Abstract
Viable counts of aerobic and anaerobic chemotrophic sulphur-oxidizers as well as phototrophic sulphur bacteria were determined in sediment samples taken from two different areas along the Baltic Sea shore which were known to regularly develop sulphidic conditions. Depth profiles of bacterial cell counts were correlated with concentration profiles of chloride, sulphate, sulphide, nitrate and phosphate in the pore water of these sediments and with potential activities of nitrate reduction, thiosulphate transformation and sulphate formation. The data revealed a complex multilayered structure within the sediments. Sulphide was released into the water from sediments of both sampling areas, but it was found that light and the availability of oxygen significantly reduced this amount. In the highly reduced sediment at Hiddensee, the highest numbers of phototrophic and chemotrophic sulphur-oxidizers were found near the sediment surface. Therefore, it was concluded that the combined action of both groups of bacteria most efficiently oxidizes reduced sulphur compounds in the top layers of the sediments. Nitrate may replace oxygen as final electron acceptor and will support oxidation of sulphide, in particular when oxygen and light are limiting.
Article PDF
Similar content being viewed by others
Literature Cited
Blackburn, T. H., Kleiber, P. & Fenchel, T., 1975. Photosynthetic sulphide oxidation in marine sediments. — Oikos26, 103–108.
Feher, F. & Laue, W., 1956. Beiträge zur Chemie des Schwefels. 29. Über die Darstellung von Rohsulfanen. — Z. anorg. allg. Chem.288, 103–112.
Imhoff, J. F., 1988. Anoxygemic phototrophic bacteria. In: Methods in aquatic bacteriology. Ed. by B. Austin. Wiley, Chichester, 207–240.
Jörgensen, B. B., 1982. Mineralization of organic matter in the sea bed — the role of sulfate reduction. — Nature, Lond.296, 643–645.
Jörgensen, B. B. & Bak, F., 1991. Pathways and microbiology of thiosulfate transformations and sulfate reduction in a marine sediment. — Appl. environ. Microbiol.57, 847–856.
Kämpf, C. & Pfennig, N., 1980. Capacity of Chromatiaceae for chemotrophic growth. — Arch. Microbiol.127, 125–135.
Lorant, I. S., 1929. Über eine neue colorimetrische Methode zur Bestimmung des Schwefels in Sulfiden, Sulfaten usw. — Hoppe-Seyler's Z. physiol. Chem.185, 245–266.
Pachmayr, F., 1960. Vorkommen und Bestimmung von Schwefelverbindungen in Mineralwasser. Diss., Univ. München, 48 pp.
Pfenning, N. & Trüper, H. G., 1992. The family Chromatiaceae. In: The Prokaryotes. Ed. by A. Balows, H. G. Trüper, M. Dworkin, W. Harder & K. H. Schleifer. Springer, New York, Vol.4, 3200–3221.
Suckow, R., 1966. Schwefelmikrobengesellschaften der See- und Boddengewässer von Hiddensee. — Z. allg. Mikrobiol.6, 309–315.
Widdel, F., 1988. Microbiology and ecology of sulfate- and sulfur-reducing bacteria. In: Biology of anaerobic microorganisms. Ed. by A. J. B. Zehnder. Wiley, New York, 469–585.
Wooster, W. S., Lee, A. J. & Dietrich, G., 1969. Redefinition of salinity. — Deep Sea Res.16, 321–322.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Imhoff, J.F., Schneider, A. & Podgorsek, L. Correlation of viable cell counts, metabolic activity of sulphur-oxidizing bacteria and chemical parameters of marine sediments. Helgolander Meeresunters 49, 223–236 (1995). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02368352
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02368352