctic Ocean/Tasman Sea * Campaign: Leg29 * Basis: Glomar Challenger * Method/Device: Drilling/drill rig (DRILL) * Comment: 1 cores; 6 m cored; 0 m drilled; 91.7 % recovery
Parameter(s):
# | Name | Short Name | Unit | Principal Investigator | Method/Device | Comment |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
1 | DEPTH, sediment/rock | Depth sed | m | Geocode | ||
2 | Sample code/label | Sample label | DSDP/ODP/IODP sample designation | |||
3 | Sand | Sand | % | Smear slide analysis | ||
4 | Silt | Silt | % | Smear slide analysis | ||
5 | Size fraction < 0.002 mm, clay | <2 µm | % | Smear slide analysis | ||
6 | Lithology/composition/facies | Lithology | Smear slide analysis | |||
7 | Comment | Comment | Smear slide analysis | |||
8 | Carbonates | Carb | % | Smear slide analysis | ||
9 | Nannofossils | Nannos | % | Smear slide analysis | ||
10 | Foraminifera | Foram | % | Smear slide analysis | ||
11 | Radiolarians | Rad | % | Smear slide analysis | ||
12 | Diatoms | Diatoms | % | Smear slide analysis | ||
13 | Silicoflagellates | Silicoflag | % | Smear slide analysis | ||
14 | Spiculae | Spiculae | % | Smear slide analysis | ||
15 | Phosphate | PO4 | % | Smear slide analysis | ||
16 | Quartz | Qz | % | Smear slide analysis | ||
17 | Mica | Mica | % | Smear slide analysis | ||
18 | Biotite | Bt | % | Smear slide analysis | ||
19 | Clay minerals | Clay min | % | Smear slide analysis | ||
20 | Glauconite | Glt | % | Smear slide analysis | ||
21 | Opaque minerals | Opaque | % | Smear slide analysis | ||
22 | Heavy minerals | HM | % | Smear slide analysis | ||
23 | Terrigenous | Terr | % | Smear slide analysis | terrigeneous detritus | |
24 | Micronodules | Micronod | % | Smear slide analysis |
License:
Creative Commons Attribution 3.0 Unported (CC-BY-3.0)
Size:
161 data points
Data
1 Depth sed [m] | 2 Sample label | 3 Sand [%] | 4 Silt [%] | 5 <2 µm [%] | 6 Lithology | 7 Comment | 8 Carb [%] | 9 Nannos [%] | 10 Foram [%] | 11 Rad [%] | 12 Diatoms [%] | 13 Silicoflag [%] | 14 Spiculae [%] | 15 PO4 [%] | 16 Qz [%] | 17 Mica [%] | 18 Bt [%] | 19 Clay min [%] | 20 Glt [%] | 21 Opaque [%] | 22 HM [%] | 23 Terr [%] | 24 Micronod [%] |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
0.70 | 29-280-1-1,70 | 15 | 25 | 25 | FORAM DIAT BEARING DET CARB NANNO OOZE | Dominat lithology; relative abundance | 25 | 10 | 10 | 7 | 7 | 2 | 1 | 0 | 2 | 1 | 1 | 10 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 5 | 0 |
0.70 | 29-280-1-1,70 | 2 | 60 | 73 | RADS DIAT FORAM NANNO BEARING DET CARB SILTY CLAY | Minor lithology; relative abundance | 55 | 53 | 7 | 0 | 8 | 0 | 2 | 0 | 2 | 2 | 0 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
0.81 | 29-280-1-1,81 | 0 | 0 | 0 | NANNO RICH FORAM OOZE | Minor lithology; relative abundance | 0 | 25 | 66 | 2 | 2 | 0 | 2 | 0 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 5 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
1.37 | 29-280-1-11,137 | 0 | 0 | 0 | SILICEOUS RICH DET CLAY | Minor lithology; relative abundance | 0 | 2 | 2 | 10 | 20 | 0 | 15 | 2 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 50 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 0 | 5 |
2.40 | 29-280-1-2,90 | 5 | 20 | 75 | CLAY RICH NANNO OOZE | Minor lithology; relative abundance | 0 | 55 | 0 | 2 | 1 | 0 | 2 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 25 | 10 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 5 |
4.21 | 29-280-1-31,121 | 2 | 40 | 58 | DET SILTY CLAY | Minor lithology; relative abundance | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 2 | 0 | 90 | 0 |
5.55 | 29-280-1-41,105 | 0 | 0 | 0 | SILICEOUS RICH NANNO OOZE | Dominat lithology; relative abundance | 0 | 87 | 1 | 2 | 5 | 0 | 5 | 0 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |