Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Offshore wind park monitoring programmes, lessons learned and recommendations for the future

  • OFFSHORE WIND FARM IMPACTS
  • Opinion Paper
  • Published:
Hydrobiologia Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Over a decade of monitoring offshore wind park environmental impact triggered a reflection on the overall objectives and how to best continue with the monitoring programmes. Essentially, basic monitoring has to be rationalised at the level of the likelihood of impact detection, the meaningfulness of impact size and representativeness of the findings. Targeted monitoring is crucial and should continue to be applied to disentangle processes behind observed impacts, for instance the overarching artificial reef effect caused by wind parks. The major challenge, however, remains to achieve a reliable assessment of the cumulative impacts. A continuous international consultation and collaboration with marine scientists, managers, government officials and industry will be needed to ensure an optimisation of the future monitoring programmes.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Beiersdorf, A. & A. Radecke (eds), 2014. Ecological Research at the Offshore Windfarm alpha ventus: Challenges, Results and Perspectives. Springer, Wiesbaden: 201.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bergström, L., L. Kautsky, T. Malm, R. Rosenberg, M. Wahlberg, N. A. Capetillo & D. Wilhelmsson, 2014. Effects of offshore wind farms on marine wildlife – a generalized impact assessment. Environmental Research Letters 9(3): 034012.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Berlow, E. L., 1999. Strong effects of weak interactions in ecological communities. Nature 398: 330–334.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Boehlert, G. W. & A. B. Gill, 2010. Environmental and ecological effects of ocean renewable energy development – a current synthesis. Oceanography 23: 68–81.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Brabant, R., N. Vanermen, E. Stienen & S. Degraer, 2015. Towards a cumulative collision risk assessment of local and migrating birds in North Sea offshore wind farms. Hydrobiologia, this issue. doi:10.1007/s10750-015-2224-2.

  • Brandt, M. J., A. Diederichs, K. Betke & G. Nehls, 2011. Responses of harbour porpoises to pile driving at the Horns Rev II offshore wind farm in the Danish North Sea. Marine Ecology Progress Series 421: 205–216.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Brandt, M. J., A. Diederichs, K. Betke & G. Nehls, 2012. Effects of offshore pile driving on harbor porpoises (Phocoena phocoena). In Popper, A. N. & A. Hawkins (eds), The Effects of Noise on Aquatic Life. Advances in Experimental Medicine and Biology 730. Springer Science and Business Media, New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bremner, J., 2008. Species’ traits and ecological functioning in marine conservation and management. Journal of Experimental Marine Biology and Ecology 366: 37–47.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Busch, M., A. Kannen, S. Garthe & M. Jessopp, 2013. Consequences of a cumulative perspective on marine environmental impacts: Offshore wind farming and seabirds at North Sea scale in context of the EU marine strategy framework directive. Ocean and Coastal Management 71: 213–224.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Coates, D., G. Van Hoey, J. Reubens, S. Vanden Eede, V. De Maersschalck, M. Vincx & J. Vanaverbeke, 2013. The macrobenthic community around an offshore wind farm. In Degraer, S., R. Brabant & B. Rumes (eds), Environmental Impacts of Offshore Wind Farms in the Belgian Part of the North Sea: Learning from the Past to Optimise Future Monitoring Programmes. Royal Belgian Institute of Natural Sciences, Operational Directorate Natural Environment, Marine Ecology and Management Section, Brussels: 87–97.

    Google Scholar 

  • Coates, D. A., Y. Deschutter, M. Vincx & J. Vanaverbeke, 2014. Enrichment and shifts in macrobenthic assemblages in an offshore wind farm area in the Belgian part of the North Sea. Marine Environmental Research 95: 1–12.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Collie, J. S., S. J. Hall, M. J. Kaiser & I. R. Poiner, 2000. A qualitative analysis of fishing impacts on shelf-sea benthos. Journal of Animal Ecology 69: 785–798.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cormier, R., A. Kannen, M. Elliott, P. Hall, M. Ian & I. M. Davies 2013. Marine and Coastal Ecosystem-Based Risk Management Handbook. ICES Cooperative Research Report 317: 60.

  • Cramer Buch, M., 2013. Improving knowledge about environmental impacts. In Danish Energy Agency, Danish Offshore Wind. Key Environmental Issues – a Follow-up. The Environmental Group: The Danish Energy Agency, The Danish Nature Agency, DONG Energy and Vattenfall.

  • Dähne, M., A. Gilles, K. Lucke, V. Peschko, S. Adler, K. Krugel, J. Sundermeyer & U. Siebert, 2013. Effects of pile-driving on harbour porpoises (Phocoena phocoena) at the first offshore wind farm in Germany. Environmental Research Letters 8(2): 025002.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dannheim, J., 2007. Macrozoobenthic Response to Fishery – Trophic Interactions in Highly Dynamic Coastal Ecosystems. Alfred Wegener Institute. Bremerhaven, University of Bremen, PhD dissertation: 226.

  • Dannheim, J., T. Brey, A. Schröder, K. Mintenbeck, R. Knust & W. E. Arntz, 2014. Trophic look at soft-bottom communities – Short-term effects of trawling cessation on benthos. Journal of Sea Research 85: 18–28.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dazey, E., B. McIntosh, S. Brown & K. M. Dudzinski, 2012. Assessment of underwater anthropogenic noise associated with construction activities in Bechers Bay, Santa Rosa Island California. Journal of Environmental Protection 2012(3): 1286–1294.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Degraer, S. & R. Brabant (eds), 2009. Offshore Wind Farms in the Belgian Part of the North Sea: State of the Art After Two Years of Environmental Monitoring. Royal Belgian Institute of Natural Sciences, Management Unit of the North Sea Mathematical Models, Marine ecosystem management unit, Brussel: 287.

    Google Scholar 

  • Degraer, S. & R. Brabant (eds), 2013. Environmental Impacts of Offshore Wind Farms in the Belgian Part of the North Sea: Learning from the Past to Optimise Future Monitoring Programmes. Royal Belgian Institute of Natural Sciences, Management Unit of the North Sea Mathematical Models, Marine ecosystem management unit, Brussel: 239.

    Google Scholar 

  • De Juan, S., M. Demestre & P. Sanchez, 2011. Exploring the degree of trawling disturbance by the analysis of benthic communities ranging from a heavily exploited fishing ground to an undisturbed area in the NW Mediterranean. Scientia Marina 75(3): 507–516.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • De Mesel, I., F. Kerckhof, A. Norro, B. Rumes & S. Degraer, 2015. Succession and seasonal dynamics of the epifauna community on offshore wind farm foundations and their role as stepping stones for non-indigenous species. Hydrobiologia, this issue. doi:10.1007/s10750-014-2157-1.

  • De Troch, M., J. Reubens, E. Heirman, S. Degraer & M. Vincx, 2013. Energy profiling of demersal fish: A case-study in wind farm artificial reefs. Marine Environmental Research 92: 224–233.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Drewitt, A. L. & R. H. W. Langston, 2006. Assessing the impact of wind farms on birds. Ibis 148: 29–42.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Duineveld, G. C. A., M. J. N. Bergman & M. S. S. Lavaleye, 2007. Effects of an area closed to fisheries on the composition of the benthic fauna in the southern North Sea. ICES Journal of Marine Science 64: 899–908.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Elliott, M., 2002. The role of the DPSIR aproach and conceptual models in marine environmental management: An example for offshore windpower. Marine Pollution Bulletin 44(6): iii–iv.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Elliott, M., 2011. Marine science and management means tackling exogenic unmanaged pressures and endogenic managed pressures. A numbered guide. Marine Pollution Bulletin 62: 651–655.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • EWEA, 2014. The European Offshore Wind Industry – Key Trends and Statistics 2013, European Wind Energy Association, www.ewea.org/fileadmin/files/library/publications/statistics/European_offshore_statistics_2013.pdf.

  • Gill, A. B., 2005. Offshore renewable energy – ecological implications of generating electricity in the coastal zone. Journal of Applied Ecology 42: 605–615.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gill, A. B., M. Bartlett & F. Thomsen, 2012. Potential interactions between diadromous fishes of U.K. conservation importance and the electromagnetic fields and subsea sound from marine renewable energy developments. Journal of Fish Biology 81: 1791.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gill, A. B., I. Gloyne-Phillips, J. A. Kimber & P. Sigray, 2014. Marine renewable energy, electromagnetic fields and EM-sensitive animals. In Shields, M. & A. Payne (eds), Humanity and the Sea: Marine Renewable Energy and the Interactions with the Environment. Springer Science and Business Media, Dordrecht.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gray, J. S. & M. Elliot, 2009. Ecology of marine sediments: from science to management. Oxford University Press, Oxford: 256.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gray, J. S., P. Dayton, S. Thrush & M. J. Kaiser, 2006. On effects of trawling, benthos and sampling design. Marine Pollution Bulletin 52: 840–843.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Gutow, L., K. Teschke, A. Schmidt, J. Dannheim, R. Krone & M. Gusky, 2014. Rapid increase of benthic structural and functional diversity at the alpha ventus offshore test site. In BSH & BMU (ed.), Ecological Research at the Offshore Windfarm Alpha Ventus – Challenges, Results and Perspectives. Federal Maritime and Hydrographic Agency (BSH), Federal Ministry of the Environment, Nature Conservation and Nuclear Safety (BMU), Wiesbaden: 67–81.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Haelters, J., L. Vigin & S. Degraer, 2013. Attraction of harbour porpoises to offshore wind farms: what can be expected? In Degraer, S., R. Brabant & B. Rumes (eds), Environmental Impacts of Offshore Wind Farms in the Belgian part of the North Sea: Learning from the Past to Optimise Future Monitoring Programmes. Royal Belgian Institute of Natural Sciences, Operational Directorate Natural Environment, Marine Ecology and Management Section, Brussels: 167–171.

    Google Scholar 

  • Haelters J., V. Dulière, L. Vigin & S. Degraer, 2015. Towards a numerical model to simulate the observed displacement of harbour porpoises Phocoena phocoena due to pile driving in Belgian waters. Hydrobiologia, this issue. doi:10.1007/s10750-014-2138-4.

  • Hooper, D. U., F. S. Chapin, J. J. Ewel, A. Hector, P. Inchausti, S. Lavorel, J. H. Lawton, D. M. Lodge, M. Loreau, S. Naeem, B. Schmid, H. Setälä, A. J. Symstad, J. Vandermeer & D. A. Wardle, 2005. Effects of biodiversity on ecosystem functioning: a consensus of current knowledge. Ecological Monographs 75: 3–35.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Huddleston, J. (ed.), 2010. Understanding the Environmental Impacts of Offshore Windfarms. COWRIE 2010, London: 138.

    Google Scholar 

  • ICES, 2013. Report of the Working Group on Marine Benthal and Renewable Energy Developments (WGMBRED), 19–22 March 2013, Caen, France. ICES CM 2013/SSGEF:17: 23.

  • Inger, R., M. J. Attrill, S. Bearhop, A. C. Broderick, W. James Grecian, D. J. Hodgson, C. Mills, E. Sheehan, S. C. Votier, M. J. Witt & B. J. Godley, 2009. Marine renewable energy: potential benefits to biodiversity? An urgent call for research. Journal of Applied Ecology 46: 1145–1153.

    Google Scholar 

  • Joschko, T. J., B. H. Buck, L. Gutow & A. Schröder, 2008. Colonization of an artificial hard substrate by Mytilus edulis in the German Bight. Marine Biology Research 4: 350–360.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kerckhof, F., S. Degraer, A. Norro & B. Rumes, 2011. Offshore intertidal hard substrata: a new habitat promoting non-indigenous species in the Southern North Sea: an exploratory study. In Degraer, S., R. Brabant & B. Rumes (eds), Offshore Wind Farms in the Belgian part of the North Sea: Selected Findings from the Baseline and Targeted Monitoring. Royal Belgian Institute of Natural Sciences, Management Unit of the North Sea Mathematical Models, Marine Ecosystem Management Section, Brussels.

    Google Scholar 

  • Krägefsky, S., 2014. Effects of the Alpha Ventus offshore test site on pelagic fish. Chapter 10. In Beiersdorf, A. & A. Radecke (eds), Ecological Research at the Offshore Windfarm Alpha Ventus: Challenges, Results and Perspectives. Springer, Wiesbaden: 83–94.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Krone, R., 2012. Offshore wind power reef effects and reef fauna roles. Bremen, University Bremen, PhD dissertation. 213 pp.

  • Krone, R., L. Gutow, T. Brey, J. Dannheim & A. Schroder, 2013a. Mobile demersal megafauna at artificial structures in the German Bight – Likely effects of offshore wind farm development. Estuarine Coastal and Shelf Science 125: 1–9.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Krone, R., L. Gutow, T. J. Joschko & A. Schroder, 2013b. Epifauna dynamics at an offshore foundation—Implications of future wind power farming in the North Sea. Marine Environmental Research 85: 1–12.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Krone, R., 2014. Untersuchung der Effekte von Windenergieanlagen auf Fische und Megafauna im Testfeld Alpha Ventus. Final report of the StUKplus-Project: 56 [Available at http://www.bsh.de/de/Meeresnutzung/Wirtschaft/Windparks/StUKplus/Berichte/Abschlussberichte/StUKplus-Schlussbericht_AWI1-B_demersale_Megafauna_FKZ_0327689A.pdf].

  • Langhamer, O., 2012. Artificial Reef Effect in Relation to Offshore Renewable Energy Conversion: State of the art. The Scientific World Journal 2012: 386713.

    Article  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  • Leonhard, S.B., C. Stenberg, J. Støttrup (eds), 2011. Effect of the Horns Rev 1 Offshore Wind Farm on Fish Communities. Follow-up Seven Years after Construction. DTU Aqua, Orbicon, DHI, NaturFocus. Report commissioned by The Environmental Group through contract with Vattenfall Vindkraft A/S. DTU Aqua-report No 246-2011. National Institute of Aquatic Resources, Technical University of Denmark: 66.

  • Lindeboom, H. J., H. J. Kouwenhoven, M. J. N. Bergman, S. Bouma, S. Brasseur, R. Daan, R. C. Fijn, D. de Haan, S. Dirksen, R. van Hal, R. H. R. Lambers, R. Ter Hofstede, K. L. Krijgsveld, M. Leopold & M. Scheidat, 2011. Short-term ecological effects of an offshore wind farm in the Dutch coastal zone; a compilation. Environmental Research Letters 6(3): 035101.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • McCann, K. S., J. B. Rasmussen & J. Umbanhowar, 2005. The dynamics of spatially coupled food webs. Ecology Letters 8: 513–523.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Mendel, B., J. Kotzerka, J. Sommerfeld, H. Schwemmer, N. Sonntag & S. Garthe, 2014. Effects of Alpha Ventus offshore test site on distribution patterns, behaviour and flight heights of seabirds. In BSH & BMU (ed.), Ecological Research at the Offshore Windfarm Alpha Ventus – Challenges, Results and Perspectives. Federal Maritime and Hydrographic Agency (BSH), Federal Ministry of the Environment, Nature Conservation and Nuclear Safety (BMU), Wiesbaden: 96–109.

    Google Scholar 

  • Miller, R. G., Z. L. Hutchison, A. K. Macleod, M. T. Burrows, E. J. Cook, K. S. Last & B. Wilson, 2013. Marine renewable energy development: assessing the Benthic Footprint at multiple scales. Frontiers in Ecology and the Environment 11: 433–440.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Norro, A., B. Rumes & S. Degraer, 2013. Differentiating between underwater construction sound of monopile and jacket foundations for offshore windmills: A case study from the Belgian part of the North Sea. The Scientific World Journal 2013: 7.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Petersen, K. J. & T. Malm, 2006. Offshore windmill farms: Threats or possibilities to the marine environment. Ambio 35: 29–34.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Post, D. M., M. E. Conners & D. S. Goldberg, 2000. Prey preference by a top predator and the stability of linked food chains. Ecology 81: 8–14.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Reubens, J. T., S. Degraer & M. Vincx, 2011. Aggregation and feeding behaviour of pouting (Trisopterus luscus) at wind turbines in the Belgian part of the North Sea. Fisheries Research 108: 223–227.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Reubens, J., M. De Rijcke, S. Degraer & M. Vincx, 2014a. Diel variation in feeding and movement patterns of juvenile Atlantic cod at offshore wind farms. Journal of Sea Research 85: 214–221.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Reubens, J., S. Degraer & M. Vincx, 2014b. The ecology of benthopelagic fishes at offshore wind farms: a synthesis of 4 years of research. Hydrobiologia 727: 121–136.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Rogers, S. I., P. J. Somerfield, M. Schratzberger, R. Warwick, T. A. D. Maxwell & J. R. Ellis, 2008. Sampling strategies to evaluate the status of offshore soft sediment assemblages. Marine Pollution Bulletin 56: 880–894.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Scheidat, M., 2011. Short-term ecological effects of an offshore wind farm in the Dutch coastal zone; a compilation. Environmental Research Letters 6(3): 035101.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Slabbekoorn, H., N. Bouton, I. van Opzeeland, A. Coers, C. ten Cate & A. N. Popper, 2010. A noisy spring: the impact of globally rising underwater sound levels on fish. Trends in Ecology and Evolution 1243: 9.

    Google Scholar 

  • Teilmann, J. & J. Carstensen, 2012. Negative long term effects on harbour porpoises from a large scale offshore wind farm in the Baltic – evidence of slow recovery. Environmental Research Letters 7(2012): 10.

    Google Scholar 

  • Thompson, P. M., D. Lusseau, T. Barton, D. Simmons, J. Rusin & H. Bailey, 2010. Assessing the responses of coastal cetaceans to the construction of offshore wind turbines. Marine Pollution Bulletin 60(8): 1200–1208.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Vanden Eynde, D., M. Baeye, R. Brabant, M. Fettweis, F. Francken, P. Haerens, M. Mathys, M. Sas & V. Van Lancker, 2013. All quiet on the sea bottom front? Lessons from the morphodynamic monitoring. In Degraer, S., R. Brabant & B. Rumes (eds), Offshore Wind Farms in the Belgian part of the North Sea: Heading for an Understanding of Environmental Impacts. Royal Belgian Institute of Natural Sciences, Management Unit of the North Sea Mathematical Models, Marine ecosystem management unit, Brussels: 35–47.

    Google Scholar 

  • Vanermen, N., T. Onkelinx, W. Courtens, M. Van de walle, H. Verstraete & E. W. M. Stienen, 2015a. Seabird avoidance and attraction at an offshore wind farm in the Belgian part of the North Sea. Hydrobiologia, this issue. doi:10.1007/s10750-014-2088-x.

  • Vanermen, N., T. Onkelinx, P. Verschelde, W. Courtens, M. Van de walle, H. Verstraete & E. W. M. Stienen, 2015b. Assessing seabird displacement at offshore wind farms: power ranges of a monitoring and data handling protocol. Hydrobiologia, this issue. doi:10.1007/s10750-014-2156-2.

  • Weijerman, W., H. J. Lindeboom & A. Zuur, 2005. Regime shifts in marine ecosystems of the North Sea and Wadden Sea. Marine Ecology Progress Series 298: 21–39.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Westra, C., 2014. Offshore wind. Clean energy from the sea, schone energie van de zee. Chris Westra Consulting. ISBN 978-90-823004-0-6.

  • Wilhelmsson, D. & T. Malm, 2008. Fouling assemblages on offshore wind power plants and adjacent substrata. Estuarine Coastal and Shelf Science 79(3): 459–466.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wilhelmsson, D., T. Malm, R. Thompson, J. Tchou, G. Sarantakos, N. McCormick, S. Luitjens, M. Gullström, J. K. Patterson Edwards, O. Amir & A. Dubi (eds), 2010. Greening Blue Energy: Identifying and Managing the Biodiversity Risks and Opportunities of Offshore Renewable Energy. IUCN (International Union for Conservation of Nature), Gland.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wilson, J. C. & M. Elliot, 2009. The potential for habitat creation produced by offshore wind farms. Wind Energy 12: 203–212.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wilson, J., M. Elliott, N. Cutts, L. Mander, V. Mendão, R. Perez-Dominguez & A. Phelps, 2010. Coastal and offshore wind energy generation: Is it environmentally benign? Energies 3: 1383–1422.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

With contributions from: Ilse de Mesel, Matthias Baeye, Dick Botteldooren, Robin Brabant, Delphine Coates, Wouter Courtens, Elisabeth Debusschere, Luc Dekoninck, Veronique De Maersschalck, Yana Deschutter, Jozefien Derweduwen, Marisa Di Marcantonio, Valérie Dulière, Michael Fettweis, Frederic Francken, Jan Haelters, Piet Haerens, Kris Hostens, Rik Houthaeve, Jean-Sébastien Houziaux, Francis Kerckhof, Mieke Mathys, Alain Norro, Thierry Onkelinx, Jan Reubens, Bob Rumes, Marc Sas, Eric W.M. Stienen, Jan Vanaverbeke, Sofie Vandendriessche, Sarah Vanden Eede, Dries Van den Eynde, Marc Van de walle, Nicolas Vanermen, Gert Van Hoey, An Vanhulle, Vera Van Lancker, Timothy Van Renterghem, Hilbran Verstraete, Laurence Vigin and Magda Vincx.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding authors

Correspondence to Han Lindeboom or Steven Degraer.

Additional information

Guest editors: Steven Degraer, Jennifer Dannheim, Andrew B. Gill, Han Lindeboom & Dan Wilhelmsson / Environmental impacts of offshore wind farms.

Han Lindeboom and Steven Degraer shared first authorship.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Lindeboom, H., Degraer, S., Dannheim, J. et al. Offshore wind park monitoring programmes, lessons learned and recommendations for the future. Hydrobiologia 756, 169–180 (2015). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10750-015-2267-4

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10750-015-2267-4

Keywords

Navigation