Skip to main content
Log in

Lake ice simulation using a 3D unstructured grid model

  • Published:
Ocean Dynamics Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

We develop a single-class ice and snow model embedded inside a 3D hydrodynamic model on unstructured grids and apply it to lake studies using highly variable mesh resolution. The model is able to reasonably capture the ice fields observed in both small and large lakes. For the first time, we attempt simulation of ice processes on very small scales (~ 1 m). Physically sound results are obtained at the expense of moderately increased computational cost, although more rigorous validation nearshore is needed due to lack of observation. We also outline challenges on developing new process-based capabilities for accurately simulating nearshore ice.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6
Fig. 7
Fig. 8
Fig. 9
Fig. 10
Fig. 11
Fig. 12
Fig. 13
Fig. 14
Fig. 15

Similar content being viewed by others

Data availability

The datasets generated during and/or analyzed during the current study are available from the corresponding author on reasonable request.

References

  • Anderson J, Liu Y, Moghimi S, Zhang Y, Wu CH (to be submitted) Coastal upwelling and downwelling near the Keweenaw Peninsula, Lake Superior. J Geophys Res Oceans

  • Bai P, Wang J, Chu P, Hawley N, Fujisaki-Manome A, Kessler J, Lofgren BM, Beletsky D, Anderson EJ, Li Y (2020) Modeling the ice-attenuated waves in the Great Lakes. Ocean Dyn 70:991–1003

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Benjamin SG, Smirnova TG, James EP et al (2022) Inland lake temperature initialization via coupled cycling with atmospheric data assimilation. Geosci Model Dev 15(17):6659–6676

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bouchat A, Hutter N, Chanut J, Dupont F, Dukhovskoy D, Garric G et al (2022) Sea ice rheology experiment (SIREx): 1. Scaling and statistical properties of sea-ice deformation fields. J Geophys Res Oceans 127:667. https://doi.org/10.1029/2021JC017667

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bouillon S, Fichefet T, Legat V, Madec G (2013) The elastic–viscous–plastic method revisited. Ocean Model 71:2–12. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ocemod.2013.05.013

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bouillon S, Rampal P (2015) Presentation of the dynamical core of neXtSIM, a new sea ice model. Ocean Model 91:23–37. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ocemod.2015.04.005

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fujisaki A, Wang J, Bai X, Leshkevich G, Lofgren B (2013) Model-simulated interannual variability of Lake Erie ice cover, circulation, and thermal structure in response to atmospheric forcing, 2003–2012. J Geophys Res Oceans 118:4286–4304. https://doi.org/10.1002/jgrc.20312

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hsieh Y-F (2011) Modeling ice cover and water temperature of Lake Mendota. PhD Thesis. Madison, Wisconsin. University of Wisconsin-Madison

  • Hunke EC, Lipscomb WH, Turner AK, Jeffery N, Elliott S CICE (2015) The Los Alamos sea ice model documentation and software user’s manual version 5.1, Tech. Rep., Los Alamos National Laboratory, LA-CC-06-012, https://github.com/CICE-Consortium/CICE-svn-trunk/blob/main/cicedoc/cicedoc.pdf (last access: 4 April 2022)

  • Hutter N, Losch M (2020) Feature-based comparison of sea ice deformation in lead-permitting sea ice simulations. Cryosphere 14:93–113. https://doi.org/10.5194/tc-14-93-2020

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kimmritz M, Losch M, Danilov S (2017) A comparison of viscous-plastic sea ice solvers with and without replacement pressure. Ocean Model 115:59–69. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ocemod.2017.05.006

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kitchell JF (1992) Food web management : a case study of Lake Mendota, Lake Mendota Symposium, Madison, Wisconsin. Springer-Verlag, Berlin

  • Li Y, Beletsky D, Wang J, Austin JA, Kessler J, Fujisaki-Manome A, Bai P (2021) Modeling a large coastal upwelling event in Lake Superior. J Geophys Res Oceans 126. https://doi.org/10.1029/2020JC016512

  • Lin Y, Fujisaki-Manome A, Anderson EJ (2022) Simulating landfast ice in Lake Superior. J Mar Sci Eng 10:932

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Matheson DH, Munawar M (1978) Lake Superior Basin and its development. JGreat Lakes Res 4(3–4):249–263. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0380-1330(78)72196-9

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mironov D, Heise E, Kourzeneva E, Ritter B, Schneider N, Terzhevik A (2010) Implementation of the lake parameterisation scheme FLake into the numerical weather prediction model COSMO. Boreal Environ Res 15:218–230

    Google Scholar 

  • Parkinson CL, Washington WM (1979) A large-scale numerical model of sea ice. J Geophys Res 84(C1):311–337. https://doi.org/10.1029/JC084iC01p00311

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rampal P, Dansereau V, Olason E, Bouillon S, Williams T, Korosov A, Samaké A (2019) On the multi-fractal scaling properties of sea ice deformation. Cryosphere 13:2457–2474. https://doi.org/10.5194/tc-13-2457-2019

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Smirnova TG, Brown JM, Benjamin SG, Kenyon JS (2016) Modifications to the rapid update cycle land surface model (RUC LSM) available in the weather research and forecasting (WRF) model. Mon Weather Rev 144:1851–1865

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Titze D, Austin J (2016) Novel, direct observations of ice on Lake Superior during the high ice coverage of winter 2013–2014. J Great Lakes Res 42:997–1006

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wang Q, Danilov S, Sidorenko D, Timmermann R, Wekerle C, Wang X, Jung T, Schroter J (2014) The finite element sea ice-ocean model (FESOM) v.1.4: formulation of an ocean general circulation model. Geoscientic Model Dev 7(2):663–693. https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-7-663-2014

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • West B, O’Connor D, Parno M, Krackow M, Polashenski C (2022) Bonded discrete element simulations of sea ice with non-local failure: applications to Nares Strait. J. Adv Model Earth Syst 14:e2021MS002614. https://doi.org/10.1029/2021MS002614

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • White B, Austin J, Matsumoto K (2012) A three dimensional model of Lake Superior with ice and biogeochemistry. J Great Lakes Res 30(1):61–71

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Xiao C, Lofgren BM, Wang J, Chu PY (2016) Improving the lake scheme within a coupled WRF-lake model in the Laurentian Great Lakes. J Adv Model Earth Syst 8:1969–1985

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ye F, Zhang Y, Friedrichs M, Wang HV, Irby I, Shen J, Wang Z (2016) A 3D, cross-scale, baroclinic model with implicit vertical transport for the Upper Chesapeake Bay and its tributaries. Ocean Model 107:82–96. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ocemod.2016.10.004

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zeng X, Zhao M, Dickinson RE (1998) Intercomparison of bulk aerodynamic algorithms for the computation of sea surface fluxes using TOGA COARE and TAO data. J Climatol 11:2628–2644

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zhang J, Hibler WD (1997) On an efficient numerical method for modelling sea ice dynamics. J Geophys Res 102:8691–8702

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zhang Y, Ateljevich E, Yu H-C, Wu C-H, Yu JCS (2015) A new vertical coordinate system for a 3D unstructured-grid model. Ocean Model 85:16–31

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zhang Y, Ye F, Stanev EV, Grashorn S (2016) Seamless cross-scale modeling with SCHISM. Ocean Model 102:64–81. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ocemod.2016.05.002

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

Simulations used in this paper were conducted using the following computational facilities: (1) William & Mary Research Computing (URL: https://www.wm.edu/it/rc); (2) Texas Advanced Computing Center (TACC), The University of Texas at Austin.

Funding

This study is funded by NOAA (Grant number NA21NOS0080197).

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Yinglong Joseph Zhang.

Ethics declarations

Competing interests

The authors declare no competing interests.

Supplemental Material

An animation of the modeled ice concentration shown in Fig. 8 can be found at http://ccrm.vims.edu/yinglong/TMP/anim_r61f_iceconc.avi (starting day is 1 Dec 2018). An animation of the modeled ice concentration shown in Fig. 15 can be found at http://ccrm.vims.edu/yinglong/TMP/anim_iceconc_r62c.avi.

Additional information

Responsible Editor :Jia Wang, Joanna Staneva

This article is part of the Topical Collection on the 12th International Workshop on Modeling the Ocean (IWMO), Ann Arbor, USA, 25 June – 1 July 2022

Rights and permissions

Springer Nature or its licensor (e.g. a society or other partner) holds exclusive rights to this article under a publishing agreement with the author(s) or other rightsholder(s); author self-archiving of the accepted manuscript version of this article is solely governed by the terms of such publishing agreement and applicable law.

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Zhang, Y.J., Wu, C., Anderson, J. et al. Lake ice simulation using a 3D unstructured grid model. Ocean Dynamics 73, 219–230 (2023). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10236-023-01549-9

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10236-023-01549-9

Keywords

Navigation