Skip to main content
Log in

Near-bottom performance of the Acoustic Doppler Velocimeter (ADV) – a comparative study

  • Published:
Aquatic Ecology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

In a laboratory flume, a comparative study on the near-bottom performance of the Acoustic Doppler Velocimeter (ADV) was conducted. Two different ADV systems were tested for different configurations and two flow velocities (9 cm s−1, 18 cm s−1). The results were compared with synchronous measurements with a Laser Doppler Anemometer (LDA). Near-bottom velocity measurements with the ADV have to be interpreted carefully as the ADV technique underestimates flow velocities in a zone close to the sediment. The height of this zone above the sediment varies with different ADV systems and configurations. The values for nominal sampling volume height (SVH) given by the software often underestimate the true, effective sampling volume heights. Smaller nominal SVH improve the ADV near-bottom performance, but the vertical extent of the zone in which the ADV underestimates flow by more than 20% may be larger than true SVH/2 by a factor of 2 (=true SVH). When the measurement volume approaches the bottom, ADV data quality parameters (signal-to-noise-ratio (SNR) and signal amplitude) exceeding the average ‘open water’ level, are clear indicators that the ADV has begun to underestimate the flow velocity. Unfortunately, this is not a safe indicator for the range of reliable measurements as the ADV may begin to underestimate velocities even with unchanged ‘open water’ data quality parameters. Thus, one can only recommend avoiding measurements below a distance from the bottom that was defined empirically comparing the ADV and the LDA velocity profiles. This distance is 2.5 times nominal sampling volume height for the tested ADV systems and experimental settings.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Agrawal Y.C. and Aubrey D.G. (1992). Velocity observations above a rippled bed using Laser Doppler Velocimetry. J. Geophys. Res. – Oceans 97: 20249–20259

    Google Scholar 

  2. Blondeaux P. (2001). Mechanics of coastal forms. Annu. Rev. Fluid Mech. 33: 339–370

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Buchhave P. (1984). Three-component LDA measurements. DISA Information 29: 3–13

    Google Scholar 

  4. Carollo F.G., Ferro V. and Termini D. (2002). Flow velocity measurements in vegetated channels. J. Hydraul. Eng-ASCE 128: 664–673

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Denny M.W. (1988). Biology and the Mechanics of the Wave-swept Environment. Princeton University Press, Princeton, New Jersey

    Google Scholar 

  6. Doering J.C. and Baryla A.J. (2002). An investigation of the velocity field under regular and irregular waves over a sand beach. Coast Eng. 44: 275–300

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Doron P., Bertuccioli L., Katz J. and Osborn T.R. (2001). Turbulence characteristics and dissipation estimates in the coastal ocean bottom boundary layer from PIV data. J. Phys. Oceanogr. 31: 2108–2134

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Finelli C.M., Hart D.D. and Fonseca D.M. (1999). Evaluating the spatial resolution of an acoustic Doppler velocimeter and the consequences for measuring near-bed flows. Limnol. Oceanogr. 44: 1793–1801

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Friedrichs M., Graf G. and Springer B. (2000). Skimming flow induced over a simulated polychaete tube lawn at low population densities. Mar. Ecol. Prog. Ser. 192: 219–228

    Google Scholar 

  10. Gjelstrup P. 1994. Measurement of 3 velocity components with single lens 5 beam LDA optics. DANTEC.

  11. Green M.O., Hewitt J.E. and Thrush S.F. (1998). Seabed drag coefficient over natural beds of horse mussels (Atrina zelandica). J. Mar. Res. 56: 613–637

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Hart D.D., Clark B.D. and Jasentuliyana A. (1996). Fine-scale field measurement of benthic flow environments inhabited by stream invertebrates. Limnol. Oceanogr. 41: 297–308

    Google Scholar 

  13. Huettel M., Ziebis W. and Forster S. (1996). Flow-induced uptake of particulate matter in permeable sediments. Limnol. Oceanogr. 41: 309–322

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Khalili A., Huettel M. and Merzkirch W. (2001). Fine-scale flow measurements in the benthic boundary layer. In: (eds) The Benthic Boundary Layer, pp 44–77. Oxford University Press, Oxford

    Google Scholar 

  15. Kim S.C., Friedrichs C.T., Maa J.P.Y. and Wright L.D. (2000). Estimating bottom stress in tidal boundary layer from acoustic Doppler velocimeter data. J. Hydraul. Eng-ASCE 126: 399–406

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Koch E.W. (1999). Preliminary evidence on the interdependent effect of currents and porewater geochemistry on Thalassia testudinum Banks ex Konig seedlings. Aquat. Bot. 63: 95–102

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  17. Kraus N.C., Lohrmann A. and Cabrera R. (1994). New acoustic meter for measuring 3d laboratory flows. J. Hydraul. Eng-ASCE 120: 406–411

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. Lawless M. and Robert A. (2001). Scales of boundary resistance in coarse-grained channels: turbulent velocity profiles and implications. Geomorphology 39: 221–238

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. Lohrmann A., Cabrera R., Gelfenbaum G. and Haines J. 1995. Direct measurements of Reynold stress with an acoustic Doppler velocimeter (ADV) for laboratory use. In IEEE 5th Working Conference on Current Measurements. pp. 205–210.

  20. Nikora V., Goring D. and Ross A. (2002a). The structure and dynamics of the thin near-bed layer in a complex marine environment: a case study in Beatrix Bay, New Zealand. Estuar. Coast Shelf Sci. 54: 915–926

    Article  Google Scholar 

  21. Nikora V., Green M.O., Thrush S.F., Hume T.M. and Goring D. (2002b). Structure of the internal boundary layer over a patch of pinnid bivalves (Atrina zelandica) in an estuary. J. Mar. Res. 60: 121–150

    Article  Google Scholar 

  22. Nikora V.I., Suren A.M., Brown S.L.R. and Biggs B.J.F. (1998). The effects of the moss Fissidens rigidulus (Fissidentaceae: Musci) on near-bed flow structure in an experimental cobble bed flume. Limnol. Oceanogr. 43: 1321–1331

    Article  Google Scholar 

  23. Robson B.J., Chester E.T. and Davis J.A. (1999). Manipulating the intensity of near-bed turbulence in rivers: effects on benthic invertebrates. Freshwater Biol. 42: 645–653

    Article  Google Scholar 

  24. Sleath J.F.A. (1984). Sea Bed Mechanics. John Wiley & Sons, New York

    Google Scholar 

  25. Springer B., Friedrichs M., Graf G., Nittikowski J. and Queisser W. (1999). A high-precision current measurement system for laboratory flume systems: a case study around a circular cylinder. Mar. Ecol. Prog. Ser. 183: 305–310

    Google Scholar 

  26. Valle-Levinson A., Jara F., Molinet C. and Soto D. (2001). Observations of intratidal variability of flows over a sill/contraction combination in a Chilean fjord. J. Geophys. Res. – Oceans 106: 7051–7064

    Article  Google Scholar 

  27. Wildish D. and Kristmanson D. (1997). Benthic Suspension Feeders and Flow. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge

    Google Scholar 

  28. Zhang Y.W., Streitlien K., Bellingham J.G. and Baggeroer A.B. (2001). Acoustic Doppler velocimeter flow measurement from an autonomous underwater vehicle with applications to deep ocean convection. J. Atmos. Ocean Technol. 18: 2038–2051

    Article  Google Scholar 

  29. Ziebis W., Huettel M. and Forster S. (1996). Impact of biogenic sediment topography on oxygen fluxes in permeable seabeds. Mar. Ecol. Prog. Ser. 140: 227–237

    CAS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Elimar Precht.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Precht, E., Janssen, F. & Huettel, M. Near-bottom performance of the Acoustic Doppler Velocimeter (ADV) – a comparative study. Aquat Ecol 40, 481–492 (2006). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10452-004-8059-y

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10452-004-8059-y

Key words

Navigation