Citation:

PANGAEA.230319

Always quote citation above when using data! You can download the citation in several formats below.

RIS Citation BibTeX Citation Text Citation Facebook TwitterShow Map Google Earth

Related to:

DSDP (1989): Data from the Deep Sea Drilling Project. Sediment, hard rock and reference files. National Geophysical Data Center, National Environmental Satellite, Data and Information Service, National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration, U.S. Department of Commerce, 1, CD-ROM

Smith, L A; McNeely, B; Laury, R; Foreman, H P; Dickinson, K; Capo, R; Beall, A O; Worzel, J Lamar; Bryant, William (1973): Initial Reports of the Deep Sea Drilling Project 10. Initial Reports of the Deep Sea Drilling Project, U.S. Government Printing Office, X, 748 pp, https://doi.org/10.2973/dsdp.proc.10.1973

Further details:

Processed smear slide data base - background and methods

Project(s):

Deep Sea Drilling Project (DSDP)

Coverage:

Latitude: 24.150000 * Longitude: -86.397500

Date/Time Start: 1970-03-27T00:00:00 * Date/Time End: 1970-03-27T00:00:00

Minimum DEPTH, sediment/rock: 1.30 m * Maximum DEPTH, sediment/rock: 438.10 m

Event(s):

10-95 * Latitude: 24.150000 * Longitude: -86.397500 * Date/Time: 1970-03-27T00:00:00 * Elevation: -1633.0 m * Penetration: 463 m * Recovery: 118.1 m * Location: Gulf of Mexico/SCARP * Campaign: * Basis: Glomar Challenger * Method/Device: Drilling/drill rig (DRILL) * Comment: 22 cores; 170 m cored; 0 m drilled; 69.5 % recovery

Parameter(s):

#	Name	Short Name	Unit	Method/Device	Comment
1	DEPTH, sediment/rock	Depth sed	m		Geocode
2	Sample code/label	Sample label		DSDP/ODP/IODP sample designation
3	Sand	Sand	%	Smear slide analysis
4	Silt	Silt	%	Smear slide analysis
5	Size fraction < 0.002 mm, clay	<2 µm	%	Smear slide analysis
6	Stratigraphy	Stratigraphy		Smear slide analysis
7	Lithology/composition/facies	Lithology		Smear slide analysis
8	Comment	Comment		Smear slide analysis
9	Carbonates	Carb	%	Smear slide analysis
10	Dolomite	Dol	%	Smear slide analysis
11	Aragonite	Arg	%	Smear slide analysis
12	Nannofossils	Nannos	%	Smear slide analysis
13	Foraminifera	Foram	%	Smear slide analysis
14	Pteropoda	Pteropoda	%	Smear slide analysis
15	Radiolarians	Rad	%	Smear slide analysis
16	Spiculae	Spiculae	%	Smear slide analysis
17	Quartz	Qz	%	Smear slide analysis
18	Feldspar	Fsp	%	Smear slide analysis
19	Mica	Mica	%	Smear slide analysis
20	Opaque minerals	Opaque	%	Smear slide analysis
21	Amphibole	Amp	%	Smear slide analysis
22	Volcanic glass	Volc glass	%	Smear slide analysis

License:

Creative Commons Attribution 3.0 Unported (CC-BY-3.0)

Size:

798 data points

Data

Download dataset as tab-delimited text — use the following character encoding:

1 Depth sed [m]	2 Sample label	3 Sand [%]	4 Silt [%]	5 <2 µm [%]	6 Stratigraphy	7 Lithology	8 Comment	9 Carb [%]	10 Dol [%]	11 Arg [%]	12 Nannos [%]	13 Foram [%]	14 Pteropoda [%]	15 Rad [%]	16 Spiculae [%]	17 Qz [%]	18 Fsp [%]	19 Mica [%]	20 Opaque [%]	21 Amp [%]	22 Volc glass [%]
1.30	10-95-1-11,130	35	60	60	Upper pleistocene	NANNO OOZE	Dominat lithology; numerical abundance	16	0	2	38	16	4	0	16	4	0	0	0	0	0
6.35	10-95-1-5,35	35	60	60	Upper pleistocene	FORAM NANNO OOZE	Dominat lithology; numerical abundance	4	0	4	78	14	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0
82.95	10-95-2-1,95	35	60	60	Lower oligocene	FORAM NANNO OOZE	Dominat lithology; numerical abundance	2	0	20	47	20	0	2	9	0	0	0	0	0	0
86.30	10-95-2-31,130	35	60	60	Lower oligocene	FORAM SPONGE NANNO OOZE	Dominat lithology; numerical abundance	4	0	15	48	15	0	4	15	0	0	0	0	0	0
90.55	10-95-2-61,105	35	60	60	Lower oligocene	FORAM NANNO OOZE	Dominat lithology; relative abundance	6	0	2	75	23	0	0	23	0	0	0	0	0	6
123.00	10-95-3-2,50	35	60	60	Lower oligocene	FORAM NANNOFOSSIL OOZE	Dominat lithology; numerical abundance	4	0	4	52	16	0	4	16	0	0	0	0	0	4
126.00	10-95-3-4,50	35	60	60	Lower oligocene	SPONGE FORAM NANNO OOZE	Dominat lithology; numerical abundance	4	0	4	52	16	0	4	16	0	0	0	0	0	4
129.60	10-95-3-61,110	60	60	60	Lower oligocene	FORAM NANNO OOZE	Dominat lithology; numerical abundance	4	0	4	49	35	0	0	4	0	0	0	0	0	4
161.50	10-95-4-21,100	60	60	60	Lower oligocene	FORAM NANNO OOZE	Dominat lithology; numerical abundance	3	3	0	43	31	0	3	13	0	0	0	0	0	3
199.00	10-95-5-11,100	60	60	60	Lower oligocene	FORAM NANNO OOZE	Dominat lithology; numerical abundance	4	0	0	36	36	0	4	16	0	0	0	0	0	4
202.92	10-95-5-4,42	60	60	60	Lower oligocene	FORAM NANNO OOZE	Dominat lithology; numerical abundance	4	0	0	38	38	0	0	4	0	0	0	0	0	16
239.96	10-95-6-3,96	10	60	60	Upper eocene	RAD LIME MUD	Minor lithology; numerical abundance	34	0	0	34	4	0	14	14	0	0	0	0	0	0
244.60	10-95-6-61,110	35	60	60	Upper eocene	RAD NANNO LIME MUD	Minor lithology; numerical abundance	35	0	0	49	4	0	0	4	0	0	0	0	0	4
277.63	10-95-7-3,63	60	35	35	Middle eocene	NANNO RAD OOZE	Minor lithology; numerical abundance	25	0	0	25	11	0	25	11	0	0	0	0	0	3
282.60	10-95-7-61,110	60	60	60	Middle eocene	NANNO RAD OOZE	Minor lithology; numerical abundance	28	0	0	28	12	0	28	4	0	0	0	0	0	0
335.75	10-95-8-3,75	60	60	60	Middle eocene	NANNO RAD OOZE	Minor lithology; numerical abundance	28	0	0	28	12	0	28	4	0	0	0	0	0	0
340.50	10-95-8-61,100	60	60	60	Middle eocene	NANNO RAD OOZE	Minor lithology; numerical abundance	25	0	0	25	10	0	25	10	3	0	0	0	0	3
363.45	10-95-10-1,45	35	60	60	Upper paleocene	FORAM NANNO OOZE	Minor lithology; numerical abundance	33	0	0	33	33	0	0	0	0	0	1	0	1	0
366.80	10-95-10-3,80	60	60	60	Upper paleocene	NANNO OOZE	numerical abundance	33	0	0	33	33	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0
368.25	10-95-10-4,75	60	60	60	Upper paleocene	FORAM NANNO OOZE	relative abundance	55	0	0	55	23	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0
378.70	10-95-11-2,20	60	60	60	Lower paleocene	FORAM NANNO OOZE	Minor lithology; numerical abundance	32	0	0	32	32	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	4
381.17	10-95-11-31,117	85	35	35	Lower paleocene	NANNO ASH	Minor lithology; relative abundance	6	0	0	23	0	0	2	6	6	0	6	0	0	75
382.00	10-95-11-4,50	60	60	60	Lower paleocene	FORAM NANNO OOZE	numerical abundance	33	0	0	33	33	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0
387.06	10-95-12-11,106	60	35	35	Lower paleocene	NANNO ASH	Minor lithology; relative abundance	6	0	0	23	6	0	0	0	6	6	6	6	0	75
388.43	10-95-12-2,93	60	60	60	Lower paleocene	NANNO BEARING LIME MUD	Minor lithology; relative abundance	55	0	0	23	23	0	0	0	6	0	0	0	0	0
391.90	10-95-12-41,140	60	60	60	Lower paleocene	FORAM NANNO OOZE	Minor lithology; numerical abundance	29	0	0	39	29	0	0	0	3	0	0	0	0	0
396.35	10-95-13-11,135	10	85	60	Campanian	FORAM LIME MUD	Minor lithology; relative abundance	75	0	0	0	55	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0
398.85	10-95-13-3,85	35	60	60	Campanian	ARAGONITE MUD	Minor lithology; relative abundance	55	0	55	6	23	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0
400.85	10-95-13-41,135	35	60	60	Campanian	NANNO BEARING LIME MUD	Minor lithology; relative abundance	55	0	0	55	23	0	0	0	0	0	0	2	0	0
400.95	10-95-14-1,95	60	60	60	Campanian	FORAM NANNO OOZE	Minor lithology; numerical abundance	33	0	0	33	33	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0
416.14	10-95-15-6,35	60	60	60	Santonian	FORAM NANNO OOZE	numerical abundance	14	4	0	47	35	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0
422.75	10-95-16-4,98	60	60	60	Santonian	FORAM COCCOLITH OOZE	numerical abundance	29	0	0	39	29	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0
423.32	10-95-16-5,5	60	60	60	Santonian	TERRIGENOUS MUD	Minor lithology; relative abundance	0	0	0	0	75	0	0	0	23	6	0	23	0	0
434.32	10-95-17-6,55	60	60	60	Santonian	FORAM NANNO OOZE	Minor lithology; numerical abundance	33	0	0	33	33	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0
434.49	10-95-17-6,72	60	60	60	Santonian	FORAM NANNO OOZE	Minor lithology; numerical abundance	30	0	0	40	30	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0
436.60	10-95-18-CC,0	60	60	60	Santonian	FORAM NANNO OOZE	numerical abundance	0	0	0	51	37	0	4	0	0	0	0	4	0	0
438.10	10-95-19-CC,0	10	60	60	Albian	CARBONACEOUS FECOID LIME MUD	Minor lithology; numerical abundance	39	6	0	53	4	0	0	0	0	0	0	23	0	0
438.10	10-95-19-CC,0	60	60	60	Albian	NANNO OOZE	Minor lithology; relative abundance	55	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	4	0	0