Citation:

PANGAEA.230416

Always quote citation above when using data! You can download the citation in several formats below.

RIS Citation BibTeX Citation Text Citation Facebook TwitterShow Map Google Earth

Related to:

DSDP (1989): Data from the Deep Sea Drilling Project. Sediment, hard rock and reference files. National Geophysical Data Center, National Environmental Satellite, Data and Information Service, National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration, U.S. Department of Commerce, 1, CD-ROM

Wise, Sherwood W; Weser, Oscar E; Schrader, Hans-Jürgen; Pratt, Richard M; Piper, David J W; Musich, L F; Kling, Stanley; Ingle, James C; Duncan, John R; Kulm, LaVerne D; von Huene, Roland (1973): Initial Reports of the Deep Sea Drilling Project. Initial Reports of the Deep Sea Drilling Project, U.S. Government Printing Office, XVIII, 1077 pp, https://doi.org/10.2973/dsdp.proc.18.1973

Further details:

Processed smear slide data base - background and methods

Project(s):

Deep Sea Drilling Project (DSDP)

Coverage:

Latitude: 31.537200 * Longitude: -133.372700

Date/Time Start: 1971-06-05T00:00:00 * Date/Time End: 1971-06-05T00:00:00

Minimum DEPTH, sediment/rock: 0.15 m * Maximum DEPTH, sediment/rock: 27.18 m

Event(s):

18-172 * Latitude: 31.537200 * Longitude: -133.372700 * Date/Time: 1971-06-05T00:00:00 * Elevation: -4768.0 m * Penetration: 24 m * Recovery: 26.5 m * Location: North Pacific * Campaign: * Basis: Glomar Challenger * Method/Device: Drilling/drill rig (DRILL) * Comment: 3 cores; 23 m cored; 1 m drilled; 115.2 % recovery

Parameter(s):

#	Name	Short Name	Unit	Method/Device	Comment
1	DEPTH, sediment/rock	Depth sed	m		Geocode
2	Sample code/label	Sample label		DSDP/ODP/IODP sample designation
3	Sand	Sand	%	Smear slide analysis
4	Silt	Silt	%	Smear slide analysis
5	Size fraction < 0.002 mm, clay	<2 µm	%	Smear slide analysis
6	Stratigraphy	Stratigraphy		Smear slide analysis
7	Lithology/composition/facies	Lithology		Smear slide analysis
8	Comment	Comment		Smear slide analysis
9	Carbonates	Carb	%	Smear slide analysis
10	Nannofossils	Nannos	%	Smear slide analysis
11	Foraminifera	Foram	%	Smear slide analysis
12	Quartz	Qz	%	Smear slide analysis
13	Feldspar	Fsp	%	Smear slide analysis
14	Zeolite	Zeo	%	Smear slide analysis
15	Iron	Fe	%	Smear slide analysis
16	Pyroxene	Pyrox	%	Smear slide analysis
17	Volcanic glass	Volc glass	%	Smear slide analysis

License:

Creative Commons Attribution 3.0 Unported (CC-BY-3.0)

Size:

678 data points

Data

Download dataset as tab-delimited text — use the following character encoding:

1 Depth sed [m]	2 Sample label	4 Silt [%]	5 <2 µm [%]	6 Stratigraphy	7 Lithology	8 Comment	9 Carb [%]	10 Nannos [%]	11 Foram [%]	12 Qz [%]	13 Fsp [%]	14 Zeo [%]	15 Fe [%]	16 Pyrox [%]	17 Volc glass [%]
0.15	18-172-1-1,15	5	85	Quaternary	RED CLAY	Dominat lithology; numerical abundance	2	0	0	0	0	4	0	0	4
0.96	18-172-1-1,96	5	85	Quaternary	RED CLAY	Dominat lithology; numerical abundance	2	0	0	0	0	4	0	0	4
2.43	18-172-1-2,93	5	85	Quaternary	RED CLAY	Dominat lithology; numerical abundance	2	0	0	0	0	4	0	0	4
3.75	18-172-1-3,75	10	85	Quaternary	RED CLAY	Dominat lithology; relative abundance	0	0	6	0	0	0	0	0	5
4.15	18-172-1-31,115	5	87	Quaternary	RED CLAY	Dominat lithology; numerical abundance	4	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	4
5.40	18-172-1-4,90	5	85	Quaternary	RED CLAY	Dominat lithology; numerical abundance	2	0	0	0	0	4	0	0	4
6.94	18-172-1-5,94	5	58	Quaternary	ZEOLITIC RED CLAY	Dominat lithology; numerical abundance	2	0	0	0	0	4	0	0	0
7.51	18-172-1-6,1	5	87	Quaternary	RED CLAY	Dominat lithology; numerical abundance	2	0	0	0	0	6	0	0	0
9.00	18-172-1-61,150	6	78	Neogene	ZEOLITE RICH RED CLAY	Dominat lithology; numerical abundance	0	0	0	0	0	16	0	0	0
9.11	18-172-2-1,11	2	30	Neogene	RED CLAY ZEOLITITE	Dominat lithology; numerical abundance	0	0	0	0	0	60	0	0	0
9.80	18-172-2-1,80	5	73	Neogene	ZEOLITE RICH RED CLAY	Dominat lithology; numerical abundance	2	0	0	0	0	20	0	0	0
9.82	18-172-2-1,82	6	54	Neogene	ZEOLITIC RED CLAY	Minor lithology; numerical abundance	0	0	0	3	3	40	0	0	0
11.08	18-172-2-2,58	0	76	Neogene	ZEOLITE RICH RED CLAY	Dominat lithology; relative abundance	0	6	0	2	2	20	0	0	0
11.25	18-172-2-2,75	0	34	Neogene	RED CLAY ZEOLITITE	Dominat lithology; numerical abundance	0	0	0	3	3	60	0	3	0
12.17	18-172-2-3,17	0	0	Neogene	ZEOLITITE	Minor lithology; numerical abundance	0	0	0	2	2	96	0	0	0
12.60	18-172-2-3,60	0	31	Neogene	RED CLAY ZEOLITITE	Dominat lithology; numerical abundance	0	0	0	2	2	65	0	0	0
12.70	18-172-2-3,70	0	15	Neogene	RED CLAY RICH ZEOLITITE	Minor lithology; numerical abundance	0	0	0	2	2	81	0	0	0
14.25	18-172-2-4,75	0	31	Neogene	RED CLAY ZEOLITITE	Dominat lithology; numerical abundance	0	0	0	2	2	65	0	0	0
14.95	18-172-2-41,145	0	9	Neogene	ZEOLITITE	Minor lithology; numerical abundance	0	0	0	2	2	87	0	0	0
15.60	18-172-2-5,60	0	0	Neogene	ZEOLITITE	Minor lithology; numerical abundance	0	0	0	2	2	96	0	0	0
16.00	18-172-2-51,100	0	25	Neogene	RED CLAY ZEOLITITE	Dominat lithology; numerical abundance	0	0	0	2	2	71	0	0	0
17.90	18-172-2-61,140	0	81	Neogene	ZEOLITE RICH RED CLAY	Dominat lithology; numerical abundance	0	0	0	2	2	15	0	0	0
18.79	18-172-3-1,52	0	10	Lower oligocene	RED CLAY BEARING ZEOLITITE	Dominat lithology; numerical abundance	0	0	0	0	0	90	0	0	0
18.82	18-172-3-1,55	0	10	Lower oligocene	RED CLAY BEARING ZEOLITITE	Dominat lithology; numerical abundance	0	6	0	0	2	80	0	2	0
19.27	18-172-3-11,100	0	10	Lower oligocene	RED CLAY BEARING ZEOLITITE	Dominat lithology; numerical abundance	0	2	0	1	1	86	0	0	0
20.57	18-172-3-2,80	0	50	Lower oligocene	ZEOLITIC RED CLAY	Dominat lithology; numerical abundance	1	3	0	3	3	40	0	0	0
20.87	18-172-3-21,110	0	72	Lower oligocene	ZEOLITIC RED CLAY	Dominat lithology; numerical abundance	1	0	0	1	1	25	0	0	0
21.14	18-172-3-21,137	0	0	Lower oligocene	MINERAL BEARING ZEOLITITE	Minor lithology; numerical abundance	0	0	0	5	5	90	0	0	0
21.61	18-172-3-3,34	35	25	Lower oligocene	RED CLAY ZEOLITITE	Minor lithology; numerical abundance	0	0	0	2	2	71	0	0	0
21.89	18-172-3-3,62	0	5	Lower oligocene	NANNO OOZE	Minor lithology; numerical abundance	0	95	0	0	0	0	0	0	0
22.17	18-172-3-3,90	0	15	Lower oligocene	RED CLAY RICH ZEOLITITE	Minor lithology; numerical abundance	0	0	0	2	2	81	0	0	0
22.37	18-172-3-31,110	0	5	Lower oligocene	ZEOLITE NANNO OOZE	Dominat lithology; numerical abundance	0	65	0	0	0	30	0	0	0
22.47	18-172-3-31,120	0	55	Lower oligocene	ZEOLITIC RED CLAY	Dominat lithology; numerical abundance	4	1	0	2	2	35	0	0	0
23.01	18-172-3-4,24	0	75		ZEOLITIC RED CLAY	Dominat lithology; relative abundance	1	6	0	6	6	25	0	0	0
23.37	18-172-3-4,60	0	8		RED CLAY BEARING NANNO OOZE	Minor lithology; relative abundance	0	90	6	0	6	2	0	0	0
23.52	18-172-3-4,75	0	95		RED CLAY	Dominat lithology; relative abundance	1	6	0	6	6	2	0	0	0
24.21	18-172-3-41,144	0	40		RED CLAY ZEOLITITE	Dominat lithology; relative abundance	0	6	0	1	1	60	0	0	0
24.97	18-172-3-5,70	0	100		RED CLAY	Minor lithology; relative abundance	0	0	0	0	0	6	0	0	0
25.47	18-172-3-51,120	0	67		ZEOLITIC RED CLAY	Dominat lithology; relative abundance	0	8	0	6	6	25	6	0	0
25.67	18-172-3-51,140	0	5		NANNO OOZE	Minor lithology; numerical abundance	0	94	0	0	0	1	0	0	0
26.04	18-172-3-6,27	0	8		ZEOLITITE	Minor lithology; relative abundance	6	0	0	2	2	86	0	0	0
26.27	18-172-3-6,50	0	94		RED CLAY	Dominat lithology; relative abundance	0	1	0	6	6	1	0	0	0
27.18	18-172-3-61,141	0	8		NANNO OOZE	Minor lithology; relative abundance	0	0	0	6	6	5	0	0	0