Skip to main content
Log in

Seafloor monitoring west of Helgoland (German Bight, North Sea) using the acoustic ground discrimination system RoxAnn

  • Original
  • Published:
Geo-Marine Letters Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Marine habitats of shelf seas are in constant dynamic change and therefore need regular assessment particularly in areas of special interest. In this study, the single-beam acoustic ground discrimination system RoxAnn served to assess seafloor hardness and roughness, and combine these parameters into one variable expressed as RGB (red green blue) color code followed by k-means fuzzy cluster analysis (FCA). The data were collected at a monitoring site west of the island of Helgoland (German Bight, SE North Sea) in the course of four surveys between September 2011 and November 2014. The study area has complex characteristics varying from outcropping bedrock to sandy and muddy sectors with mostly gradual transitions. RoxAnn data enabled to discriminate all seafloor types that were suggested by ground-truth information (seafloor samples, video). The area appears to be quite stable overall; sediment import (including fluid mud) was detected only from the NW. Although hard substrates (boulders, bedrock) are clearly identified, the signal can be modified by inclination and biocover. Manually, six RoxAnn zones were identified; for the FCA, only three classes are suggested. The latter classification based on ‘hard’ boundaries would suffice for stakeholder issues, but the former classification based on ‘soft’ boundaries is preferred to meet state-of-the-art scientific objectives.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6
Fig. 7
Fig. 8
Fig. 9

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Bartholomä A (2006) Acoustic bottom detection and seabed classification in the German Bight, southern North Sea. Geo-Mar Lett 26:177–184

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bezdek JC (1974) Numerical taxonomy with fuzzy sets. J Math Biol 1:57–71

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bezdek JC, Ehrlich R, Full W (1984) FCM The fuzzy c-means clustering algorithm. Comput Geosci 10:191–203

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Brekhovskikh LM, Lysanov IP, Lysanov YP (2003) Fundamentals of ocean acoustics. Springer, Berlin

    Google Scholar 

  • Brown CJ, Smith SJ, Lawton P, Anderson JT (2011) Benthic habitat mapping: a review of progress towards improved understanding of the spatial ecology of the seafloor using acoustic techniques. Estuar Coast Shelf Sci 92:502–520

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • BSH (2016) Anleitung zur Kartierung des Meeresbodens mittels hochauflösender Sonare in den deutschen Meeresgebieten. BSH Nr. 7201, 148 pp

  • Budiman (2003) http://www.mathworks.com/matlabcentral/ fileexchange/4353-fuzzy-k-means/content/contents.m

  • Burrough PA, van Gaans PFM, Hootsmans RJ (1997) Continuous classification in soil survey: spatial correlation, confusion and boundaries. Geoderma 77:115–135

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Callies U, Plüß A, Kappenberg J, Kapitza H (2011) Particle tracking in the vicinity of Helgoland, North Sea: a model comparison. Ocean Dyn 61(12):2121–2139

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Calvert J, Strong JA, McGonigle C, Quinn R (2015) An evaluation of supervised and unsupervised classification techniques for marine benthic habitat mapping using multibeam echosounder data. ICES J Mar Sci 72(5):1498–1513

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chang TS, Bartholomä A, Flemming BW (2006) Seasonal dynamics of fine-grained sediments in a back-barrier tidal basin of the German Wadden Sea (Southern North Sea). J Coast Res 22:328–338

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chivers RC, Emerson N, Burns DR (1990) New acoustic processing for underway surveying. Hydrogr J 56:8–17

    Google Scholar 

  • Cholwek G, Bonde J, Li X, Richards C, Yin K (2000) Processing RoxAnn sonar data to improve its categorization of lake bed surficial substrates dagger. Mar Geophys Res 21:409–421

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cogan CB, Todd BJ, Lawton P, Noji TT (2009) The role of marine habitat mapping in ecosystem-based management. ICES J Mar Sci 66(9):2033–2042

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Daniell J, Siwabessy J, Nichol S, Brooke B (2015) Insights into environmental drivers of acoustic angular response using a self-organising map and hierarchical clustering. Geo-Mar Lett 35:387–403. doi:10.1007/s00367-015-0415-5

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dean BJ, Ellis JT, Irlandi E (2013) Measuring nearshore variability in benthic environments: an acoustic approach. Ocean Coast Manag 86:33–41

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Diesing M, Green SL, Stephens D, Lark RM, Stewart HA, Dove D (2014) Mapping seabed sediments: Comparison of manual, geostatistical, object-based image analysis and machine learning approaches. Cont Shelf Res 84:107–119

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ferrini VL, Flood RD (2006) The effects of fine-scale surface roughness and grain size on 300 kHz multibeam backscatter intensity in sandy marine sedimentary environments. Mar Geol 228(1):153–172

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Figge K (1981) Karte zur Sedimentverteilung in der Deutschen Bucht im Maßstab 1: 250000. Deutsches Hydrographisches Institut Nr 2900

  • Foster-Smith RL, Davies J, Sotheran I (2000) Broad scale remote survey and mapping of subtidal habitats and biota. Technical report of the Broadscale Mapping Project. Edinburgh, Scottish Natural Heritage Research, Survey and Monitoring Report no 167

  • Foster-Smith RL, Brown CJ, Meadows WJ, White WH, Limpenny DS (2004) Mapping seabed biotopes at two spatial scales in the eastern English Channel. Part 2. Comparison of two acoustic ground discrimination systems. J Mar Biol Assoc UK 84:489–500

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Foster-Smith B, Connor D, Davies J (2007) MESH Guide to Habitat Mapping. JNCC, Peterborough. http://www.searchmesh.net

  • Franke HD, Gutow L (2004) Long-term changes in the macrozoobenthos around the rocky island of Helgoland (German Bight, North Sea). Helgol Mar Res 58(4):303–310

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gavrilov AN, Duncan AJ, McCauley RD, Parnum IM, Penrose JD, Siwabessy PJW, Woods AJ, Tseng YT (2005) Characterization of the seafloor in Australia’s coastal zone using acoustic techniques. In: Proc Int Conf Underwater Acoustic Measurements: Technologies & Results, pp 1075–1080

  • Goff JA, Olson HC, Duncan CS (2000) Correlation of side-scan backscatter intensity with grain-size distribution of shelf sediments, New Jersey margin. Geo-Mar Lett 20(1):43–49

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Greenstreet SP, Tuck ID, Grewar GN, Armstrong E, Reid DG, Wrigh PJ (1997) An assessment of the acoustic survey technique, RoxAnn, as a means of mapping seabed habitat. ICES J Mar Sci 54:939–959

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Greenstreet SP, Holland GJ, Guirey EJ, Armstrong E, Fraser HM, Gibb IM (2010) Combining hydroacoustic seabed survey and grab sampling techniques to assess “local” sandeel population abundance. ICES J Mar Sci 67(5):971–984

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hamilton LJ (2001) Acoustic seabed classification systems. Defence Science and Technology Organisation, Victoria (Australia), Aeronautical and Maritime Research Lab no DSTO-TN-0401

  • Hamilton LJ (2005) A bibliography of acoustic seabed classification. CRC Coastal Zone Estuary and Waterway Management, Technical Report 27

  • Hamilton LJ, Mulhearn PJ, Poeckert R (1999) Comparison of RoxAnn and QTC-View acoustic bottom classification system performance for the Cairns area, Great Barrier Reef, Australia. Cont Shelf Res 19:1577–1597

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hass HC, Kuhn G, Monien P, Brumsack HJ, Forwick M (2010) Climate fluctuations during the past two millennia as recorded in sediments from Maxwell Bay, South Shetland Islands, West Antarctica. Geol Soc Lond Spec Publ 344:243–260

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hebbeln D, Scheurle C, Lamy F (2003) Depositional history of the Helgoland mud area, German Bight, North Sea. Geo-Mar Lett 23(2):81–90

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Henriques V, Guerra MT, Mendes B, Gaudêncio MJ, Fonseca P (2015) Benthic habitat mapping in a Portuguese marine protected area using EUNIS: an integrated approach. J Sea Res 100:77–90

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Huang Z, Nichol SL, Siwabessy JPW, Daniell J, Brooke BP (2012) Predictive modelling of seabed sediment parameters using multibeam acoustic data: a case study on the Carnarvon Shelf, Western Australia. Int J Geogr Inf Sci 26:283–307

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • ICES (2007) Acoustic seabed classification of marine physical and biological landscapes. ICES Cooperative Research Report no 286, pp 1–183

  • Jagodzinski Z (1960) Multiple echoes in echosounders and the probability of detection of small targets. Int Hydrogr Rev 37:63–68

    Google Scholar 

  • Kenny AJ, Cato I, Desprez M, Fader G, Schuttenhelm RTE, Side J (2003) An overview of seabed-mapping technologies in the context of marine habitat classification. ICES J Mar Sci 60:411–418

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lucieer V, Lamarche G (2011) Unsupervised fuzzy classification and object-based image analysis of multibeam data to map deep water substrates, Cook Strait, New Zealand. Cont Shelf Res 31(11):1236–1247

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lucieer V, Lucieer A (2009) Fuzzy clustering for seafloor classification. Mar Geol 264(3/4):230–241

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lurton X, Lamarche G (eds) (2015) Backscatter measurements by seafloor‐mapping sonars. Guidelines and recommendations. http://geohab.org/wp‐content/uploads/2014/05/BSWG‐REPORT‐MAY2015.pdf

  • MacQueen J (1967) Some methods for classification and analysis of multivariate observations. In: Cam LM, Neyman J (eds) Proc 5th Berkeley Symp Mathematical Statistics and Probability. University of California Press, Berkeley, pp 281–297

    Google Scholar 

  • Mamede R, Rodrigues AM, Freitas R, Quintino V (2015) Single-beam acoustic variability associated with seabed habitats. J Sea Res 100:152–159

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • McCauley RD, Siwabessy PJW (2006) Practical guide to acoustic techniques for benthic habitat classification. CRC for Coastal Zone, Estuary and Waterway Management, Indooroopilly, Queensland, Australia, Technical Report 84, pp 1–39

  • Mielck F, Hass HC, Betzler C (2012) High-resolution hydroacoustic seafloor classification of sandy environments in the German Wadden Sea. J Coast Res 30:1107–1117

    Google Scholar 

  • Mielck F, Bartsch I, Hass HC, Wölfl AC, Bürk D, Betzler C (2014) Predicting spatial kelp abundance in shallow coastal waters using the acoustic ground discrimination system RoxAnn. Estuar Coast Shelf Sci 143:1–11

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ostrovsky I, Tęgowski J (2010) Hydroacoustic analysis of spatial and temporal variability of bottom sediment characteristics in Lake Kinneret in relation to water level fluctuation. Geo-Mar Lett 30:261–269

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Papenmeier S, Schrottke K, Bartholomä A (2014) Over time and space changing characteristics of estuarine suspended particles in the German Weser and Elbe estuaries. J Sea Res 85:104–115

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Penrose JD, Siwabessy PJW, Gavrilov A, Parnum I, Hamilton LJ, Bickers A, Brooke B, Ryan DA, Kennedy P (2005) Acoustic techniques for seabed classification. CRC for Coastal Zone Estuary and Waterway Management, Technical Report 32, pp 1–130

  • Richardson MD, Briggs KB, Williams KL, Lyons AP, Jackson DR (2001) Effects of changing roughness on acoustic scattering: (2) anthropogenic changes. In: Leighton TG, Heald GJ, Griffiths G, Griffiths HD (eds) Proc Inst Acoustics 23(2):343–390

  • Schlagintweit GEO (1993) Real-time acoustic bottom classification for hydrography a field evaluation of RoxAnn. In: OCEANS’93. Engineering in Harmony with Ocean. Proceedings IEEE:III-214

  • Schmidt-Thomé P (1982) Geologische Karte von Helgoland mit Erläuterungen. Geologisches Jahrbuch A62. Schweizerbart, Stuttgart

    Google Scholar 

  • Serpetti N, Heath M, Armstrong E, Witte U (2011) Blending single beam RoxAnn and multi-beam swathe QTC hydro-acoustic discrimination techniques for the Stonehaven area, Scotland, UK. J Sea Res 65:442–455

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Shumchenia EJ, King JW (2010) Comparison of methods for integrating biological and physical data for marine habitat mapping and classification. Cont Shelf Res 30(16):1717–1729

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Snellen M, Siemes K, Simons DG (2011) Model-based sediment classification using single-beam echosounder signals. J Acoust Soc Am 129:2878–2888

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Spaeth C (1990) Zur Geologie der Insel Helgoland. Küste 49:1–32

    Google Scholar 

  • Stanev EV, Al-Nadhairi R, Valle-Levinson A (2015) The role of density gradients on tidal asymmetries in the German Bight. Ocean Dyn 65(1):77–92

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • von Haugwitz W, Wong HK, Salge U (1988) The mud area southeast of Helgoland: a reflection seismic study. Mitt Geol-Paläontol Inst Univ Hamburg 65:409–422

    Google Scholar 

  • Voulgaris G, Collins MB (1990) USP RoxAnn ground discrimination system: a preliminary evaluation. ARE Portland UTH Tech Memo 36/90 RE005314, University of Southampton, Marine Consultancy Services Tech Rep no SUDO/TEC/90/5C, pp 1–75

  • Wilding TA, Sayer MD, Provost PG (2003) Factors affecting the performance of the acoustic ground discrimination system RoxAnn™. ICES J Mar Sci 60(6):1373–1380

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Winter C, Herrling G, Bartholomä A, Capperucci R, Callies U, Heipke C, Schmidt A, Hillebrand H, Reimers C, Bremer P, Weiler R (2014) Scientific concepts for monitoring the ecological state of German coastal seas (in German). Wasser und Abfall 07-08/2014:21–26. doi:10.1365/s35152-014-0685-7

  • Wölfl A-C, Lim CH, Hass HC, Lindhorst S, Tosonotto G, Lettmann KA, Kuhn G, Wolff J-O, Abele D (2014) Distribution and characteristics of marine habitats in a subpolar bay based on hydroacoustics and bed shear stress estimates—Potter Cove, King George Island, Antarctica. Geo-Mar Lett 34:435–446

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

The authors would like to thank Cpt. Robert Voss and his crew of RV Heincke for their help and cooperation during many surveys. We acknowledge the aid of many students in the frame of internships. This study was carried out within the WIMO project (“Scientific Monitoring Concepts for the German Bight”) funded by the Ministry for Environment and Climate Protection and Ministry for Science and Culture of Lower Saxony, Germany. We are grateful to two reviewers and the journal editors for many helpful comments. All data can be downloaded from the PANGAEA data bank (www.pangaea.de).

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to H. Christian Hass.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of interest

The authors declare that there is no conflict of interest with third parties.

Additional information

Responsible guest editor: C. Winter

Electronic supplementary material

Below is the link to the electronic supplementary material.

ESM 1

(PDF 240 kb)

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Hass, H.C., Mielck, F., Fiorentino, D. et al. Seafloor monitoring west of Helgoland (German Bight, North Sea) using the acoustic ground discrimination system RoxAnn. Geo-Mar Lett 37, 125–136 (2017). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00367-016-0483-1

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00367-016-0483-1

Keywords

Navigation