Hayes, Dennis E; Pimm, Anthony C (2005): Smear slide analysis of Hole 14-144A [dataset]. PANGAEA, https://doi.org/10.1594/PANGAEA.230382
Always quote citation above when using data! You can download the citation in several formats below.
Related to:
DSDP (1989): Data from the Deep Sea Drilling Project. Sediment, hard rock and reference files. National Geophysical Data Center, National Environmental Satellite, Data and Information Service, National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration, U.S. Department of Commerce, 1, CD-ROM
von Rad, Ulrich; Supko, Peter R; Roth, Peter H; Berger, Wolfgang H; Benson, William E; Beckmann, Jean-Pierre; Hayes, Dennis E; Pimm, Anthony C (1972): Initial Reports of the Deep Sea Drilling Project 14. Initial Reports of the Deep Sea Drilling Project, U.S. Government Printing Office, XIV, 975 pp + 1447 pp, https://doi.org/10.2973/dsdp.proc.14.1972
Further details:
Project(s):
Deep Sea Drilling Project (DSDP)
Coverage:
Latitude: 9.453800 * Longitude: -54.342000
Date/Time Start: 1970-11-23T00:00:00 * Date/Time End: 1970-11-23T00:00:00
Minimum DEPTH, sediment/rock: 20.05 m * Maximum DEPTH, sediment/rock: 190.20 m
Event(s):
14-144A * Latitude: 9.453800 * Longitude: -54.342000 * Date/Time: 1970-11-23T00:00:00 * Elevation: -2957.0 m * Penetration: 197 m * Recovery: 30.4 m * Location: North Atlantic/CONT RISE * Campaign: Leg14 * Basis: Glomar Challenger * Method/Device: Drilling/drill rig (DRILL) * Comment: 6 cores; 53 m cored; 0 m drilled; 57.4 % recovery
Parameter(s):
# | Name | Short Name | Unit | Principal Investigator | Method/Device | Comment |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
1 | DEPTH, sediment/rock | Depth sed | m | Geocode | ||
2 | Sample code/label | Sample label | DSDP/ODP/IODP sample designation | |||
3 | Sand | Sand | % | Smear slide analysis | ||
4 | Silt | Silt | % | Smear slide analysis | ||
5 | Size fraction < 0.002 mm, clay | <2 µm | % | Smear slide analysis | ||
6 | Stratigraphy | Stratigraphy | Smear slide analysis | |||
7 | Lithology/composition/facies | Lithology | Smear slide analysis | |||
8 | Comment | Comment | Smear slide analysis | |||
9 | Carbonates | Carb | % | Smear slide analysis | ||
10 | Nannofossils | Nannos | % | Smear slide analysis | ||
11 | Foraminifera | Foram | % | Smear slide analysis | ||
12 | Opal, biogenic silica | bSiO2 | % | Smear slide analysis | ||
13 | Siliceous microfossils | Silic foss | % | Smear slide analysis | ||
14 | Radiolarians | Rad | % | Smear slide analysis | ||
15 | Spiculae | Spiculae | % | Smear slide analysis | ||
16 | Minerals, other | Min other | % | Smear slide analysis | ||
17 | Minerals | Minerals | % | Smear slide analysis | isotropic minerals | |
18 | Phosphorite | Phosph | % | Smear slide analysis | ||
19 | Quartz | Qz | % | Smear slide analysis | ||
20 | Feldspar | Fsp | % | Smear slide analysis | ||
21 | Zeolite | Zeo | % | Smear slide analysis | ||
22 | Mica | Mica | % | Smear slide analysis | ||
23 | Biotite | Bt | % | Smear slide analysis | ||
24 | Clay minerals | Clay min | % | Smear slide analysis | ||
25 | Glauconite | Glt | % | Smear slide analysis | ||
26 | Pyrite, FeS2 | Py | % | Smear slide analysis | ||
27 | Limonite | Lm | % | Smear slide analysis | ||
28 | Organic matter | OM | % | Smear slide analysis | organic debris |
License:
Creative Commons Attribution 3.0 Unported (CC-BY-3.0)
Size:
729 data points
Data
1 Depth sed [m] | 2 Sample label | 3 Sand [%] | 4 Silt [%] | 5 <2 µm [%] | 6 Stratigraphy | 7 Lithology | 8 Comment | 9 Carb [%] | 10 Nannos [%] | 11 Foram [%] | 12 bSiO2 [%] | 13 Silic foss [%] | 14 Rad [%] | 15 Spiculae [%] | 16 Min other [%] | 17 Minerals [%] | 18 Phosph [%] | 19 Qz [%] | 20 Fsp [%] | 21 Zeo [%] | 22 Mica [%] | 23 Bt [%] | 24 Clay min [%] | 25 Glt [%] | 26 Py [%] | 27 Lm [%] | 28 OM [%] |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
20.05 | 14-144A-1-1,5 | 0 | 5 | 95 | Lower oligocene | CLAY | Dominat lithology; relative abundance | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 |
20.08 | 14-144A-1-1,8 | 0 | 20 | 80 | Lower oligocene | (FORAM) ANNNO MARL OOZE | Dominat lithology; relative abundance | 39 | 23 | 6 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 27 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
21.00 | 14-144A-1-11,100 | 10 | 50 | 40 | Lower oligocene | FORAM NANNO CHALK OOZE | Dominat lithology; relative abundance | 57 | 22 | 15 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 0 | 0 |
21.73 | 14-144A-1-2,23 | 3 | 47 | 50 | Lower oligocene | FORAM NANNO CHALK OOZE | Dominat lithology; relative abundance | 41 | 20 | 20 | 0 | 0 | 3 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 11 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 |
23.75 | 14-144A-1-3,75 | 20 | 30 | 50 | Lower oligocene | FORAM NANNO OOZE | Dominat lithology; relative abundance | 0 | 30 | 40 | 0 | 2 | 3 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 23 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
26.75 | 14-144A-1-5,75 | 2 | 68 | 30 | Lower oligocene | (NANNO) CHALK OOZE | Dominat lithology; relative abundance | 80 | 15 | 10 | 0 | 5 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 23 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
43.50 | 14-144A-2-4,75 | 3 | 47 | 50 | Lower oligocene | NANNO FORAM CHALK OOZE | Dominat lithology; relative abundance | 42 | 24 | 17 | 1 | 0 | 2 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 12 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 |
45.00 | 14-144A-2-5,75 | 3 | 47 | 50 | Lower oligocene | NANNO FORAM CHALK OOZE | Dominat lithology; relative abundance | 41 | 22 | 17 | 2 | 0 | 2 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 12 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 |
46.53 | 14-144A-2-6,78 | 20 | 20 | 60 | Lower oligocene | FORAM NANNO OOZE | Dominat lithology; relative abundance | 35 | 51 | 35 | 0 | 0 | 5 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 10 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
47.00 | 14-144A-2-61,125 | 40 | 30 | 30 | Lower oligocene | COCCOLITH-BEARING FORAM CHALK OOZE | Dominat lithology; relative abundance | 46 | 13 | 33 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
140.91 | 14-144A-3-1,75 | 0 | 20 | 80 | Upper paleocene | FORAM NANNO CHALK OOZE | Dominat lithology; relative abundance | 48 | 26 | 16 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 0 | 5 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 |
143.51 | 14-144A-3-3,35 | 0 | 30 | 70 | Upper paleocene | FORAM NANNO MARL MUD | Dominat lithology; relative abundance | 34 | 22 | 6 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 6 | 0 | 2 | 0 | 5 | 0 | 2 | 22 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
143.96 | 14-144A-3-3,80 | 0 | 70 | 30 | Upper paleocene | CHLORITIC CALCISILTITE | Dominat lithology; relative abundance | 80 | 5 | 5 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 0 | 5 | 10 | 2 | 5 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
144.46 | 14-144A-3-31,130 | 5 | 60 | 35 | Upper paleocene | FORAM CARBONATE SILT | Dominat lithology; relative abundance | 44 | 11 | 16 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 17 | 0 | 2 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 8 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
145.21 | 14-144A-3-4,55 | 0 | 0 | 0 | Upper paleocene | NANNO (FORAM) CHALK OOZE | Dominat lithology; relative abundance | 37 | 23 | 14 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 0 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 17 | 0 | 2 | 0 | 0 |
145.60 | 14-144A-3-4,94 | 0 | 30 | 70 | Upper paleocene | ZEOLITIC MARL MUD | Dominat lithology; numerical abundance | 38 | 10 | 14 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 3 | 0 | 10 | 7 | 0 | 17 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
146.91 | 14-144A-3-5,75 | 10 | 30 | 60 | Upper paleocene | ZEOLITIC NANNO FORAM MARL | Dominat lithology; relative abundance | 35 | 31 | 25 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 15 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 2 | 0 | 0 |
148.41 | 14-144A-3-6,75 | 10 | 30 | 60 | Maestrichtian | ZEOLITIC NANNO FORAM MARL | Dominat lithology; relative abundance | 40 | 31 | 25 | 2 | 0 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 30 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 0 |
172.05 | 14-144A-4-11,105 | 0 | 40 | 60 | Upper senonian | SILICA-CEMENTED CLAYSTONE - (PRE-CHERT) | Dominat lithology; relative abundance | 0 | 10 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 3 | 0 | 32 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 53 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
172.40 | 14-144A-4-11,140 | 0 | 15 | 85 | Upper senonian | ZEOLITIC NANNO MARL MUD | Dominat lithology; relative abundance | 0 | 30 | 8 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 4 | 0 | 10 | 1 | 1 | 44 | 0 | 2 | 0 | 0 |
172.80 | 14-144A-4-2,30 | 0 | 20 | 80 | Upper senonian | ZEOLITIC NANNO MARL MUD | Dominat lithology; relative abundance | 0 | 25 | 5 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 10 | 0 | 2 | 0 | 15 | 0 | 0 | 45 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 |
172.90 | 14-144A-4-2,40 | 0 | 0 | 0 | Upper senonian | SILICA-CEMENTED MARL MUDSTONE | Dominat lithology; numerical abundance | 20 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
173.20 | 14-144A-4-2,70 | 0 | 0 | 0 | Upper senonian | SILICA-CEMENTED MARL MUDSTONE | Dominat lithology; numerical abundance | 20 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
173.45 | 14-144A-4-2,95 | 10 | 30 | 60 | Upper senonian | ZEOLITIC FORAM NANNO MARL MUD | Dominat lithology; relative abundance | 34 | 16 | 6 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 12 | 0 | 2 | 0 | 3 | 2 | 2 | 23 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 |
181.60 | 14-144A-5-CC,0 | 0 | 20 | 20 | Lower senonian | CALCAREOUS ORGANIC ZEOLITIC SILTY CLAY | Dominat lithology; relative abundance | 26 | 10 | 10 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 17 | 2 | 0 | 10 | 1 | 1 | 15 | 17 | 2 | 0 | 25 |
181.60 | 14-144A-5-CC,0 | 60 | 25 | 25 | Lower senonian | FORAM GLAUCONITIC PHOSPHORITIC LIMESTONE | Dominat lithology; relative abundance | 42 | 0 | 14 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
190.20 | 14-144A-6-11,120 | 0 | 30 | 70 | Coniacian | CALCAREOUS ZEOLITIC ORGANIC SHALE | Dominat lithology; relative abundance | 30 | 10 | 10 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 0 | 15 | 0 | 0 | 35 | 0 | 2 | 0 | 25 |