Anonymous (2005): Smear slide analysis of Hole 1-6 [dataset]. PANGAEA, https://doi.org/10.1594/PANGAEA.230306
Always quote citation above when using data! You can download the citation in several formats below.
Related to:
DSDP (1989): Data from the Deep Sea Drilling Project. Sediment, hard rock and reference files. National Geophysical Data Center, National Environmental Satellite, Data and Information Service, National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration, U.S. Department of Commerce, 1, CD-ROM
Pessagno, E A; Fischer, A G; Burk, Creighton A; Bukry, David; Berggren, William A; Beall, A O; Worzel, J Lamar; Ewing, Maurice (1969): Initial Reports of the Deep Sea Drilling Project 1. U. S. Government Printing Office, I, 999 pp, https://doi.org/10.2973/dsdp.proc.1.1969
Further details:
Project(s):
Deep Sea Drilling Project (DSDP)
Coverage:
Latitude: 30.839800 * Longitude: -67.647700
Date/Time Start: 1968-09-12T00:00:00 * Date/Time End: 1968-09-12T00:00:00
Minimum DEPTH, sediment/rock: 41.30 m * Maximum DEPTH, sediment/rock: 250.17 m
Event(s):
1-6 * Latitude: 30.839800 * Longitude: -67.647700 * Date/Time: 1968-09-12T00:00:00 * Elevation: -5124.0 m * Penetration: 256.6 m * Recovery: 28.3 m * Location: North Atlantic/CONT RISE * Campaign: Leg1 * Basis: Glomar Challenger * Method/Device: Drilling/drill rig (DRILL) * Comment: 6 cores; 46.6 m cored; 0 m drilled; 60.7 % recovery
Parameter(s):
# | Name | Short Name | Unit | Principal Investigator | Method/Device | Comment |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
1 | DEPTH, sediment/rock | Depth sed | m | Geocode | ||
2 | Sample code/label | Sample label | DSDP/ODP/IODP sample designation | |||
3 | Sand | Sand | % | Smear slide analysis | ||
4 | Silt | Silt | % | Smear slide analysis | ||
5 | Size fraction < 0.002 mm, clay | <2 µm | % | Smear slide analysis | ||
6 | Stratigraphy | Stratigraphy | Smear slide analysis | |||
7 | Lithology/composition/facies | Lithology | Smear slide analysis | |||
8 | Comment | Comment | Smear slide analysis | |||
9 | Carbonates | Carb | % | Smear slide analysis | ||
10 | Nannofossils | Nannos | % | Smear slide analysis | ||
11 | Foraminifera | Foram | % | Smear slide analysis | ||
12 | Lamellibranchiata | Lamellibranchiata | % | Smear slide analysis | ||
13 | Radiolarians | Rad | % | Smear slide analysis | ||
14 | Diatoms | Diatoms | % | Smear slide analysis | ||
15 | Spiculae | Spiculae | % | Smear slide analysis | ||
16 | Quartz | Qz | % | Smear slide analysis | ||
17 | Zeolite | Zeo | % | Smear slide analysis | ||
18 | Clay minerals | Clay min | % | Smear slide analysis | ||
19 | Glauconite | Glt | % | Smear slide analysis | ||
20 | Pyrite, FeS2 | Py | % | Smear slide analysis | ||
21 | Limonite | Lm | % | Smear slide analysis | ||
22 | Volcanic glass | Volc glass | % | Smear slide analysis | ||
23 | Organic matter | OM | % | Smear slide analysis | organic debris | |
24 | Minerals | Minerals | % | Smear slide analysis | isotropic minerals |
License:
Creative Commons Attribution 3.0 Unported (CC-BY-3.0)
Size:
644 data points
Data
1 Depth sed [m] | 2 Sample label | 3 Sand [%] | 4 Silt [%] | 5 <2 µm [%] | 6 Stratigraphy | 7 Lithology | 8 Comment | 9 Carb [%] | 10 Nannos [%] | 11 Foram [%] | 12 Lamellibranchiata [%] | 13 Rad [%] | 14 Diatoms [%] | 15 Spiculae [%] | 16 Qz [%] | 17 Zeo [%] | 18 Clay min [%] | 19 Glt [%] | 20 Py [%] | 21 Lm [%] | 22 Volc glass [%] | 23 OM [%] | 24 Minerals [%] |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
41.30 | 1-6-1-1,50 | 0 | 20 | 80 | Quaternary | SILTY CLAY | Dominat lithology; relative abundance | 2 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 15 | 5 | 0 |
41.99 | 1-6-1-11,119 | 0 | 17 | 83 | Quaternary | SILTY CLAY | Dominat lithology; relative abundance | 2 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 15 | 2 | 1 |
43.00 | 1-6-1-2,70 | 0 | 3 | 97 | Quaternary | ORGANIC FECAL MATERIAL? | Minor lithology; numerical abundance | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
45.90 | 1-6-1-4,60 | 0 | 10 | 85 | Quaternary | BROWN DEEP SEA CALY | Dominat lithology; relative abundance | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 5 | 2 | 85 | 0 | 0 | 5 | 5 | 0 | 0 |
152.19 | 1-6-2-1,9 | 0 | 30 | 70 | Middle eocene | DIATOM-RAD CLAY | Minor lithology; relative abundance | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 10 | 20 | 2 | 0 | 10 | 60 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
153.00 | 1-6-2-1,90 | 0 | 24 | 76 | Middle eocene | DIATOM-RAD-SPONGE CLAY | Dominat lithology; relative abundance | 2 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 8 | 8 | 8 | 0 | 5 | 70 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 |
153.80 | 1-6-2-2,20 | 0 | 15 | 85 | Middle eocene | MONTMORILLINITIC CLAY | Dominat lithology; relative abundance | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 10 | 85 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 5 | 0 | 0 |
156.70 | 1-6-2-4,10 | 0 | 15 | 85 | Middle eocene | CLAY | Dominat lithology; relative abundance | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 10 | 85 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 5 | 0 | 0 |
158.88 | 1-6-2-5,78 | 0 | 10 | 90 | Middle eocene | BLUE GREEN CLAY | Dominat lithology; relative abundance | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 5 | 90 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 5 | 0 | 0 |
192.10 | 1-6-3-2,10 | 0 | 70 | 30 | Middle eocene | COCCO.DIATOM OOZE | Dominat lithology; relative abundance | 0 | 30 | 0 | 0 | 5 | 35 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 30 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 0 | 0 |
194.12 | 1-6-3-3,62 | 0 | 80 | 20 | Middle eocene | DIATOM-COCCO OOZE | Dominat lithology; relative abundance | 0 | 35 | 0 | 0 | 10 | 35 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 20 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 0 | 0 |
195.64 | 1-6-3-4,64.5 | 0 | 100 | 0 | Middle eocene | SILT | Minor lithology; numerical abundance | 0 | 30 | 5 | 0 | 0 | 20 | 20 | 20 | 0 | 0 | 3 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
196.10 | 1-6-3-41,110 | 0 | 100 | 0 | Middle eocene | SPONGE SPICULE SILT | Minor lithology; relative abundance | 0 | 2 | 25 | 0 | 2 | 5 | 50 | 15 | 0 | 0 | 5 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
196.60 | 1-6-3-CC,0 | 0 | 100 | 0 | Middle eocene | DIATOM-COCCO OOZE | Dominat lithology; numerical abundance | 0 | 40 | 0 | 0 | 10 | 40 | 6 | 0 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 0 | 0 |
230.13 | 1-6-4-1,93 | 0 | 100 | 0 | Middle eocene | DIATOM COCCO OOZE | Dominat lithology; relative abundance | 5 | 35 | 2 | 0 | 15 | 30 | 15 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
230.19 | 1-6-4-1,99 | 0 | 80 | 20 | Middle eocene | DIATOM OOZE | Minor lithology; numerical abundance | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 20 | 40 | 20 | 0 | 0 | 20 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
230.40 | 1-6-4-11,120 | 0 | 80 | 20 | Middle eocene | LIGHT BLUE GRAY DIATOM COCCO OOZE | Minor lithology; numerical abundance | 5 | 15 | 0 | 0 | 12 | 26 | 12 | 0 | 0 | 20 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
231.20 | 1-6-4-2,50 | 0 | 100 | 0 | Middle eocene | DIATOM COCCO OOZE | Dominat lithology; relative abundance | 5 | 30 | 2 | 0 | 15 | 30 | 20 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 0 | 0 |
231.27 | 1-6-4-2,57 | 0 | 90 | 10 | Middle eocene | BLUISH GREEN CLAY+DIATOM OOZE | Minor lithology; relative abundance | 0 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 20 | 50 | 20 | 0 | 0 | 10 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 0 | 0 |
231.40 | 1-6-4-2,70 | 0 | 50 | 50 | Middle eocene | BLUISH CLAY AND DIATOM NANNO OOZE | Minor lithology; relative abundance | 0 | 20 | 0 | 0 | 5 | 20 | 5 | 50 | 0 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
232.87 | 1-6-4-3,67 | 60 | 40 | 0 | Middle eocene | SILTY SAND | Minor lithology; numerical abundance | 20 | 5 | 10 | 0 | 0 | 5 | 20 | 30 | 0 | 0 | 10 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
233.00 | 1-6-4-3,80 | 0 | 100 | 0 | Middle eocene | CALCISILTITE | Minor lithology; numerical abundance | 80 | 5 | 0 | 0 | 5 | 5 | 5 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
233.24 | 1-6-4-31,104 | 0 | 60 | 40 | Middle eocene | CLAYEY DIATOM OOZE | Minor lithology; numerical abundance | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 50 | 0 | 0 | 5 | 40 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 5 | 0 | 0 |
246.60 | 1-6-5-1,0 | 50 | 2 | 48 | Middle eocene | CALCAREOUS CHERT | Minor lithology; numerical abundance | 0 | 0 | 10 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 25 | 10 | 0 | 0 | 5 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
246.75 | 1-6-5-1,15 | 0 | 90 | 10 | Middle eocene | DIATOM OOZE | Minor lithology; relative abundance | 0 | 10 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 70 | 10 | 0 | 0 | 10 | 0 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
247.16 | 1-6-5-1,56 | 0 | 100 | 0 | Middle eocene | CALCISILTITE | Dominat lithology; numerical abundance | 75 | 5 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 10 | 10 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
248.60 | 1-6-5-2,50 | 0 | 45 | 55 | Middle eocene | CLAY | Dominat lithology; numerical abundance | 10 | 20 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 10 | 10 | 0 | 0 | 40 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
250.17 | 1-6-6-11,117 | 85 | 15 | 0 | Middle eocene | MEDIUM SAND | Dominat lithology; numerical abundance | 15 | 3 | 20 | 10 | 0 | 2 | 15 | 30 | 0 | 0 | 5 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |