Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Flexible habitat selection and interactive habitat segregation in the marine congeners Idotea baltica and Idotea emarginata (Crustacea, Isopoda)

  • Research Article
  • Published:
Marine Biology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Habitat segregation among competing species is widespread yet very little is know how this is achieved in practice. In a case study, we examined short-term effects of conspecific and congeneric density on habitat selection in two competing marine isopod species, Idotea emarginata and Idotea baltica. Under semi-natural conditions in large outdoor cylindrical tanks (4 m high; volume 5.5 m3), animal groups of different size and composition had the choice between a set of relevant habitat samples (surface-floating seaweed, the water column, seaweed on the bottom). Habitat selection in both I. baltica and I. emarginata proved to be largely independent of conspecific density (level of intraspecific competition). In single-species treatments, both species showed a similar and stable pattern of distribution, with a clear preference for seaweed on the bottom. In mixed-species treatments (MST), however, the species were largely separated by habitat. While the distribution of I. emarginata was completely unaffected by the mere presence of interspecific competitors, habitat selection of I. baltica changed notably when I. emarginata was present. The habitat use patterns observed in MST conformed to those realized in geographical areas where the two species overlap in distribution: I. emarginata is dominant among decaying seaweed on the sea floor, and I. baltica is the dominant species among surface-floating seaweed. Our findings suggest that habitat segregation between the two species is essentially interactive, resulting from rapid decision-making of I. baltica with respect to habitat selection. The underlying mechanism is discussed. I. emarginata is highly superior to I. baltica in interference competition and rapidly eliminates the latter from one-habitat systems which do not allow I. baltica to escape from this interaction. In more natural, heterogeneous environments, however, I. baltica seems to be able to coexist with the superior competitor due to its broader habitat niche, flexibility in habitat selection, and a behavioural disposition to avoid normally preferred habitats when these are occupied by I. emarginata.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Arthur WA (1982) Evolutionary consequences of interspecific competition. Adv Ecol Res 12:127–187

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Boersma M, DeMeester L, Spaak P (1999) Environmental stress and local adaptation in Daphnia magna. Limnol Oceanogr 44:393–412

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bay LK, Jones GP, McCormick MI (2001) Habitat selection and aggression as determinants of spatial segregation among damselfish on a coral reef. Coral Reefs 20:289–298

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bowers MA, Thompson DB, Brown JH (1987) Spatial organization of a desert rodentcommunity: food addition and species removal. Oecologia (Berlin) 72:77–82

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Branch GM (1984) Competition between marine organisms: ecological and evolutionary implications. Oceanogr Mar Biol 22:429–593

    Google Scholar 

  • Bremset G, Heggenes J (2001) Competitive interactions in young Atlantic salmon (Salmo salar L.) and brown trout (Salmo trutta L,) in lotic environments. Nord J Freshw Res 75:127–142

    Google Scholar 

  • Connell JH (1983) On the prevalence and relative importance of interspecific competition: evidence from field experiments. Am Nat 122:661–696

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Douglass RJ (1976) Spatial interactions and microhabitat selections of two locally sympatric voles, Microtus montanus and Microtus pennsylvanicus. Ecology 57:346–352

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ebersole JP (1995) Niche separation of two damselfish species by aggression and differential microhabitat utilization. Ecology 66:14–20

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Finger TR (1982) Interactive segregation among three species of sculpins (Cottus). Copeia 3:680–694

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Franke H-D, Janke M (1998) Mechanisms and consequences of intra- and interspecificinterference competition in Idotea baltica (Pallas) and Idotea emarginata (Fabricius) (Crustacea: Isopoda): a laboratory study of possible proximate causes of habitatsegregation. J Exp Mar Biol Ecol 227:1–21

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fusetani N (2004) Biofouling and antifouling. Nat Prod Rep 21:94–104

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Furness RW, Todd CM (1984) Diets and feeding of fulmars Fulmaris glacialis during the breeding season: a comparison between St Kilda and Shetland colonies. Ibis 126:379–387

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hairston NG (1980) The experimental test of an analysis of field distributions: competition in terrestrial salamanders. Ecology 61:817–826

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Howard D, Harrison R (1984) Habitat segregation in ground crickets: the role of interspecific competition and habitat selection. Ecology 65:69–76

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ingólfsson A, Agnarsson I (2003) Amphipods and isopods in the rocky intertidal: dispersal and movements during high tide. Mar Biol 143:859–866

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jormalainen V, Tuomi J (1989) Sexual differences in habitat selection and activity of the colour polymorphic isopod Idotea baltica. Anim Behav 38:576–585

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jormalainen V, Tuomi J, Merilaita S (1992) Mate choice for male and female size in aquatic isopod Idotea balthica. Ann Zool Fenn 29:161–167

    Google Scholar 

  • Křivan V, Sirot E (2002) Habitat selection by two competing species in a two-habitatenvironment. Am Nat 160:214–234

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Larson RJ (1980) Competition, habitat selection, and the bathymetric segregation of two rockfish (Sebastes) species. Ecol Monogr 50:221–239

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lawton JM, Hassell MP (1981) Asymmetrical competition in insects. Nature 289:793–795

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lürling M, Roozen F, van Donk E, Goser B (2003) Response of Daphnia to substances released from crowded congeners and conspecifics. J Plankton Res 25:967–978

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Matveev V (1993) An investigation of allelopathic effects of Daphnia. Freshw Biol 29:99–105

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Naylor E (1955) The ecological distribution of British species of Idotea (Isopoda). J Anim Ecol 24:270–281

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Naylor E (1972) British marine isopods. Synopses of the British Fauna (New Series) No. 3. Academic Press, London

  • Qian PY (1999) Larval settlement of polychaetes. Hydrobiologia 402:239–253

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Robertson DR (1996) Interspecific competition controls abundance and habitat use of territorial Caribbean damselfishes. Ecology 77:885–899

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Roozen F, Lürling M (2001) Behavioural response of Daphnia to olfactory cues from food, competitors and predators. J Plankton Res 23:797–808

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rosenzweig ML (1981) A theory of habitat selection. Ecology 62:327–335

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Salemaa H (1979) Ecology of Idotea spp. (Isopoda) in the northern Baltic. Ophelia 18:133–150

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Schluter D (2000) Ecological character displacement in adaptive radiation. Am Nat 156:S4–S16

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Schoener TW (1983) Field experiments on interspecific competition. Am Nat 122:240–285

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Schoener TW (1986) Resource partitioning. In: Kikkawa J, Anderson DJ (eds) Community ecology: pattern and process. Blackwell, Oxford, pp 91–126

    Google Scholar 

  • Slatkin M (1984) Ecological causes of sexual dimorphism. Evolution 38:622–630

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sone S, Inoue M, Yanagisawa Y (2001) Habitat use and diet of two stream gobies of the genus Rhinogobius in south-western Shikoku, Japan. Ecol Res 16:205–219

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Steinberg PD, de Nys R (2002) Chemical mediation of colonization of seaweed surfaces. J Phycol 38:621–629

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Suhling F (1996) Interspecific competition and habitat selection by the riverine dragonfly Onychogomphus uncatus. Freshw Biol 35:209–217

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Thiel M, Gutow L (2005a) The ecology of rafting in the marine environment. I. The floating substrata. Oceanogr Mar Biol 42:181–263

    Google Scholar 

  • Thiel M, Gutow L (2005b) The ecology of rafting in the marine environment. II. The rafting organisms and community. Oceanogr Mar Biol 43:279–418

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wallerstein BR, Brusca RC (1982) Fish predation: a preliminary study of its role in the zoogeography and evolution of shallow water idoteid isopods (Crustacea: Isopoda: Idoteidae). J Biogeogr 9:135–150

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Werner EE, Hall DJ (1977) Competition and habitat shift in two sunfish (Centrarchidae). Ecology 60:256–264

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zar JH (1999) Biostatistical analysis, 4th edn. Prentice-Hall, Upper Saddle River, NJ

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Biologische Anstalt Helgoland, Foundation Alfred Wegener Institute for Polar and Marine Research, Marine Station, Box 180, 27483, Helgoland, Germany

    H.-D. Franke, L. Gutow & M. Janke

Authors
  1. H.-D. Franke
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. L. Gutow
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. M. Janke
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to H.-D. Franke.

Additional information

Communicated by O. Kinne, Oldendorf/Luhe

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Franke, HD., Gutow, L. & Janke, M. Flexible habitat selection and interactive habitat segregation in the marine congeners Idotea baltica and Idotea emarginata (Crustacea, Isopoda). Mar Biol 150, 929–939 (2007). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00227-006-0421-2

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00227-006-0421-2

Keywords

Search

Navigation