Hollister, Charles D; Ewing, John I (2005): Smear slide analysis of Hole 11-107 [dataset]. PANGAEA, https://doi.org/10.1594/PANGAEA.230331
Always quote citation above when using data! You can download the citation in several formats below.
Related to:
DSDP (1989): Data from the Deep Sea Drilling Project. Sediment, hard rock and reference files. National Geophysical Data Center, National Environmental Satellite, Data and Information Service, National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration, U.S. Department of Commerce, 1, CD-ROM
Kaneps, Ansis G; Worstell, Paula J; Wilcoxon, James A; Poag, C Wylie; Paulus, F J; Luterbacher, Hanspeter; Lancelot, Yves; Hathaway, James; Habib, Daniel; Hollister, Charles D; Ewing, John I (1972): Initial Reports of the Deep Sea Drilling Project 11. Initial Reports of the Deep Sea Drilling Project, U.S. Government Printing Office, XI, 1077 pp, https://doi.org/10.2973/dsdp.proc.11.1972
Further details:
Project(s):
Deep Sea Drilling Project (DSDP)
Coverage:
Latitude: 38.659800 * Longitude: -72.475300
Date/Time Start: 1970-05-28T00:00:00 * Date/Time End: 1970-05-28T00:00:00
Minimum DEPTH, sediment/rock: 57.10 m * Maximum DEPTH, sediment/rock: 76.60 m
Event(s):
11-107 * Latitude: 38.659800 * Longitude: -72.475300 * Date/Time: 1970-05-28T00:00:00 * Elevation: -2571.0 m * Penetration: 78 m * Recovery: 1.5 m * Location: North Atlantic/CONT RISE * Campaign: Leg11 * Basis: Glomar Challenger * Method/Device: Drilling/drill rig (DRILL) * Comment: 1 cores; 3 m cored; 9 m drilled; 50 % recovery
Parameter(s):
| # | Name | Short Name | Unit | Principal Investigator | Method/Device | Comment |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | DEPTH, sediment/rock | Depth sed | m | Geocode | ||
| 2 | Sample code/label | Sample label | DSDP/ODP/IODP sample designation | |||
| 3 | Sand | Sand | % | Smear slide analysis | ||
| 4 | Silt | Silt | % | Smear slide analysis | ||
| 5 | Size fraction < 0.002 mm, clay | <2 µm | % | Smear slide analysis | ||
| 6 | Stratigraphy | Stratigraphy | Smear slide analysis | |||
| 7 | Lithology/composition/facies | Lithology | Smear slide analysis | |||
| 8 | Comment | Comment | Smear slide analysis | |||
| 9 | Carbonates | Carb | % | Smear slide analysis | ||
| 10 | Dolomite | Dol | % | Smear slide analysis | ||
| 11 | Nannofossils | Nannos | % | Smear slide analysis | ||
| 12 | Foraminifera | Foram | % | Smear slide analysis | ||
| 13 | Diatoms | Diatoms | % | Smear slide analysis | ||
| 14 | Spiculae | Spiculae | % | Smear slide analysis | ||
| 15 | Quartz | Qz | % | Smear slide analysis | ||
| 16 | Feldspar | Fsp | % | Smear slide analysis | ||
| 17 | Mica | Mica | % | Smear slide analysis | ||
| 18 | Clay minerals | Clay min | % | Smear slide analysis | ||
| 19 | Glauconite | Glt | % | Smear slide analysis | ||
| 20 | Pyrite, FeS2 | Py | % | Smear slide analysis | ||
| 21 | Heavy minerals | HM | % | Smear slide analysis | ||
| 22 | Rutile | Rt | % | Smear slide analysis |
License:
Creative Commons Attribution 3.0 Unported (CC-BY-3.0)
Size:
42 data points
Data
| 1 Depth sed [m] | 2 Sample label | 3 Sand [%] | 4 Silt [%] | 5 <2 µm [%] | 6 Stratigraphy | 7 Lithology | 8 Comment | 9 Carb [%] | 10 Dol [%] | 11 Nannos [%] | 12 Foram [%] | 13 Diatoms [%] | 14 Spiculae [%] | 15 Qz [%] | 16 Fsp [%] | 17 Mica [%] | 18 Clay min [%] | 19 Glt [%] | 20 Py [%] | 21 HM [%] | 22 Rt [%] |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 57.10 | 11-107-1-CC,0 | 60 | 60 | 60 | Pleistocene | SANDY HEMIPELAGIC MUD | Dominat lithology; numerical abundance | 0 | 0 | 0 | 3 | 3 | 3 | 28 | 12 | 6 | 28 | 3 | 0 | 12 | 0 |
| 76.60 | 11-107-2-CC,0 | 60 | 60 | 60 | Lower pleistocene | MUD | Dominat lithology; numerical abundance | 11 | 3 | 3 | 3 | 0 | 0 | 26 | 11 | 6 | 26 | 3 | 3 | 0 | 3 |