Hayes, Dennis E; Frakes, Lawrence A (2005): Smear slide analysis of Hole 28-267B. PANGAEA, https://doi.org/10.1594/PANGAEA.230543
Always quote citation above when using data! You can download the citation in several formats below.
Related to:
DSDP (1989): Data from the Deep Sea Drilling Project. Sediment, hard rock and reference files. National Geophysical Data Center, National Environmental Satellite, Data and Information Service, National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration, U.S. Department of Commerce, 1, CD-ROM
Webb, Peter-Noel; Wall, Robert E; Piper, David J W; McCollum, D W; Kemp, E M; Kaneps, Ansis G; Ford, Arthur B; Chen, Pei-Hsin; Burns, Derek A; Barrett, Peter J; Hayes, Dennis E; Frakes, Lawrence A (1975): Initial Reports of the Deep Sea Drilling Project. Initial Reports of the Deep Sea Drilling Project, U.S. Government Printing Office, XXVIII, 999 pp, https://doi.org/10.2973/dsdp.proc.28.1975
Further details:
Project(s):
Deep Sea Drilling Project (DSDP)
Coverage:
Latitude: -59.262300 * Longitude: 104.488300
Date/Time Start: 1973-01-06T00:00:00 * Date/Time End: 1973-01-06T00:00:00
Minimum DEPTH, sediment/rock: 105.40 m * Maximum DEPTH, sediment/rock: 314.55 m
Event(s):
28-267B * Latitude: -59.262300 * Longitude: 104.488300 * Date/Time: 1973-01-06T00:00:00 * Elevation: -4522.0 m * Penetration: 323 m * Recovery: 53.5 m * Location: Antarctic Ocean/BASIN * Campaign: Leg28 * Basis: Glomar Challenger * Method/Device: Drilling/drill rig (DRILL) * Comment: 10 cores; 95 m cored; 0 m drilled; 56.1 % recovery
Parameter(s):
# | Name | Short Name | Unit | Principal Investigator | Method/Device | Comment |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
1 | DEPTH, sediment/rock | Depth sed | m | Geocode | ||
2 | Sample code/label | Sample label | DSDP/ODP/IODP sample designation | |||
3 | Sand | Sand | % | Smear slide analysis | ||
4 | Silt | Silt | % | Smear slide analysis | ||
5 | Size fraction < 0.002 mm, clay | <2 µm | % | Smear slide analysis | ||
6 | Stratigraphy | Stratigraphy | Smear slide analysis | |||
7 | Lithology/composition/facies | Lithology | Smear slide analysis | |||
8 | Comment | Comment | Smear slide analysis | |||
9 | Carbonates | Carb | % | Smear slide analysis | ||
10 | Nannofossils | Nannos | % | Smear slide analysis | ||
11 | Diatoms | Diatoms | % | Smear slide analysis | ||
12 | Spiculae | Spiculae | % | Smear slide analysis | ||
13 | Quartz | Qz | % | Smear slide analysis | ||
14 | Feldspar | Fsp | % | Smear slide analysis | ||
15 | Zeolite | Zeo | % | Smear slide analysis | ||
16 | Mica | Mica | % | Smear slide analysis | ||
17 | Clay minerals | Clay min | % | Smear slide analysis | ||
18 | Heavy minerals | HM | % | Smear slide analysis | ||
19 | Terrigenous | Terr | % | Smear slide analysis | terrigeneous detritus |
License:
Creative Commons Attribution 3.0 Unported (CC-BY-3.0)
Size:
881 data points
Data
1 Depth sed [m] | 2 Sample label | 3 Sand [%] | 4 Silt [%] | 5 <2 µm [%] | 6 Stratigraphy | 7 Lithology | 8 Comment | 9 Carb [%] | 10 Nannos [%] | 11 Diatoms [%] | 12 Spiculae [%] | 13 Qz [%] | 14 Fsp [%] | 15 Zeo [%] | 16 Mica [%] | 17 Clay min [%] | 18 HM [%] | 19 Terr [%] |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
105.40 | 28-267B-1-1,40 | 2 | 28 | 70 | Pliocene | DIATOM RICH SILTY CLAY | Dominat lithology; relative abundance | 2 | 0 | 20 | 0 | 25 | 5 | 0 | 0 | 50 | 0 | 80 |
106.60 | 28-267B-1-CC,0 | 1 | 30 | 70 | Pliocene | DIATOM RICH SILTY CLAY | Dominat lithology; relative abundance | 2 | 0 | 20 | 2 | 15 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 65 | 0 | 80 |
134.56 | 28-267B-2-11,106 | 0 | 15 | 85 | Neogene | DIATOM DETRITAL CLAY | Dominat lithology; relative abundance | 2 | 0 | 30 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 60 | 0 | 70 |
134.67 | 28-267B-2-11,117 | 0 | 20 | 80 | Neogene | DIATOM DETRITAL CLAY | Dominat lithology; numerical abundance | 0 | 0 | 40 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 50 | 0 | 60 |
134.98 | 28-267B-2-11,148 | 5 | 25 | 70 | Neogene | CLAYEY DIATOM OOZE | Dominat lithology; relative abundance | 0 | 0 | 60 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 30 | 0 | 40 |
135.10 | 28-267B-2-CC,0 | 5 | 30 | 65 | Neogene | DIATOM RICH SILTY CLAY | Dominat lithology; relative abundance | 2 | 0 | 24 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 50 | 2 | 75 |
144.18 | 28-267B-3-11,118 | 0 | 35 | 65 | Upper miocene | DIATOM DETRITAL SILTY CLAY | Dominat lithology; relative abundance | 2 | 0 | 30 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 50 | 2 | 70 |
144.30 | 28-267B-3-11,130 | 0 | 10 | 90 | Upper miocene | CLAYEY DIATOM OOZE | Minor lithology; numerical abundance | 0 | 0 | 60 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 35 | 2 | 40 |
144.48 | 28-267B-3-11,148 | 1 | 25 | 75 | Upper miocene | DIATOM RICH SILTY CLAY | Dominat lithology; relative abundance | 0 | 0 | 40 | 0 | 15 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 45 | 2 | 60 |
145.27 | 28-267B-3-2,77 | 5 | 45 | 50 | Upper miocene | DIATOM DETRITAL SILTY CLAY | Dominat lithology; relative abundance | 0 | 0 | 30 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 30 | 2 | 60 |
145.60 | 28-267B-3-21,110 | 1 | 30 | 70 | Upper miocene | DIATOM DETRITAL SILTY CLAY | Dominat lithology; relative abundance | 0 | 2 | 40 | 0 | 15 | 5 | 0 | 0 | 40 | 1 | 60 |
145.75 | 28-267B-3-21,125 | 0 | 35 | 65 | Upper miocene | SILTY CLAY DIATOM OOZE | Dominat lithology; relative abundance | 0 | 0 | 60 | 0 | 13 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 25 | 2 | 40 |
146.10 | 28-267B-3-CC,0 | 1 | 25 | 75 | Upper miocene | DIATOM RICH SILTY CLAY | Dominat lithology; relative abundance | 0 | 2 | 20 | 0 | 20 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 60 | 2 | 80 |
162.50 | 28-267B-4-1,50 | 0 | 25 | 75 | Upper miocene | DIATOM RICH CLAY | Minor lithology; relative abundance | 0 | 0 | 20 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 60 | 2 | 80 |
162.95 | 28-267B-4-1,95 | 1 | 20 | 80 | Upper miocene | CLAYEY DIATOM OOZE | Dominat lithology; relative abundance | 0 | 0 | 70 | 2 | 5 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 25 | 2 | 30 |
164.44 | 28-267B-4-2,94 | 0 | 33 | 67 | Upper miocene | CLAY RICH DIATOM OOZE | Dominat lithology; relative abundance | 0 | 0 | 70 | 2 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 20 | 10 | 20 |
165.96 | 28-267B-4-3,96 | 0 | 20 | 80 | Upper miocene | CLAYEY DIATOM OOZE | Dominat lithology; relative abundance | 0 | 0 | 65 | 2 | 8 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 25 | 2 | 35 |
165.99 | 28-267B-4-3,99 | 0 | 25 | 75 | Upper miocene | CLAYEY DIATOM OOZE | Dominat lithology; relative abundance | 0 | 0 | 70 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 20 | 5 | 30 |
182.60 | 28-267B-5-11,110 | 1 | 25 | 75 | Middle miocene | DIATOM RICH SILTY CLAY | Dominat lithology; relative abundance | 0 | 0 | 20 | 0 | 20 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 60 | 2 | 80 |
183.30 | 28-267B-5-2,30 | 0 | 10 | 90 | Middle miocene | CLAYEY DIATOM OOZE | Dominat lithology; numerical abundance | 0 | 0 | 70 | 0 | 5 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 25 | 0 | 30 |
184.48 | 28-267B-5-21,148 | 0 | 20 | 80 | Middle miocene | CLAY RICH DIATOM OOZE | Dominat lithology; relative abundance | 0 | 2 | 80 | 2 | 5 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 15 | 0 | 20 |
185.74 | 28-267B-5-31,124 | 1 | 20 | 80 | Middle miocene | CLAYEY DIATOM OOZE | Dominat lithology; relative abundance | 0 | 2 | 50 | 2 | 10 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 40 | 2 | 50 |
188.50 | 28-267B-5-51,100 | 0 | 20 | 80 | Middle miocene | DIATOM RICH CLAY | Dominat lithology; relative abundance | 0 | 2 | 24 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 60 | 2 | 75 |
189.30 | 28-267B-5-6,30 | 0 | 10 | 90 | Middle miocene | CLAY RICH DIATOM OOZE | Dominat lithology; relative abundance | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 18 | 0 | 20 |
189.66 | 28-267B-5-6,66 | 1 | 33 | 67 | Middle miocene | DIATOM DETRITAL SILTY CLAY | Dominat lithology; relative abundance | 0 | 0 | 40 | 2 | 20 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 40 | 2 | 60 |
189.92 | 28-267B-5-6,92 | 1 | 50 | 50 | Middle miocene | DIATOM DETRITAL SILTY CLAY | Dominat lithology; relative abundance | 0 | 0 | 40 | 0 | 25 | 5 | 0 | 4 | 30 | 2 | 60 |
190.60 | 28-267B-5-CC,0 | 1 | 35 | 65 | SILTY CLAYEY DIATOM OOZE | Dominat lithology; relative abundance | 0 | 2 | 60 | 0 | 15 | 2 | 0 | 2 | 25 | 2 | 40 | |
210.70 | 28-267B-6-11,120 | 0 | 25 | 75 | Lower miocene | DIATOM DETRITAL CLAY | Dominat lithology; relative abundance | 0 | 2 | 40 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 45 | 0 | 60 |
211.30 | 28-267B-6-2,30 | 0 | 20 | 80 | Lower miocene | CLAYEY DIATOM OOZE | Dominat lithology; numerical abundance | 0 | 0 | 50 | 0 | 10 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 40 | 0 | 50 |
215.00 | 28-267B-6-41,100 | 1 | 35 | 65 | Lower miocene | DIATOM DETRITAL SILTY CLAY | Dominat lithology; relative abundance | 0 | 0 | 40 | 0 | 20 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 40 | 2 | 60 |
216.31 | 28-267B-6-5,81 | 0 | 0 | 0 | Lower miocene | CLAY RICH DIATOM OOZE | Dominat lithology; numerical abundance | 0 | 0 | 70 | 0 | 10 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 20 | 0 | 30 |
218.60 | 28-267B-6-CC,0 | 0 | 10 | 90 | Lower miocene | CLAYEY DIATOM OOZE | Dominat lithology; numerical abundance | 0 | 0 | 60 | 0 | 5 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 35 | 0 | 40 |
239.25 | 28-267B-7-1,75 | 1 | 15 | 85 | Miocene | DIATOM RICH CLAY | Dominat lithology; relative abundance | 0 | 0 | 20 | 0 | 10 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 70 | 2 | 80 |
240.90 | 28-267B-7-2,90 | 0 | 22 | 78 | Miocene | DIATOM RICH CLAY | Dominat lithology; relative abundance | 0 | 0 | 15 | 0 | 20 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 65 | 2 | 85 |
242.25 | 28-267B-7-3,75 | 0 | 35 | 65 | Miocene | DIATOM DETRITAL SILTY CLAY | Dominat lithology; relative abundance | 0 | 0 | 40 | 0 | 20 | 0 | 2 | 0 | 40 | 2 | 60 |
244.20 | 28-267B-7-41,120 | 0 | 20 | 80 | Miocene | DIATOM RICH CLAY | Dominat lithology; relative abundance | 0 | 0 | 20 | 0 | 15 | 2 | 0 | 2 | 65 | 2 | 80 |
247.60 | 28-267B-7-CC,0 | 1 | 48 | 62 | Miocene | DIATOM RICH SILTY CLAY | Dominat lithology; relative abundance | 0 | 0 | 20 | 0 | 30 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 50 | 2 | 80 |
268.00 | 28-267B-8-11,100 | 0 | 30 | 70 | Miocene | DIATOM RICH SILTY CLAY | Dominat lithology; relative abundance | 0 | 0 | 15 | 0 | 25 | 2 | 2 | 0 | 60 | 0 | 85 |
269.05 | 28-267B-8-2,55 | 1 | 27 | 73 | Miocene | DIATOM BEARING SILTY CLAY | Minor lithology; relative abundance | 0 | 0 | 10 | 0 | 25 | 0 | 2 | 0 | 65 | 2 | 90 |
271.82 | 28-267B-8-4,32 | 0 | 25 | 75 | Miocene | DIATOM DETRITAL SILTY CLAY | Dominat lithology; relative abundance | 0 | 0 | 40 | 2 | 20 | 2 | 0 | 2 | 45 | 2 | 60 |
273.72 | 28-267B-8-5,72 | 0 | 0 | 0 | Miocene | DIATOM RICH CLAY | Dominat lithology; relative abundance | 0 | 2 | 20 | 0 | 10 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 70 | 2 | 80 |
275.98 | 28-267B-8-61,148 | 0 | 0 | 0 | Miocene | DIATOM OOZE | Dominat lithology; relative abundance | 0 | 0 | 90 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 2 | 0 | 9 | 0 | 10 |
276.10 | 28-267B-8-CC,0 | 0 | 20 | 80 | Miocene | DIATOM DETRITAL CLAY | Dominat lithology; relative abundance | 0 | 0 | 40 | 0 | 10 | 0 | 2 | 0 | 50 | 0 | 60 |
296.13 | 28-267B-9-1,85 | 1 | 11 | 89 | Miocene | DIATOM BEARING CLAY | Dominat lithology; relative abundance | 0 | 0 | 10 | 2 | 10 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 80 | 0 | 90 |
296.61 | 28-267B-9-11,133 | 0 | 20 | 80 | Miocene | DIATOM BEARING CLAY | Dominat lithology; relative abundance | 0 | 0 | 8 | 2 | 17 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 75 | 2 | 92 |
297.38 | 28-267B-9-2,60 | 0 | 16 | 84 | Miocene | DIATOM BEARING CLAY | Dominat lithology; relative abundance | 0 | 0 | 5 | 0 | 15 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 80 | 2 | 95 |
300.68 | 28-267B-9-4,90 | 0 | 8 | 92 | Miocene | CLAY | Dominat lithology; relative abundance | 0 | 0 | 2 | 2 | 8 | 2 | 0 | 2 | 90 | 0 | 98 |
303.70 | 28-267B-9-6,92 | 0 | 8 | 92 | Miocene | CLAY | Dominat lithology; relative abundance | 0 | 0 | 2 | 2 | 8 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 90 | 0 | 98 |
314.55 | 28-267B-10-11,105 | 0 | 0 | 0 | Upper eocene | NANNO CHALK | Dominat lithology; numerical abundance | 0 | 100 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |