Hayes, Dennis E; Pimm, Anthony C (2005): Smear slide analysis of Hole 14-144 [dataset]. PANGAEA, https://doi.org/10.1594/PANGAEA.230381
Always quote citation above when using data! You can download the citation in several formats below.
Related to:
DSDP (1989): Data from the Deep Sea Drilling Project. Sediment, hard rock and reference files. National Geophysical Data Center, National Environmental Satellite, Data and Information Service, National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration, U.S. Department of Commerce, 1, CD-ROM
von Rad, Ulrich; Supko, Peter R; Roth, Peter H; Berger, Wolfgang H; Benson, William E; Beckmann, Jean-Pierre; Hayes, Dennis E; Pimm, Anthony C (1972): Initial Reports of the Deep Sea Drilling Project 14. Initial Reports of the Deep Sea Drilling Project, U.S. Government Printing Office, XIV, 975 pp + 1447 pp, https://doi.org/10.2973/dsdp.proc.14.1972
Further details:
Project(s):
Deep Sea Drilling Project (DSDP)
Coverage:
Latitude: 9.453800 * Longitude: -54.342000
Date/Time Start: 1970-11-23T00:00:00 * Date/Time End: 1970-11-23T00:00:00
Minimum DEPTH, sediment/rock: 58.20 m * Maximum DEPTH, sediment/rock: 328.00 m
Event(s):
14-144 * Latitude: 9.453800 * Longitude: -54.342000 * Date/Time: 1970-11-23T00:00:00 * Elevation: -2957.0 m * Penetration: 327 m * Recovery: 28 m * Location: North Atlantic/CONT RISE * Campaign: Leg14 * Basis: Glomar Challenger * Method/Device: Drilling/drill rig (DRILL) * Comment: 8 cores; 40 m cored; 0 m drilled; 70 % recovery
Parameter(s):
# | Name | Short Name | Unit | Principal Investigator | Method/Device | Comment |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
1 | DEPTH, sediment/rock | Depth sed | m | Geocode | ||
2 | Sample code/label | Sample label | DSDP/ODP/IODP sample designation | |||
3 | Sand | Sand | % | Smear slide analysis | ||
4 | Silt | Silt | % | Smear slide analysis | ||
5 | Size fraction < 0.002 mm, clay | <2 µm | % | Smear slide analysis | ||
6 | Stratigraphy | Stratigraphy | Smear slide analysis | |||
7 | Lithology/composition/facies | Lithology | Smear slide analysis | |||
8 | Comment | Comment | Smear slide analysis | |||
9 | Carbonates | Carb | % | Smear slide analysis | ||
10 | Nannofossils | Nannos | % | Smear slide analysis | ||
11 | Foraminifera | Foram | % | Smear slide analysis | ||
12 | Lamellibranchiata | Lamellibranchiata | % | Smear slide analysis | ||
13 | Opal, biogenic silica | bSiO2 | % | Smear slide analysis | ||
14 | Chert | Chert | % | Smear slide analysis | fragments | |
15 | Radiolarians | Rad | % | Smear slide analysis | ||
16 | Diatoms | Diatoms | % | Smear slide analysis | ||
17 | Spiculae | Spiculae | % | Smear slide analysis | ||
18 | Minerals, other | Min other | % | Smear slide analysis | ||
19 | Barite | Brt | % | Smear slide analysis | ||
20 | Quartz | Qz | % | Smear slide analysis | ||
21 | Feldspar | Fsp | % | Smear slide analysis | ||
22 | Zeolite | Zeo | % | Smear slide analysis | ||
23 | Mica | Mica | % | Smear slide analysis | ||
24 | Biotite | Bt | % | Smear slide analysis | ||
25 | Clay minerals | Clay min | % | Smear slide analysis | ||
26 | Glauconite | Glt | % | Smear slide analysis | ||
27 | Pyrite, FeS2 | Py | % | Smear slide analysis | ||
28 | Iron | Fe | % | Smear slide analysis | ||
29 | Organic matter | OM | % | Smear slide analysis | organic debris |
License:
Creative Commons Attribution 3.0 Unported (CC-BY-3.0)
Size:
753 data points
Data
1 Depth sed [m] | 2 Sample label | 3 Sand [%] | 4 Silt [%] | 5 <2 µm [%] | 6 Stratigraphy | 7 Lithology | 8 Comment | 9 Carb [%] | 10 Nannos [%] | 11 Foram [%] | 12 Lamellibranchiata [%] | 13 bSiO2 [%] | 14 Chert [%] | 15 Rad [%] | 16 Diatoms [%] | 17 Spiculae [%] | 18 Min other [%] | 19 Brt [%] | 20 Qz [%] | 21 Fsp [%] | 22 Zeo [%] | 23 Mica [%] | 24 Bt [%] | 25 Clay min [%] | 26 Glt [%] | 27 Py [%] | 28 Fe [%] | 29 OM [%] |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
58.20 | 14-144-1-11,120 | 30 | 50 | 20 | Middle eocene | RAD FORAM NANNO CHALK OOZE | Dominat lithology; relative abundance | 40 | 17 | 23 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 15 | 2 | 3 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
59.70 | 14-144-1-21,120 | 3 | 37 | 60 | Middle eocene | SLIGHTLY SILICEOUS NANNO FORAM CHALK | Dominat lithology; relative abundance | 40 | 26 | 14 | 0 | 2 | 0 | 2 | 0 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 13 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
60.50 | 14-144-1-3,50 | 40 | 20 | 40 | Middle eocene | RAD AND FORAM BEARING NANNO CHALK OOZE | Dominat lithology; relative abundance | 42 | 22 | 19 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 14 | 2 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
66.10 | 14-144-1-CC,0 | 20 | 50 | 30 | RAD FORAM NANNO MARL OOZE | Dominat lithology; relative abundance | 36 | 12 | 24 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 18 | 2 | 3 | 2 | 0 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | |
104.05 | 14-144-2-1,5 | 30 | 12 | 58 | Upper paleocene | RAD AND FORAM BEARING NANNO CHALK OOZE | Dominat lithology; relative abundance | 40 | 28 | 11 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 6 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 2 | 10 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
108.50 | 14-144-2-31,150 | 23 | 5 | 72 | Upper paleocene | SLIGHTLY SILICEOUS FORAM NANNO OOZE | Dominat lithology; relative abundance | 0 | 52 | 20 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 5 | 0 | 3 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 20 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
163.22 | 14-144-3-11,122 | 0 | 30 | 70 | Upper senonian | SLIGHTLY ZEOLITIC AND BARITE-BEARING MARL MUD | Dominat lithology; relative abundance | 35 | 15 | 5 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 5 | 2 | 0 | 5 | 0 | 0 | 52 | 0 | 2 | 0 | 0 |
163.90 | 14-144-3-2,40 | 0 | 15 | 85 | Upper senonian | ZEOLITIC MARL MUD | Dominat lithology; relative abundance | 62 | 3 | 3 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 2 | 0 | 9 | 0 | 0 | 15 | 0 | 2 | 0 | 0 |
164.60 | 14-144-3-21,110 | 0 | 25 | 75 | Upper senonian | CALCAREOUS SLIGHTLY ZEOLITIC AND BARITE BEARING MUDSTONE | Dominat lithology; relative abundance | 35 | 5 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 3 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 65 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
164.70 | 14-144-3-21,120 | 0 | 20 | 80 | Upper senonian | ZEOLITIC FORAM NANNO MARL MUD | Dominat lithology; relative abundance | 37 | 7 | 10 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 0 | 17 | 0 | 0 | 24 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
165.10 | 14-144-3-CC,0 | 0 | 20 | 80 | Upper senonian | SLIGHTLY ZEOLITIC AND CALCAREOUS CLAY | Dominat lithology; relative abundance | 15 | 5 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 5 | 3 | 2 | 3 | 0 | 0 | 77 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
214.75 | 14-144-4-2,25 | 5 | 25 | 70 | Upper cretaceous | ZEOLITIC CLAY | Dominat lithology; relative abundance | 15 | 3 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 0 | 25 | 0 | 0 | 50 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 15 |
215.50 | 14-144-4-21,100 | 10 | 22 | 68 | Upper cretaceous | CALCAREOUS CLAY | Dominat lithology; relative abundance | 38 | 10 | 20 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 0 | 8 | 2 | 2 | 53 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 5 |
216.51 | 14-144-4-3,51 | 0 | 50 | 50 | Upper cretaceous | CARBONACEOUS ZEOLITIC FORAM MARL | Dominat lithology; numerical abundance | 48 | 3 | 6 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 14 | 0 | 0 | 15 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 11 |
216.66 | 14-144-4-3,66 | 5 | 60 | 35 | Upper cretaceous | CARBONACEOUS AND ZEOLITIC FORAM DEBRIS MARL CHALK | Dominat lithology; relative abundance | 70 | 5 | 5 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 10 | 0 | 0 | 23 | 0 | 2 | 0 | 10 |
217.60 | 14-144-4-CC,0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | Upper cretaceous | ARGILLACEOUS FORAM BIOSPARITE (LIMESTONE) | Dominat lithology; relative abundance | 75 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
264.86 | 14-144-5-1,86 | 0 | 50 | 50 | Cretaceous | DEBRIS CHALK MARL | Dominat lithology; relative abundance | 55 | 5 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 0 | 2 | 0 | 5 | 0 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 3 | 0 | 2 |
265.00 | 14-144-5-11,100 | 0 | 60 | 40 | Cretaceous | (AUTHIGENIC?) CARBONATE MARL | Dominat lithology; relative abundance | 50 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 10 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
265.10 | 14-144-5-11,110 | 0 | 30 | 70 | Cretaceous | ZEOLITIC? DEBRIS MARL | Dominat lithology; relative abundance | 36 | 5 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 5 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 20 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 5 | 0 | 0 |
295.39 | 14-144-6-1,38 | 15 | 40 | 55 | Cretaceous | QUARTZOSE LIMESTONE | Dominat lithology; relative abundance | 65 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 15 | 3 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 4 | 0 | 2 | 0 | 0 |
296.40 | 14-144-6-11,140 | 20 | 35 | 45 | Cretaceous | CALCAREOUS MUDSTONE | Dominat lithology; relative abundance | 55 | 2 | 3 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 30 | 0 | 0 | 10 | 2 | 35 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 |
298.85 | 14-144-7-1,85 | 5 | 47 | 47 | Lower cretaceous | SLIGHTLY QUARTZOSE CARBONACEOUS CLAY | Dominat lithology; relative abundance | 10 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 20 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 23 | 0 | 23 | 2 | 0 |
299.00 | 14-144-7-11,100 | 0 | 0 | 0 | Lower cretaceous | SLIGHTLY QUARTZOSE ?ZEOLITIC CLAY | Dominat lithology; relative abundance | 11 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 15 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 15 | 0 | 1 |
299.15 | 14-144-7-11,115 | 5 | 65 | 30 | Lower cretaceous | COQUINA MARL | Dominat lithology; relative abundance | 31 | 2 | 0 | 28 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 5 | 0 | 3 | 0 | 0 | 28 | 0 | 2 | 0 | 0 |
326.00 | 14-144-8-2,50 | 40 | 30 | 30 | Lower cretaceous | CALCAREOUS SANDY MUDSTONE | Dominat lithology; relative abundance | 53 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 40 | 2 | 0 | 8 | 2 | 20 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
327.40 | 14-144-8-3,40 | 30 | 30 | 40 | CALCAREOUS SANDY MUDSTONE | Dominat lithology; relative abundance | 47 | 1 | 2 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 30 | 2 | 0 | 8 | 0 | 35 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | |
328.00 | 14-144-8-31,100 | 10 | 40 | 50 | CALCAREOUS SILTSTONE | Dominat lithology; relative abundance | 67 | 1 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 30 | 2 | 0 | 10 | 1 | 22 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 |