Worzel, J Lamar; Bryant, William (2005): Smear slide analysis of Hole 10-96 [dataset]. PANGAEA, https://doi.org/10.1594/PANGAEA.230320
Always quote citation above when using data! You can download the citation in several formats below.
Related to:
DSDP (1989): Data from the Deep Sea Drilling Project. Sediment, hard rock and reference files. National Geophysical Data Center, National Environmental Satellite, Data and Information Service, National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration, U.S. Department of Commerce, 1, CD-ROM
Smith, L A; McNeely, B; Laury, R; Foreman, H P; Dickinson, K; Capo, R; Beall, A O; Worzel, J Lamar; Bryant, William (1973): Initial Reports of the Deep Sea Drilling Project 10. Initial Reports of the Deep Sea Drilling Project, U.S. Government Printing Office, X, 748 pp, https://doi.org/10.2973/dsdp.proc.10.1973
Further details:
Project(s):
Deep Sea Drilling Project (DSDP)
Coverage:
Latitude: 23.742700 * Longitude: -85.763300
Date/Time Start: 1970-03-30T00:00:00 * Date/Time End: 1970-03-30T00:00:00
Minimum DEPTH, sediment/rock: 103.50 m * Maximum DEPTH, sediment/rock: 329.20 m
Event(s):
10-96 * Latitude: 23.742700 * Longitude: -85.763300 * Date/Time: 1970-03-30T00:00:00 * Elevation: -3439.0 m * Penetration: 332 m * Recovery: 27 m * Location: Gulf of Mexico/KNOLL * Campaign: Leg10 * Basis: Glomar Challenger * Method/Device: Drilling/drill rig (DRILL) * Comment: 4 cores; 30 m cored; 0 m drilled; 90 % recovery
Parameter(s):
# | Name | Short Name | Unit | Principal Investigator | Method/Device | Comment |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
1 | DEPTH, sediment/rock | Depth sed | m | Geocode | ||
2 | Sample code/label | Sample label | DSDP/ODP/IODP sample designation | |||
3 | Sand | Sand | % | Smear slide analysis | ||
4 | Silt | Silt | % | Smear slide analysis | ||
5 | Size fraction < 0.002 mm, clay | <2 µm | % | Smear slide analysis | ||
6 | Stratigraphy | Stratigraphy | Smear slide analysis | |||
7 | Lithology/composition/facies | Lithology | Smear slide analysis | |||
8 | Comment | Comment | Smear slide analysis | |||
9 | Carbonates | Carb | % | Smear slide analysis | ||
10 | Dolomite | Dol | % | Smear slide analysis | ||
11 | Aragonite | Arg | % | Smear slide analysis | ||
12 | Nannofossils | Nannos | % | Smear slide analysis | ||
13 | Foraminifera | Foram | % | Smear slide analysis | ||
14 | Radiolarians | Rad | % | Smear slide analysis | ||
15 | Diatoms | Diatoms | % | Smear slide analysis | ||
16 | Silicoflagellates | Silicoflag | % | Smear slide analysis | ||
17 | Spiculae | Spiculae | % | Smear slide analysis | ||
18 | Quartz | Qz | % | Smear slide analysis | ||
19 | Feldspar | Fsp | % | Smear slide analysis | ||
20 | Mica | Mica | % | Smear slide analysis | ||
21 | Clay minerals | Clay min | % | Smear slide analysis | ||
22 | Opaque minerals | Opaque | % | Smear slide analysis | ||
23 | Pyrite, FeS2 | Py | % | Smear slide analysis | ||
24 | Heavy minerals | HM | % | Smear slide analysis | ||
25 | Rutile | Rt | % | Smear slide analysis | ||
26 | Zircon | Zrn | % | Smear slide analysis | ||
27 | Amphibole | Amp | % | Smear slide analysis | ||
28 | Volcanic glass | Volc glass | % | Smear slide analysis | ||
29 | Rock fragments | Rock fragm | % | Smear slide analysis |
License:
Creative Commons Attribution 3.0 Unported (CC-BY-3.0)
Size:
504 data points
Data
1 Depth sed [m] | 2 Sample label | 3 Sand [%] | 4 Silt [%] | 5 <2 µm [%] | 6 Stratigraphy | 7 Lithology | 8 Comment | 9 Carb [%] | 10 Dol [%] | 11 Arg [%] | 12 Nannos [%] | 13 Foram [%] | 14 Rad [%] | 15 Diatoms [%] | 16 Silicoflag [%] | 17 Spiculae [%] | 18 Qz [%] | 19 Fsp [%] | 20 Mica [%] | 21 Clay min [%] | 22 Opaque [%] | 23 Py [%] | 24 HM [%] | 25 Rt [%] | 26 Zrn [%] | 27 Amp [%] | 28 Volc glass [%] | 29 Rock fragm [%] |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
103.50 | 10-96-1-21,100 | 0 | 85 | 10 | Lower pleistocene | CALCAREOUS TERRIGENOUS MUD | Dominat lithology; numerical abundance | 0 | 5 | 0 | 14 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 5 | 0 | 0 | 34 | 14 | 14 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
103.82 | 10-96-1-21,132 | 35 | 60 | 60 | Lower pleistocene | CALCAREOUS TERRIGENOUS MUD | Dominat lithology; numerical abundance | 9 | 2 | 0 | 9 | 0 | 2 | 2 | 0 | 2 | 22 | 0 | 9 | 9 | 9 | 0 | 2 | 0 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
103.90 | 10-96-1-21,140 | 0 | 60 | 85 | Lower pleistocene | CALCAREOUS TERRIGENOUS MUD | Dominat lithology; relative abundance | 25 | 0 | 2 | 11 | 0 | 3 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 11 | 0 | 3 | 25 | 11 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
106.40 | 10-96-1-4,90 | 0 | 60 | 85 | Lower pleistocene | CALCAREOUS TERRIGENOUS MUD | Dominat lithology; numerical abundance | 29 | 1 | 1 | 12 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 3 | 0 | 0 | 29 | 12 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
107.95 | 10-96-1-5,95 | 0 | 60 | 60 | Lower pleistocene | CARBONACEOUS CALCAREOUS TERRIGENOUS MUD | Dominat lithology; numerical abundance | 0 | 1 | 0 | 14 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 4 | 0 | 0 | 33 | 14 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
109.32 | 10-96-1-6,82 | 60 | 60 | 35 | Lower pleistocene | TERRIGENOUS SILTY SAND | Dominat lithology; numerical abundance | 12 | 3 | 0 | 0 | 12 | 3 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 27 | 3 | 3 | 0 | 12 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 3 | 12 |
109.74 | 10-96-1-61,124 | 60 | 60 | 60 | Lower pleistocene | CARBONACEOUS QUARTZOSE SANDY SILT | Dominat lithology; numerical abundance | 32 | 3 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 32 | 0 | 3 | 3 | 13 | 0 | 3 | 0 | 3 | 3 | 3 | 0 |
109.87 | 10-96-1-61,137 | 60 | 60 | 35 | Lower pleistocene | TERRIGENOUS SAND | Dominat lithology; numerical abundance | 4 | 4 | 0 | 0 | 4 | 4 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 49 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 15 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 4 | 0 |
200.00 | 10-96-2-1,70 | 35 | 60 | 60 | Lower oligocene | SPICULE BEARING FORAM NANNO OOZE | Dominat lithology; relative abundance | 0 | 0 | 0 | 55 | 55 | 6 | 0 | 0 | 23 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
201.54 | 10-96-2-2,74 | 35 | 60 | 60 | Lower oligocene | FORAM NANNO OOZE | Dominat lithology; relative abundance | 0 | 0 | 0 | 55 | 55 | 6 | 0 | 0 | 6 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 6 | 0 |
202.35 | 10-96-2-3,5 | 60 | 60 | 60 | Lower oligocene | FORAM NANNO RICH ASHY SAND | Dominat lithology; relative abundance | 0 | 0 | 0 | 29 | 29 | 3 | 0 | 0 | 3 | 2 | 0 | 3 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 4 | 29 | 0 |
204.15 | 10-96-2-4,35 | 35 | 60 | 60 | Lower oligocene | SPICULE BEARING FORAM NANNO OOZE | Dominat lithology; numerical abundance | 0 | 0 | 0 | 38 | 38 | 4 | 0 | 0 | 16 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 4 | 0 |
206.55 | 10-96-2-51,125 | 35 | 60 | 60 | Lower oligocene | FORAM NANNO OOZE | Dominat lithology; relative abundance | 0 | 0 | 0 | 55 | 55 | 6 | 0 | 0 | 23 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
301.88 | 10-96-3-1,88 | 35 | 60 | 60 | Lower eocene | RAD NANNO OOZE | Dominat lithology; numerical abundance | 0 | 3 | 0 | 33 | 14 | 33 | 0 | 3 | 14 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
304.35 | 10-96-3-3,35 | 60 | 60 | 60 | Lower eocene | SPICULE NANNO RAD OOZE | Dominat lithology; numerical abundance | 0 | 4 | 0 | 28 | 12 | 28 | 0 | 0 | 28 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
307.85 | 10-96-3-5,85 | 60 | 60 | 60 | Lower eocene | VERY ASHY SPICULE RAD NANNO OOZE | Dominat lithology; numerical abundance | 0 | 0 | 0 | 22 | 10 | 22 | 0 | 0 | 22 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 22 | 0 |
309.80 | 10-96-3-61,130 | 35 | 60 | 60 | Lower eocene | RAD NANNO OOZE | Dominat lithology; numerical abundance | 3 | 3 | 0 | 33 | 14 | 33 | 0 | 0 | 14 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
329.20 | 10-96-5-1,20 | 0 | 60 | 60 | Upper paleocene | NANNO OOZE | Dominat lithology; relative abundance | 0 | 6 | 0 | 75 | 2 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 0 |