Abstract
The greenhouse effect, thanks mainly to the water vapor in our atmosphere, has created a livable climate on Earth. Climate change, however, may potentially have dire consequences. It is generally assumed that the rise in CO2 levels in the atmosphere is the main culprit, although several other greenhouse gases (GHG) also play a role. Next to limitation of CO2 emissions by higher efficiency, developing alternative energy sources or changing our wasteful style of living, there are two general approaches to combat climate change. Both fall under the heading ‘Geo-engineering the Climate’, a report submitted to the Royal Society in 2009. These include methods to fight: (1) symptoms, or (2) causes the first group encompasses attempts to change the Earth’s albedo, for example by spreading aerosols of SO2 in the stratosphere, or painting all our roofs white. Among methods to remove CO2 from the atmosphere, the best known are CCS (carbon capture and storage) and ‘geological storage’, which has nothing to do with geology, except for the receptacle being of natural origin [4]. There are two processes by which CO2 has been removed from the atmosphere throughout geological time, primarily by weathering reactions of Ca- and Mg-silicates, and to a lesser extent by storage of organic carbon in coal beds, oil and natural gas, and carbonates. Thus, enhanced weathering is a logical step to remove CO2 from the atmosphere. To that purpose, abundant rock types available in large volumes are ground to increase reactivity, possibly mix with pyrolized wood known as ‘biochar’ (Brazil: ‘terra preta’), and spread the mix in climate zones that favor rapid weathering, ie. the wet tropics. Industrializing nations like India, China or Brazil would not need to limit their CO2 emissions by restricting industrial production, thereby slowing their economic development, but could instead compensate their emissions by enhanced weathering.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Preview
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
References
Schuiling, RD, and Tickell, O (2010): Enhanced weathering of olivine to capture CO2. Journal of Applied Geochemistry (12/4): 510–519.
Dunsmore, HE (1992): A geological perspective on global warming and the possibility of carbon dioxide removal as calcium carbonate mineral. Energy Conversion and Management (33): 565–572.
Schuiling, RD, and Krijgsman, P (2006): Enhanced weathering; an effective and cheap tool to sequester CO2. Climatic Change (74/1–3): 349–354.
Van Schöll, L, Kuyper, ThW, Smits, MM, Landeweert, R, Hoffland, E, and Van Bremen, N (2008): Rock-eating mycorrhizas: their role in plant nutrition and biogeochemical cycles. Plant Soil (303):
35–47.
Needham, SJ, Worden, SH, and Cuadros, J (2006): Sediment ingestion by worms and the production of bio-clays: a study of macrobiologically enhanced weathering and early diagenetic processes. Sedimentology (53): 567–579.
Steen, B, and Borg, G (2002): An estimate of the cost of sustainable production of metal concentrates from the Earth’s crust. Ecological Economics (42/3): 401–413.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2012 Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg
About this paper
Cite this paper
Schuiling, R.D. (2012). Olivine and Climate Change. In: Broekmans, M. (eds) Proceedings of the 10th International Congress for Applied Mineralogy (ICAM). Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-27682-8_76
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-27682-8_76
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg
Print ISBN: 978-3-642-27681-1
Online ISBN: 978-3-642-27682-8
eBook Packages: Earth and Environmental ScienceEarth and Environmental Science (R0)