Kennett, James P; Houtz, Robert E (2005): Smear slide analysis of Hole 29-275. PANGAEA, https://doi.org/10.1594/PANGAEA.230553
Always quote citation above when using data! You can download the citation in several formats below.
Related to:
DSDP (1989): Data from the Deep Sea Drilling Project. Sediment, hard rock and reference files. National Geophysical Data Center, National Environmental Satellite, Data and Information Service, National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration, U.S. Department of Commerce, 1, CD-ROM
Perch-Nielsen, Katharina; Ovenshine, A Thomas; Margolis, Stanley V; Jenkins, D Graham; Hampton, Monty A; Hajos, Marta; Gostin, Victor A; Edwards, Anthony R; Andrews, Peter B; Kennett, James P; Houtz, Robert E (1975): Initial Reports of the Deep Sea Drilling Project. Initial Reports of the Deep Sea Drilling Project, U.S. Government Printing Office, XXIX, 999 pp, https://doi.org/10.2973/dsdp.proc.29.1975
Further details:
Project(s):
Deep Sea Drilling Project (DSDP)
Coverage:
Latitude: -50.439000 * Longitude: 176.316500
Date/Time Start: 1973-03-04T00:00:00 * Date/Time End: 1973-03-04T00:00:00
Minimum DEPTH, sediment/rock: 1.17 m * Maximum DEPTH, sediment/rock: 55.60 m
Event(s):
29-275 * Latitude: -50.439000 * Longitude: 176.316500 * Date/Time: 1973-03-04T00:00:00 * Elevation: -2800.0 m * Penetration: 62 m * Recovery: 17 m * Location: Antarctic Ocean/PLATEAU * Campaign: Leg29 * Basis: Glomar Challenger * Method/Device: Drilling/drill rig (DRILL) * Comment: 4 cores; 33.5 m cored; 9.5 m drilled; 50.8 % recovery
Parameter(s):
# | Name | Short Name | Unit | Principal Investigator | Method/Device | Comment |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
1 | DEPTH, sediment/rock | Depth sed | m | Geocode | ||
2 | Sample code/label | Sample label | DSDP/ODP/IODP sample designation | |||
3 | Sand | Sand | % | Smear slide analysis | ||
4 | Silt | Silt | % | Smear slide analysis | ||
5 | Size fraction < 0.002 mm, clay | <2 µm | % | Smear slide analysis | ||
6 | Stratigraphy | Stratigraphy | Smear slide analysis | |||
7 | Lithology/composition/facies | Lithology | Smear slide analysis | |||
8 | Comment | Comment | Smear slide analysis | |||
9 | Foraminifera | Foram | % | Smear slide analysis | ||
10 | Radiolarians | Rad | % | Smear slide analysis | ||
11 | Diatoms | Diatoms | % | Smear slide analysis | ||
12 | Spiculae | Spiculae | % | Smear slide analysis | ||
13 | Quartz | Qz | % | Smear slide analysis | ||
14 | Feldspar | Fsp | % | Smear slide analysis | ||
15 | Zeolite | Zeo | % | Smear slide analysis | ||
16 | Mica | Mica | % | Smear slide analysis | ||
17 | Clay minerals | Clay min | % | Smear slide analysis | ||
18 | Glauconite | Glt | % | Smear slide analysis | ||
19 | Pyrite, FeS2 | Py | % | Smear slide analysis | ||
20 | Heavy minerals | HM | % | Smear slide analysis | ||
21 | Epidote | Ep | % | Smear slide analysis | ||
22 | Volcanic glass | Volc glass | % | Smear slide analysis | ||
23 | Palagonite | Palagonite | % | Smear slide analysis | ||
24 | Manganese | Mn | % | Smear slide analysis | ||
25 | Terrigenous | Terr | % | Smear slide analysis | terrigeneous detritus | |
26 | Micronodules | Micronod | % | Smear slide analysis |
License:
Creative Commons Attribution 3.0 Unported (CC-BY-3.0)
Size:
375 data points
Data
1 Depth sed [m] | 2 Sample label | 3 Sand [%] | 4 Silt [%] | 5 <2 µm [%] | 6 Stratigraphy | 7 Lithology | 8 Comment | 9 Foram [%] | 10 Rad [%] | 11 Diatoms [%] | 12 Spiculae [%] | 13 Qz [%] | 14 Fsp [%] | 15 Zeo [%] | 16 Mica [%] | 17 Clay min [%] | 18 Glt [%] | 19 Py [%] | 20 HM [%] | 21 Ep [%] | 22 Volc glass [%] | 23 Palagonite [%] | 24 Mn [%] | 25 Terr [%] | 26 Micronod [%] |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
1.17 | 29-275-1-11,117 | 25 | 65 | 15 | Upper campanian | QTZ RICH DIATOM RAD OOZE | Dominat lithology; relative abundance | 2 | 25 | 40 | 5 | 15 | 2 | 0 | 5 | 0 | 5 | 0 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 20 | 5 |
1.45 | 29-275-1-11,145 | 20 | 78 | 2 | Upper campanian | QTZ RICH DIATOM RAD OOZE | Dominat lithology; relative abundance | 0 | 45 | 30 | 0 | 20 | 1 | 0 | 2 | 0 | 2 | 0 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 21 | 0 |
2.39 | 29-275-1-2,89 | 30 | 65 | 5 | Upper campanian | GLAUC AND QTZ RICH RAD DIATOM OOZE | Dominat lithology; numerical abundance | 0 | 36 | 23 | 3 | 13 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 13 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 13 | 0 |
2.43 | 29-275-1-2,93 | 0 | 0 | 0 | Upper campanian | QTZ RAD BEARING RADS DIATOM OOZE | Dominat lithology; relative abundance | 0 | 45 | 50 | 1 | 5 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
2.45 | 29-275-1-2,95 | 40 | 50 | 10 | Upper campanian | GLAUC RAD DIATOM SILT | Dominat lithology; relative abundance | 0 | 20 | 30 | 2 | 20 | 0 | 0 | 5 | 0 | 25 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 25 | 2 |
3.80 | 29-275-1-3,80 | 0 | 0 | 0 | Upper campanian | QTZ BEARING GLAUC RICH DIATOM RAD OOZE | Dominat lithology; relative abundance | 0 | 45 | 35 | 3 | 7 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 10 | 0 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
5.80 | 29-275-1-41,130 | 15 | 80 | 5 | Upper campanian | GLAUC RICH RADS RICH DIATOM OOZE | Dominat lithology; relative abundance | 0 | 15 | 25 | 10 | 10 | 2 | 0 | 15 | 0 | 20 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 25 | 5 |
6.10 | 29-275-1-CC,0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | Upper campanian | GLAUC BEARING QTZ RICH DIATOM RAD OOZE | Dominat lithology; numerical abundance | 0 | 45 | 35 | 3 | 10 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 7 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
7.01 | 29-275-2-2,49 | 20 | 70 | 10 | Upper campanian | SILT AND GLAUC RICH RAD DIATOM OOZE | Dominat lithology; relative abundance | 0 | 20 | 35 | 5 | 15 | 2 | 0 | 5 | 0 | 20 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 2 |
13.22 | 29-275-2-6,70 | 45 | 35 | 20 | Upper campanian | RAD SP.SPIC GLAUC RICH SILTY SAND | Dominat lithology; numerical abundance | 0 | 10 | 5 | 15 | 15 | 5 | 0 | 15 | 0 | 20 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 10 | 0 | 0 | 35 | 5 |
34.96 | 29-275-4-11,146 | 20 | 50 | 30 | Upper campanian | GLAUC NODULE DETRITAL CLAYEY SILT | Dominat lithology; relative abundance | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 85 | 1 | 0 | 2 | 0 | 5 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 8 |
36.09 | 29-275-4-21,109 | 15 | 35 | 50 | Upper campanian | GLAUC DETRITAL SILTY CLAY | Minor lithology; relative abundance | 0 | 2 | 2 | 2 | 15 | 2 | 0 | 20 | 35 | 25 | 0 | 2 | 0 | 2 | 2 | 0 | 35 | 5 |
36.12 | 29-275-4-21,112 | 10 | 65 | 25 | Upper campanian | GLAUC BEARING NODULE RICH CLAYEY SILT | Dominat lithology; relative abundance | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 87 | 2 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 0 | 2 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 10 |
53.15 | 29-275-5-1,65 | 10 | 35 | 55 | Upper campanian | GLAUC QTZ BEARING MICACEOUS SILTY CLAY | Dominat lithology; relative abundance | 0 | 2 | 2 | 2 | 15 | 2 | 2 | 20 | 45 | 10 | 2 | 5 | 0 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
55.60 | 29-275-5-CC,0 | 35 | 35 | 30 | Upper campanian | GLAUC NODULE DETRITAL SANDY SILTY CLAY | Dominat lithology; relative abundance | 0 | 2 | 0 | 2 | 85 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 5 | 0 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 86 | 10 |