Citation:

PANGAEA.230312

Always quote citation above when using data! You can download the citation in several formats below.

RIS Citation BibTeX Citation Text Citation Facebook TwitterShow Map Google Earth

Related to:

DSDP (1989): Data from the Deep Sea Drilling Project. Sediment, hard rock and reference files. National Geophysical Data Center, National Environmental Satellite, Data and Information Service, National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration, U.S. Department of Commerce, 1, CD-ROM

Smith, L A; McNeely, B; Laury, R; Foreman, H P; Dickinson, K; Capo, R; Beall, A O; Worzel, J Lamar; Bryant, William (1973): Initial Reports of the Deep Sea Drilling Project 10. Initial Reports of the Deep Sea Drilling Project, U.S. Government Printing Office, X, 748 pp, https://doi.org/10.2973/dsdp.proc.10.1973

Further details:

Processed smear slide data base - background and methods

Project(s):

Deep Sea Drilling Project (DSDP)

Coverage:

Latitude: 23.015000 * Longitude: -92.086000

Date/Time Start: 1970-03-01T00:00:00 * Date/Time End: 1970-03-01T00:00:00

Minimum DEPTH, sediment/rock: 649.36 m * Maximum DEPTH, sediment/rock: 650.55 m

Event(s):

10-87 * Latitude: 23.015000 * Longitude: -92.086000 * Date/Time: 1970-03-01T00:00:00 * Elevation: -3761.0 m * Penetration: 657 m * Recovery: 2.5 m * Location: Gulf of Mexico/BASIN * Campaign: * Basis: Glomar Challenger * Method/Device: Drilling/drill rig (DRILL) * Comment: 1 cores; 9 m cored; 0 m drilled; 27.8 % recovery

Parameter(s):

#	Name	Short Name	Unit	Method/Device	Comment
1	DEPTH, sediment/rock	Depth sed	m		Geocode
2	Sample code/label	Sample label		DSDP/ODP/IODP sample designation
3	Sand	Sand	%	Smear slide analysis
4	Silt	Silt	%	Smear slide analysis
5	Size fraction < 0.002 mm, clay	<2 µm	%	Smear slide analysis
6	Stratigraphy	Stratigraphy		Smear slide analysis
7	Lithology/composition/facies	Lithology		Smear slide analysis
8	Comment	Comment		Smear slide analysis
9	Carbonates	Carb	%	Smear slide analysis
10	Dolomite	Dol	%	Smear slide analysis
11	Aragonite	Arg	%	Smear slide analysis
12	Nannofossils	Nannos	%	Smear slide analysis
13	Foraminifera	Foram	%	Smear slide analysis
14	Chert	Chert	%	Smear slide analysis	fragments
15	Spiculae	Spiculae	%	Smear slide analysis
16	Quartz	Qz	%	Smear slide analysis
17	Feldspar	Fsp	%	Smear slide analysis
18	Mica	Mica	%	Smear slide analysis
19	Opaque minerals	Opaque	%	Smear slide analysis
20	Iron	Fe	%	Smear slide analysis
21	Heavy minerals	HM	%	Smear slide analysis
22	Zircon	Zrn	%	Smear slide analysis
23	Amphibole	Amp	%	Smear slide analysis
24	Volcanic glass	Volc glass	%	Smear slide analysis
25	Basalt	Basalt	%	Smear slide analysis
26	Rock fragments	Rock fragm	%	Smear slide analysis

License:

Creative Commons Attribution 3.0 Unported (CC-BY-3.0)

Size:

125 data points

Data

Download dataset as tab-delimited text — use the following character encoding:

1 Depth sed [m]	2 Sample label	3 Sand [%]	4 Silt [%]	5 <2 µm [%]	6 Stratigraphy	7 Lithology	8 Comment	9 Carb [%]	10 Dol [%]	11 Arg [%]	12 Nannos [%]	13 Foram [%]	14 Chert [%]	15 Spiculae [%]	16 Qz [%]	17 Fsp [%]	18 Mica [%]	19 Opaque [%]	20 Fe [%]	21 HM [%]	22 Zrn [%]	23 Amp [%]	24 Volc glass [%]	25 Basalt [%]	26 Rock fragm [%]
649.36	10-87-1-11,136	40	35	25	Middle miocene	QUARTZOSE SANDY MUD	Dominat lithology; relative abundance	0	0	6	6	6	6	0	50	5	0	0	0	0	6	6	0	0	10
649.40	10-87-1-11,140	0	60	60	Middle miocene	SLIGHTLY CALCAREOUS MUD QUARTZOSE	Dominat lithology; relative abundance	0	6	0	6	0	0	0	55	0	7	6	0	0	0	0	0	0	0
649.64	10-87-1-2,14	60	60	35	Middle miocene	SANDY MUDSTONE	Dominat lithology; numerical abundance	0	0	0	4	4	0	4	37	4	15	15	4	4	0	0	0	4	0
650.35	10-87-1-2,85	10	85	60	Middle miocene	ASHY SILTSTONE	Minor lithology; numerical abundance	24	0	0	0	0	0	0	24	0	24	2	0	0	0	0	24	0	2
650.55	10-87-1-21,105	60	60	35	Middle miocene	ASHY BIOTITIC MUDSTONE	Dominat lithology; numerical abundance	0	5	0	0	0	0	0	31	4	16	13	0	0	0	1	31	0	0