Skip to main content
Log in

Phytoplankton, protozooplankton and nutrient dynamics in the Bornholm Basin (Baltic Sea) in 2002–2003 during the German GLOBEC Project

  • Original Paper
  • Published:
International Journal of Earth Sciences Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

From March 2002 to until April 2003 we investigated the seasonal nutrient and phytoplankton dynamics in the central Bornholm Basin (Baltic Sea) within the framework of the German GLOBEC Project. We choose a nested approach consisting of vertical fluorescence profiles, phytoplankton counts and nutrient analyses. The Fluoroprobe (MultiProbe, BBE Moldaenke) is capable of distinguishing four algal groups (Cryptophyceae, Cyanophyceae, Chlorophyceae, Bacillariophyceae + Dinophyceae). Winter nutrient concentrations were about 5 μM NO3 and 0.5 μM PO4 in the central Basin. The spring phytoplankton bloom was dominated by the diatom Skeletonema sp. and reached a maximum of about 270 μg C/l before the onset of the seasonal stratification. Protozooplankton was dominated by the Mesodinium rubrum (a phototrophic ciliate = Myrionecta rubra) and reached a maximum biomass of about 200–300 μg C/l about 2 weeks after the demise of the diatom spring bloom. During summer, the water column was stratified and a subsurface maximum developed near the thermocline consisting of Bacillariophyceae, Cryptophycea and other phototrophic flagellates. Phytoplankton and protozooplankton biomass was generally low. Nutrient concentrations point towards a nitrogen limitation during this period. The stratification period ended during September and surface nutrient concentrations increased again. Protozooplankton reached a second maximum during September. With the Fluoroprobe small scale structures in the plankton community could be detected like a subsurface Cryptophyceae maximum near the thermocline that however, could not be confirmed by cell counts. The chlorophyll a estimate of the Fluoroprobe was in good agreement with the phytoplankton biomass estimated from counts. We conclude that only by combining modern sensing technology with microscopy, the small-scale dynamics and taxonomic spectrum of the plankton can be fully captured.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6
Fig. 7

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Alheit J (2004) The GLOBEC-Germany Project. Int Globec Newsl 10:9

    Google Scholar 

  • Augustin CB, Boersma M (2006) Effects of nutritional stress on different Acartia species. J Plankton Res 28(4):429–436

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Beutler M, Wiltshire KH, Meyer B, Moldaenke C, Dau H (2001) In situ profiles of phytoplankton: algal composition and biomass determined fluorometrically. In: Ninth international conference on harmful algal blooms, Hobart (Australia), pp 202–205

  • Beutler M, Wiltshire KH, Meyer B, Moldaenke C, Luring C, Meyerhofer M, Hansen UP Dau H (2002) A fluorometric method for the differentiation of algal populations in vivo and in situ. Photosynth Res 72:39–53

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Broglio E, Jonasdottir SH, Calbet A, Jakobsen HH, Saiz E (2003) Effect of heterotrophic versus autotrophic food on feeding and reproduction of the calanoid copepod Acartia tonsa: relationship with prey fatty acid composition. Aquat Microb Ecol 31:267–278

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cloern JE, Grenz C, Vidergar-Lucas L (1995) An empirical model of the phytoplankton chlorophyll:carbon ratio-the conversation factor between productivity and growth rate. Limnol Oceanogr 40:1313–1321

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Crawford DW (1989) Mesodinium rubrum: the phytoplankter that wasn’t. Mar Ecol Prog Ser 58:161–174

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dickmann M (2005) Feeding ecology of sprat (Sprattus sprattus L.) and sardine (Sardina pilchardus W.) larvae in the Baltic Sea and in the North Sea. PhD Thesis, University of Rostock, p 93

  • Edler L (1979) Recommendations on methods for marine biological studies in the Baltic Sea. Phytoplankton and chlorophyll. Baltic Mar Biol 5:1–38

    Google Scholar 

  • Fennel W (1995) A model of the yearly cycle of nutrients and plankton in the Baltic Sea. J Mar Syst 6:313–329

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fleming V, Kaitala S (2006) Phytoplankton spring bloom intensity index for the Baltic Sea estimated for the years 1992 to 2004. Hydrobiologia 554:57–65

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gordon HR, McCuley A (1975) Estimation of the depth of sunlight penetration in the sea for remote sensing. Appl Opt 14:413–416

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gustafson DEJ, Stoecker DK, Johnson MD, Van Heukelem WF, Sneider K (2000) Cryptophyte algae are robbed of their organelles by the marine ciliate Mesodinium rubrum. Nature 405:1049–1052

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Graneli E, Turner JT (2002) Top–down regulation in ctenophore-copepod-ciliate-diatom- phytoflagellate communities in coastal waters: a mesocosm study. Mar Ecol Prog Ser 239:57–68

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hällfors G (2004) Checklist of Baltic Sea phytoplankton species: including some heterotrophic protistan groups. Baltic Sea environment proceedings. Baltic Environmental Protection Commission-HELCOM, p 95

  • Hinrichsen HH, Lehmann A, Möllmann C, Schmidt JO (2003) Dependency of larval fish survival on retention/dispersion in food limited environments: the Baltic Sea as a case study. Fish Oceanogr 12:425–433

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hirche HJ, Meyer U, Niehoff B (1997) Egg production of Calanus finmarchicus: Effect of temperature, food and season. Mar Biol 127:609–620

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Johansson M, Gorokhova E, Larsson U (2004) Annual variability in ciliate community structure, potential prey and predators in the open northern Baltic Sea proper. J Plankton Res 26:67–80

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kivi K (1993) Nutrient limitation and grazing control of the Baltic plankton community during annual succession. Limnol Oceanogr 38:893–905

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Klein Breteler WCM., Koski M, Rampen S (2004) Role of essential lipids in copepod nutrition: no evidence for trophic upgrading of food quality by a marine ciliate. Mar Ecol Prog Ser 274:199–208

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Laamanen MJ, Forsström L, Sivonen K (2002) Diversity of Aphanizomenon populations (cyanobacteria) on a Baltic Sea salinity gradient—only one ITS1-S genotype persits in the Baltic Sea. In: Laamanen MJ (ed) Genetic and species diversity of planktonic cyanobacteria in the northern Baltic Sea. Contributions of the Finnish Inst. of Marine Research, Helsinki, vol. 4, Part IV, p 14

  • Maar M, Nielsen TG, Gooding S, Tonnesson K, Tiselius P, Zervoudaki S, Christou E, Sell A, Richardson K (2004) Trophodynamic function of copepods, appendicularians and protozooplankton in the late summer zooplankton community in the Skagerrak. Mar Biol 144:917–933

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Maar M, Nielsen TG, Richardson K, Christaki U, Hansen OS, Zervoudaki S, Christou E (2002) Spatial and temporal variability of food web structure during the spring bloom in the Skagerrak. Mar Ecol Prog Ser 239:11–29

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Malzahn AM (2006) Larval fish dynamics in changing environments. PhD Thesis, University of Kiel, p 98

  • Möllmann C, Kornilovs G, Sidrevics L (2000) Long-term dynamics of main mesozooplankton species in the central Baltic Sea. J Plankton Res 22:2015–2038

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Peters J, Renz J, van Beusekom JEE, Boersma M, Hagen W (2006) Trophodynamics and seasonal cycle of the copepod Pseudocalanus acuspes in the Central Baltic Sea (Bornholm Basin) – evidence from lipid composition. Mar Biol 149:1417–1429

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Platt T, Sathyendranath S (1988) Oceanic primary production: estimation by remote sensing at local and regional scales. Science 241:1561–1724

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Putt D, Stoecker DK (1989) An experimentally determined carbon: volume ratio for marine “oligotrichous” ciliates from estuarine and coastal waters. Limnol Oceanogr 34:1097–1103

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Renz J, Hirche HJ (2006) Life cycle of Pseudocalanus acuspes Giesbrecht (Copepoda, Calanoida) in the Central Baltic Sea: I. Seasonal and spatial distribution. Mar Biol 148:567–580

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Setala O, Kivi K (2003) Planktonic ciliates in the Baltic Sea in summer: distribution, species association and estimated grazing impact. Aquat Microb Ecol 32:287–297

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sommer F (2003) A comparison of the impact of major mesozooplankton taxa on marine, brackish and freshwater phytoplankton during summer. PhD Thesis, University of Kiel, Berichte aus dem Institut für Meereskunde an der Universität Kiel, No. 329, p 91

  • St John MA, Clemmesen C, Lund T, Köster F (2001) Diatom production in the marine environment: implications for larval fish growth and condition. ICES J Mar Sci 58:1106–1113

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tang KW, Taal M (2005) Trophic modification of food quality by heterotrophic protists: species-specific effects on copepod egg production and egg hatching. J Exp Mar Biol Ecol 318:85–98

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Utermöhl H (1958) Zur Vervollkommnung der quantitativen Phytoplanktonmethodik. Mitt Int Verh Theor Angew Limnol 9:1–38

    Google Scholar 

  • von Bodungen B, von Bröckel K, Smetacek V, Zeitschel B (1981) Growth and sedimentation of the phytoplankton spring bloom in the Bornholm Basin. Kieler Meeresforschung Sonderheft 5:49–60

    Google Scholar 

  • Wasmund N, Nausch G, Mathäus W (1998) Phytoplankton spring blooms in the southern Baltic Sea—spatio-temporal development and long-term trends. J Plankton Res 20:1099–1117

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wasmund N, Pollehne F, Postel L, Siegel H, Zettler ML (2003) Assessment of the biological state of the Baltic Sea in 2002 (in German). Meereswiss Ber 56:1–78

    Google Scholar 

  • Wasmund N, Uhlig S (2003) Phytoplankton trends in the Baltic Sea. ICES J Mar Sci 60:177–186

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

We thank all participants of the many GLOBEC-Cruises for their help in collecting the samples. Comments by two reviewers considerably improved the manuscript. This study was funded through the GLOBEC-Germany project (03F0320C) by the German Federal Ministry of Science and Education (BMBF).

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Justus E. E. van Beusekom.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

van Beusekom, J.E.E., Mengedoht, D., Augustin, C.B. et al. Phytoplankton, protozooplankton and nutrient dynamics in the Bornholm Basin (Baltic Sea) in 2002–2003 during the German GLOBEC Project. Int J Earth Sci (Geol Rundsch) 98, 251–260 (2009). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00531-007-0231-x

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00531-007-0231-x

Keywords

Navigation