Citation:

PANGAEA.230537

Always quote citation above when using data! You can download the citation in several formats below.

RIS Citation BibTeX Citation Text Citation Facebook TwitterShow Map Google Earth

Related to:

DSDP (1989): Data from the Deep Sea Drilling Project. Sediment, hard rock and reference files. National Geophysical Data Center, National Environmental Satellite, Data and Information Service, National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration, U.S. Department of Commerce, 1, CD-ROM

Webb, Peter-Noel; Wall, Robert E; Piper, David J W; McCollum, D W; Kemp, E M; Kaneps, Ansis G; Ford, Arthur B; Chen, Pei-Hsin; Burns, Derek A; Barrett, Peter J; Hayes, Dennis E; Frakes, Lawrence A (1975): Initial Reports of the Deep Sea Drilling Project. Initial Reports of the Deep Sea Drilling Project, U.S. Government Printing Office, XXVIII, 999 pp, https://doi.org/10.2973/dsdp.proc.28.1975

Further details:

Processed smear slide data base - background and methods

Project(s):

Deep Sea Drilling Project (DSDP)

Coverage:

Latitude: -34.968800 * Longitude: 112.044700

Date/Time Start: 1972-12-22T00:00:00 * Date/Time End: 1972-12-22T00:00:00

Minimum DEPTH, sediment/rock: 1.41 m * Maximum DEPTH, sediment/rock: 170.56 m

Event(s):

28-264 * Latitude: -34.968800 * Longitude: 112.044700 * Date/Time: 1972-12-22T00:00:00 * Elevation: -2876.0 m * Penetration: 215.5 m * Recovery: 52.7 m * Location: Indian Ocean//PLATEAU * Campaign: * Basis: Glomar Challenger * Method/Device: Drilling/drill rig (DRILL) * Comment: 9 cores; 85.5 m cored; 28.5 m drilled; 61.6 % recovery

Parameter(s):

#	Name	Short Name	Unit	Method/Device	Comment
1	DEPTH, sediment/rock	Depth sed	m		Geocode
2	Sample code/label	Sample label		DSDP/ODP/IODP sample designation
3	Sand	Sand	%	Smear slide analysis
4	Silt	Silt	%	Smear slide analysis
5	Size fraction < 0.002 mm, clay	<2 µm	%	Smear slide analysis
6	Stratigraphy	Stratigraphy		Smear slide analysis
7	Lithology/composition/facies	Lithology		Smear slide analysis
8	Comment	Comment		Smear slide analysis
9	Dolomite	Dol	%	Smear slide analysis
10	Nannofossils	Nannos	%	Smear slide analysis
11	Foraminifera	Foram	%	Smear slide analysis
12	Radiolarians	Rad	%	Smear slide analysis
13	Diatoms	Diatoms	%	Smear slide analysis
14	Spiculae	Spiculae	%	Smear slide analysis
15	Quartz	Qz	%	Smear slide analysis
16	Feldspar	Fsp	%	Smear slide analysis
17	Zeolite	Zeo	%	Smear slide analysis
18	Mica	Mica	%	Smear slide analysis
19	Clay minerals	Clay min	%	Smear slide analysis
20	Iron	Fe	%	Smear slide analysis
21	Volcanic glass	Volc glass	%	Smear slide analysis

License:

Creative Commons Attribution 3.0 Unported (CC-BY-3.0)

Size:

980 data points

Data

Download dataset as tab-delimited text — use the following character encoding:

1 Depth sed [m]	2 Sample label	4 Silt [%]	5 <2 µm [%]	6 Stratigraphy	7 Lithology	8 Comment	9 Dol [%]	10 Nannos [%]	11 Foram [%]	12 Rad [%]	13 Diatoms [%]	14 Spiculae [%]	15 Qz [%]	16 Fsp [%]	17 Zeo [%]	18 Mica [%]	19 Clay min [%]	20 Fe [%]	21 Volc glass [%]
1.41	28-264-1-11,141	0	0	Pleistocene	FORAM RICH NANNO OOZE	Dominat lithology; relative abundance	0	85	15	0	0	2	0	0	0	0	0	2	0
2.74	28-264-1-21,124	0	0	Pleistocene	FORAM NANNO OOZE	Dominat lithology; numerical abundance	0	55	35	0	0	3	0	0	0	0	0	0	0
4.09	28-264-1-31,109	0	0	Pleistocene	FORAM NANNO OOZE	Dominat lithology; relative abundance	0	65	35	0	0	2	0	2	0	0	0	2	0
4.13	28-264-1-31,113	0	0	Pleistocene	FORAM NANNO OOZE	Dominat lithology; relative abundance	0	75	25	0	0	2	0	0	1	0	0	0	0
8.96	28-264-1-61,146	0	0	Pleistocene	FORAM NANNO OOZE	Dominat lithology; relative abundance	0	68	28	0	0	2	0	0	0	0	0	0	0
9.10	28-264-1-CC,0	0	0	Pleistocene	FORAM RICH NANNO OOZE	Dominat lithology; relative abundance	0	80	20	0	0	2	0	0	0	0	0	2	0
25.60	28-264-2-1,10	0	0	Upper miocene	FORAM BEARING NANNO OOZE	Dominat lithology; relative abundance	0	89	9	0	2	2	0	0	0	0	0	0	0
27.14	28-264-2-2,14	0	0	Upper miocene	FORAM RICH NANNO OOZE	Dominat lithology; relative abundance	0	90	8	0	0	2	0	0	0	0	0	2	0
28.70	28-264-2-3,20	0	0	Upper miocene	FORAM BEARING NANNO OOZE	Dominat lithology; relative abundance	0	96	4	0	0	2	0	0	0	0	0	2	0
30.75	28-264-2-4,75	0	0	Upper eocene	FORAM RICH NANNO OOZE	Dominat lithology; relative abundance	0	80	20	0	0	2	0	0	0	0	0	0	2
30.80	28-264-2-4,80	0	0	Upper eocene	NANNO OOZE	Minor lithology; relative abundance	0	100	2	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0
31.46	28-264-2-41,146	0	0	Upper eocene	NANNO OOZE	Minor lithology; relative abundance	0	98	2	2	0	2	0	0	0	0	0	0	0
33.05	28-264-2-6,5	0	0	Upper eocene	NANNO OOZE	Dominat lithology; relative abundance	0	98	2	2	0	2	0	0	0	0	0	0	0
57.35	28-264-3-21,135	0	0	Upper eocene	NANNO OOZE	Dominat lithology; relative abundance	0	98	2	0	0	2	0	0	0	0	0	0	2
60.42	28-264-3-41,142	0	0	Upper eocene	NANNO OOZE	Dominat lithology; relative abundance	0	98	2	0	0	2	2	0	0	0	0	0	0
61.07	28-264-3-5,57	0	0	Upper eocene	NANNO OOZE	Dominat lithology; relative abundance	0	98	2	0	0	1	0	0	0	0	0	0	1
63.60	28-264-3-CC,0	0	0	Middle eocene	NANNO OOZE	Dominat lithology; relative abundance	0	100	2	0	0	2	0	0	0	0	0	0	2
66.43	28-264-4-21,103	0	0	Middle eocene	NANNO OOZE	Dominat lithology; relative abundance	0	98	2	0	0	2	0	0	0	0	0	0	0
66.46	28-264-4-21,106	0	0	Middle eocene	NANNO OOZE	Dominat lithology; relative abundance	0	98	2	0	0	2	0	0	0	0	0	0	0
68.25	28-264-4-31,135	0	0	Middle eocene	NANNO OOZE	Dominat lithology; relative abundance	0	98	2	0	0	2	0	0	2	0	0	0	0
69.32	28-264-4-4,92	0	0	Middle eocene	NANNO OOZE	Dominat lithology; relative abundance	0	98	2	0	0	2	0	0	0	0	0	0	0
70.10	28-264-4-5,20	0	0	Middle eocene	NANNO OOZE	Dominat lithology; relative abundance	0	98	2	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0
74.30	28-264-5-11,130	0	0	Middle eocene	NANNO OOZE	Dominat lithology; relative abundance	0	98	2	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	2
76.85	28-264-5-3,85	0	0	Middle eocene	NANNO OOZE	Dominat lithology; relative abundance	0	98	2	0	0	2	0	0	0	0	0	0	2
76.90	28-264-5-3,90	0	0	Middle eocene	NANNO OOZE	Dominat lithology; relative abundance	0	98	2	0	0	2	0	0	0	0	0	0	2
78.90	28-264-5-41,140	0	0	Middle eocene	NANNO OOZE	Dominat lithology; relative abundance	0	98	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	2
80.40	28-264-5-51,140	0	0	Middle eocene	NANNO OOZE	Dominat lithology; relative abundance	0	98	2	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	2
83.90	28-264-6-11,140	0	0	Middle eocene	NANNO OOZE	Dominat lithology; relative abundance	0	98	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	2
86.93	28-264-6-31,143	0	0	Middle eocene	NANNO OOZE	Dominat lithology; relative abundance	0	98	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	2	0	0	0
92.57	28-264-7-1,57	0	0	Middle eocene	NANNO OOZE	Dominat lithology; relative abundance	0	98	0	0	0	0	0	0	1	0	0	0	2
93.95	28-264-7-2,45	0	0	Middle eocene	NANNO OOZE	Minor lithology; relative abundance	0	98	2	0	0	0	0	0	2	0	0	0	0
93.96	28-264-7-2,46	0	0	Middle eocene	NANNO OOZE	Dominat lithology; relative abundance	0	98	2	0	0	2	0	0	2	0	0	0	0
98.10	28-264-7-CC,0	5	95	Middle eocene	NANNO CHALK	Dominat lithology; relative abundance	0	0	0	0	0	0	23	0	0	0	100	0	0
104.10	28-264-8-21,110	0	0	Middle eocene	NANNO OOZE	Dominat lithology; relative abundance	0	98	0	0	0	0	0	0	2	2	0	0	0
107.00	28-264-8-41,100	0	0	Middle eocene	NANNO OOZE	Dominat lithology; relative abundance	0	98	0	0	0	0	0	0	2	2	0	0	0
107.60	28-264-8-CC,0	5	95	Middle eocene	NANNO CHALK	Dominat lithology; numerical abundance	0	0	0	0	0	0	1	0	0	0	100	0	0
130.00	28-264-9-1,0	0	0	Middle eocene	NANNO CHALK	Dominat lithology; relative abundance	0	98	0	0	0	0	0	0	2	0	0	0	2
132.85	28-264-9-21,135	0	0	Middle eocene	NANNO CHALK	Dominat lithology; relative abundance	0	98	0	0	0	0	0	0	2	2	0	0	2
133.10	28-264-9-CC,0	10	90	Middle eocene	NANNO CHALK	Dominat lithology; numerical abundance	0	0	0	0	0	0	1	0	0	0	100	0	0
159.92	28-264-10-11,142	0	0	Lower eocene	MICA BEARING NANNO CHALK	Dominat lithology; relative abundance	0	95	2	0	0	0	0	0	2	4	0	0	0
161.06	28-264-10-21,106	0	0	Lower eocene	MICA RICH NANNO OOZE	Dominat lithology; relative abundance	0	83	2	0	0	2	0	0	0	13	0	0	2
161.82	28-264-10-3,32	0	0	Lower eocene	MICA RICH NANNO OOZE	Dominat lithology; relative abundance	0	85	2	0	0	0	0	0	2	13	0	0	2
162.51	28-264-10-31,101	0	0	Lower eocene	MICA RICH NANNO OOZE	Dominat lithology; relative abundance	0	2	0	0	0	0	0	0	2	2	0	0	0
162.86	28-264-10-31,136	0	0	Lower eocene	MICA RICH NANNO OOZE	Dominat lithology; relative abundance	2	80	0	0	0	2	0	0	0	20	0	0	2
162.92	28-264-10-31,142	0	0	Lower eocene	MICA RICH NANNO OOZE	Dominat lithology; relative abundance	0	85	2	0	0	2	0	0	0	13	0	0	2
163.10	28-264-10-CC,0	40	60	Middle paleocene	NANNO CHALK	Dominat lithology; numerical abundance	0	0	0	0	0	0	1	0	0	0	100	0	0
169.26	28-264-11-11,126	0	0	Senonian	MICACEOUS FORAM-RICH NANNO OOZE	Dominat lithology; relative abundance	0	68	18	0	0	2	0	0	0	10	0	0	2
169.27	28-264-11-11,127	0	0	Senonian	MICACEOUS NANNO OOZE	Minor lithology; relative abundance	0	70	0	0	0	0	0	0	2	30	0	0	2
170.56	28-264-11-21,106	0	0	Senonian	MICACEOUS FORAM-RICH NANNO OOZE	Dominat lithology; numerical abundance	0	63	18	0	0	0	0	0	0	18	0	0	2