Kennett, James P; Houtz, Robert E (2005): Smear slide analysis of Hole 29-279A. PANGAEA, https://doi.org/10.1594/PANGAEA.230559
Always quote citation above when using data! You can download the citation in several formats below.
Related to:
DSDP (1989): Data from the Deep Sea Drilling Project. Sediment, hard rock and reference files. National Geophysical Data Center, National Environmental Satellite, Data and Information Service, National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration, U.S. Department of Commerce, 1, CD-ROM
Perch-Nielsen, Katharina; Ovenshine, A Thomas; Margolis, Stanley V; Jenkins, D Graham; Hampton, Monty A; Hajos, Marta; Gostin, Victor A; Edwards, Anthony R; Andrews, Peter B; Kennett, James P; Houtz, Robert E (1975): Initial Reports of the Deep Sea Drilling Project. Initial Reports of the Deep Sea Drilling Project, U.S. Government Printing Office, XXIX, 999 pp, https://doi.org/10.2973/dsdp.proc.29.1975
Further details:
Project(s):
Deep Sea Drilling Project (DSDP)
Coverage:
Latitude: -51.335700 * Longitude: 162.635000
Date/Time Start: 1973-03-20T00:00:00 * Date/Time End: 1973-03-20T00:00:00
Minimum DEPTH, sediment/rock: 14.40 m * Maximum DEPTH, sediment/rock: 194.10 m
Event(s):
29-279A * Latitude: -51.335700 * Longitude: 162.635000 * Date/Time: 1973-03-20T00:00:00 * Elevation: -3341.0 m * Penetration: 202 m * Recovery: 77.3 m * Location: Antarctic Ocean/Tasman Sea/RIDGE * Campaign: Leg29 * Basis: Glomar Challenger * Method/Device: Drilling/drill rig (DRILL) * Comment: 12 cores; 100.5 m cored; 0 m drilled; 76.9 % recovery
Parameter(s):
# | Name | Short Name | Unit | Principal Investigator | Method/Device | Comment |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
1 | DEPTH, sediment/rock | Depth sed | m | Geocode | ||
2 | Sample code/label | Sample label | DSDP/ODP/IODP sample designation | |||
3 | Sand | Sand | % | Smear slide analysis | ||
4 | Silt | Silt | % | Smear slide analysis | ||
5 | Size fraction < 0.002 mm, clay | <2 µm | % | Smear slide analysis | ||
6 | Stratigraphy | Stratigraphy | Smear slide analysis | |||
7 | Lithology/composition/facies | Lithology | Smear slide analysis | |||
8 | Comment | Comment | Smear slide analysis | |||
9 | Carbonates | Carb | % | Smear slide analysis | ||
10 | Nannofossils | Nannos | % | Smear slide analysis | ||
11 | Foraminifera | Foram | % | Smear slide analysis | ||
12 | Siliceous microfossils | Silic foss | % | Smear slide analysis | other siliceous material | |
13 | Siliceous microfossils | Silic foss | % | Smear slide analysis | ||
14 | Radiolarians | Rad | % | Smear slide analysis | ||
15 | Diatoms | Diatoms | % | Smear slide analysis | ||
16 | Silicoflagellates | Silicoflag | % | Smear slide analysis | ||
17 | Spiculae | Spiculae | % | Smear slide analysis | ||
18 | Minerals, other | Min other | % | Smear slide analysis | ||
19 | Quartz | Qz | % | Smear slide analysis | ||
20 | Feldspar | Fsp | % | Smear slide analysis | ||
21 | Zeolite | Zeo | % | Smear slide analysis | ||
22 | Mica | Mica | % | Smear slide analysis | ||
23 | Biotite | Bt | % | Smear slide analysis | ||
24 | Clay minerals | Clay min | % | Smear slide analysis | ||
25 | Glauconite | Glt | % | Smear slide analysis | ||
26 | Opaque minerals | Opaque | % | Smear slide analysis | ||
27 | Heavy minerals | HM | % | Smear slide analysis | ||
28 | Epidote | Ep | % | Smear slide analysis | ||
29 | Hornblende | Hbl | % | Smear slide analysis | ||
30 | Pyroxene | Pyrox | % | Smear slide analysis | ||
31 | Olivine | Ol | % | Smear slide analysis | ||
32 | Volcanic glass | Volc glass | % | Smear slide analysis | ||
33 | Rock fragments | Rock fragm | % | Smear slide analysis | ||
34 | Mesostasis | Mesostasis | % | Smear slide analysis | ||
35 | Terrigenous | Terr | % | Smear slide analysis | terrigeneous detritus |
License:
Creative Commons Attribution 3.0 Unported (CC-BY-3.0)
Size:
1526 data points
Data
1 Depth sed [m] | 2 Sample label (DSDP/ODP/IODP sample designation) | 3 Sand [%] (Smear slide analysis) | 4 Silt [%] (Smear slide analysis) | 5 <2 µm [%] (Smear slide analysis) | 6 Stratigraphy (Smear slide analysis) | 7 Lithology (Smear slide analysis) | 8 Comment (Smear slide analysis) | 9 Carb [%] (Smear slide analysis) | 10 Nannos [%] (Smear slide analysis) | 11 Foram [%] (Smear slide analysis) | 12 Silic foss [%] (other siliceous material, Sme...) | 13 Silic foss [%] (Smear slide analysis) | 14 Rad [%] (Smear slide analysis) | 15 Diatoms [%] (Smear slide analysis) | 16 Silicoflag [%] (Smear slide analysis) | 17 Spiculae [%] (Smear slide analysis) | 18 Min other [%] (Smear slide analysis) | 19 Qz [%] (Smear slide analysis) | 20 Fsp [%] (Smear slide analysis) | 21 Zeo [%] (Smear slide analysis) | 22 Mica [%] (Smear slide analysis) | 23 Bt [%] (Smear slide analysis) | 24 Clay min [%] (Smear slide analysis) | 25 Glt [%] (Smear slide analysis) | 26 Opaque [%] (Smear slide analysis) | 27 HM [%] (Smear slide analysis) | 28 Ep [%] (Smear slide analysis) | 29 Hbl [%] (Smear slide analysis) | 30 Pyrox [%] (Smear slide analysis) | 31 Ol [%] (Smear slide analysis) | 32 Volc glass [%] (Smear slide analysis) | 33 Rock fragm [%] (Smear slide analysis) | 34 Mesostasis [%] (Smear slide analysis) | 35 Terr [%] (terrigeneous detritus, Smear ...) |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
14.40 | 29-279A-1-11,140 | 10 | 60 | 30 | Pleistocene | MICARB RICH NANNO FORAM OOZE | Dominat lithology; relative abundance | 15 | 30 | 45 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 4 | 0 | 4 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 6 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 2 |
15.50 | 29-279A-1-21,100 | 0 | 0 | 0 | Pleistocene | NANNO RICH MICARB FORAM OOZE | Minor lithology; relative abundance | 35 | 12 | 50 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
17.30 | 29-279A-1-31,130 | 0 | 70 | 30 | Middle miocene | FORAM+MICARB BEARING NANNO OOZE | Dominat lithology; relative abundance | 10 | 80 | 8 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 |
19.10 | 29-279A-1-CC,0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | Middle miocene | FORAM BEARING NANNO OOZE | Dominat lithology; relative abundance | 0 | 84 | 10 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 2 | 2 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 10 | 0 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 0 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 45 | 5 |
19.10 | 29-279A-1-CC,0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | Middle miocene | FORAM BEARING NANNO OOZE | Dominat lithology; relative abundance | 0 | 88 | 9 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 20 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
19.10 | 29-279A-1-CC,0 | 1 | 1 | 1 | Middle miocene | FORAM BEARING NANNO OOZE | Dominat lithology; relative abundance | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 25 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
100.05 | 29-279A-2-11,105 | 0 | 0 | 0 | Middle miocene | FORAM RICH NANNO OOZE | Dominat lithology; relative abundance | 0 | 84 | 15 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
102.10 | 29-279A-2-CC,0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | Middle miocene | FORAM BEARING NANNO OOZE | Dominat lithology; relative abundance | 5 | 83 | 8 | 15 | 15 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 20 | 2 | 1 | 2 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 0 | 1 | 50 | 0 | 1 |
102.10 | 29-279A-2-CC,0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | Middle miocene | FORAM BEARING NANNO OOZE | Dominat lithology; relative abundance | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
113.00 | 29-279A-3-31,100 | 0 | 0 | 0 | Lower miocene | FORAM RICH NANNO OOZE | Dominat lithology; relative abundance | 5 | 79 | 15 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 2 | 0 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 1 |
115.43 | 29-279A-3-5,43 | 0 | 0 | 0 | Lower miocene | FORAM RICH NANNO OOZE | Dominat lithology; relative abundance | 0 | 84 | 15 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
115.61 | 29-279A-3-5,61 | 0 | 0 | 0 | Lower miocene | FORAM RICH NANNO OOZE | Dominat lithology; relative abundance | 0 | 84 | 15 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
116.30 | 29-279A-3-51,130 | 20 | 30 | 50 | Lower miocene | FORAM BEARING NANNO OOZE | Dominat lithology; relative abundance | 5 | 83 | 10 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 |
116.44 | 29-279A-3-51,144 | 0 | 0 | 1 | Lower miocene | FORAM BEARING NANNO OOZE | Dominat lithology; relative abundance | 5 | 83 | 10 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 0 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 |
117.10 | 29-279A-3-6,60 | 0 | 0 | 0 | Lower miocene | FORAM BEARING NANNO OOZE | Dominat lithology; relative abundance | 0 | 92 | 5 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
118.10 | 29-279A-3-CC,0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | Lower miocene | FORAM RICH NANNO OOZE | Dominat lithology; relative abundance | 0 | 78 | 20 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 10 | 0 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 2 | 2 | 0 | 20 | 0 |
118.10 | 29-279A-3-CC,0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | Lower miocene | FORAM RICH NANNO OOZE | Dominat lithology; relative abundance | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 30 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
119.10 | 29-279A-4-11,110 | 0 | 0 | 0 | Lower miocene | CLAY+FORAM BEARING NANNO OOZE | Dominat lithology; relative abundance | 0 | 90 | 5 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 0 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 5 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
121.10 | 29-279A-4-CC,0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | Lower miocene | NANNO OOZE | Dominat lithology; relative abundance | 3 | 93 | 3 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 2 | 20 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 |
121.10 | 29-279A-4-CC,0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | Lower miocene | NANNO OOZE | Dominat lithology; relative abundance | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 10 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
131.50 | 29-279A-5-31,100 | 0 | 0 | 0 | Lower miocene | FORAM BEARING NANNO OOZE | Dominat lithology; relative abundance | 0 | 87 | 5 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
133.60 | 29-279A-5-CC,0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | Lower miocene | FORAM RICH NANNO OOZE | Dominat lithology; relative abundance | 6 | 68 | 20 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 4 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 25 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 2 | 1 | 0 | 25 | 1 |
133.60 | 29-279A-5-CC,0 | 30 | 30 | 40 | Lower miocene | FORAM RICH NANNO OOZE | Dominat lithology; relative abundance | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 3 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
138.21 | 29-279A-6-1,71 | 0 | 0 | 0 | Lower miocene | FORAM BEARING NANNO OOZE | Dominat lithology; relative abundance | 0 | 88 | 10 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 0 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
146.60 | 29-279A-6-CC,0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | Lower miocene | NANNO OOZE | Dominat lithology; relative abundance | 5 | 88 | 5 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 3 | 0 | 0 | 30 | 0 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 2 | 0 | 10 | 1 |
146.60 | 29-279A-6-CC,0 | 0 | 60 | 40 | Lower miocene | NANNO OOZE | Dominat lithology; relative abundance | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 10 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
147.66 | 29-279A-7-1,66 | 0 | 0 | 0 | Lower miocene | FORAM BEARING NANNO OOZE | Dominat lithology; relative abundance | 0 | 92 | 7 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
156.10 | 29-279A-7-CC,0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | Lower miocene | FORAM BEARING NANNO OOZE | Dominat lithology; numerical abundance | 5 | 87 | 7 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 20 | 0 | 3 | 1 | 0 | 14 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 20 | 1 |
156.10 | 29-279A-7-CC,0 | 0 | 40 | 60 | Lower miocene | FORAM BEARING NANNO OOZE | Dominat lithology; relative abundance | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
161.42 | 29-279A-8-4,92 | 0 | 0 | 0 | Lower miocene | FORAM BEARING NANNO OOZE | Dominat lithology; relative abundance | 0 | 92 | 5 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 0 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 2 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
163.49 | 29-279A-8-51,149 | 0 | 0 | 0 | Lower miocene | FORAM BEARING NANNO OOZE | Dominat lithology; relative abundance | 4 | 89 | 5 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 2 |
170.36 | 29-279A-9-31,136 | 0 | 0 | 0 | Lower miocene | FORAM BEARING NANNO OOZE | Dominat lithology; relative abundance | 0 | 93 | 5 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 1 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
170.44 | 29-279A-9-31,144 | 0 | 0 | 0 | Lower miocene | FORAM RICH NANNO OOZE | Dominat lithology; relative abundance | 4 | 78 | 15 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 4 | 0 | 3 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 |
172.26 | 29-279A-9-5,26 | 0 | 0 | 0 | Lower miocene | FORAM RICH NANNO OOZE | Dominat lithology; relative abundance | 0 | 83 | 15 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
174.75 | 29-279A-9-61,125 | 10 | 60 | 30 | Lower miocene | FORAM BEARING NANNO OOZE | Dominat lithology; relative abundance | 3 | 82 | 9 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 3 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 0 | 3 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 3 |
175.10 | 29-279A-9-CC,0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | Lower miocene | GLASS AND FORAM BEARING NANNO OOZE | Dominat lithology; numerical abundance | 0 | 87 | 8 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 30 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 10 | 40 | 0 | 0 |
175.10 | 29-279A-9-CC,0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | Lower miocene | GLASS AND FORAM BEARING NANNO OOZE | Dominat lithology; numerical abundance | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 10 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 10 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 3 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
176.30 | 29-279A-10-11,110 | 0 | 0 | 0 | Lower miocene | relative abundance | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 55 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 55 | 1 | 0 | 0 | |
184.10 | 29-279A-10-CC,0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | Lower miocene | DISC + FORAM BEARING NANNO OOZE | Dominat lithology; numerical abundance | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 15 | 1 | 2 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 45 | 0 |
184.10 | 29-279A-10-CC,0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | Lower miocene | DISC + FORAM BEARING NANNO OOZE | Dominat lithology; relative abundance | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 20 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 15 | 0 | 10 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
184.10 | 29-279A-10-CC,0 | 0 | 1 | 1 | Lower miocene | DISC + FORAM BEARING NANNO OOZE | Dominat lithology; relative abundance | 1 | 89 | 8 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 0 | 1 | 2 | 0 | 2 | 1 | 0 | 2 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 1 |
188.65 | 29-279A-11-3,65 | 10 | 80 | 10 | Lower miocene | DETRITAL SILT NANNO OOZE | Dominat lithology; relative abundance | 0 | 68 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 31 |
194.10 | 29-279A-11-CC,0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | DISC BEARING NANNO OOZE | Dominat lithology; numerical abundance | 1 | 96 | 3 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 55 | 55 | 2 | 0 | 3 | 1 | 0 | 15 | 55 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 10 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 40 | 2 | |
194.10 | 29-279A-11-CC,0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | DISC BEARING NANNO OOZE | Dominat lithology; relative abundance | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 23 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 0 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 0 | |
194.10 | 29-279A-11-CC,0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | DISC BEARING NANNO OOZE | Dominat lithology; relative abundance | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 55 | 0 | 0 | 0 |