Citation:

PANGAEA.230313

Always quote citation above when using data! You can download the citation in several formats below.

RIS Citation BibTeX Citation Text Citation Facebook TwitterShow Map Google Earth

Related to:

DSDP (1989): Data from the Deep Sea Drilling Project. Sediment, hard rock and reference files. National Geophysical Data Center, National Environmental Satellite, Data and Information Service, National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration, U.S. Department of Commerce, 1, CD-ROM

Smith, L A; McNeely, B; Laury, R; Foreman, H P; Dickinson, K; Capo, R; Beall, A O; Worzel, J Lamar; Bryant, William (1973): Initial Reports of the Deep Sea Drilling Project 10. Initial Reports of the Deep Sea Drilling Project, U.S. Government Printing Office, X, 748 pp, https://doi.org/10.2973/dsdp.proc.10.1973

Further details:

Processed smear slide data base - background and methods

Project(s):

Deep Sea Drilling Project (DSDP)

Coverage:

Latitude: 21.382200 * Longitude: -94.003500

Date/Time Start: 1970-03-04T00:00:00 * Date/Time End: 1970-03-04T00:00:00

Minimum DEPTH, sediment/rock: 0.20 m * Maximum DEPTH, sediment/rock: 136.20 m

Event(s):

10-88 * Latitude: 21.382200 * Longitude: -94.003500 * Date/Time: 1970-03-04T00:00:00 * Elevation: -2532.0 m * Penetration: 135 m * Recovery: 33 m * Location: Gulf of Mexico/KNOLL * Campaign: * Basis: Glomar Challenger * Method/Device: Drilling/drill rig (DRILL) * Comment: 5 cores; 32 m cored; 0 m drilled; 103.1 % recovery

Parameter(s):

#	Name	Short Name	Unit	Method/Device	Comment
1	DEPTH, sediment/rock	Depth sed	m		Geocode
2	Sample code/label	Sample label		DSDP/ODP/IODP sample designation
3	Sand	Sand	%	Smear slide analysis
4	Silt	Silt	%	Smear slide analysis
5	Size fraction < 0.002 mm, clay	<2 µm	%	Smear slide analysis
6	Stratigraphy	Stratigraphy		Smear slide analysis
7	Lithology/composition/facies	Lithology		Smear slide analysis
8	Comment	Comment		Smear slide analysis
9	Carbonates	Carb	%	Smear slide analysis
10	Dolomite	Dol	%	Smear slide analysis
11	Aragonite	Arg	%	Smear slide analysis
12	Nannofossils	Nannos	%	Smear slide analysis
13	Foraminifera	Foram	%	Smear slide analysis
14	Pteropoda	Pteropoda	%	Smear slide analysis
15	Radiolarians	Rad	%	Smear slide analysis
16	Diatoms	Diatoms	%	Smear slide analysis
17	Spiculae	Spiculae	%	Smear slide analysis
18	Anhydrite	Anh	%	Smear slide analysis
19	Quartz	Qz	%	Smear slide analysis
20	Feldspar	Fsp	%	Smear slide analysis
21	Mica	Mica	%	Smear slide analysis
22	Clay minerals	Clay min	%	Smear slide analysis
23	Opaque minerals	Opaque	%	Smear slide analysis
24	Iron	Fe	%	Smear slide analysis
25	Heavy minerals	HM	%	Smear slide analysis
26	Zircon	Zrn	%	Smear slide analysis
27	Amphibole	Amp	%	Smear slide analysis
28	Volcanic glass	Volc glass	%	Smear slide analysis
29	Basalt	Basalt	%	Smear slide analysis

License:

Creative Commons Attribution 3.0 Unported (CC-BY-3.0)

Size:

475 data points

Data

Download dataset as tab-delimited text — use the following character encoding:

1 Depth sed [m]	2 Sample label	3 Sand [%]	4 Silt [%]	5 <2 µm [%]	6 Stratigraphy	7 Lithology	8 Comment	9 Carb [%]	10 Dol [%]	11 Arg [%]	12 Nannos [%]	13 Foram [%]	14 Pteropoda [%]	15 Rad [%]	16 Diatoms [%]	17 Spiculae [%]	18 Anh [%]	19 Qz [%]	20 Fsp [%]	21 Mica [%]	22 Clay min [%]	23 Opaque [%]	24 Fe [%]	25 HM [%]	26 Zrn [%]	27 Amp [%]	28 Volc glass [%]	29 Basalt [%]
0.20	10-88-1-1,20	10	35	85	Upper pleistocene	COCCOLITH NANNO OOZE	Dominat lithology; relative abundance	0	0	0	55	6	0	2	0	6	0	6	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	6	0
1.35	10-88-1-11,135	10	60	60	Upper pleistocene	FORAM BEARING SILTY NANNO OOZE	Dominat lithology; relative abundance	23	6	0	55	23	6	0	0	0	0	6	0	0	0	6	0	0	0	0	0	0
1.60	10-88-1-2,10	0	60	60	Upper pleistocene	COCCOLITH OOZE	Dominat lithology; relative abundance	6	6	0	55	6	0	0	0	6	0	6	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0
1.70	10-88-1-2,20	10	60	60	Upper pleistocene	NANNO (COCCOLITH) FORAM SILTY OOZE	Dominat lithology; relative abundance	0	6	0	55	23	6	0	0	6	0	6	0	1	0	6	0	0	2	0	6	0
2.50	10-88-1-21,100	10	60	60	Upper pleistocene	SILTY COCCOLITH OOZE	Dominat lithology; numerical abundance	16	4	0	37	4	0	0	0	4	0	16	0	0	0	16	0	0	0	0	0	0
4.26	10-88-1-31,126	10	60	85	Upper pleistocene	NANNO OOZE	Dominat lithology; relative abundance	0	0	0	75	6	0	0	0	0	0	6	8	0	0	0	0	2	2	0	0	0
5.00	10-88-1-4,50	10	60	85	Upper pleistocene	NANNO OOZE	Dominat lithology; relative abundance	23	0	2	75	6	2	0	0	2	0	6	0	0	0	6	2	0	0	2	0	0
51.39	10-88-2-1,15	10	60	60	Middle pleistocene	SILTY NANNO OOZE	Dominat lithology; relative abundance	0	0	0	77	6	2	0	0	0	0	6	0	0	0	0	2	0	0	0	6	2
53.59	10-88-2-2,85	10	35	85	Lower pleistocene	COCCOLITH OOZE	Dominat lithology; relative abundance	23	0	0	55	6	0	0	0	0	0	6	0	0	0	6	0	0	0	2	0	0
56.44	10-88-2-4,70	10	60	60	Lower pleistocene	COCCOLITH OOZE	Dominat lithology; relative abundance	0	0	0	55	6	2	0	0	0	0	6	0	0	0	23	0	0	0	1	0	0
58.04	10-88-2-5,80	10	60	60	Lower pleistocene	FORAM BEARING SILTY NANNO OOZE	Dominat lithology; relative abundance	6	0	0	55	23	0	6	0	0	0	6	0	0	0	6	0	0	0	1	0	0
59.49	10-88-2-6,75	10	60	85	Lower pleistocene	COCCOLITH OOZE	Dominat lithology; relative abundance	6	6	0	75	6	0	0	0	6	0	6	0	0	0	23	0	0	0	0	0	0
102.64	10-88-3-31,140	10	60	60	Upper pliocene	SILTY NANNO OOZE	Dominat lithology; relative abundance	6	6	0	75	6	6	0	0	0	0	6	0	0	0	23	0	0	0	0	0	0
102.94	10-88-3-4,20	10	60	85	Upper pliocene	NANNO OOZE	Dominat lithology; relative abundance	0	6	0	75	6	0	0	6	0	2	6	0	0	0	6	0	0	0	2	0	0
107.20	10-88-3-61,146	10	60	60	Upper pliocene	NANNO OOZE	Dominat lithology; relative abundance	0	0	6	55	23	0	0	6	0	0	6	0	0	10	23	0	0	0	0	0	0
128.04	10-88-5-1,4	10	60	85	Lower pliocene	NANNO OOZE	Dominat lithology; relative abundance	0	0	0	75	6	0	0	0	0	0	6	6	0	10	23	0	0	0	0	0	0
136.20	10-88-5-6,70	10	60	60		SILTY NANNO OOZE	Dominat lithology; relative abundance	23	6	0	75	6	0	0	0	0	0	6	0	0	0	6	0	0	0	0	6	0