Citation:

PANGAEA.230484

Always quote citation above when using data! You can download the citation in several formats below.

RIS Citation BibTeX Citation Text Citation Facebook TwitterShow Map Google Earth

Related to:

DSDP (1989): Data from the Deep Sea Drilling Project. Sediment, hard rock and reference files. National Geophysical Data Center, National Environmental Satellite, Data and Information Service, National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration, U.S. Department of Commerce, 1, CD-ROM

Supko, Peter R; Manheim, Frank T; Girdler, R W; Coleman, Robert; Stoffers, Peter; Siddiquie, H N; Nigrini, Catherine A; Matter, A; Mallik, Tapas Kumar; Kidd, Robert B; Jipa, Dan Constantin; Fleisher, R L; Boudreaux, J E; Ali, S; Whitmarsh, Robert B; Weser, Oscar E; Ross, David A (1974): Initial Reports of the Deep Sea Drilling Project. Initial Reports of the Deep Sea Drilling Project, U.S. Government Printing Office, XXIII, 1180 pp, https://doi.org/10.2973/dsdp.proc.23.1974

Further details:

Processed smear slide data base - background and methods

Project(s):

Deep Sea Drilling Project (DSDP)

Coverage:

Latitude: 9.029200 * Longitude: 72.877800

Date/Time Start: 1972-03-10T00:00:00 * Date/Time End: 1972-03-10T00:00:00

Minimum DEPTH, sediment/rock: 1.40 m * Maximum DEPTH, sediment/rock: 387.60 m

Event(s):

23-219A * Latitude: 9.029200 * Longitude: 72.877800 * Date/Time: 1972-03-10T00:00:00 * Elevation: -1764.0 m * Penetration: 411 m * Recovery: 55.7 m * Location: Indian Ocean/Arabian Sea/RIDGE * Campaign: * Basis: Glomar Challenger * Method/Device: Drilling/drill rig (DRILL) * Comment: 13 cores; 396 m cored; 9 m drilled; 14.1 % recovery

Parameter(s):

#	Name	Short Name	Unit	Method/Device	Comment
1	DEPTH, sediment/rock	Depth sed	m		Geocode
2	Sample code/label	Sample label		DSDP/ODP/IODP sample designation
3	Sand	Sand	%	Smear slide analysis
4	Silt	Silt	%	Smear slide analysis
5	Size fraction < 0.002 mm, clay	<2 µm	%	Smear slide analysis
6	Stratigraphy	Stratigraphy		Smear slide analysis
7	Lithology/composition/facies	Lithology		Smear slide analysis
8	Comment	Comment		Smear slide analysis
9	Nannofossils	Nannos	%	Smear slide analysis
10	Foraminifera	Foram	%	Smear slide analysis
11	Radiolarians	Rad	%	Smear slide analysis
12	Spiculae	Spiculae	%	Smear slide analysis
13	Quartz	Qz	%	Smear slide analysis
14	Clay minerals	Clay min	%	Smear slide analysis
15	Glauconite	Glt	%	Smear slide analysis

License:

Creative Commons Attribution 3.0 Unported (CC-BY-3.0)

Size:

122 data points

Data

Download dataset as tab-delimited text — use the following character encoding:

1 Depth sed [m]	2 Sample label	3 Sand [%]	4 Silt [%]	5 <2 µm [%]	6 Stratigraphy	7 Lithology	8 Comment	9 Nannos [%]	10 Foram [%]	11 Rad [%]	12 Spiculae [%]	13 Qz [%]	14 Clay min [%]	15 Glt [%]
1.40	23-219A-1-11,140	0	0	0		FORAM AND RAD RICH NANNO OOZE	Dominat lithology; numerical abundance	70	15	15	0	0	0	0
4.30	23-219A-1-31,130	0	0	0		FORAM AND RAD BEARING NANNO OOZE	Dominat lithology; numerical abundance	85	5	10	0	0	0	0
4.55	23-219A-1-4,5	0	0	0		FORAM AND RAD RICH NANNO OOZE	Dominat lithology; numerical abundance	70	15	15	0	0	0	0
5.30	23-219A-1-4,80	0	0	0		FORAM AND RAD BEARING NANNO CHALK	Dominat lithology; numerical abundance	90	5	5	0	0	0	0
351.00	23-219A-8-51,100	0	0	0	Upper paleocene	SPICULE BEARING QUARTZ RICH SILTY CLAY	Dominat lithology; relative abundance	0	0	2	10	15	75	2
354.45	23-219A-9-11,145	0	30	70	Upper paleocene	SPICULE RICH QUARTZ BEARING SILTY CLAY	Dominat lithology; relative abundance	0	0	0	10	20	70	2
371.90	23-219A-11-1,90	10	40	50	Upper paleocene	CLAYEY SILTSTONE	Dominat lithology; numerical abundance	0	0	0	0	0	0	0
386.59	23-219A-12-5,59	0	20	80	Upper paleocene	SILTY CLAYSTONE	Dominat lithology; numerical abundance	0	0	0	0	0	0	0
387.60	23-219A-12-CC,0	0	30	70	Upper paleocene	GLAUCONITE BEARING SILTY CLAY	Dominat lithology; numerical abundance	0	0	0	0	0	0	0