FrontiersThe hazard of near-Earth asteroid impacts on earth
Section snippets
Why are near-Earth asteroids important?
Although interplanetary space is very empty by human standards, Earth is in a “cosmic shooting gallery”, as anyone looking up into clear, dark skies can witness: several meteors can be seen flashing across the heavens per hour—cometary and asteroidal dust grains disintegrating in the upper atmosphere. They are accompanied by a size spectrum [1] of ever larger, increasingly less common, bodies up to at least several tens of kilometers in diameter. Although occasional recovered meteorites are
Historical recognition of the impact hazard
Ideas that comets might be dangerous date back at least to the 17th century, when Edmond Halley is said to have addressed the Royal Society and speculated that the Caspian Sea might be an impact scar [11]. The physical nature of comets remained poorly understood, however, until the mid-20th century. The first NEA (Eros) was not discovered until 1898 and the first NEA that actually crosses Earth's orbit (Apollo) was not found until 1932. By the 1940s, three Earth-crossing NEAs had been found,
Physical and dynamical properties of NEAs
NEAs are defined, somewhat arbitrarily, as asteroids whose perihelia (closest orbital distance to the Sun) are <1.3 AU (1 AU=the mean distance of Earth from the Sun). About 20% of NEAs are currently in orbits that can approach the Earth's orbit to within <0.05 AU; these are termed potentially hazardous objects (PHOs). In terms of their origin and physical nature, PHOs are no different from other NEAs; they just happen to come close enough to Earth at the present time so that close planetary
Past history of impacts on Earth
I now discuss briefly, from a planetary science perspective, the role of impacts on the geological and biological history of our planet. By considering the past, I set the stage for the modern impact hazard. Clearly, impacts dominated the early geological evolution of the surface of our planet until at least 3.8 Ga. It is almost equally incontrovertible that impacts have continued to interrupt more quiescent evolution of our planet's ecosphere well into the Cenozoic; such impacts will continue,
The impact hazard: consequences for society in the 21st century
Cosmic projectiles rain down on us, ranging from the frequent flashes of meteoroids, to less frequent meteorite-producing bolides, to the even less common A-bomb level upper-atmospheric explosions recorded by Earth-orbiting surveillance satellites, to the historically rare Tunguska-level events, and finally to the still rarer but potentially extremely destructive impacts of bodies >100 m diameter, which must be considered not in terms of their frequency but instead in terms of their low but
Three representative scenarios of NEA consequences
I briefly summarize three scenarios (drawn from many more in [63]), which illustrate the breadth of issues that must be confronted in managing potential consequences of NEA impacts. For each impact disaster scenario, I consider the nature of the devastation, the probability that the event will happen, the likely warning time, the possibilities for post-warning mitigation, the nature of issues to be faced in after-event disaster management, and—of most practical interest—what can be done now to
Evaluation of the modern impact hazard
Unlike other topics in astronomy (except solar flares and coronal mass ejections), only the impact hazard presents serious practical issues for society. Contrasting with most practical issues involving meteorology, geology and geophysics, the impact hazard is both more extreme in potential consequences and yet so rare that it has not even been experienced in more than minor ways in historical times. It has similarities to natural hazards in that its practical manifestations mainly involve
Acknowledgements
I thank Chris Koeberl, Rick Binzel and Larry Nittler for helpful reviews. Preparation of this review was assisted by the Alan Harris, David Morrison and members of the B612 Foundation. [AH]
Dr. Clark R. Chapman is a planetary scientist at the Boulder, CO, office of Southwest Research Institute. He is past chair of the Division for Planetary Sciences of the American Astronomical Society, first editor of Journal of Geophysical Research-Planets, and has been on the science teams of the Galileo, NEAR-Shoemaker and MESSENGER deep space missions. His PhD (1972) is from the Earth and Planetary Sciences Dept. of MIT.
References (73)
- et al.
Debiased orbital and absolute magnitude distribution of the near-Earth objects
Icarus
(2002) - et al.
Physical properties of near-Earth objects
- et al.
Size, density, and structure of Comet Shoemaker-Levy 9 inferred from the physics of tidal breakup
Icarus
(1996) The evolution of asteroids as meteorite parent-bodies
What we know and don't know about surfaces of potentially hazardous small bodies
- Earth Impact Database, http://www.unb.ca/passc/ImpactDatabase/, accessed 2003 Dec....
- et al.
The snowball Earth hypothesis: testing the limits of global change
Terra Nova
(2002) - et al.
A reduced estimate of the number of kilometre-sized near-Earth asteroids
Nature
(2000) Meteoroids: an item in the inventory
Formation of planetesimals and accretion of the terrestrial planets
Space Sci. Rev.
(2000)
The effect of Yarkovsky thermal forces on the dynamical evolution of asteroids and meteoroids
Asteroidal dust
Study to Determine the Feasibility of Extending the Search for Near-Earth Objects to Smaller Limiting Diameters
Lunar impact history from 40Ar/39Ar dating of glass spherules
Science
Mass flux in the ancient Earth–Moon system and benign implications for the origin of life on Earth
J. Geophys. Res.
Megaregolith evolution and cratering cataclysm models—lunar cataclysm as a misconception (28 years later)
Meteorit. Planet. Sci.
Planet V and the origin of the lunar Late Heavy Bombardment
Bull.-Am. Astron. Soc.
Between the Planets
The Face of the Moon
On the catastrophic effect of collisions with celestial bodies
Ir. Astron. J.
Impact mechanics at Meteor Crater, Arizona
Mariner IV photography of Mars: initial results
Science
Extraterrestrial cause for the Cretaceous–Tertiary extinction
Science
Proximal Cretaceous–Tertiary boundary impact deposits in the Caribbean
Science
Cretaceous ground zero
Nat. Hist.
Pre-Alvarez impact
Nat. Hist.
Dinosaur extinction: changing views
Near-Earth asteroid search programs
Cited by (0)
Dr. Clark R. Chapman is a planetary scientist at the Boulder, CO, office of Southwest Research Institute. He is past chair of the Division for Planetary Sciences of the American Astronomical Society, first editor of Journal of Geophysical Research-Planets, and has been on the science teams of the Galileo, NEAR-Shoemaker and MESSENGER deep space missions. His PhD (1972) is from the Earth and Planetary Sciences Dept. of MIT.