Hayes, Dennis E; Frakes, Lawrence A (2005): Smear slide analysis of Hole 28-267 [dataset]. PANGAEA, https://doi.org/10.1594/PANGAEA.230541
Always quote citation above when using data! You can download the citation in several formats below.
Related to:
DSDP (1989): Data from the Deep Sea Drilling Project. Sediment, hard rock and reference files. National Geophysical Data Center, National Environmental Satellite, Data and Information Service, National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration, U.S. Department of Commerce, 1, CD-ROM
Webb, Peter-Noel; Wall, Robert E; Piper, David J W; McCollum, D W; Kemp, E M; Kaneps, Ansis G; Ford, Arthur B; Chen, Pei-Hsin; Burns, Derek A; Barrett, Peter J; Hayes, Dennis E; Frakes, Lawrence A (1975): Initial Reports of the Deep Sea Drilling Project. Initial Reports of the Deep Sea Drilling Project, U.S. Government Printing Office, XXVIII, 999 pp, https://doi.org/10.2973/dsdp.proc.28.1975
Further details:
Processed smear slide data base - background and methods. hdl:10013/epic.32353.d001
Project(s):
Deep Sea Drilling Project (DSDP)
Coverage:
Latitude: -59.262300 * Longitude: 104.488300
Date/Time Start: 1973-01-06T00:00:00 * Date/Time End: 1973-01-06T00:00:00
Minimum DEPTH, sediment/rock: 1.08 m * Maximum DEPTH, sediment/rock: 204.00 m
Event(s):
28-267 * Latitude: -59.262300 * Longitude: 104.488300 * Date/Time: 1973-01-06T00:00:00 * Elevation: -4522.0 m * Penetration: 219.5 m * Recovery: 26.1 m * Location: Antarctic Ocean/BASIN * Campaign: Leg28 * Basis: Glomar Challenger * Method/Device: Drilling/drill rig (DRILL) * Comment: 6 cores; 48.5 m cored; 9.5 m drilled; 53.8 % recovery
Parameter(s):
# | Name | Short Name | Unit | Principal Investigator | Method/Device | Comment |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
1 | DEPTH, sediment/rock | Depth sed | m | Geocode | ||
2 | Sample code/label | Sample label | DSDP/ODP/IODP sample designation | |||
3 | Sand | Sand | % | Smear slide analysis | ||
4 | Silt | Silt | % | Smear slide analysis | ||
5 | Size fraction < 0.002 mm, clay | <2 µm | % | Smear slide analysis | ||
6 | Stratigraphy | Stratigraphy | Smear slide analysis | |||
7 | Lithology/composition/facies | Lithology | Smear slide analysis | |||
8 | Comment | Comment | Smear slide analysis | |||
9 | Carbonates | Carb | % | Smear slide analysis | ||
10 | Nannofossils | Nannos | % | Smear slide analysis | ||
11 | Radiolarians | Rad | % | Smear slide analysis | ||
12 | Diatoms | Diatoms | % | Smear slide analysis | ||
13 | Spiculae | Spiculae | % | Smear slide analysis | ||
14 | Quartz | Qz | % | Smear slide analysis | ||
15 | Feldspar | Fsp | % | Smear slide analysis | ||
16 | Mica | Mica | % | Smear slide analysis | ||
17 | Clay minerals | Clay min | % | Smear slide analysis |
License:
Creative Commons Attribution 3.0 Unported (CC-BY-3.0)
Size:
510 data points
Data
1 Depth sed [m] | 2 Sample label | 3 Sand [%] | 4 Silt [%] | 5 <2 µm [%] | 6 Stratigraphy | 7 Lithology | 8 Comment | 9 Carb [%] | 10 Nannos [%] | 11 Rad [%] | 12 Diatoms [%] | 13 Spiculae [%] | 14 Qz [%] | 15 Fsp [%] | 16 Mica [%] | 17 Clay min [%] |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
1.08 | 28-267-1-11,108 | 1 | 12 | 88 | Pliocene | DIATOM BEARING CLAY | Dominat lithology; relative abundance | 0 | 0 | 0 | 10 | 0 | 10 | 2 | 0 | 80 |
1.30 | 28-267-1-11,130 | 12 | 5 | 83 | Pliocene | DIATOM BEARING CLAY | Dominat lithology; relative abundance | 0 | 0 | 0 | 5 | 2 | 10 | 5 | 0 | 80 |
2.50 | 28-267-1-21,100 | 1 | 2 | 98 | Pliocene | CLAY | Minor lithology; relative abundance | 0 | 0 | 0 | 3 | 0 | 2 | 2 | 0 | 95 |
2.60 | 28-267-1-21,110 | 0 | 10 | 90 | Pliocene | DIATOM BEARING CLAY | Dominat lithology; numerical abundance | 0 | 0 | 0 | 5 | 0 | 8 | 2 | 0 | 85 |
2.80 | 28-267-1-21,130 | 1 | 19 | 81 | Pliocene | DIATOM RICH CLAY | Dominat lithology; numerical abundance | 0 | 0 | 0 | 15 | 0 | 15 | 0 | 0 | 70 |
4.60 | 28-267-1-CC,0 | 1 | 30 | 70 | DIATOM RICH SILT CLAY | Dominat lithology; numerical abundance | 0 | 0 | 0 | 15 | 0 | 15 | 10 | 0 | 60 | |
42.10 | 28-267-2-CC,0 | 0 | 7 | 93 | Miocene | DIATOM RICH CLAY | Dominat lithology; relative abundance | 0 | 0 | 0 | 15 | 0 | 5 | 2 | 0 | 80 |
90.86 | 28-267-3-11,136 | 0 | 10 | 90 | Lower miocene | CLAY | Minor lithology; relative abundance | 0 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 90 |
90.90 | 28-267-3-11,140 | 0 | 10 | 90 | Lower miocene | CLAY | Dominat lithology; numerical abundance | 0 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 88 |
92.30 | 28-267-3-21,130 | 0 | 5 | 95 | Lower miocene | CLAY | Dominat lithology; relative abundance | 0 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 0 | 5 | 0 | 0 | 95 |
93.25 | 28-267-3-3,75 | 0 | 5 | 95 | Lower miocene | CLAY | Dominat lithology; numerical abundance | 0 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 0 | 4 | 0 | 0 | 94 |
95.25 | 28-267-3-41,125 | 0 | 5 | 95 | Lower miocene | CLAY | Dominat lithology; relative abundance | 0 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 95 |
96.44 | 28-267-3-5,94 | 0 | 4 | 96 | Lower miocene | CLAY | Dominat lithology; numerical abundance | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 4 | 0 | 0 | 95 |
96.68 | 28-267-3-51,118 | 0 | 1 | 99 | Lower miocene | CLAY | Minor lithology; relative abundance | 15 | 2 | 0 | 2 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 80 |
97.10 | 28-267-3-CC,0 | 0 | 20 | 80 | Lower miocene | CLAY | Dominat lithology; relative abundance | 0 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 80 |
128.75 | 28-267-4-1,75 | 0 | 0 | 0 | Tertiary | CLAY BEARING NANNO OOZE | Dominat lithology; relative abundance | 2 | 90 | 1 | 1 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 5 |
129.32 | 28-267-4-11,132 | 0 | 0 | 0 | Tertiary | NANNO OOZE | Minor lithology; relative abundance | 0 | 90 | 0 | 1 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 9 |
130.30 | 28-267-4-2,80 | 0 | 0 | 0 | Tertiary | NANNO OOZE | Dominat lithology; relative abundance | 0 | 95 | 0 | 2 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 5 |
131.90 | 28-267-4-3,90 | 0 | 0 | 0 | Tertiary | NANNO OOZE | Dominat lithology; relative abundance | 0 | 93 | 1 | 1 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 5 |
133.30 | 28-267-4-4,80 | 0 | 0 | 0 | Tertiary | NANNO OOZE | Dominat lithology; relative abundance | 0 | 90 | 0 | 5 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 5 |
134.90 | 28-267-4-5,90 | 0 | 0 | 0 | Tertiary | NANNO OOZE | Dominat lithology; relative abundance | 1 | 95 | 0 | 2 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 2 |
136.20 | 28-267-4-6,70 | 0 | 0 | 0 | Tertiary | NANNO OOZE | Dominat lithology; relative abundance | 0 | 95 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 5 |
137.10 | 28-267-4-CC,0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | CLAY RICH NANNO OOZE | Dominat lithology; relative abundance | 5 | 65 | 0 | 1 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 30 | |
166.57 | 28-267-5-11,107 | 0 | 0 | 0 | Middle oligocene | NANNO CHALK | Minor lithology; relative abundance | 2 | 90 | 0 | 3 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 5 |
166.59 | 28-267-5-11,109 | 0 | 0 | 0 | Middle oligocene | NANNO OOZE,CHALK,LIGHTER BROWN | Minor lithology; relative abundance | 3 | 92 | 2 | 2 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 3 |
166.59 | 28-267-5-11,109 | 0 | 0 | 0 | Middle oligocene | NANNO OOZE,DARK BROWN LAYER | Minor lithology; relative abundance | 0 | 95 | 0 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 5 |
166.72 | 28-267-5-11,122 | 0 | 0 | 0 | Middle oligocene | NANNO OOZE | Dominat lithology; relative abundance | 1 | 95 | 0 | 2 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 3 |
167.10 | 28-267-5-2,10 | 0 | 0 | 0 | Middle oligocene | CHALK | Dominat lithology; relative abundance | 5 | 95 | 0 | 2 | 2 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
167.21 | 28-267-5-2,21 | 0 | 0 | 0 | Middle oligocene | NANNO OOZE | Dominat lithology; relative abundance | 2 | 94 | 0 | 1 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 3 |
168.80 | 28-267-5-3,30 | 0 | 0 | 0 | Middle oligocene | NANNO OOZE | Dominat lithology; relative abundance | 3 | 92 | 0 | 2 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 5 |
170.10 | 28-267-5-CC,0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | Middle oligocene | NANNO OOZE | Dominat lithology; relative abundance | 4 | 90 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 5 |
204.00 | 28-267-6-1,50 | 0 | 0 | 0 | Lower tertiary | NANNO CHALK | Dominat lithology; numerical abundance | 0 | 95 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 5 |