Citation:

PANGAEA.230541

Always quote citation above when using data! You can download the citation in several formats below.

RIS Citation BibTeX Citation Text Citation Facebook TwitterShow Map Google Earth

Related to:

DSDP (1989): Data from the Deep Sea Drilling Project. Sediment, hard rock and reference files. National Geophysical Data Center, National Environmental Satellite, Data and Information Service, National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration, U.S. Department of Commerce, 1, CD-ROM

Webb, Peter-Noel; Wall, Robert E; Piper, David J W; McCollum, D W; Kemp, E M; Kaneps, Ansis G; Ford, Arthur B; Chen, Pei-Hsin; Burns, Derek A; Barrett, Peter J; Hayes, Dennis E; Frakes, Lawrence A (1975): Initial Reports of the Deep Sea Drilling Project. Initial Reports of the Deep Sea Drilling Project, U.S. Government Printing Office, XXVIII, 999 pp, https://doi.org/10.2973/dsdp.proc.28.1975

Further details:

Processed smear slide data base - background and methods

Project(s):

Deep Sea Drilling Project (DSDP)

Coverage:

Latitude: -59.262300 * Longitude: 104.488300

Date/Time Start: 1973-01-06T00:00:00 * Date/Time End: 1973-01-06T00:00:00

Minimum DEPTH, sediment/rock: 1.08 m * Maximum DEPTH, sediment/rock: 204.00 m

Event(s):

28-267 * Latitude: -59.262300 * Longitude: 104.488300 * Date/Time: 1973-01-06T00:00:00 * Elevation: -4522.0 m * Penetration: 219.5 m * Recovery: 26.1 m * Location: Antarctic Ocean/BASIN * Campaign: * Basis: Glomar Challenger * Method/Device: Drilling/drill rig (DRILL) * Comment: 6 cores; 48.5 m cored; 9.5 m drilled; 53.8 % recovery

Parameter(s):

#	Name	Short Name	Unit	Method/Device	Comment
1	DEPTH, sediment/rock	Depth sed	m		Geocode
2	Sample code/label	Sample label		DSDP/ODP/IODP sample designation
3	Sand	Sand	%	Smear slide analysis
4	Silt	Silt	%	Smear slide analysis
5	Size fraction < 0.002 mm, clay	<2 µm	%	Smear slide analysis
6	Stratigraphy	Stratigraphy		Smear slide analysis
7	Lithology/composition/facies	Lithology		Smear slide analysis
8	Comment	Comment		Smear slide analysis
9	Carbonates	Carb	%	Smear slide analysis
10	Nannofossils	Nannos	%	Smear slide analysis
11	Radiolarians	Rad	%	Smear slide analysis
12	Diatoms	Diatoms	%	Smear slide analysis
13	Spiculae	Spiculae	%	Smear slide analysis
14	Quartz	Qz	%	Smear slide analysis
15	Feldspar	Fsp	%	Smear slide analysis
16	Mica	Mica	%	Smear slide analysis
17	Clay minerals	Clay min	%	Smear slide analysis

License:

Creative Commons Attribution 3.0 Unported (CC-BY-3.0)

Size:

510 data points

Data

Download dataset as tab-delimited text — use the following character encoding:

1 Depth sed [m]	2 Sample label	3 Sand [%]	4 Silt [%]	5 <2 µm [%]	6 Stratigraphy	7 Lithology	8 Comment	9 Carb [%]	10 Nannos [%]	11 Rad [%]	12 Diatoms [%]	13 Spiculae [%]	14 Qz [%]	15 Fsp [%]	16 Mica [%]	17 Clay min [%]
1.08	28-267-1-11,108	1	12	88	Pliocene	DIATOM BEARING CLAY	Dominat lithology; relative abundance	0	0	0	10	0	10	2	0	80
1.30	28-267-1-11,130	12	5	83	Pliocene	DIATOM BEARING CLAY	Dominat lithology; relative abundance	0	0	0	5	2	10	5	0	80
2.50	28-267-1-21,100	1	2	98	Pliocene	CLAY	Minor lithology; relative abundance	0	0	0	3	0	2	2	0	95
2.60	28-267-1-21,110	0	10	90	Pliocene	DIATOM BEARING CLAY	Dominat lithology; numerical abundance	0	0	0	5	0	8	2	0	85
2.80	28-267-1-21,130	1	19	81	Pliocene	DIATOM RICH CLAY	Dominat lithology; numerical abundance	0	0	0	15	0	15	0	0	70
4.60	28-267-1-CC,0	1	30	70		DIATOM RICH SILT CLAY	Dominat lithology; numerical abundance	0	0	0	15	0	15	10	0	60
42.10	28-267-2-CC,0	0	7	93	Miocene	DIATOM RICH CLAY	Dominat lithology; relative abundance	0	0	0	15	0	5	2	0	80
90.86	28-267-3-11,136	0	10	90	Lower miocene	CLAY	Minor lithology; relative abundance	0	0	0	2	0	0	0	0	90
90.90	28-267-3-11,140	0	10	90	Lower miocene	CLAY	Dominat lithology; numerical abundance	0	0	0	2	0	0	0	0	88
92.30	28-267-3-21,130	0	5	95	Lower miocene	CLAY	Dominat lithology; relative abundance	0	0	0	2	0	5	0	0	95
93.25	28-267-3-3,75	0	5	95	Lower miocene	CLAY	Dominat lithology; numerical abundance	0	0	0	2	0	4	0	0	94
95.25	28-267-3-41,125	0	5	95	Lower miocene	CLAY	Dominat lithology; relative abundance	0	0	0	2	0	0	0	0	95
96.44	28-267-3-5,94	0	4	96	Lower miocene	CLAY	Dominat lithology; numerical abundance	0	0	0	1	0	4	0	0	95
96.68	28-267-3-51,118	0	1	99	Lower miocene	CLAY	Minor lithology; relative abundance	15	2	0	2	0	1	0	0	80
97.10	28-267-3-CC,0	0	20	80	Lower miocene	CLAY	Dominat lithology; relative abundance	0	0	0	2	0	0	0	0	80
128.75	28-267-4-1,75	0	0	0	Tertiary	CLAY BEARING NANNO OOZE	Dominat lithology; relative abundance	2	90	1	1	2	0	0	0	5
129.32	28-267-4-11,132	0	0	0	Tertiary	NANNO OOZE	Minor lithology; relative abundance	0	90	0	1	2	0	0	0	9
130.30	28-267-4-2,80	0	0	0	Tertiary	NANNO OOZE	Dominat lithology; relative abundance	0	95	0	2	2	0	0	0	5
131.90	28-267-4-3,90	0	0	0	Tertiary	NANNO OOZE	Dominat lithology; relative abundance	0	93	1	1	2	0	0	0	5
133.30	28-267-4-4,80	0	0	0	Tertiary	NANNO OOZE	Dominat lithology; relative abundance	0	90	0	5	2	0	0	0	5
134.90	28-267-4-5,90	0	0	0	Tertiary	NANNO OOZE	Dominat lithology; relative abundance	1	95	0	2	2	0	0	0	2
136.20	28-267-4-6,70	0	0	0	Tertiary	NANNO OOZE	Dominat lithology; relative abundance	0	95	0	0	2	0	0	0	5
137.10	28-267-4-CC,0	0	0	0		CLAY RICH NANNO OOZE	Dominat lithology; relative abundance	5	65	0	1	2	0	0	0	30
166.57	28-267-5-11,107	0	0	0	Middle oligocene	NANNO CHALK	Minor lithology; relative abundance	2	90	0	3	2	0	0	0	5
166.59	28-267-5-11,109	0	0	0	Middle oligocene	NANNO OOZE,CHALK,LIGHTER BROWN	Minor lithology; relative abundance	3	92	2	2	2	0	0	0	3
166.59	28-267-5-11,109	0	0	0	Middle oligocene	NANNO OOZE,DARK BROWN LAYER	Minor lithology; relative abundance	0	95	0	2	0	0	0	0	5
166.72	28-267-5-11,122	0	0	0	Middle oligocene	NANNO OOZE	Dominat lithology; relative abundance	1	95	0	2	2	0	0	0	3
167.10	28-267-5-2,10	0	0	0	Middle oligocene	CHALK	Dominat lithology; relative abundance	5	95	0	2	2	2	0	0	0
167.21	28-267-5-2,21	0	0	0	Middle oligocene	NANNO OOZE	Dominat lithology; relative abundance	2	94	0	1	2	0	0	0	3
168.80	28-267-5-3,30	0	0	0	Middle oligocene	NANNO OOZE	Dominat lithology; relative abundance	3	92	0	2	2	0	0	2	5
170.10	28-267-5-CC,0	0	0	0	Middle oligocene	NANNO OOZE	Dominat lithology; relative abundance	4	90	0	0	2	0	0	0	5
204.00	28-267-6-1,50	0	0	0	Lower tertiary	NANNO CHALK	Dominat lithology; numerical abundance	0	95	0	0	0	0	0	0	5