Skip to main content
Log in

Modeling macroalgae growth and nutrient dynamics for integrated multi-trophic aquaculture

  • Published:
Journal of Applied Phycology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Integrated multi-trophic aquaculture (IMTA) is being explored on both economic and environmental grounds in many traditional aquaculture regions. To test a variety of suitable macroalgae species and management scenarios, a numerical model is developed to quantify the remediation of dissolved nutrients and production of macroalgae near a nutrient source. Differences in the morphological, physiological, and economic characteristics of different macroalgae species can provide flexibility when considering the cost and benefit of farming macroalgae. Results show that of the three species studied, Macrocystis pyrifera removed 75 % of dissolved inorganic nitrogen (DIN) input from a point source, while Porphyra umbilicalis and Ulva lactuca removed 5 %. Both M. pyrifera and P. umbilicalis have reduced bioremediation capacity at increasing flow rates. U. lactuca showed increased bioremediation potential as flow rate increased from low to moderate flows. Increasing the optical depth increased the bioremediation potential of M. pyrifera for moderate values of the light attenuation coefficient, whereas bioremediation was unaffected by optical depth for both U. lactuca and P. umbilicalis. Harvesting increased bioremediation capacity of all species by up to 25-fold dependent on the establishment phase and harvesting frequency. We conclude that the choice of macroalgae species greatly affects the success of IMTA and that both harvesting and farm arrangements can be used to greatly optimize bioremediation.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6
Fig. 7

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Aldridge JN, Trimmer M (2009) Modelling the distribution and growth of ‘problem’ green seaweed in the Medway estuary, UK. Hydrobiologia 629:107–122

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Al-Hafedh YS, Alam A, Buschmann AH (2014) Bioremediation potential, growth and biomass yield of the green seaweed. Ulva lactuca in an integrated marine aquaculture system at the Red Sea coast of Saudi Arabia at different stocking densities and effluent flow rates. Rev Aquac. doi:10.1111/raq.12060

    Google Scholar 

  • Broch OJ, Slagstad D (2012) Modelling seasonal growth and composition of the kelp Saccharina latissima. J Appl Phycol 24:759–776

  • Broch OJ, Ellingsen IH, Forbord S, Wang X, Zsolt V, Alver MO, Skjermo J (2013) Modelling the cultivation and bioremediation potential of the kelp Saccharina latissima in close proximity to an exposed salmon farm in Norway. Aquac Env Interact 4:187–206

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bruhn A, Dahl J, Nielsen HB, Nikolaisen L, Rasmussen MB, Markager S, Jensen PD (2011) Bioenergy potential of Ulva Lactuca: biomass yield, methane production and combustion. Bioresour Technol 102:2595–2604

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Buschmann AH, Varela DA, Hernandez-Gonzalez MC, Huovinen P (2008) Opportunities and challenges for the development of an integrated seaweed-based aquaculture activity in Chile: determining the physiological capabilities of Macrocystis and Gracilaria as biofilters. J Appl Phycol 20:571–577

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Carmona R, Kraemer GP, Yarish C (2006) Exploring Northeast American and Asian species of Porphyra for use in an integrated finfish–algal aquaculture system. Aquaculture 252:54–65

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chopin T, Yarish C, Wilkes R, Belyea E, Lu S, Mathieson A (1999) Developing Porphyra/salmon integrated aquaculture for bioremediation and diversification of the aquaculture industry. J Appl Phycol 11:463–472

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Clementson LA, Parslow JS, Turnbull AR, Bonham PI (2004) Properties of light absorption in a highly coloured estuarine system in south-east Australia which is prone to blooms of the toxic dinoflagellate Gymnodinium catenatum. Estuar Coast Shelf Sci 60:101–112

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • CSIRO (2009) CSIRO Atlas of Regional Seas (CARS), from http://www.marine.csiro.au/~dunn/cars2009/.

  • ElkhornSlough.org (2012). Elkhorn slough plants: sea lettuce, from http://www.elkhornslough.org/sloughlife/plants/sea_lettuce.htm.

  • Enriquez S, Agusti S, Duarte CM (1994) Light absorption by marine macrophytes. Oecologia 98:121–129

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Everett JD, Baird ME, Suthers IM (2007) Nutrient and plankton dynamics in an intermittently closed/open lagoon, Smiths Lake, south-eastern Australia: an ecological model. Estuar Coast Shelf Sci 72:690–702

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Gerard VA (1982) In situ water motion and nutrient uptake by the giant kelp Macrocystis pyrifera. Mar Biol 69:51–54

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hafting JT (1999) Effect of tissue nitrogen and phosphorus quota on growth of Porphyra yezoensis blades in suspension cultures. Hydrobiologia 398/399:305–314

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Haines KC, Wheeler PA (1978) Ammonium and nitrate uptake by the marine macrophytes Hypnea musciformis (Rhodophyta) and Macrocystis pyrifera (Phaeophyta). J Phycol 14:319–324

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Hepburn CD, Holborow JD, Wing SR, Frew RD, Hurd CL (2007) Exposure to waves enhances the growth rate and nitrogen status of the giant kelp Macrocystis pyrifera. Mar Ecol Prog Ser 339:99–108

  • Hernandez-Carmona C, Robledo D, Serviere-Zaragoza E (2001) Effect of nutrient availability on Macrocystis pyrifera recruitment and survival near its southern limit off Baja California. Bot Mar 44:221–229

  • Hernández I, Martínez-Aragón JF, Tovar A, Pérez-Lloréns JL, Vergara JJ (2002) Biofiltering efficiency in removal of dissolved nutrients by three species of estuarine macroalgae cultivated with sea bass (Dicentrarchus labrax) waste waters 2. Ammonium. J Appl Phycol 14:375–384

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hernandez I, Fernandez-Engo MA, Perez-Llorens JL, Vergara JJ (2005) Integrated outdoor culture of two estuarine macroalgae as biofilters for dissolved nutrients from Sparus aurata waste waters. J Appl Phycol 17:557–567

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Johansson G, Snoeijs P (2002) Macroalgal photosynthetic responses to light in relation to thallus morphology and depth zonation. Mar Ecol Prog Ser 244:63–72

  • Lee CS, Ang P Jr (1991) A simple model for seaweed growth and optimal harvesting strategy. Ecol Model 55:67–74

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lobban CS, Harrison PJ (1994) Seaweed ecology and physiology. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Markager S, Sand-Jensen K (1996) Implications of thallus thickness for growth-irradiance relationships of marine macroalgae. Eur J Phycol 31:79–87

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • MarLIN. (2012). Purple laver—Porphyra umbilicalis, from http://www.marlin.ac.uk/speciesinformation.php?speciesID=4194

  • Neori A, Cohen I, Gordin H (1991) Ulva lactuca biofilters for marine fishpond effluents. II. Growth rate, yield and C:N ratio. Bot Mar 34:483–489

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • North WJ, Jackson GA, Manley SL (1986) Macrocystis and its environment, knowns and unknowns. Aquat Bot 26:9–26

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pedersen A, Kraemer G, Yarisha C (2004) The effects of temperature and nutrient concentrations on nitrate and phosphate uptake in different species of Porphyra from Long Island Sound (USA). J Exp Mar Biol Ecol 312:235–252

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Ren JS, Stenton-Dozey J, Plew DR, Fang J, Gall M (2012) An ecosystem model for optimising production in integrated multitrophic aquaculture systems. Ecol Model 246:34–46

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Robertson-Andersson DV, Potgieter M, Hansen J, Bolton JJ, Troell M, Anderson R, Probyn T (2008) Integrated seaweed cultivation on an abalone farm in South Africa. J Appl Phycol 20:579–595

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rodriguez GE, Rassweiler A, Reed DC, Holbrook SJ (2013) The importance of progressive senescence in the biomass dynamics of giant kelp (Macrocystis pyrifera). Ecology 94:1848–1858

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Rykiel EJ (1995) Testing of ecological models: the meaning of validation. Ecol Model 90:229–244

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sanderson JC, Di Benedetto R (1988) Tasmanian seaweeds for the edible market Department of Sea Fisheries Technical report. Marine Laboratories Department of Sea Fisheries, Hobart, Tasmania

  • Sanderson JC, Cromey CJ, Dring MJ, Kelly MS (2008) Distribution of nutrients for seaweed cultivation around salmon cages at farm sites in north-west Scotland. Aquaculture 278:60–68

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Silva C, Yanez E, Martin-Diaz ML, DelValls TA (2012) Assessing a bioremediation strategy in a shallow coastal system affected by a fish farm culture—application of GIS and shellfish dynamic models in the San Pedro, SW Spain. Mar Pollut Bull 64:751–765

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Solidoro C, Pecenik G, Pastres R, Franco D, Dejak C (1997) Modelling macroalgae (Ulva rigida) in the Venice lagoon: model structure identification and first parameters estimation. Ecol Model 94:191–206

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Thompson PA, Bonham P, Wilcox S, Crawford C (2005) Baseline monitoring in D’Entrecasteaux Channel Technical report. CSIRO Marine and Atmospheric Research, Hobart, Tasmania

  • Trancoso AR, Saraiva S, Fenandes L, Pina P, Leitao P, Neves R (2005) Modelling macroalgae using a 3D hydrodynamic-ecological model in a shallow, temperate estuary. Ecol Model 187:232–246

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Troell M, Joyce A, Chopin T, Neori A, Buschmann AH, Fang JG (2009) Ecological engineering in aquaculture—potential for integrated multi-trophic aquaculture (IMTA) in marine offshore systems. Aquaculture 297:1–9

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Utter BD, Denny MW (1996) Wave-induced forces on the giant kelp Macrocystis pyrifera (Agardh): field test of a computational model. J Exp Biol 199:2645–2654

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Wang X, Olsen LM, Reitan KI, Olsen Y (2012) Discharge of nutrient wastes from salmon farms: environmental effects, and potential for integrated multi-trophic aquaculture. Aquac Env Interact 2:267–283

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wheeler WN (1980) Effect of boundary layer transport on the fixation of carbon by the giant kelp Macrocystis pyrifera. Mar Biol 56:103–10

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Wild-Allen K, Herzfeld M, Thompson PA, Rosebrock U, Parslow J, Volkman JK (2010) Applied coastal biogeochemical modelling to quantify the environmental impact of fish farm nutrients and inform managers. J Mar Syst 81:134–147

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Yokoyama H, Ishihi Y (2010) Bioindicator and biofilter function of Ulva spp. (Chlorophyta) for dissolved inorganic nitrogen discharged from a coastal fish farm—potential role in integrated multi-trophic aquaculture. Aquaculture 310:74–83

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Zimmerman RC, Kremer JN (1984) Episodic nutrient supply to a kelp forest ecosystem in Southern California. J Mar Res 42:591–604

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

We acknowledge Dr. Mark Baird for his generous assistance and valuable advice and the FRDC for funding part of this research.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Scott Hadley.

Appendix

Appendix

Table 4 Biological intermediate processes
Table 5 Parameters for the macroalgal growth model

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Hadley, S., Wild-Allen, K., Johnson, C. et al. Modeling macroalgae growth and nutrient dynamics for integrated multi-trophic aquaculture. J Appl Phycol 27, 901–916 (2015). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10811-014-0370-y

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10811-014-0370-y

Keywords

Navigation