Skip to main content
Log in

Electrical properties of seafloor massive sulfides

  • Technical Paper
  • Published:
Geo-Marine Letters Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Seafloor massive sulfide (SMS) deposits are increasingly seen as important marine metal resources for the future. A growing number of industrialized nations are involved in the surveying and sampling of such deposits by drilling. Drill ships are expensive and their availability can be limited; seabed drill rigs are a cost-effective alternative and more suitable for obtaining cores for resource evaluation. In order to achieve the objectives of resource evaluations, details are required of the geological, mineralogical, and physical properties of the polymetallic deposits and their host rocks. Electrical properties of the deposits and their ore minerals are distinct from their unmineralized host rocks. Therefore, the use of electrical methods to detect SMS while drilling and recovering drill cores could decrease the costs and accelerate offshore operations by limiting the amount of drilling in unmineralized material. This paper presents new data regarding the electrical properties of SMS cores that can be used in that assessment. Frequency-dependent complex electrical resistivity in the frequency range between 0.002 and 100 Hz was examined in order to potentially discriminate between different types of fresh rocks, alteration and mineralization. Forty mini-cores of SMS and unmineralized host rocks were tested in the laboratory, originating from different tectonic settings such as the intermediate-spreading ridges of the Galapagos and Axial Seamount, and the Pacmanus back-arc basin. The results indicate that there is a clear potential to distinguish between mineralized and non-mineralized samples, with some evidence that even different types of mineralization can be discriminated. This could be achieved using resistivity magnitude alone with appropriate rig-mounted electrical sensors. Exploiting the frequency-dependent behavior of resistivity might amplify the differences and further improve the rock characterization.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6
Fig. 7

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Bairlein K, Bücker M, Hördt A, Hinze B, Nordsiek S (2016) Temperature dependence of spectral induced polarization data: experimental results and membrane polarization theory. Geophys J Int. doi:10.1093/gji/ggw027

  • Bartetzko A, Delius H, Pechnig R (2005) Effect of compositional and structural variations on log responses of igneous and metamorphic rocks I: mafic rocks. In: Harvey PK, Brewer TS, Pezard PA, Petrov VY (eds) Petrophysical properties of crystalline rocks. Geol Soc Spec Publ 240:255–278. doi:10.1144/GSL.SP.2005.240.01.19

  • Bartetzko A, Klitzsch N, Itturino G, Kaufhold S, Arnold J (2006) Electrical properties of hydrothermally altered dacite from the PACMANUS hydrothermal field (ODP Leg 193). J Volcanol Geotherm Res 152:109–120

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Binns RA, Barriga FJAS, Miller DJ, Ocean Drilling Program Leg 193 Shipboard Scientific Party (2002) Anatomy of an active felsic-hosted hydrothermal system, Eastern Manus Basin. In: Proc Ocean Drilling Program, Initial Reports 193. College Station

  • Butler DK (2006) Near-surface geophysics. Investigations in geophysics, vol 13. Society of Exploration Geophysicists, Tulsa

    Google Scholar 

  • Glasby GP (2002) Deep seabed mining: past failures and future prospects. Mar Georesour Geotechnol 20:161–176

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Grissemann C (1971) Examination of the frequency-dependent conductivity of ore-containing rock on artificial models. Scientific report 2. Electronics Laboratory, University of Innsbruck, Austria

    Google Scholar 

  • Hannington MD, de Ronde CD, Petersen S (2005) Sea-floor tectonics and submarine hydrothermal systems. In: Hedenquist JW, Thompson JFH, Goldfarb RJ, Richards JP (eds) Economic geology 100th anniversary volume. Society of Economic Geologists, Littelton, pp 111–141

    Google Scholar 

  • Hannington M, Jamieson J, Monecke T, Petersen S, Beaulieu S (2011) The abundance of seafloor massive sulfide deposits. Geology 39:1155–1158

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Heuser M, Spagnoli G, Leroy P, Klitzsch N, Stanjek H (2012) Electro-osmotic flow in clays and its potential for reducing clogging in mechanical tunnel driving. Bull Eng Geol Environ 71:721–733

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hoagland P, Beaulieu S, Tivey MA, Eggert RG, German C, Glowka L, Lin J (2010) Deep-sea mining of seafloor massive sulfides. Mar Policy 34:728–732

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hördt A, Milde S (2012) Studies on the origin of induced polarisation with gel-filled sandstone samples. Near Surf Geophys 6:469–478

    Google Scholar 

  • Iturrino GJ, Davis E, Johnson J, Gröschel-Becker HM, Lewis TJ, Chapman D, Cermak V (2000) Permeability, electrical, and thermal properties of sulfide, sedimentary, and basaltic units from the Bent Hill area of Middle Valley, Juan de Fuca Ridge. In: Zierenberg RA, Fouquet Y, Miller, Normark WR (eds) Proc Ocean Drilling Program, Scientific Results, pp 1–42. College Station. doi:10.2973/odp.proc.sr.169.115.2000

  • Keller G (1987) Rock and mineral properties. In: Nabighian MN (ed) Electromagnetic methods in applied geophysics – Theory. Society of Exploration Geophysicists, Tulsa

    Google Scholar 

  • Kowalczyk P, Bloomer S, Kowalczyk M (2015) Geophysical methods for the mapping of submarine massive sulphide deposits. In: Proc Offshore Technology Conf, Houston. doi:10.4043/26049-MS

  • Kruschwitz S, Binley A, Lesmes D, Elshenawy A (2010) Textural controls on low-frequency electrical spectra of porous media. Geophysics 75:WA113–WA123

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Palacky GV (1987) Resistivity characteristics of geologic targets. In: Nabighian MN (ed) Electromagnetic methods in applied geophysics. Society of Exploration Geophysicists, Tulsa, pp 52–129

    Google Scholar 

  • Pelton WH, Ward SH, Hallof G, Sill WR, Nelson PH (1978) Mineral discrimination and removal of inductive coupling with multifrequency IP. Geophysics 43:588–609

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rona P (2003) Resources of the sea floor. Science 299:673–674

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Schön J (2004) Physical properties of rocks - Fundamentals and principles of petrophysics. In: Helbig K, Treitel S (eds) Handbook of geophysical exploration, seismic exploration, vol 18. Elsevier, Amsterdam

    Google Scholar 

  • Spagnoli G, Freudenthal T, Strasser M, Weixler L (2014) Development and possible applications of Mebo200 for geotechnical investigations for the underwater mining. In: Proc Offshore Technology Conf, Houston. doi:10.4043/25081-MS

  • Spagnoli G, Miedema SA, Herrmann C, Rongau J, Weixler L, Denegre J (2015) Preliminary design of a trench cutter system for deep-sea mining applications under hyperbaric conditions. IEEE J Ocean Eng (in press). doi:10.1109/JOE.2015.2497884

  • Szitkar F, Petersen S, Caratori Tontini F, Cocchi L (2015) High-resolution magnetics reveal the deep structure of a volcanic-arc-related basalt-hosted hydrothermal site (Palinuro, Tyrrhenian Sea). Geochem Geophys Geosyst 16:1950–1961. doi:10.1002/2015GC005769

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Telford WM, Geldard LP, Sherriff RE (1990) Applied geophysics. University Press, Cambridge

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Volkmann J, Klitzsch N (2015) Wideband impedance spectroscopy from 1 mHz to 10 MHz by combination of four‐ and two‐electrode methods. J Appl Geophys 114:191–201

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Waltham T (2009) Foundations of engineering geology. CRC Press, Boca Raton

    Google Scholar 

  • Waquet B, Fouquet Y (2011) Evolution of geotechnical properties in hydrothermal sulfide mounds: a maturation threshold. In: Abstr Vol SME Annual Meeting, Denver

  • Weller A, Slater L, Nordsiek S, Ntarlagiannis D (2010) On the estimation of specific surface per unit volume from induced polarization: a robust empirical relation fits multiple data sets. Geophysics 75:WA105–WA112

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Weller A, Slater L, Nordsiek S (2013) On the relationship between induced polarization and surface conductivity: implications for petrophysical interpretation of electrical measurements. Geophysics 78:D315–D325

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Yamazaki T, Park SH (2003) Relationship between geotechnical engineering properties and assay of seafloor massive sulphides. In: Proc 13th Int Offshore and Polar Engineering Conf, Honolulu, pp 310–316

Download references

Acknowledgments

The authors wish to thank the Future Oceans research and technology transfer program MaTeP of The Future Ocean Cluster (GEOMAR and CAU Kiel) and BAUER Maschinen GmbH for the financial support for this project and for the permission granted to publish these results. The article benefitted from constructive assessments by Dr. N. Klitzsch and two anonymous reviewers.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Giovanni Spagnoli.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of interest

The authors declare that there is no conflict of interest with third parties.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Spagnoli, G., Hannington, M., Bairlein, K. et al. Electrical properties of seafloor massive sulfides. Geo-Mar Lett 36, 235–245 (2016). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00367-016-0439-5

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00367-016-0439-5

Keywords

Navigation