Citation:

PANGAEA.230538

Always quote citation above when using data! You can download the citation in several formats below.

RIS Citation BibTeX Citation Text Citation Facebook TwitterShow Map Google Earth

Related to:

DSDP (1989): Data from the Deep Sea Drilling Project. Sediment, hard rock and reference files. National Geophysical Data Center, National Environmental Satellite, Data and Information Service, National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration, U.S. Department of Commerce, 1, CD-ROM

Webb, Peter-Noel; Wall, Robert E; Piper, David J W; McCollum, D W; Kemp, E M; Kaneps, Ansis G; Ford, Arthur B; Chen, Pei-Hsin; Burns, Derek A; Barrett, Peter J; Hayes, Dennis E; Frakes, Lawrence A (1975): Initial Reports of the Deep Sea Drilling Project. Initial Reports of the Deep Sea Drilling Project, U.S. Government Printing Office, XXVIII, 999 pp, https://doi.org/10.2973/dsdp.proc.28.1975

Further details:

Processed smear slide data base - background and methods

Project(s):

Deep Sea Drilling Project (DSDP)

Coverage:

Latitude: -34.968800 * Longitude: 112.044700

Date/Time Start: 1972-12-22T00:00:00 * Date/Time End: 1972-12-22T00:00:00

Minimum DEPTH, sediment/rock: 9.92 m * Maximum DEPTH, sediment/rock: 156.60 m

Event(s):

28-264A * Latitude: -34.968800 * Longitude: 112.044700 * Date/Time: 1972-12-22T00:00:00 * Elevation: -2876.0 m * Penetration: 158.5 m * Recovery: 33.2 m * Location: Indian Ocean//PLATEAU * Campaign: * Basis: Glomar Challenger * Method/Device: Drilling/drill rig (DRILL) * Comment: 4 cores; 38 m cored; 0 m drilled; 87.4 % recovery

Parameter(s):

#	Name	Short Name	Unit	Method/Device	Comment
1	DEPTH, sediment/rock	Depth sed	m		Geocode
2	Sample code/label	Sample label		DSDP/ODP/IODP sample designation
3	Sand	Sand	%	Smear slide analysis
4	Silt	Silt	%	Smear slide analysis
5	Size fraction < 0.002 mm, clay	<2 µm	%	Smear slide analysis
6	Stratigraphy	Stratigraphy		Smear slide analysis
7	Lithology/composition/facies	Lithology		Smear slide analysis
8	Comment	Comment		Smear slide analysis
9	Nannofossils	Nannos	%	Smear slide analysis
10	Foraminifera	Foram	%	Smear slide analysis
11	Radiolarians	Rad	%	Smear slide analysis
12	Spiculae	Spiculae	%	Smear slide analysis
13	Minerals, other	Min other	%	Smear slide analysis
14	Quartz	Qz	%	Smear slide analysis
15	Feldspar	Fsp	%	Smear slide analysis
16	Zeolite	Zeo	%	Smear slide analysis
17	Mica	Mica	%	Smear slide analysis
18	Heavy minerals	HM	%	Smear slide analysis
19	Volcanic glass	Volc glass	%	Smear slide analysis

License:

Creative Commons Attribution 3.0 Unported (CC-BY-3.0)

Size:

288 data points

Data

Download dataset as tab-delimited text — use the following character encoding:

1 Depth sed [m]	2 Sample label	6 Stratigraphy	7 Lithology	8 Comment	9 Nannos [%]	10 Foram [%]	11 Rad [%]	12 Spiculae [%]	13 Min other [%]	14 Qz [%]	15 Fsp [%]	16 Zeo [%]	17 Mica [%]	18 HM [%]	19 Volc glass [%]
9.92	28-264A-1-11,142	Pleistocene	FORAM RICH NANNO OOZE	Dominat lithology; relative abundance	0	8	0	2	0	0	2	0	0	0	2
10.09	28-264A-1-2,9	Pleistocene	FORAM RICH NANNO OOZE	Dominat lithology; relative abundance	70	23	0	1	0	0	0	0	0	0	2
12.89	28-264A-1-31,139	Pleistocene	FORAM RICH NANNO OOZE	Dominat lithology; relative abundance	80	13	0	2	0	0	0	0	0	0	6
15.91	28-264A-1-51,140	Pleistocene	FORAM RICH NANNO OOZE	Dominat lithology; numerical abundance	0	0	5	45	0	25	0	0	0	0	25
15.92	28-264A-1-51,142	Pleistocene	FORAM RICH NANNO OOZE	Dominat lithology; relative abundance	63	23	0	3	0	0	0	0	2	0	6
19.40	28-264A-2-11,140	Pliocene	FORAM NANNO OOZE	Dominat lithology; relative abundance	65	30	0	2	0	2	0	0	0	2	2
25.46	28-264A-2-51,146	Pliocene	FORAM RICH NANNO OOZE	Dominat lithology; relative abundance	78	18	0	2	0	0	0	0	0	2	2
26.03	28-264A-2-6,53	Pliocene	FORAM NANNO OOZE	Dominat lithology; relative abundance	68	28	0	2	0	0	0	0	0	2	2
27.10	28-264A-2-CC,0	Pliocene	FORAM RICH NANNO OOZE	Dominat lithology; relative abundance	78	18	0	2	2	0	2	0	0	2	2
139.91	28-264A-3-1,41	Middle eocene	NANNO OOZE	Dominat lithology; relative abundance	98	2	0	0	0	0	0	2	2	0	2
143.52	28-264A-3-31,102	Middle eocene	NANNO OOZE	Dominat lithology; relative abundance	95	2	0	0	0	0	0	2	2	2	2
147.93	28-264A-3-6,93	Middle eocene	NANNO OOZE	Dominat lithology; relative abundance	98	2	0	0	0	0	0	0	2	0	2
148.60	28-264A-3-CC,0	Middle eocene	NANNO OOZE	Dominat lithology; relative abundance	95	2	0	2	0	0	0	0	3	0	0
151.15	28-264A-4-2,65	Middle eocene	NANNO OOZE	Dominat lithology; relative abundance	98	2	0	0	0	0	0	0	2	0	2
156.00	28-264A-4-51,100	Lower eocene	NANNO OOZE	Dominat lithology; relative abundance	98	2	0	0	0	0	0	2	2	0	2
156.60	28-264A-4-CC,0	Lower eocene	NANNO OOZE	Dominat lithology; relative abundance	98	2	0	0	0	0	0	2	3	0	2